-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9-Jan-04, at 8:37 PM, Greg Broiles wrote:
Further appeals to Congress and the states are no longer a sure bet.
The soap box and the ballot box have been throughly tried, is it now
time to get out the ammo box?
You're forgetting the jury
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is why the Tax Freedom Day approach is more useful. Tax freedom
day is of course the day when the average American or Brit or whatever
has stopped working for the government and has the rest of his income
for himself. For most years, this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ever heard of toll roads? Yes, those things you drive on and pay for
their
use. They work quite well in many of the socialist European countries
so
they ought to work in the land of the free too.
Yes, the way this usually works is that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/12/20031213-3.html
Statement on H.R. 2417
Statement by the President
Today, I have signed into law H.R. 2417, the Intelligence
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004. The Act authorizes funding for
http://www.sundaytimes.co.za/zones/sundaytimes/newsst/newsst1073024337.asp
SAO PAULO - Brazilian police photographed and fingerprinted all arriving
Americans on Thursday - tit-for-tat for a similar US program that begins
next week.
In all, 230 American citizens were thus identified Thursday at
Major Variola (ret) wrote:
TV stations which exploit the aetherial commons are a tricky case.
The government licensors have to be very careful not to induce
censorship.
Yet, the FCC has guidelines what can and cannot be aired. Thus no free
speech as you claim it to be.
Michael
Tim May wrote:
For every negro welfare momma who took money for the past number of
years, tell her to pay it all back, with compounded interest, or face
time in a labor camp to repay what she stole. And if she cannot, or
will not, which is ovewhelmingly likely, harvest her organs (if any
Major Variola (ret) wrote:
TV stations which exploit the aetherial commons are a tricky case.
The government licensors have to be very careful not to induce
censorship.
Yet, the FCC has guidelines what can and cannot be aired. Thus no free
speech as you claim it to be.
Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27-Dec-03, at 9:53 AM, Tyler Durden wrote:
All symbols that are related to Nazism. One of the reasons (if not the
reason) why they banned Wolfenstein 3D.
Interesting. So even if the swatsika is protrayed as a bad thing (to
the point of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27-Dec-03, at 9:53 AM, Tyler Durden wrote:
All symbols that are related to Nazism. One of the reasons (if not the
reason) why they banned Wolfenstein 3D.
Interesting. So even if the swatsika is protrayed as a bad thing (to
the point of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-Dec-03, at 12:37 PM, Eric Cordian wrote:
A Berlin criminal court sentenced 38-year-old Michael Regener to 40
months in prison after a six-month trial that tested the boundaries of
free expression in a nation with strict laws against hate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The German law clearly defines what is hate speech. It is not an easy
task as you can see in a six month trial.
Germany, or any State that restricts words or thought, needs a regime
change
with extreme prejudice.
Then I guess you better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
..
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/special/iraq/index.htm
- --
Michael
Smithers this is ridiculous, this is America. Justice should favour
the rich!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-Dec-03, at 12:37 PM, Eric Cordian wrote:
A Berlin criminal court sentenced 38-year-old Michael Regener to 40
months in prison after a six-month trial that tested the boundaries of
free expression in a nation with strict laws against hate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It really is that they hate us for our (relative) freedom.
Believe it or not, but most people do not care about what way you live.
The only way they know about your freedom by watching american TV. So
blame it on yourself.
I
can see that on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
...
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/special/iraq/index.htm
- --
Michael
Smithers this is ridiculous, this is America. Justice should favour
the rich!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It really is that they hate us for our (relative) freedom.
Believe it or not, but most people do not care about what way you live.
The only way they know about your freedom by watching american TV. So
blame it on yourself.
I
can see that on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21-Dec-03, at 10:58 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
--
James A. Donald:
I am anti war. You lot are pro Saddam.
Michael Kalus
Why. Because we OPPOSED the war on Saddam?
Because you have been justifying his actions, denying his
crimes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-Dec-03, at 8:41 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
I am anti war. You lot are pro Saddam.
Why. Because we OPPOSED the war on Saddam? That's an interresting logic
you have here:
I am against the war, unless of course, it is initiated by lies,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't know who you are referring too, but that comment is amusing,
because it is exactly the kind of lambaste broadside that one hears on
Faux news channel all the time. Anyway, I say that Saddam has human
rights, just like everyone else, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't know who you are referring too, but that comment is amusing,
because it is exactly the kind of lambaste broadside that one hears on
Faux news channel all the time. Anyway, I say that Saddam has human
rights, just like everyone else, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-Dec-03, at 8:41 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
I am anti war. You lot are pro Saddam.
