Rising carbon dioxide is greening the Earth - but it's not all good news

> John Newman: > read the links you sent? They ar as Zordon suggested "Zwally’s team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year, while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the

CNN - asking the right questions

> Steve Kinney: > Hitler; Trump WTF Hitler; the loser calling for a redo, fam Guezz you support the rekount Nobody still wins, lol .

Ding Dong the Wicked Witch is DEAD!!!

> John Newman: > Most pot heads I know Instead of thinking for yourself, you subscribe to a predetermined pattern of behavior, citing "what pothead's think" as a foundation for your truth Eat it In a sensory deprevation tank > it's like me telling you "drink 2l of vodka" It is not, why keep

Ding Dong the Wicked Witch is DEAD!!!

> John Newman: > Alcohol is a drug Chemically, yes but not legally or socially, or you'd be in jail and out of a job, fam > you snipped out bullshit about "eat a half gram and find out" Cuz you didnut try it, or address it .5g flower is 100mg THC I said 500mg THC Eat it > freak out like a

"Feel free to diminish as much as you like" - "You’re doing it to yourself"

> Tom: > (lies, propaganda, idiocy) Must hav all the dataz > nobody cares Nobody does care, keep posting Zzz But do condense them a twinkle more; fukin 10 posts in a row, al linx; FUCK!

Ding Dong the Wicked Witch is DEAD!!!

> Razer: > There IS a lethal dose however for hash and other extracts Wrong! (I'm on my Donald Trump shit [1]) > people produce for profit using all sorts of good shit like butane and ether. And CO2, which you breath in all day Ever use soap? Grab some dry ice and stop being such a grinch >

Ding Dong the Wicked Witch is DEAD!!!

> Shawn K. Quinn: > Honestly, if you're going to vote exclusively for candidates with no > realistic chance of being elected... you may as well just not vote. But your stupid argument says these two options have the same effect =D > In Texas, if you voted for Stein, Johnson, McMullin, or Mickey

Re: [WAR] [HISTORY] Afganistan, Russia, USSR, Lybia, WW2, pre-WW2 - "Why do they hate us so?"

> It is funny, in a sad way, to see a nominally "anarchist oriented" > forum dominated by people bickering over the relative virtues of their > preferred nationalist heroes, a.k.a. mass murderers and their excuses > for same. Funny, but inevitable. Yup. A large percentage of people fall for some

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

> I don't think I ever said that or agreed to it. I'm not > interested in *irrelevant* technical discussions. But, > for instance, I've discussed a few times why a cyberweaponlike > tor (widely supported in fake, american, privacy circles ) is > TECHNICALLY flawed -

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

> It's a waste of time and bandwidth responding to ... Lulz > Or the psychological stalking by Translation: When you call him on lies and bullshit, it's 'psychological stalking' ..thats so full of win, I'm going to start using that. Outright lie, and when called on it 'Hey, don't

Re: Fw: 6 Major Media Conspiracies Happening Right in Front of Your Eyes.

> In a game there are agreed rules, and participation is voluntary. Warfare meets this criteria, no? There are rules of war, like the Geneva convention. Participation is largely voluntary, and even with nations that have forced conscript armies, one can argue that - for example with Israel, or

Re: Fw: 6 Major Media Conspiracies Happening Right in Front of Your Eyes.

> In a real fight the only rule is to end it by the fastest, safest > means available. Safest for whom? I assume that, finding yourself in a fight, and knocked about the jaw a few times, that you'd choose not to simply grab your adversary by the head and crack his skull onto a fence pole or

Re: [WAR] George Soros calls on world to unite against Vladimir Putin

> Read the previous post. You don't 'own' anything. You correct factual > mistakes but you have no 'side' in the discussion. You're right. I don't take "sides" for the sake of taking sides. I try to see the value of as many perspectives as possible, and to understand and be able to reason from

Re: Fw: 6 Major Media Conspiracies Happening Right in Front of Your Eyes.

