Hello Heiko,
> Looking at the code of the current unsharp mask method I realized that
> the module uses its own implementation of a gaussian blur filter. Is
> there any reason not to employ the one in src/common/gaussian.[ch]? Are
> there any concerns against simplifying the sharpening modu
Le mercredi 17 avril 2019 à 19:46 +0200, Robert Rembold a écrit :
> It's a known issue which was introduced after 3.24.3 and should be solved in
> 3.24.7: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1719
Great! Thanks for the pointer, too bad I spent some much time on this :)
I'll wait for 3.24.7
My normal font size now appears to look fine but there appears to be a
great deal of misplaced bold font being used. I also not that the line
spacing looks like it is set at 2 which is really extending the module
lengths.
On 2019-04-17 10:46 a.m., Robert Rembold wrote:
It's a known issue which
I think we mix up 2 (or 3) different things in this topic. Let's say
a contributor wants to implement some feature:
First some discussion should probably happen, for example other
developers can help with pointers on how said feature can and should be
integrated into DT core. I don't see any need
Hi,
I just started to implement a simple (non-blind) deconvolution filter as
an addition sharpening method. I plan to add this as an additional mode
for the sharpening module.
Looking at the code of the current unsharp mask method I realized that
the module uses its own implementation of a
It's a known issue which was introduced after 3.24.3 and should be
solved in 3.24.7: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1719
Am 17.04.19 um 19:35 schrieb William Ferguson:
My gtk2 is 2.24.32, so only the gtk3 is different 3.22.30 vs 3.24.x
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 1:24 PM Robert Rembold
My gtk2 is 2.24.32, so only the gtk3 is different 3.22.30 vs 3.24.x
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 1:24 PM Robert Rembold wrote:
> Hi Pascal,
> Unfortunately, I also noticed the described issue here. You're not alone ;)
>
> My settings are as follows:
> - Ubuntu 18.10 with Xfce
> - 1920*1080 screen res
We are facing the same issue, where to discuss things, with the lua-scripts
repository. We've thought about using github issues and discuss.pixls.us,
but we still haven't come up with a solution. I think I'm just going to
try the github issues and see how it goes.
Bill
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 1
Hi Pascal,
Unfortunately, I also noticed the described issue here. You're not alone ;)
My settings are as follows:
- Ubuntu 18.10 with Xfce
- 1920*1080 screen resolution
- gtk-2.24.32
- gtk-3.24.4
- built darktable from sources few days ago (if exact version matters I
can check)
Best Regards,
Le mercredi 17 avril 2019 à 14:12 -0300, Moritz Moeller a écrit :
> But I agree with parent that it is not the right tool to discuss big
> changes.
> IRC has no history. IRC has no message threads.
> That's why I mentioned NNTP.
My first best is GitHub Issues.
You create an enhancement request t
On 17.4.19 09:16, johannes hanika wrote:
i second the 'getting old' bit. and i really like IRC.
Maybe you misunderstood my message's intend?
Yes, I too prefer IRC over any 'modern' chat client.
But I agree with parent that it is not the right tool to discuss big
changes.
IRC has no histor
Hi Bill,
Thanks for testing.
> Did a pull yesterday and built from git last night. Opened the Canon
> lens list and was able to scroll with the mouse wheel. If I move to
> the top of the list it autoscrolls up and the same with the bottom
> even though the arrow buttons(?) aren't visible. I'm
Did a pull yesterday and built from git last night. Opened the Canon lens
list and was able to scroll with the mouse wheel. If I move to the top of
the list it autoscrolls up and the same with the bottom even though the
arrow buttons(?) aren't visible. I'm on Ubuntu 18.04. I also checked
2.6.2,
Le mercredi 17 avril 2019 à 08:47 -0400, Mark Feit a écrit :
> PRs shouldn't exist until there's code to be pulled. Sometimes there's
> discussion about a project before anyone writes a single line.
I just don't agree. Many nice dt features won't have been created
otherwise. Many people like dt,
On 4/16/19 1:51 PM, rawfiner wrote:
Using github by commenting directly on PRs
I'm in favor of this with some modifications with the mailing list as a
second choice. IRC is too ephemeral without logging and conversations
can go on for days and end up intermixed with other topics, making it
On 4/16/19 11:46 PM, Moritz Moeller wrote:
> There is this thing called 'a news server' which has all of below
> but has infinite history (for free) and you can actually see who
> replied to whom before even opening/deciding to read a message.
>
> That feature alone makes a news server with a dece
i second the 'getting old' bit. and i really like IRC. i could never
get the hang of these fancy websites that force you to use a mouse.
for slack at least there used to be an IRC bridge. it seems mattermost
may be an alternative that does support IRC, for those of us who
insist on animated gifs fo
This is driving me crazy and I don't find a solution.
Take the lens correction module, click on the camera to get a list.
Select Nikon or Canon as there is a very long sub-menu. But in this
sub-menu you cannot scroll. There is no arrows on top or bottom and the
mouse scroll does nothing. This me
Hi,
Am 16.04.19 um 19:51 schrieb rawfiner:
Currently, the place where big changes should be discussed is IRC
(according to houz, as I have not seen this information anywhere, which
is problematic as new contributors may make big changes, so they have at
least to be able to know where is the pl
19 matches
Mail list logo
