Rob Klingsten wrote:
Hi folks, I am over my head here with kernel panics...
I've got a shiny new system: Tyan S2865 (nforce 4 ultra), AMD Athlon x2
3800+, a single SATA-2 drive and 1gb of DDR400 RAM. The board and CPU
are brand new, the drive and RAM came from a desktop machine which I had
Rob Klingsten wrote:
Yes, I have the DIMMs in banks 1 and 2 out of 4 and I've removed and
reseated them; I have swapped out the SATA cable, there are no PCI or
PCI Express cards (system is headless.)
And it looks like it was just that easy; I pulled one DIMM and ran the
system on a single
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Daniel Tryba wrote:
If Ed in this thread is correct that the svm flag in /proc/cpuinfo
indicates Pacifica, then the Turion64 X2 TL-52 (1.6Ghz) has it (also
there is a flag in the bios on this machine).
Oh right. I forgot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
I want to buy a new system with an AMD64 X2, as I want to try
virtualization I need to know what kind of processor contains
the Pacifica (now AMD-V) set of instructions.
Does anybody have any information about that as the documents
I have found are not
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
I meant the whole shebang.
I don't mean to distribute it. More of a massive benchmark to compare
the gcc with the best commercial compiler and see what difference it
made to applications we use all the time.
It would be interesting to do this for both 32-bit
Giacomo Mulas wrote:
Two or three months, when I last compiled the latest version of the big
quantum chemistry code (NWChem) I use (which spends a lot of time doing
floating point linear algebra). The computer on which I tested is a
relatively old Athlon 64 3500+, your mileage may vary on
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:50:57AM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
I wouldn't throw away that Intel compiler just yet. For that matter, I'd
give serious consideration to switching to a Core 2 Duo and a copy of
Intel's tuning tools ... they are quite good
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
A Dijous 14 Juny 2007 15:21, Lennart Sorensen va escriure:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 04:40:52PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Hi folks, I just bought a pair of AMD64 systems for a work project,
and I'm confused about the performance I'm getting from them.
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 07:53:44AM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
sounds like a sane thing to do then is to run a amd64 kernel and build your
apps in 32 bit mode. They get the advantage of 32 over 64, but you get the
advantage of having lots more of them running in your 64
Giacomo Mulas wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
The last test I ran on my Athlon64 X2 4200+ (2.2 GHz) got me about 10
gigaflops in 32-bit arithmetic and about half of that in 64-bit
arithmetic.
I don't understand that. Are you saying that the 64-bits was really
Stephen Olander-Waters wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 16:08 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
really, reading you makes me doubt about the whole port. How many apps do we
have in the debian pool that can win some kind of performance?
Personally, I don't care. I went 64-bit for *FUN*,
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
A Dijous 14 Juny 2007 16:40, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky va escriure:
[...]
b. You want to develop 64-bit applications
why? you want to develop applications, that they run in a 32 or 64 system
it's
another thing. Maybe they run better or worst
Alexandru Cardaniuc wrote:
Hi All!
I've been using HP Pavilion zv5260 as a desktop replacement for a while
and now decided to get a real desktop. I am not sure if I should build a
new box myself or buy a pre-built one. I need a home workstation that is
going to be used primarily for writing and
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:24:11PM -0700, Alexandru Cardaniuc wrote:
Hi All!
I've been using HP Pavilion zv5260 as a desktop replacement for a while
and now decided to get a real desktop. I am not sure if I should build a
new box myself or buy a pre-built one. I need
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. I've been using the latest unstable with a Pentium III for quite a whille
now with no problems at all. I decided to upgrade my h/w to an Athlon 3800+
and I thought I could just install the disks from the old system to the new h/w
and work from there.
The new
Jack Malmostoso wrote:
I've gotten a
few traces in /var/log/messages, which I'll post to the appropriate
place as soon as I find out what the appropriate place is.
If it's kernel related, the LKML is the right place.
Yeah ... once I try a 32-bit kernel, that's where I'm going. Etch,
I just got a new box (Athlon 54 X2 4200+ on a Gigabyte Technology NVIDIA
GeForce 6100 Socket AM2 AMD ATX Motherboard). I'm getting miscellaneous
crashes on Etch. They usually occur during I/O intensive operations, and
at this point I have no reason to suspect the hardware. I've gotten a
few
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 04:25:06PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ed L. Cashin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
So if the Release file has a bad signature, who would be the one to
remove the signature? I wouldn't mind contacting that person.