>>> 1. The Conspiracy > > Explained in full: > > http://pilobilus.net/CGBSpender3.jpg Such can only be the case if you're looking to play 'their' game. The very creation of such 'organizations' is what leads to the associated chaos in the first place. Rather, I favor a free association of

Re: Fw: 6 Major Media Conspiracies Happening Right in Front of Your Eyes.

> 1. The Conspiracy to Make You Love the State Indoctrination into the >nurturing womb of the state is essential for our society to function >as it does. > 2. The Conspiracy to Conceal the True Powers in the World There is an >invisible unelected power which controls government and

Re: [WAR] George Soros calls on world to unite against Vladimir Putin

>> Focusing on discrimination in russia right now is WAR >> PROPAGANDA. >> > > > THAT'S the argument I've been making. Ok. I get where you're coming from, and this is an important point of INFORMATION WARFARE / PROPAGANDA. In this aspect, I'll agree with you guys and admit that as

Re: [WAR] George Soros calls on world to unite against Vladimir Putin

> > > On 10/09/2016 11:04 AM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: > >> anyone that disagrees with you at all, must be an agent of the state. > > > No... You're mistaking me for Juan. > > Your reams of vacillating bullshit to garner reactions as the convo goes > this way and that way and sideways is typical

Re: [WAR] George Soros calls on world to unite against Vladimir Putin

> >> Why not just address the point about Stalin, and forced work camps for >> homosexuals, starting in 1933? > > > Honestly? Because I'm not interested. You DID correct my blanket > statement about "since 1917" but the rest of your spew bores the living > fuck out of me. Thank you for retracting

Re: [WAR] George Soros calls on world to unite against Vladimir Putin

> Your lack of specificity as a way to keep trolling the convo has been > noted over and over and over again by Juan. Right. Because calling you out with a specific year which negates your statement is a lack of specificity. Why not just address the point about Stalin, and forced work camps for

Re: [WAR] George Soros calls on world to unite against Vladimir Putin

> > > On 10/09/2016 09:52 AM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: >> >> Your assertion about Russian in 1917 was false. Period. > > > No it wasn't. By your own statement You said "AND my POINT is THERE ARE NO DISCRIMINATORY LEGAL POLICIES and haven't been since 1917." That is patently false. What I

Re: [WAR] George Soros calls on world to unite against Vladimir Putin

> Better start looking through Russian laws about 'sexual-oriented > propaganda'. Because, just off the top of my head, for a start, material > suggesting young people visit prostitutes of the opposite gender is > illegal. Fine. But prostitution is illegal. That has nothing to do with outlawing

Re: [WAR] George Soros calls on world to unite against Vladimir Putin

> > What X mentioned: "law banning distribution of "propaganda > of non-traditional sexual relationships" to minors." isn't. Oh? Care to explain or should we just take your word for it? Because it seems to me that a law that makes a DISCRIMINATION between one type of material and another is,

Re: Sim Theory

> > I figure it's best to ignore the implications of the simulation > hypothesis. There's nothing to be done about it. If I'm understanding you correctly, I find I quite agree, but for perhaps different reasons, because I don't find the implications to be all that difficult. Whether reality is

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> > So "being attacked by the US nazis is an axiom" - But it's not > provable nor disprobable. So how do they know it will happen? They don't KNOW. They suspect. Like you suspect the law of non-contradiction is absolutely, always, in all cases, true. They can't prove it, or disprove

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> On Oct 5, 2016 9:16 PM, "Razer" wrote: > Razer is correct. Unicorns do exist. Now Juan probably will say that > Nyan Cats don't exist, hunfs! ;P I unicorn is just a horny horse, and a pegasus is just a horse high on dope. Rather elementary.

