Re: ROTF Libertarian Joke

On 01/08/2017 08:39 PM, Razer wrote: > Ayn Rand, Rand Paul and Paul Ryan walk into a bar. The bartender serves > them tainted alcohol because there are no regulations. They die. > > https://twitter.com/missokistic/status/466416327666974722 For sure. But after their friends figure it out, they

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:01:22 -0800 Razer wrote: > > On 01/08/2017 08:54 PM, "juan" Kill-listed at the server. > mommy mommy. I'm being treated like the despicable piece of shit that I am and I DON"T LIKE IT. Too bad I can't actually KILL people who

Re: The (Western) Empire: free speech, holocaust denial, jail in 14 countries

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:03:28 -0800 Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 08:49 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > > > What about that holocaust? What was the number of Jews holocausted > > in all the newspapers after WWI? > > Jews fought in the German army in WWI stupid. and

Re: ROTF Libertarian Joke

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:39:51 -0800 Razer wrote: > Ayn Rand, Rand Paul and Paul Ryan walk into a bar. The bartender > serves them tainted alcohol because there are no regulations. They > die. More stupid trolling. However, that piece of trolling illustrates that

Re: The (Western) Empire: free speech, holocaust denial, jail in 14 countries

On 01/08/2017 08:49 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > What about that holocaust? What was the number of Jews holocausted in > all the newspapers after WWI? Jews fought in the German army in WWI stupid.

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 08:54 PM, "juan" Kill-listed at the server.

Re: The (Western) Empire: free speech, holocaust denial, jail in 14 countries

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 08:27:43PM -0800, Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 07:34 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > To learn who controls you, look only at those you may not criticize. > > > If you live in a Nazi nation they'll kill you for criticizing them. > > Any questions stupid? What about

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:49:25 -0800 Razer wrote: > I predict it will be the year of the renegades... of funk... Why is a trolling shitbag like you subscribed tho this list?

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

# Secret World of Mohamed Atta https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LULV1gicJs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJIqtwW1kR0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V01Ol2Nk-Tk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Able_Danger https://fas.org/sgp/news/2010/09/dark-contrast.pdf https://fas.org/sgp/jud/dark-contrast2.pdf

Re: The (Western) Empire: free speech, holocaust denial, jail in 14 countries

On 01/08/2017 07:34 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > To learn who controls you, look only at those you may not criticize. If you live in a Nazi nation they'll kill you for criticizing them. Any questions stupid?

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:04:32 -0800 Razer wrote: > This entirely lost me. Convo over. What convo. This was just me wasting time with an absolute shitbag like you. 11 > > > > >> If there are they didn't all show up last week you know? The guy I > >> share camp

The (Western) Empire: free speech, holocaust denial, jail in 14 countries

What a swell empire it is - not. For the free speech crime of holocaust denial today, in the EU, jail is the punishment in 14 EU countries. To learn who controls you, look only at those you may not criticize. Free speech? Freedom to publicly communicate/ publish conentious conspiracies such as

ROTF Libertarian Joke

Ayn Rand, Rand Paul and Paul Ryan walk into a bar. The bartender serves them tainted alcohol because there are no regulations. They die. https://twitter.com/missokistic/status/466416327666974722

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:43:21 -0800 Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 06:37 PM, juan wrote: > > The ~15 million 'ilegal' immigrants who > > can't cross the border > > DUDE! There MIGHT BE "~15 million 'ilegal' immigrants" in the country. This is how stupid your

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 06:40 PM, juan wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:30:49 -0800 > Razer wrote: > >> >> On 01/08/2017 06:17 PM, juan wrote: >>> By the way, I didn't even bother fully reading that >> >> I know that. You're a functional illiterate. > > Tell me rayzer, like a good

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 06:37 PM, juan wrote: > The ~15 million 'ilegal' immigrants who > can't cross the border DUDE! There MIGHT BE "~15 million 'ilegal' immigrants" in the country. If there are they didn't all show up last week you know? The guy I share camp space with is from El Salvador and

