Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Live questions

2014-09-19 Thread Dimitris Kontokostas
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Paul Wilton wrote: > Many thanks for the update Patrick. > > If I need to setup a new dbpedia Live instance, If I were to take the > DBpedia 2014 dump (from May), presumably I can then apply the changesets > from the date of that dump , then process your changes

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Live questions

2014-09-19 Thread Patrick van Kleef
All, > yep - but given Live is not Live anymore... you will need to baseline > changesets from somewhere once it comes back.. it seems DBpedia2014 dumps > would be a good place to start ? Actually the live.dbpedia.org/sparql or the dbpedia-live.openlinksw.com/sparql endpoints already serve n

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Live questions

2014-09-19 Thread Paul Wilton
Many thanks for the update Patrick. If I need to setup a new dbpedia Live instance, If I were to take the DBpedia 2014 dump (from May), presumably I can then apply the changesets from the date of that dump , then process your changesets when they are back up from August until now. Can you point

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Live questions

2014-09-18 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 9/18/14 7:17 AM, Paul Wilton wrote: yep - but given Live is not Live anymore... you will need to baseline changesets from somewhere once it comes back.. it seems DBpedia2014 dumps would be a good place to start ? or at least provide them ? As a consumer adopting DBpedia 2014, any applicati

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Live questions

2014-09-18 Thread Paul Wilton
yep - but given Live is not Live anymore... you will need to baseline changesets from somewhere once it comes back.. it seems DBpedia2014 dumps would be a good place to start ? or at least provide them ? As a consumer adopting DBpedia 2014, any applications built upon it (like we are doing at the

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Live questions

2014-09-18 Thread Dimitris Kontokostas
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Paul Wilton wrote: > OpenLink - do you have a timescale for the DBpedia Live fixes.. ? > > Ideally, I would like to be able to move to DBpedia 2014 now + the new > onotogy, and then apply changesets to this once Dbpedia LIve is back.. > you think this will be su

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Live questions

2014-09-18 Thread Paul Wilton
OpenLink - do you have a timescale for the DBpedia Live fixes.. ? Ideally, I would like to be able to move to DBpedia 2014 now + the new onotogy, and then apply changesets to this once Dbpedia LIve is back.. you think this will be supported ? (ie changesets diffed from the 2014 dbpedia dump) th

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Live questions

2014-09-15 Thread Dimitris Kontokostas
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Paul Wilton wrote: > Thanks Dimitris, > > Do you a timescale for when the Stalling issues will be fixed, > OpenLink can answer this one > and maybe a roadmap for the re-design you might be able to share ? > Is it possible to publish regular n-triples changesets

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Live questions

2014-09-12 Thread Paul Wilton
Thanks Dimitris, Do you a timescale for when the Stalling issues will be fixed,and maybe a roadmap for the re-design you might be able to share ? Is it possible to publish regular n-triples changesets to the DBpedia 2014 release ? thanks Paul On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Dimitris Kontokostas

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Live questions

2014-09-12 Thread Dimitris Kontokostas
Hi Paul, On Sep 12, 2014 5:31 PM, "Paul Wilton" wrote: > Hi > I have a couple of questions about DBpedia Live : > > 1. Is it still Live. Last changesets seem to be on August 18th, and there > was a big gap before that. Prior to this there were numerous changesets > per day ? > The database got

[Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Live questions

2014-09-12 Thread Paul Wilton
Hi I have a couple of questions about DBpedia Live : 1. Is it still Live. Last changesets seem to be on August 18th, and there was a big gap before that. Prior to this there were numerous changesets per day ? 2. What is the project status - is it still actively maintained - (am considering using