On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:05:14PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> From: Mark A. Greer
>
> The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar
> to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci,
> put the support for the da830 in the same directory as
> the davinci code.
I meant to add a
Hi Mark,
> -Original Message-
> From: davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com
> [mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com] On Behalf
> Of Mark A. Greer
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 7:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: da830 - A
to:davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com] On Behalf
> > Of Mark A. Greer
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 7:13 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: da830 - Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:05:14PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> >
From: davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com
> > > [mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com] On
> Behalf
> > > Of Mark A. Greer
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 7:13 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: da830 - Add base DA830/OMAP-L137
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 06:09:40PM -0500, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark A. Greer [mailto:mgr...@mvista.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:40 PM
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:58:12PM -0500, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:58:12, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:05:14PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> > > From: Mark A. Greer
>
> Thanks for this. It builds for me but hangs after
> uncompressing the kernel. Do you see anything wrong with this
> sequence?
I did some fu
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 19:12:23, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:58:12PM -0500, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
>
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:05:14PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> > > > > > From: Mark A. Greer
[...]
> > > > I see that the latest patches have "EMAC_VERSI
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 11:15 -0500, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:58:12, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:05:14PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> > > > From: Mark A. Greer
> >
> > Thanks for this. It builds for me but hangs after
> > uncompressing the
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:15:04AM -0500, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:58:12, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
>
>
> I did some further digging. Note that my problem persists with the v4 patches
> -- no surprise here I think since there were no functional changes. But I can
> reply
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 16:39:26, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:58:12, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
> >
> >
> > I did some further digging. Note that my problem persists
> with the v4 patches -- no surprise here I think since there
> were no functional changes. But I can reply o
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 14:04:16, Steve Chen wrote:
> The PC invalid (0x34767068 is not a valid RAM address). It is likely
> you jump to that location via uninitialized or corrupt
> function pointer.
> You can try to disable Ethernet in kernel config to see if
> you get pass
> this point. If y
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:15:04, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:58:12, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
>
> I did some further digging. Note that my problem persists
> with the v4 patches -- no surprise here I think since there
> were no functional changes. But I can reply on that
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:50:59AM -0500, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 16:39:26, Mark A. Greer wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:58:12, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
> > Where are you downloading the uImage?
>
> TFTP from VMWare server running FC10.
Oops, I meant "where" as
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:54:00PM -0500, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:15:04, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:58:12, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
> >
> > I did some further digging. Note that my problem persists
> > with the v4 patches -- no surprise her
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:22:55AM -0500, Ambrose, Martin wrote:
> Looking at da830_evm_init() the call to da830_register_emac() is unqualified
> with respect to any config options. This, I think, is not qualitatively
> different than say the dm644x build.
I'll fix that.
___
On Thursday 30 April 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
>
> > > I use "arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Sourcery G++ Lite 2008q3-72) 4.3.2"
> > > for now.
> >
> > I rebuilt using this version and success! Thanks David for the nudge.
> >
> > I was using 2007q3-51 4.2.1. I guess I could investigate what chang
Ambrose, Martin wrote:
I did some further digging. Note that my problem persists
>>with the v4 patches -- no surprise here I think since there
were no functional changes. But I can reply on that thread if
you like.
I'm not sure how to proceed and any debugging tips are appreciated.
Hmm,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 13:25:24, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>
> >>>I did some further digging. Note that my problem persists
> > >>with the v4 patches -- no surprise here I think since there
> >>>were no functional changes. But I can reply on that thread if
> >>>you like.
>
> >>>I'm not sure how
18 matches
Mail list logo