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:30:49 -0800 Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 06:17 PM, juan wrote: > > By the way, I didn't even bother fully reading that > > > I know that. You're a functional illiterate. Tell me rayzer, like a good american fascist, how many

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:30:11 -0800 Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 06:27 PM, juan wrote: > > More truly crazy, fact-free commentary. > That's because you aren't looking out the window of the cafe I sit in > at the moment or you could see them. What would I see? The

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 06:16 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Here's the photographic proof of the post-liquified rock layers at > ground zero: That's schist. It's a lot like what's called "Chert" in California. Looks A LOT like rock doesn't it? It isn't. It crumbles when you touch it, and Schist is

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 06:27 PM, juan wrote: > More truly crazy, fact-free commentary. That's because you aren't looking out the window of the cafe I sit in at the moment or you could see them. Better look like you have money though. They're the 'shopping police' and if you aren't shopping they'll harass

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 05:49 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > Ground zero showed no building submersion: > > http://www.slideshare.net/HolyYeshua/solving-the-radioactive-riddle-of-9-11-a-simple-explanation-of-ground-zero Didn't need to be 'submerged' just undermined. And We were discussing WTC 7. Not the

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:10:25 -0800 Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 05:37 PM, juan wrote: > > Notice also the if 'terrists' attacks were retaliation for what > > you joo-amerikunts do all the time, then there would be at > > least a real, big, terrist attack every week. Yet

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:39:00 -0800 Razer wrote: > I have proved > that (at least) the shock wave of a 255,000 lb 'tuning fork' striking > the buildings nearby caused a resonance in the ground below which is > mud with wood By the way, I didn't even bother fully reading

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:30:14PM -0300, Juan wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:22:36 -0800 > Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote: > > > > > > If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a > > > building, then the building would magically sink in a

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 05:37 PM, juan wrote: > Notice also the if 'terrists' attacks were retaliation for what > you joo-amerikunts do all the time, then there would be at least > a real, big, terrist attack every week. Yet there are none. There are three police agencies patrolling the

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

Very bizarre ​ ​ and weird, just for fun! :) "Nostradamus predictions for 2017: Terrifying forewarnings of 16th century prophet revealed ​.​ " http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/740011/nostradamus-predictions-2017-prophecies Brrr... ​"​ 10 Terrifying Predictions For 2017 ​!"​ :P

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 08:35:01PM -0300, Juan wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 15:19:15 -0800 > Razer wrote: > > > > > > Reality bites (people making shit up ... on the ass). the fact that > > the subterranean structures in MUD under the buildings were > > undermined by the shock

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 17:28:45 -0800 Razer wrote: > You're probably are racist enough to think "Sand Niggers" (note the > quotes) aren't smart enough to coordinate an attack like 9-11. The fact that they can do it doesn't mean that they actually did it. You

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 05:10 PM, juan made some shit up as if he knows how I feel about Arab people: > the evil arab terrists did it eh "Terrorists? Why they're people lacking identity. They're seeking to be noticed." ~Marshall McLuhan interviewed after the very first airliner hijacking in the 60s. He

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 17:04:04 -0800 Razer wrote: > On 01/08/2017 04:49 PM, juan wrote: > > > It's funny how you ranted against 'science' > > I don't rant against science. I rant against it's rigidness in the > face of facts that should be altering it's formulation of facts, in >

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 04:32 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > excessively reinforced central column ...and floor supports at the corners but NOT in the middle of the spans on the building's outside edges. So when the buildings had torsionally flexed a few times too often as it WAS NOT designed to do, the

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:39:00 -0800 Razer wrote: > > Because resonance is a universal physical principle. I have proved > that (at least) the shock wave of a 255,000 lb 'tuning fork' striking > the buildings nearby caused a resonance in the ground below which is > mud with wood

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 05:39:52PM -0500, grarpamp wrote: ... > # Incontrovertible - New 9/11 Documentary by Tony Rooke > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5UyynjxAyw > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDQJscd5ba0 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qirWUviaZuo >

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 04:30 PM, juan wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:22:36 -0800 > Razer wrote: > >> On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote: >>> If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a >>> building, then the building would magically sink in a >>> pool of mud.

