Just my 0.02$...
When I install Ubuntu on a new disk, I always partition with a separate
/home.
This way, I when I do a fresh install (typically 15-20 min), I set DO
NOT format and use as /home that partition.
When I reboot, I have the new LTS, all my files and .config in my /home
On 1/5/23, Wiktor Nowak wrote:
> Doing a fresh install of Ubuntu is self-sabotage. Please just try.
> Double check if Your backups are intact and let the update tool do the
> work for You. That's probably at least hours of configuration and
> customization effort saved.
>
> Any Ubuntu will read
On 1/5/23, Bernhard wrote:
> In latest Debian stable (bullseye) I have DisplayCal https://displaycal.net/
> installed from the Debian backport repo.
> https://packages.debian.org/bullseye-backports/displaycal
> It uses Python 3.9.2 and simply works as expected. This seems to be the
> latest dev
Bob Tregilus schrieb am 05.01.23 um 02:38:
My biggest worry, however, is dispcalGUI being a dead project. I hope
it still works with xUbuntu 22.04.1? Guess I will find out. I need a
calibrated monitor. It will be a lot of work to figure out how to
calibrate from the command line with Argyll
Doing a fresh install of Ubuntu is self-sabotage. Please just try.
Double check if Your backups are intact and let the update tool do the
work for You. That's probably at least hours of configuration and
customization effort saved.
Any Ubuntu will read on display calibration profiles. If Your
Jack Bowling schrieb am 05.01.23 um 06:25:
Not there is current dev work ongoing to enable darktable to be offered as an
Appimage which will allow another option for older OS versions.
great news as this is standalone and uses standard conventions e. g. to save
settings data of the app
On 2023-01-04 18:29, Mica Semrick wrote:
On 1/4/23 18:10, Matthias Andree wrote:
You are considering my earlier messages rude and now you are insinuating
I had a "deeper issue"?
Your 12 paragraph response that didn't answer the question does indeed
point to you having a bad day, at the
On 1/4/23 18:10, Matthias Andree wrote:
You are considering my earlier messages rude and now you are insinuating
I had a "deeper issue"?
Your 12 paragraph response that didn't answer the question does indeed
point to you having a bad day, at the very least. Taking that out on
other people
Hi Bob,
You can get displaycal in a flatpak or there is a python3 port of it
that you can install using pip.
-m
On 1/4/23 17:38, Bob Tregilus wrote:
Hi -
My apologies for causing a kerfuffle.
I am not a dev, just a user, albeit from SuSE 6.0.
I did not understand why there were packages
Am 04.01.23 um 16:43 schrieb Mica Semrick:
You're making a lot of assumptions here. Seems like you have some
deeper issue than someone asking a simple question about support.
Maybe a break from the computer is in order.
You are considering my earlier messages rude and now you are insinuating
I
Hi -
My apologies for causing a kerfuffle.
I am not a dev, just a user, albeit from SuSE 6.0.
I did not understand why there were packages for newer unsupported
xUbuntu versions and not for an older supported version. But now I
know: dependencies.
I always do fresh installs. I realize there
Never mind. I forgot that I had installed cmake 3.22 in /usr/local. I
just queried the installed version and assumed that was what I was using.
Sorry for the noise.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 1:30 PM William Ferguson
wrote:
> I just built current master on Ubuntu 20.04 with cmake 3.16.1, without
I just built current master on Ubuntu 20.04 with cmake 3.16.1, without any
problems.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 1:21 PM Mica Semrick wrote:
> Can you not just be polite though? Do we want the default reply here to be
> "gruff with loosely associated facts?"
>
> Essentially the question of "what
Can you not just be polite though? Do we want the default reply here to be
"gruff with loosely associated facts?"
Essentially the question of "what happened to xxx package" was met with a multi
paragraph rant about LTS and Ubuntu and whatever. It didn't provide the answer
but instead veered
For what its worth, I read Matthias Andree's responses as perfectly
reasonable. Yes the words were not exceedingly polite, but the
gruffness was backed with explanation. I certainly did not read any
ad hominem attacks.
I was always of the opinion that if you stick with an LTS version of a
You're making a lot of assumptions here. Seems like you have some deeper issue
than someone asking a simple question about support. Maybe a break from the
computer is in order.
Happy new year
-m
On January 4, 2023 7:33:59 AM PST, Matthias Andree
wrote:
>Am 04.01.23 um 15:58 schrieb Mica
Am 04.01.23 um 15:58 schrieb Mica Semrick:
This answer is a bit rude and doesn't answer the original query.
It may be rude if you consider "who cares" rude, and prevents people
from wasting their time while pointing out the actual issue, which is
"old distro" which is too old to build
This answer is a bit rude and doesn't answer the original query.
There is an unmet dependency in Ubuntu 20.04 and the latest release can no
longer be built. See
https://discuss.pixls.us/t/what-happened-with-the-obs-builds/33588/2?u=darix
for more information.
You can always try the flatpak.
As old Ubuntu versions may and probably are lacking of some up to date
dependencies, probably installing a flatpak package would be a good
solution. Also I struggle to imagine a use-case where someone needs the
newest darktable version but refuses to update whole distro. Why would
it be?
W
Am 04.01.23 um 04:51 schrieb Bob Tregilus:
Hi -
I'm not sure who I should alert to this issue, someone on this dev
list or should I write to OBS support?
On the openSUSE contributors OBS they list the following four 4.2.0
darktable builds for Unbuntu based distros (I added the support
20 matches
Mail list logo