Ganneff or aba on irc.
I contacted them
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 12:14:30PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ed L. Cashin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
I can get rid of the error that way, but I still am curious about why
there's a bad signature on the release file for the amd64 stable APT
repository.
But sarge users
.debian.net/debian-amd64/doc/debian-keyring.tar.gz
--
Ed L Cashin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 04:03:01PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:19:54PM -0400, Ed L. Cashin wrote:
Has there been any news about the amd64 BADSIG on the Release file at
amd64.debian.net?
If you are running etch, why are you still pointing a deb source at
amd64
not quite as pristine, desktop (eg. wine, open
office 2,
flash, many 32bit codecs all work with painless installs). I do miss apt-get.
Bottom line, old and/or broken installers cost users.
Thanks,
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
/perl5/Debconf/Db.pm line 7.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/debconf/frontend line 6.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/debconf/frontend line 6.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
suspect you have almost everything built into your kernel. Here my 2.6
kernel is about 1.6m (vs your 7.2m).
I don't understand this. Am I doing something wrong? or is lilo wrong?
Can anyone tell me the correct way to compile a kernel if I have been
doing it wrong.
Luck
Ed Tomlinson
the issue by doing a 'modprobe mousedev' which
causes
the input dir to be created and lets X start without errors.
Luck,
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dependencies _will_ change.
Have you tried the video4linux module? If it works with your ivtv stuff
its probably your best bet.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 10 November 2005 07:25, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Hi,
2.6.14.2 should be out this weekend. The .1 fixes a security issue,
.2 fixes bind (0 sized icmp packets) and several other bugs.
Might be worth waiting. It also is worth trying to boot with apci disabled.
Ed Tomlinson
Hi,
2.6.14.2 should be out this weekend. The .1 fixes a security issue,
.2 fixes bind (0 sized icmp packets) and several other bugs.
Might be worth waiting. It also is worth trying to boot with apci disabled.
Ed Tomlinson
On Thursday 10 November 2005 06:50, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
Hello
On Monday 31 October 2005 15:58, Marcin Dębicki wrote:
Hamish Moffatt kiedys napisal:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:22:31AM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On Monday 31 October 2005 05:28, Dalibor Topic wrote:
The packagers used a specific free runtime to make the eclipse package
build
problem is - it make take a bit to understand
what strace is telling you.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 02 October 2005 10:44, Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] wrote:
2005/10/2, Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi
Is there a problem or is it just me?
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://amd64.debian.net sid/main
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/amd64
: The following signatures
couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY
E415B2B4B5F5BBED
I would be nice to have aptitude install without complaining about keys...
TIA
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 03:11, Marko Kaiser wrote:
Hello,
get dists/sid/Release.gpg and add that key via apt-key add.
Bye,
Marko
grover:/home/ed# apt-key add marillat_Release.gpg
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
grover:/home/ed# cat marillat_Release.gpg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
away in the Doc/feature-removal-schedule.txt file
in the kernel source.
Debain has just been slow to adapt.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status 2
I've reinstalled 2.69 and held the package. For some reason aptitude, without
any messages why, ignores
my instructions to hold the pack and keeps trying 2.70 (probably something
requires 2.70 - when/if aptitude
overides my instructions it SHOULD tell me why!)
Ideas
Ed Tomlinson
Forget this.
I did a second update/upgrade cycle (about 5 minutes after the first)
and 2.71 was found - it fixes this problem.
Thanks
Ed
On Friday 19 August 2005 18:13, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Hi,
Got back from vacation. Updating gets the following:
Setting up base-config (2.70) ...
/var
them has no effect
on the problem.
Ideas?
TIA,
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 21:13, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Hi,
With Xorg I get:
(==) RADEON(0): Write-combining range (0xd000,0x800)
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result
Hi,
Dual core support is not distro specific. It depends on the kernel used.
I believe that debian, with a recent (2.6.12.3+) kernel should be fine.
Ed Tomlinson
On Monday 18 July 2005 01:36, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Dear People,
My bioinformatics research group at Duke is buying a server
with the new package arch?
TIA,
Ed Tomlinson
On Monday 18 July 2005 09:03, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 17 July 2005 13:28, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Package fetching is done by reprepro and turning it more verbose gives
some more messages but not a download progress for files
Yes rebooting isn't good! Do the kernel upgrade and you won't have any worries. That is if you don't have heaps of myth/dvb patches to apply :)
Regards
Ed.