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

>> But, since you're familiar with reductio ad absurdum, perhaps you'd >> also like to read up on examples of ad hominems as well. > > > As used as a colloquial (and snobbish) synonym for insult? It's > not the same thing as the 'informal fallacy' you know... I just meant that you

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 21:04:32 - >> No, one simply denies them. But, even if one HAD to USE them, that >> would not prove them. I might use several axioms to derive a >> contradiction. > > So one or more of your 'axioms' are not true and not really > axioms. The method is called

Re: ATM fees averaging over $4.50

> http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/04/pf/atm-record-fees/ > > Bitcoin fees currently ranging $0.02 ~ $0.11 ... > https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_fees#Fee_Plotting_Sites > Yeah, it sucks. Some cities I visit don't have local branches for my bank, so in those cases, I take to making my max

misogyny

I'd like to publicly apologize. It has been brought to my attention that certain comments I've made were potentially hurtful towards women. To any that I've offended, I apologize. I'll refrain from such excesses, even if they were meant only to pantomime the liberal use of "whore, bitch, cunt"

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> On 10/05/2016 06:37 AM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: > > "'conjecture' or 'hypothesis', both of which connote apparently true but > not self-evident statements." > > That's what you get for using dictionaries. > > English language dictionaries also conflate "Want" with "Need". > > Apparently that

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> Again, truth is NOT a matter of agreement. And axioms are not > to be 'agreed' upon. Also, axioms can be proven. If axioms > couldn't be proven then any statement based on them would > be...unproven, meaningless, useless, et cetera. >From the CRC Encyclopedia of

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> You disagree because you just keep cheating. There isn't much > to add. Logic isn't about 'agreement' with you, or with the > party. I take this to mean that you don't believe that logic requires fundamental assumptions that cannot be proven, but must be agreed upon? And

Re: "Tor is dead technology"

> As X said, it DOES sort of tip the opponent off that you have something > to hide, but whether they can identify 'you'... especially using > something like Tails that spoofs your mac address and leaves no trace > that you've ever done anything more than power up at a given time. > > So if you're

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> It's worse than that :( In that I agree with much of what he says. Or at > least, I get his perspective, as part of a working understanding. But > he's clearly not interested in that :( So it goes. Yeah. It's like I told a friend of mine once during a discussion. "That is a lucid, cogent, well

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> > Ignoring what he writes, and declining to address whatever I notice, > works pretty well :) > Truth. I should learn to look at chatter like juan's as something akin to entropy. Alas, I have difficulty accepting the heat death of the universe as well; I suppose that's 'on me' as they say.

Re: "Tor is dead technology"

> The poster of that tweet, @thegrugq, 'security researcher', also said: > "the government doesn’t use Tor." > > https://twitter.com/attractr/status/783014723226861568 > > Comments? > I wouldn't expect them to use Tor. If you're a field agent that may be under surveillance, connecting to

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

>> remember that even part-time workers in the first world >> making $25k-30k USD are globally in the 1% or so. > > There use to be an informational leaflet going around called "If the > world was 10 people". In that scenario, Americans have ALL the stuff. Yeah, I've seen break-downs like that.

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> Here's some advanced calculus for you : World population ~ > 7400 millions. What's the 1% of 7400? Why, it's 74 millions. > > Now find out who those 74 million people are. Then try the 10% > group. That one should include most of the US and europe...et > cetera. I

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> Let me SPELL IT OUT for you, RETARD. I didn't deny I was typing > on a computer (as a matter of fact, I use a desktop computer). > I denied being in the "1%". GET IT now? Wait, I lost track. Are we talking about wealth, or intelligence? Because I agree that neither of us are

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> Juan is extremely onry That is a polite way of putting it. Are you suggesting I try being overly polite? Well, OK. Juan, dear sir, I wouldn't be happy to find your thumbs cramping up typing on a phone. Fear not, I shant be ill to find that you not bother responding to my twaddle and would be

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> > Sadly, the mental rigour required for precise communication and clear > thinking is not for many. I'm fine with mental rigor, except when its used to box in ideas, and try to control people. Which is, ALWAYS, how ideologues use it. So, in those circumstances, I eschew it. Because I don't

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

he "1%" then? And those phones are computers, fuck face. > > Does it hurt to be as stupid and corrupt as you are 'xorcist'? No, not at all. Because I'm smart enough to know that a programmable device that has a CPU in it is a computer. Even if, derp.. it can make a phone call.