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:22:36 -0800 Razer wrote: > On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote: > > > > If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a > > building, then the building would magically sink in a > > pool of mud. Especially when there are 'a couple' of

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

http://xkcd.com/1013 :P -- ​"The future cannot be predicted, but futures can be invented."​

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote: > > If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a > building, then the building would magically sink in a > pool of mud. Especially when there are 'a couple' of videos > showing a building that indeed seems to be 'sinking'. > >

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 05:14:52PM -0300, Juan wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:56:35 +1000 > "James A. Donald" wrote: > > > On 1/8/2017 12:12 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > > The official excuse for WTC 7's symmetrical collapse is that the > > > side of the building /not/ shown

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 08:17:26AM -0800, Razer wrote: > On 01/08/2017 05:42 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:56:35PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote: > >> I have watched videos of the collapse of WTC 7 frame by frame. It did not > >> collapse symmetrically - it sagged on

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:51:52 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: > On 1/9/2017 5:59 AM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > In their position paper Rebuilding America's Defenses, the PNAC > > folks said that their plan for global domination could not be > > effectively implemented absent a

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 15:19:15 -0800 Razer wrote: > > Reality bites (people making shit up ... on the ass). the fact that > the subterranean structures in MUD under the buildings were > undermined by the shock wave of a 255,000 lb aircraft Perhaps a poll would be in

US Government Offers $25, 000 Prize For Inventing A Way To Secure IoT Devices

> America's Federal Trade Commission has announced a $25,000 prize for > whoever creates the best tool for securing consumers' IoT devices. > > The so-called "IoT Home Inspector Challenge" asks participants to > create something that will work on current, already-on-the-market IoT > devices, with

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 03:23 PM, juan wrote: > FIDEL CASTRO SAYS SO. QOD He did? Then I'm in good company. Rr

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 15:19:15 -0800 Razer wrote: > On 01/08/2017 02:56 PM, juan wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:50:25 -0800 > > Razer wrote: > > > > > >> Because all these so-called 'experts' are affluent middle-class > > that's how commie shitbags 'think'

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 02:56 PM, juan wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:50:25 -0800 > Razer wrote: > > >> Because all these so-called 'experts' are affluent middle-class > that's how commie shitbags 'think' - if reality doesn't fit > their deranged 'theories', then it's all a

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:50:25 -0800 Razer wrote: > Because all these so-called 'experts' are affluent middle-class that's how commie shitbags 'think' - if reality doesn't fit their deranged 'theories', then it's all a 'burgeois' 'conspiracy' And

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

Correction: believing there are consequences] go their complicity in Genocide. Should read 'believing there are no consequences to their complicity in Genocide.' On 01/08/2017 02:39 PM, grarpamp wrote: > In part regarding flavor of WTC 7 that started this thread... > > # 9/11: Decade of

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 02:39 PM, grarpamp wrote: > expert witnesses You mean like the Phud in sheet metal for the computer industry who speculated on the melting temp of the steel in the buildings? A foundry worker or machinist knows more about the melting temperature of construction steel than he

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:41:13 -0800 Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 02:04 PM, juan wrote: > > 'We' are all waiting for your proof. > > > > When you provide proof of 'controlled demolition'. It's no doubt the best explanation. The proofs are everywhere

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:38:54 -0800 Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 02:12 PM, the fed said: > > You didn't watch your own fucking video. > > The video is meant to show that the media "magically" knew > > beforehand that the building would collapse, > > > > I watched

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

In part regarding flavor of WTC 7 that started this thread... # 9/11: Decade of Deception / The Toronto Hearings https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqqelDq4P48 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpiVv8tQdmY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rSJZqMwNoY https://pressfortruth.ca/ On the tenth anniversary

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 02:04 PM, juan wrote: > 'We' are all waiting for your proof. > When you provide proof of 'controlled demolition'.

