Forking does not contribute to the project. It contributes to a new
project, which darktable may not necessarily adopt. Then I have to also
fork darktable, which means that I have now solved my problem, and my
problem only, until my fork of exiv2 is merged back into the original
project, which is g
* Top Rock Photography [01-29-21 21:14]:
> My only demand is that the lawyer gets on the phone and speak to the AOM
> people. It has been almost one year! IANAL….
>
> …But I have read the AOM license,, and I have studied the case of Nokia vs
> the other members of AOM, and HEIF. In that case, all
My only demand is that the lawyer gets on the phone and speak to the AOM
people. It has been almost one year! IANAL….
…But I have read the AOM license,, and I have studied the case of Nokia vs
the other members of AOM, and HEIF. In that case, all the other lawyers
claim that a) Nokia never held a
Why don’t you take over the responsibility for the project? And be fully
accountable for a possible copyright or patent infringement?
It is presumptuous to demand something from others that you are not willing to
contribute yourself.
> Am 29.01.2021 um 20:11 schrieb Top Rock Photography
> :
>
My only concern is that, although AVIF is not patent encumbered, he refused
to add the reading/writing of metadata data to AVIF, until he speaks to a
lawyer. That has been quite a long time ago and so, my AVIF files made by
darktable seem to have no metadata.
Currently, Exiftool is no better (in t
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 22:03:39 -0300
Guillermo Rozas wrote:
> Because of several comments and the general tone of the posts by
> Robin Mills (and some of the current contributors to exiv2) on
> PIXLS.US during the last year, which I won't link here. The two
> linked discussions were meant to show t
Because of several comments and the general tone of the posts by Robin
Mills (and some of the current contributors to exiv2) on PIXLS.US during
the last year, which I won't link here. The two linked discussions were
meant to show that there are people working on exiv2, and that although
Robin's ret
I don't see why you conclude the exiv2 project is safe. After a full month of
appeals there is still no maintainer announced in the first thread you link to,
nor on the web site, nor on the github site.
Doug C.
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:11:50 -0500 Guillermo Rozas
wrote
The fut
The future of exiv2 is safe, don't worry:
https://discuss.pixls.us/t/maintainer-urgently-needed-for-exiv2/21547
https://discuss.pixls.us/t/canon-cr3-raw-support-your-move/14192
Regards,
Guillermo
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 5:03 PM wrote:
> From reading various notes, DT uses exiv2 to write the xm
From reading various notes, DT uses exiv2 to write the xmp
sidecars.
I'm wondering what will happen since Robin Mills, the maintainer has
retired and will not provide any further updates.
It doesn't look like anybody else is taking over/forking exiv2.
How will this impact Darktable?
--
sknahT
10 matches
Mail list logo