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> > ignorant establishment bot is also an expert in chinese > history! amazing. Expert? No. But you don't need to be an expert to know a few things. Like you. I see you occasionally use verbs and nouns properly. >> Look at the Middle East: For all intents and purposes they are in

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

>> >> Hey fuck head, you're typing on a computer. That makes you one of the >> global 1% too. > > > False. Like everything you said, stupid piece-of-shit. Hey fuck head, any electronic device that can post stuff on the net is a computer.

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> That's the kind of privileges you get by raping the whole world > for centuries, including spanish empire, dutch empire, british > empire(yours) and now british-amerikunt empire (yours). No > wonder you are a loyal subject ahd defender of the status quo. > Oh yes,

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> Ain't no "if" about that collapse; "when" would be more accurate. Agreed. > And the wonderful achievements of Progressive Liberalism only cost us: Agreed. > But our "homeless people" can have a shiny toy to compensate them for > their lack of basic security and so-called necessities. Yes,

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> > Yes, piece-of-shit - That's clearly what you said, and like the > 'good '(pretty mediocre) scam artist you are, you prefaced it > with "I agree with you, but...". Oh Juanita, sing that sweet sweet song of love to me once again! Of all the trolls under heaven, there is none

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> Not 'we'. I'm commenting on the estalishment progaganda you > post. Yah. > > What? You can't come up with any decent answer, piece-of-shit > psychobabble scam artist? Actually, I found that answer quite entertaining. And seeing that our previous interaction has proven

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> > Actually, people who support to varying degrees things like tor > (a pentagon's cyberweapon), google, clinton and even the US > military (not as bad as russia's) are not unthinking. They > understand perfectly well what they are doing. > Says a pinhead using Gmail.

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 18:47:08 - > xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: > > >> As sick as this society is (and I do agree on that), bloodshed is >> relatively at a minimum, and resources are plentiful. > > What kind of moral agent, sorry, robot, would say that kind of > thing? > Sorry, we

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

>> Hell, even the >> homeless can be overweight and have ipods and shit. > > They can have iPods but no shelter. How does this sound for you? > > https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/08/17/the-stuff-we-really-need-is-getting-more-expensive-other-stuff-is-getting-cheaper/ > Oh, hey I

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> It's a counterpoint to all the technocratic libertarian bullshit that > appears here. as if that republican crap somehow 'punk'. > > This society is sick and perverse and needs to be put out of it's misery > like a rat dog that just bit some gentrified whore's kid. While I do understand the

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> > It doesn't make any sense. He either wants the job or he doesn't. If he > does, he needs to figure out--FAST--that running the United States of > America is not a reality TV show!! If he doesn't, he could have declined > the GOP nomination and let... just about anyone else in the running >

Re: Wikileaks says Wednesday is the End for Hillary.

> http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/10/02/wednesday-hillary-clinton-done- > You know what... up until now I have supported what Julian and Wikileaks > have done. If he costs Hillary the election, though, that could very > well change in a hurry. Makes no difference either way. Hillary is as corrupt

Re: You could (will be) replaced by a robot coder

> > My opinion of people like Musk and the rest of the technocrats is they > ARE Darwin's finest example ... of "Marauders and Pillagers". > > Any service to society is coincidental and unintentional and solely > related to 'wealth accumulation'. Philanthropics too... It's for the > writedown. Not

Re: You could (will be) replaced by a robot coder

> Don't forget to hate on automation engineers as the unemployment rate > reaches 45% and the gubmint still hasn't figured out what to do with all > those idled people. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU > > Source: >

Re: Memory Hole

> > > On 09/29/2016 04:05 PM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: > >> Well, considering that he was taking it hard, > > How do you know? When I first heard he died, I read a few articles that were kicking around about it, and his family and friends had mentioned it, along with his financial troubles. Or,

Re: Memory Hole

> > So what happened to Ian Murdock? > Just checked the wiki. It's a bit limited. Prior to his suicide, he split up with his long-time partner Debra (Debian was named as a combination of their names), had taken it hard as most long-term mid-life breakups tend to do, and was apparently soon to be

Re: DDoS Of Things -

> > You can do IT work for anbody… you don’t have to code/sysadmin/whatever > strictly for a company in the computer industry. This has been my shift > in the past few years. +1 Buddy of moved into a sweet gig. After years of 'serious' admin work, he was burnt out, and took a gig at a local

Re: Yahoo is sued for gross negligence over huge hacking

> > Consider taking part in this. Paying for using windoze coming soon, > I heard. > Meh. Nowhere near lucrative enough. I can beat that 'handily' with regular sperm donations.

