Re: [Dbmail] Local recipient lookup?

2003-03-06 Thread Ketil Myhre Ring
>This has been covered repeatedly in the last week on the mailing list, >please look at the archives for this month. Sorry, I didn't find anything. What are the subject of those posts? >Bascially you need to either disable the local_recipient_maps definition >in main.cf, or setup a sql lookup to

Re: [Dbmail] Local recipient lookup?

2003-03-06 Thread Ryan Butler
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 17:03, Ketil Myhre Ring wrote: > >This has been covered repeatedly in the last week on the mailing list, > >please look at the archives for this month. > > Sorry, I didn't find anything. What are the subject of those posts? > Re: [Dbmail] Urgent - Relay e Unknow User is on

[Dbmail] Hello all

2003-03-06 Thread yu quannian
I encouter such a problem when I make my desttination file : raw-convert.c: In function `traverse': raw-convert.c:226: `alphasort' undeclared (first use in this function) raw-convert.c:226: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once raw-convert.c:226: for each function it appears in.) make

Re: [Dbmail] Procmail

2003-03-06 Thread Paul J Stevens
Matthew, Though I use postfix instead of sm, I run a similar setup as yours. Yes, you can tell dbmail-smtp to deliver messages to a specific folder. The -m switch does the trick. A typical dynamic procmail filter for mailinglists would be: :0 * ^List-Id: \/.* { LISTNAME=`echo $MATCH|sed 's/<

Re: [Dbmail] UebiMiau and DBMail

2003-03-06 Thread Nataniel Klug
Roel, Its running hourly with this command: /usr/sbin/dbmail-maintenance -cfpd >> /dev/null 2>&1 Is it correct? I create a script in /etc/cron.hourly to do this job for me. Nataniel Klug - Original Message - From: "Roel Rozendaal - IC&S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, March

Re: [Dbmail] Procmail

2003-03-06 Thread Aaron Stone
I didn't realize that my auto-mailboxes patch would be useful for so many other things... neat! Perhaps a more official request to include it is in order? Are there reasons why someone might prefer *not* to have mailbox autocreation? IIRC, I left an if(1) in the code to be replaced with just such a

Re: [Dbmail] Procmail

2003-03-06 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Thank you very much this works great! Actually I figured it out myself eventually by running dbmail-smtp with wrong arguments and it showed me all the options including the -m option, I hadn't seen that documented anywhere before. Perhaps I will get inspired and help with documentation. On Thu,

Re: [Dbmail] Procmail

2003-03-06 Thread Jesse Norell
Hello, One consideration would be a scenario of a spammer sending mail with varying subjects like: [UCE 123vhx] Hire a hitman to stop me sending mail! [UCE 456ska] Hire a hitman to stop me sending mail! [UCE 234kli] Hire a hitman to stop me sending mail! [UCE 34624k] Hire a hitman to stop me se

[Dbmail] Multiple copies of every email

2003-03-06 Thread Jason Burfield
I found a few things that were close to this in the archives...but no real answers. I've got DBMail set up and running with Postfix. I am having a few glitches, but the most annoying one at the moment is that mail is not deleted from the tables in DBMail. Each time I check mail I get the same exa

Re[4]: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-03-06 Thread Boyan Alexiev
Hi Eelco, Thanks. I suppose you mean the signal 11 problem, so here are two cases, both with level 5, but they have some debug lines commented out. As it may sound very strange, the problem appears also on level 5 when I put a comment on line 276 in pipe.c Also the test shows that the problem appe

Re: [Dbmail] Multiple copies of every email

2003-03-06 Thread Jeff Brenton
Hello Jason, JB> Each time I check mail I get the same exact mail I already retrieved. Let me guess... Outlook or Outlook Express as a client? Outlook and some other clients will NOT mark messages as deleted on the server, and won't remember what messages it has received, unless it can retrieve

Re: [Dbmail] Multiple copies of every email

2003-03-06 Thread Jason Burfield
Jeff... Yes...you are correct. Using Entourage on OS X results in these problems, however, using Evolution (on Linux) I do not have the problem. When I connect with Entourage I get this in my maillog: Mar 6 13:41:44 mail dbmail/pop3d[995]: pop3_handle_connection(): error, uncomplete sessio

Re[2]: [Dbmail] Multiple copies of every email

2003-03-06 Thread Jeff Brenton
Hello Jason, JB> The strange this is that the account has one message in it. Using Entourage JB> it retrieves that one message and all looks fine. Same thing on Evolution. JB> But with Entourage I get the 'error' in the logs and the message is not JB> marked for deletion. With Evolution all works

Re: Re[2]: [Dbmail] Multiple copies of every email

2003-03-06 Thread Jason Burfield
Jeff... No, Entourage shows no error at all. It performs as usual, pulling the email from the server and disconnecting. No errors anywhere in the client. -- Jason On 3/6/03 1:44 PM, "Jeff Brenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Jason, > > JB> The strange this is that the account has o

Re[4]: [Dbmail] Multiple copies of every email

2003-03-06 Thread Jeff Brenton
Hello Jason, JB> No, Entourage shows no error at all. JB> It performs as usual, pulling the email from the server and disconnecting. JB> No errors anywhere in the client. Try turning on logging, if Entourage has it; I couldn't find the problem with Outlook until I had it log all POP3 and SMTP tr

Re[4]: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-03-06 Thread Aaron Stone
Is this the line that you're talking about? trace (TRACE_DEBUG,"insert_messages(): alias deliver_to is [%s]", (char *)tmp->data); and if you comment this out, the segfault goes away? It may indicate that tmp->data is not allocated properly... Aaron On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Boyan

Re: [Dbmail] Multiple copies of every email

2003-03-06 Thread Mark Mackay - Orcon Internet
Check the unique_id column of the database. We had the same problem and it was because the UIDLs were stuffed up.From memory i think we fixed it by doing the following query: update messages set unique_id=concat(message_idnr,'A',unix_timestamp()); i don't think it matters what the values are

Re: [Dbmail] Multiple copies of every email

2003-03-06 Thread Aaron Stone
While having the message_idnr serve as the unique_id makes sense initially, I believe that it would be problematic for backups and migrations. Explaining to the users that they need to download all messages again because of a change on the server side isn't pretty. Granted, that's what you're sugg