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 02:12 PM, the fed said: > You didn't watch your own fucking video. > The video is meant to show that the media "magically" knew > beforehand that the building would collapse, I watched it. I've seen the footage before and a bunch of it at the time in real time.

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:57:55 -0800 Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 01:46 PM, juan wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:37:32 -0800 > > Razer wrote: > > > >> This page intentionally left blank > > > > ""the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the > >

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 01:46 PM, juan wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:37:32 -0800 > Razer wrote: > >> This page intentionally left blank > > ""the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the > mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7." " > > > "

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 12:40:32 -0800 Razer wrote: > On 01/08/2017 11:13 AM, the list's federal troll wrote: > > > But feel free to link all the 'evidence' showing the > > building tiping and falling on its side like a cut tree. I will be > > waiting. > > At minute 1:30

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:37:32 -0800 Razer wrote: > This page intentionally left blank ""the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7." " "

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

This page intentionally left blank

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

This page intentionally left blank

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:13:38 -0800 Razer wrote: > The fact that the ground in Manhattan below 14th street is mud and > honeycombed with building substructures as deep as the buildings are > tall is NOT a "theory". > the pentagon's bot 'asserted' "the shock

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

The fact that the ground in Manhattan below 14th street is mud and honeycombed with building substructures as deep as the buildings are tall is NOT a "theory". Nor is the reason why the Harkins Slough flyway sank into the mud during the Loma Prieta Earthquake due to liquification a "Theory". My

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 11:13 AM, juan wrote: > But feel free to link all the 'evidence' showing the building > tiping and falling on its side like a cut tree. I will be > waiting. Also see: Fracture Simulation Case Study of the WTC7 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSlIFXw3EGg Which

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 11:13 AM, the list's federal troll wrote: > But feel free to link all the 'evidence' showing the building > tiping and falling on its side like a cut tree. I will be > waiting. At minute 1:30 the commentator say "You see this thing leaning over?" about a windows

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:56:35 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: > On 1/8/2017 12:12 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > The official excuse for WTC 7's symmetrical collapse is that the > > side of the building /not/ shown clearly in photos was "scooped > > out" by falling debris. (The

The more one looks at the "Russian Hack" the more it looks like...

The more one looks at the "Russian Hack" the more it looks like (I was right...) US intel agencies and the State department put their regional satraps up to it...SOMEONE forgot to clean up the comments in the code! So far we have traces of Russia's neighbors Georgia, and Ukraine (Crowdstrike)

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:56:35PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote: > I have watched videos of the collapse of WTC 7 frame by frame. It did not > collapse symmetrically - it sagged on one side. Hence no need for any > official excuse. > > The building looked as if it had been chewed on by giant

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 1/8/2017 12:12 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: The official excuse for WTC 7's symmetrical collapse is that the side of the building /not/ shown clearly in photos was "scooped out" by falling debris. (The photos I have seen do indicate substantial damage to the facade from falling debris.) This is

Re: Battle of the AI's

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 04:24:16AM -0500, John Newman wrote: > > > On Jan 8, 2017, at 2:37 AM, grarpamp wrote: > > > > https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/07/two-google-home-bots-engage-in-a-duel-of-words/ > >

Re: Battle of the AI's

> On Jan 8, 2017, at 2:37 AM, grarpamp wrote: > > https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/07/two-google-home-bots-engage-in-a-duel-of-words/ > http://www.cw6sandiego.com/news-anchor-sets-off-alexa-devices-around-san-diego-ordering-unwanted-dollhouses/ > > Another fun use for

Re: Battle of the AI's

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 02:37:41AM -0500, grarpamp wrote: > https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/07/two-google-home-bots-engage-in-a-duel-of-words/ > LOL :) What is the current record on the Turing test? (Apologies to grarpamp for the spam, hit the wrong key).