Re: [WAR] US government set on complete destruction of Ukraine

> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 05:36:26 - > mate, you can't seriously expect me to play along with your > striking lack of basic intellectual honesty =) I don't expect anyone, to do anything. Except die. That we all have in common, at least thus far. As far as 'intellectual honesty'

Re: [WAR] US government set on complete destruction of Ukraine

> I don't know what you're talking about. Then again, neither do > you. What can I say, you get me so flustered, its tough to think with you around, hot pants. > What was your last display of buddhist stupidity? Ah yes, > "bluecore". Oh, and you wouldn't work for

Re: [WAR] US government set on complete destruction of Ukraine

> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:31:34 - > xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: > >> >> >Carry on. Your amoral slavery ramblings are such a fine >> >example of 'enlightented' mental vomits, I mean 'buddhist' >> >'philosohical' 'thought' >> > >> >You're both retarded and intellectually dishonest.

Re: DDoS Of Things -

> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:23 PM, wrote: > I'd bet a lot of readers here would have major ethical issues with > what they do... collect and mine info so they can cold call, spam, > promote, engineer, and market people brands and junk they don't > need... and wouldn't be

Re: DDoS Of Things -

> What I stated a while back about my reasons for never getting involved > in the computer industry as a way to earn my bucks... I don't get along > with fewdal punkz and hypercompetitive-hyperagressives reel well. So > what did they do? They FUCKED the whole 'Fucking thing'. In my experience

Re: [WAR] US government set on complete destruction of Ukraine

> Carry on. Your amoral slavery ramblings are such a fine > example of 'enlightented' mental vomits, I mean 'buddhist' > 'philosohical' 'thought' > > You're both retarded and intellectually dishonest. A piece of > shit IOW =) Does this mean we're breaking up again?

Re: [WAR] US government set on complete destruction of Ukraine

> > Oh, poor little broken heart... > http://youtu.be/JIrm0dHbCDU > How wonderfully apropos! First time I went to a strip club as a kid, I remember one of the dancers doing a routine to this song. ha! no accounting for coincidence, I guess.

Re: [WAR] US government set on complete destruction of Ukraine

> On Sep 28, 2016 5:54 PM, wrote: >> >> And I love a man that can whisper sweetly in Spanish to me. I'll have a > margarita with you any day, sugar tits. > > Err... Sorry for disappointing you, darling. Our sweet Juan wasn't being > romantic and inviting you to drink

Re: [WAR] US government set on complete destruction of Ukraine

> On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:54:02 - > xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: > > > >> >"margaritas ante porcos". >> >> >> Spanish > > quoted for self-parody value. > > So, uh.. what about that drink baby? And afterwards, I promise to be gentle.

Re: [WAR] US government set on complete destruction of Ukraine

> On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:40:30 - > xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: > > >> I knew you wouldn't be able to stay away from the sweet, sweet lovin' >> very long Juan. Some loves are meant to last. > > > I just routinely counter the garbage that people like you > routinely vomit. Don't think

Re: DDoS Of Things -

> What bothers me is not this particular instance, but the proof of > concept it represents, in a world where everything from refrigerators to > night lights phones home. Things present a very diffuse and low-reward > attack surface individually, but as reflectors they provide a potential >

True Story, allegorically told

A serious young man found the conflicts of the mid 20th Century confusing. He went to many people seeking a way of resolving within himself the discords that troubled him, but he remained troubled. One night in a coffee house, a self-ordained Zen Master said to him, "go to the dilapidated mansion