Why. Because we OPPOSED the war on Saddam? That's an interresting logic
you have here:
I am against the war, unless of course, it is initiated by lies,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As Bill Stuart pointed out, this is not an American war. This is a war
(or so the U.S. claims) based on alleged violation of an agreement
between Iraq and the UN. It seems to me that American Courts or
American Tribunals have no authority to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.debka.com/article_print.php?aid=743
Indications Saddam Was Not in Hiding But a Captive
DEBKAfile Special Report
December 14, 2003, 6:55 PM (GMT+02:00)
A number of questions are raised by the incredibly bedraggled, tired
and crushed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-Dec-03, at 1:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what your motivation is for wanting to rewrite history,
but that
isn't what Glaspie said.
I am guessing here that he just wants to believe that the US is acting
in their foreign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-Dec-03, at 1:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what your motivation is for wanting to rewrite history,
but that
isn't what Glaspie said.
I am guessing here that he just wants to believe that the US is acting
in their foreign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19-Dec-03, at 11:55 AM, ken wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Let's face it: not even the Nazi war criminals were treated in the
way Saddam has been treated.
Eh?
And have you heard about the Soviet Union?
I'll take it then that the US has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The US has global hegemony because in reality its policies are
reasonable,
because it isn't worth anyone's while to try to oppose it.
that I would like to oppose. It is rather the fact that in the past it
wasn't very feasible. The world is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
National Sovereignty, like the divine
right of kings, just is not taken seriously any more, and the
only people weeping big salt tears about its passing are those
who enthusiastically hailed all the Soviet violations of it as
wars of national
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The west, including the US traded and continues to trade
heavily with Castro, yet somehow that does not lead you to
believe they think Castro a good guy, nor does it lead you to
believe they are actively supporting him.
I don't think Castro is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-Dec-03, at 9:34 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
--
On 18 Dec 2003 at 15:42, Michael Kalus wrote:
By January 1984, /The Washington Post/ was reporting that the
United States had told friendly nations in the Persian Gulf
that the defeat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19-Dec-03, at 2:35 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
--
On 18 Dec 2003 at 21:57, J.A. Terranson wrote:
Yet, I shed and continue to shed tears for a race of people
that refuses to respect the rights of men and their nations.
Like the Soviets. Or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This green light story is a commie lie (originally a Baathist
lie, but these days mostly repeated by commies)
I take it then that the heroic rescue of Private Jessica Lynch is also
the truth, while the story about the use of excessive (and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19-Dec-03, at 11:55 AM, ken wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Let's face it: not even the Nazi war criminals were treated in the
way Saddam has been treated.
Eh?
And have you heard about the Soviet Union?
I'll take it then that the US has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The US has global hegemony because in reality its policies are
reasonable,
because it isn't worth anyone's while to try to oppose it.
that I would like to oppose. It is rather the fact that in the past it
wasn't very feasible. The world is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This green light story is a commie lie (originally a Baathist
lie, but these days mostly repeated by commies)
I take it then that the heroic rescue of Private Jessica Lynch is also
the truth, while the story about the use of excessive (and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The west, including the US traded and continues to trade
heavily with Castro, yet somehow that does not lead you to
believe they think Castro a good guy, nor does it lead you to
believe they are actively supporting him.
I don't think Castro is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-Dec-03, at 9:34 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
--
On 18 Dec 2003 at 15:42, Michael Kalus wrote:
By January 1984, /The Washington Post/ was reporting that the
United States had told friendly nations in the Persian Gulf
that the defeat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
National Sovereignty, like the divine
right of kings, just is not taken seriously any more, and the
only people weeping big salt tears about its passing are those
who enthusiastically hailed all the Soviet violations of it as
wars of national
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19-Dec-03, at 2:35 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
--
On 18 Dec 2003 at 21:57, J.A. Terranson wrote:
Yet, I shed and continue to shed tears for a race of people
that refuses to respect the rights of men and their nations.
Like the Soviets. Or
James A. Donald wrote:
--
On 17 Dec 2003 at 22:54, Michael Kalus wrote:
No, but it is very interresting that all of this didn't
matter while Saddam was the good guy for our causes (and by
that I mean the Western world general).
You are making up your own history.
Am I? The west
Jim Dixon wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, James A. Donald wrote:
On 17 Dec 2003 at 22:54, Michael Kalus wrote:
No, but it is very interresting that all of this didn't
matter while Saddam was the good guy for our causes (and by
that I mean the Western world general).
You are making up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Human Rights Watch, Amnesty, and countless Iraqi refugees all report
similar stories of widespread torture and murder. Is it your position
that these are all propagandists?
Dismissing as propaganda any reports that oppose your argument,
James A. Donald wrote:
--
On 17 Dec 2003 at 22:54, Michael Kalus wrote:
No, but it is very interresting that all of this didn't
matter while Saddam was the good guy for our causes (and by
that I mean the Western world general).