Re: [WAR] US government set on complete destruction of Ukraine

> > Maybe fix your mail client to attribute quotes? Alas, the webmail client here doesn't seem to be that flexible. > > Well, we all have shit like that going on, albeit far more subtle ;) > > In _Foundations of Psychohistory_, Lloyd Demause discusses the evolution > of child-rearing methods in

Re: [WAR] US government set on complete destruction of Ukraine

I'll leave out your contortions of things I've said, willful ignorance of what I meant, and your attacks. They aren't worth the time. There were, however, two useful morsels in amongst the mess, otherwise: > Are you trying to say the slave owners of the American South did not > actually benefit

Re: [WAR] US government set on complete destruction of Ukraine

> Right, to understand people, you need to see things as they might. Of course! > > But that doesn't mean that you agree with what they say and do. Of course not! :) .. the way far-out example I usually give to this is someone like a serial killer. If they were sexually, physically, and

Re: [WAR] US government set on complete destruction of Ukraine

+1. Can I +2 if I develop multi-personality syndrome? > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 09/23/2016 08:04 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > >> So the US government appears set on complete destruction of >> Ukraine. Doesn't even make strategic sense at this point. I guess >>

Re: [From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF

would not be as sweet; and that, with the right type of eyes, one can fall madly in love for span of hours, and then move along, alone again. How long one is in love for is not important, what is important is to experience it. > Yes massa O'Brien @ xorcist @ sigaint - I bow to your alpha >

Re: [From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF

intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function." F. Scott Fitzgerald > So this is it xorcist. Stop, you're going to make me blush. This is a bunch of stuff that happened as I tapped on weird little chiclet ke

Re: [From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF

> On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 12:01:39 - > Well, I don't. And what hat are you wearing now? The > manipulative emotionalist, or the cold 'scientific' thinker? I don't really care if you do, or don't. I have no vested interest in changing your mind. I'm simply stating my views, and

Re: [From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF

> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 05:50:00 - > Psychiatry is radically different. Being 'mentally healthy' > simply means being 'well adapted' to a society of crazies. I get where you are coming from. I've often said, "Being well-adapted to a sick culture is no sign of health." > The

Re: [RUS] Putin - the most moderate Russian politician acceptable to the Russian public

> First you raised a straw man "Putin good man/ bad man", then you raise a > dichotomy "the wrong question vs the right question". Straw man implies I'm arguing with you, or trying to refute your opinion. I'm just having a discussion, and the "Putin good man / bad man" thing was mostly to clarify

Re: [RUS] Putin - the most moderate Russian politician acceptable to the Russian public

> > GOOD and bad, RIGHT and wrong - are THE ONLY VARIABLES in this equation. I disagree. On a personal level, right and wrong certainly exist. I believe this is the only plane where morality has any real meaning. On a geopolitical level, good and evil are meaningless, UNLESS you make the

Re: JY vs Sea Sea vs Actual Discussion

> That is /very/ clever indeed. Why thank you. > Or just make them believe you gave up something "personally > embarrassing" but not actionable under duress. Got to give them a win > to report. > > :o) Yeah, I was always partial to having something personally embarrassing as a first level

Re: JY vs Sea Sea vs Actual Discussion

I've been toying with libgcrypt, lately. Mostly to refresh my 'C' after a long, long love affair, turned dirty mouth-spitting fuck-fest with python. It's been a long time since I had to do so much fucking book keeping. I remember why I left C behind. I'm turning over some ideas for a FUSE-based

Re: "The Tree of Liberty will get its manure..." [Was Re:]

> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:06:17PM -, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: >> Greed is a fundamental problem of Capitalism. It is also a fundamental >> problem of Socialism. The Soviet chiefs in the Politburo weren't >> standing >> in the bread lines with everyone else. > > On the other hand, greed is

Re: "The Tree of Liberty will get its manure..." [Was Re:]

> > Right. US military have trained heavily for this scenario, however. So? That can actually play to your advantage. With heavy training, comes assumptions of what to expect, and an ingrained game-plan. If you know what they expect, you simply do something else, and cause confusion. > > Well,

Re: "The Tree of Liberty will get its manure..." [Was Re:]

> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:12:11AM -, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: > They were bloody well fed anti tank and anti aircraft rpgs and the like > by the USA - that's how they took down the USSR occupation. > > >> Then took their AK47's and repelled NATO. > > Your simplification may be useful to

Re: "The Tree of Liberty will get its manure..." [Was Re:]

> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:30:55PM -0700, Razer wrote: > > You cannot eliminate human nature. > > Greed and lust for power are tendencies of human nature. > > But perhaps it is possible to commoditize politics, rather than have > politics be a tool for the wealthy and powerful? > > (How? Good

[Fwd: Re: [From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF]

Ooops. Sent this to Juan offlist, but meant to copy the list on it too. > However the idea that a professional seller of jewelry is going > to make a big sale like that, without even COUNTING the bills > because he had been chatted up with some nonsense about the > subway

Re: Switching gears

> I disagree. > Therefore, the one and only effective way to get back freedom is to > shutdown the tyranny. Maybe weapons are required, like in the US > independence war, maybe a massive amount of people is required, like we > east germans did in 1989. > > Anything else are illusions. Valid

Re: Little Brother, Re: Switching gears

> That's called "Little Brother"; we (for various forms of "we") have talked > about it a lot. Heh. Kinda funny. I called it "Little Sister" when I mentioned it to my buddy. Yeah, those are good points you make. A voting system that could downvote/purge irrelevant/private clips would be good. It

Switching gears

I'd like to bounce an idea around. At the outset, I'm going to say that I don't really like the idea. Like getting a root canal, I'd rather not have a some guy drilling around in my jaw, but what can you do? Some years back, maybe 8 years ago now, prior to the Snowden revelations, a Kiwi buddy

Re: [From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF

> > oh oh oh... so much private information and WHAT an information we > should start LAving you, xorcist. Just lAving you!!! What a holy man we > got Private? Fuck you're paranoid. I don't consider what I do for a living, or otherwise, private. My name, location, who I

Re: [From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF

> > Now, here's your fallacy. And, let me also say.. your description of the human thought process is all wrong. :) Consider it this way. When someone walks up to you, and sticks out their hand to shake hands.. you respond by reaching out and shaking hands. You're not processing it all the way

Re: [From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF

> 2016-09-21 3:33 GMT+03:00 juan <juan@gmail.com>: > > Oh... what a deadly punch/es, Juan! (one of) > The poor new CIA troll xorcist (substituting the SDW guy) starts to > understand why his fellow man (SDW) failed on the list with his cheap > US/antihuman pseudophilos

Re: [From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF

> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:40:09PM -, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: > Now, here's your fallacy. Because we humans are of course acting > rationally under pressure. Take Juan's give-me-your-money example: in > order to actually hand out your money you need to understand my > intentions, you need

Re: [From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF

>> You're like autistic or something. > > > Sure. And being gay is a disease that is cured with > electroshocks and lobotomies. Hit a nerve, did I? Sorry. No judgments. If its correct, it just means you just think differently. It's not even a big deal. For the purposes here, it just

Re: [From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF

> I don't want to put words in your mouth, but, are you > 'implicitly' saying that slavery being right or wrong is a > matter of 'cultural interpretation'? Or mostly a matter of > 'interpretation'? Look, I'm not arguing for moral relativity, which is basically what you're

Re: [From xorcist offlist] Cloudflare & NoDAPL again w/ a ROTF

> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 06:11:43PM -, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: > We should probably imagine 10 year time frame, not 6 weeks :) I think more on the scale of 100 years, but yeah. 10 would be wonderful. > But even though it's difficult, without a core of belligerently > principled and

Re: SHA-3 and GOST-R/Stribok

> > By the way, it should be called "Streebog"", "Stribog". Thank you for the correction. Reckon thats going to make searching for info a might easier. For some reason I have it with a 'k' in my notes. Anyhow, thats again.

  1   2   >