You are making up your own history.
Am I? The west
Jim Dixon wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, James A. Donald wrote:
On 17 Dec 2003 at 22:54, Michael Kalus wrote:
No, but it is very interresting that all of this didn't
matter while Saddam was the good guy for our causes (and by
that I mean the Western world general).
You are making up
Tyler Durden wrote:
Later today, a source close to the interrogation said that Saddam
would be
subjected to stress and sleep deprivation. Basically, teams of
interrogators will ask questions over and over again, and no one will get
any rest until answers are provided.
At least here in NYC
Jim Dixon wrote:
I have gazed into the abyss and seen a man having his teeth checked and
getting a haircut. :-|
And how would you have felt to be the one who got your teeth checked and
get a haircut with the whole world watching?
M.
James A. Donald wrote:
Firstly, the US army has not violated the Geneva convention:
Saddam was eligible for being shot on sight.
That might have been. But he was not, and he is shown and paraded on
TV (and don't tell me he wasn't because showing a man in his state,
showing how he gets
Jim Dixon wrote:
And how would you have felt to be the one who got your teeth checked and
get a haircut with the whole world watching?
You have omitted a bit. A better question might be: how would you have
felt if you had looted an entire country for 30 years, invaded two others,
Jim Dixon wrote:
If the prisoners at Guantanamo are POWs, why should they be charged with
crimes? It is no crime to be an enemy soldier.
According to the US Government though they are not soldiers. They are
unlawful enemy combattants.
However, customary practice is to lock POWs up until
Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
If I had record like Saddam's on me?
Gee, I'd be real happy I wasn't shot on the spot, or maybe cruelly
tortured and then shot, the way I'd behaved to people I'd captured.
Or maybe torn into pieces by a shrieking mob.
Instead of doing any of that, they check my teeth and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-Dec-03, at 5:23 PM, Jim Dixon wrote:
Damn lucky, to be honest.
No I did not omit this little bit. This is not the question.
Oh but it is.
Ah? Why?
Guilt or not guilt is not (supposely) decided when captured but in a
court of law. You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-Dec-03, at 5:43 PM, Jim Dixon wrote:
According to the US Government though they are not soldiers. They are
unlawful enemy combattants.
I can only interpret this as your saying that the US Government's
judgement in this issue is correct,
Jim Dixon wrote:
And how would you have felt to be the one who got your teeth checked and
get a haircut with the whole world watching?
You have omitted a bit. A better question might be: how would you have
felt if you had looted an entire country for 30 years, invaded two others,
Jim Dixon wrote:
I have gazed into the abyss and seen a man having his teeth checked and
getting a haircut. :-|
And how would you have felt to be the one who got your teeth checked and
get a haircut with the whole world watching?
M.
James A. Donald wrote:
Firstly, the US army has not violated the Geneva convention:
Saddam was eligible for being shot on sight.
That might have been. But he was not, and he is shown and paraded on
TV (and don't tell me he wasn't because showing a man in his state,
showing how he gets
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-Dec-03, at 5:23 PM, Jim Dixon wrote:
Damn lucky, to be honest.
No I did not omit this little bit. This is not the question.
Oh but it is.
Ah? Why?
Guilt or not guilt is not (supposely) decided when captured but in a
court of law. You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-Dec-03, at 5:43 PM, Jim Dixon wrote:
According to the US Government though they are not soldiers. They are
unlawful enemy combattants.
I can only interpret this as your saying that the US Government's
judgement in this issue is correct,
Jim Dixon wrote:
If the prisoners at Guantanamo are POWs, why should they be charged with
crimes? It is no crime to be an enemy soldier.
According to the US Government though they are not soldiers. They are
unlawful enemy combattants.
However, customary practice is to lock POWs up until
Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
If I had record like Saddam's on me?
Gee, I'd be real happy I wasn't shot on the spot, or maybe cruelly
tortured and then shot, the way I'd behaved to people I'd captured.
Or maybe torn into pieces by a shrieking mob.
Instead of doing any of that, they check my teeth and
Tyler Durden wrote:
Later today, a source close to the interrogation said that Saddam
would be
subjected to stress and sleep deprivation. Basically, teams of
interrogators will ask questions over and over again, and no one will get
any rest until answers are provided.
At least here in NYC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Dec-03, at 11:10 PM, J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
Just a few hundred dead federal goons, spread over a relatively short
period
(~6 months), where the attacks were obviously coordinated, made against
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Dec-03, at 11:10 PM, J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
Just a few hundred dead federal goons, spread over a relatively short
period
(~6 months), where the attacks were obviously coordinated, made against
63 matches
Mail list logo