On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 16:21 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 04:13:36PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sat, Jul
On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 12:28 +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
On 16/07/2005 Ed wrote:
Yes rebooting isn't good! Do the kernel upgrade and you won't have any worries.
That is if you don't have heaps of myth/dvb patches to apply :)
you have to patch your kernel for mythtv? which patches do you
I can't imagine how it's a good idea to upload a package which depends
on a kernel not available for Debian yet.
Packages should not depend on any kernel, since many people run their
own. However, I just don't understand why the package has been published
at all, since even in
source onto the system and recompiling.
Anyway the moral to the story is:
Don't install this package unless you have upgraded your kernel
Regards
Ed.
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 05:59, v0n0 wrote:
Since yesterday night, X.org 6.8.2 is in Debian unstable. Be aware if
you dist-upgrade you will get X.org installed over Xfree.
Is this bad? If so what has to be done to upgrade to X.org safely?
TIA
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 07:56 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am using Galeon Firefox in the 32bit chroot environment. I would like to
be able to click on a mailto: link and bring up evolution which is in the
standard 64 bit location. Is this easily
I am using Galeon Firefox in the 32bit chroot environment. I would like to be able to click on a mailto: link and bring up evolution which is in the standard 64 bit location. Is this easily possible?
Regards
Ed.
I am using the FX5700 LE on an AMD3000+ I get 2430fps using the latest driver: 7667.
(Manually Installed)
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 18:20 +, Sven Krahn wrote:
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
My FX5200 on an Athlon XP 2800+ machine gets 610fps on default glxgears.
An FX5200 is no speedy card
thing I had to do was to download
the sound driver from nvidia's site (possibly another way to get sound
working...but this worked).
No problems here - The kernels alsa drivers support the sound card too.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
Hi folks,
I've been experiencing a problem with mysql-server-4.1 on two
different amd64 machines, running two different versions of the package.
The errors in the log are similar to http://lists.debian.org/debian-
amd64/2005/03/msg00481.html -- but I don't know if the source of the
82, in open
mod = __import__(result)
File /usr/lib/python2.3/dbhash.py, line 5, in ?
import bsddb
File /usr/lib/python2.3/bsddb/__init__.py, line 40, in ?
import _bsddb
ImportError: No module named _bsddb
TIA,
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi
I also use 1.5.0_03 / 2.3.0.2 with very good results. I found that the default
setup enables UPnP by default. Here I have to turn if off or azureus
stalls ( use tools / options / Plugins / UPnP and unclick and apply).
Luck
Ed
On Sunday 12 June 2005 14:30, Rupert Heesom wrote:
I've
Knoppix meets the requirements. Beware XFS with NFS and/or Samba. I have
recently moved all my clients systems off XFS.
Ed.
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:11 +0200, Thomas Steffen wrote:
Hi,
it seems I have to repair my XFS filesystem manually (recovery fails).
Can anyone recommend a rescue CD
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:23:44PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
This installation report has not yet had a reply. As most of the issues
seem amd64 kernel related, could someone from the AMD64 team please
answer this report?
Athlon XP = k7 = i386. Athlon 64 = k8 =
On Friday 13 May 2005 23:21, Bob Proulx wrote:
Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Looks like the bind9-host package is sticky...
Or has two different sources.
grover:/home/ed# aptitude update
...
grover:/home/ed# aptitude upgrade
...
The following packages will be upgraded:
bind9-host
Hi,
Try disabling micro PnP suport. Think you have about a minute to get to the
options, turn off the pluging, save and exit.
Ed
On Saturday 14 May 2005 06:41, Gerhard Gauling wrote:
Package: azureus
Version: 2.3.0.0-2
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line
Hi
Looks like the bind9-host package is sticky...
grover:/home/ed# aptitude update
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
Hit http://amd64.debian.net sid/main Packages
Get:1
On Friday 13 May 2005 18:35, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:12:55PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Notice that it still thinks bind9-host needs to be installed. How do I
find out why? Alternately, how
do I fix it?
grover:/home/ed# apt-get clean
grover:/home/ed# apt
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 1:59am, mtms wrote:
On 11 May 2005, 00:40, Ed Cogburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because its already been done. mtms announced earlier that he's keeping
a mirror of our old non-free. And he's not going to get sued by anyone
either.
Wait a mo! Not me
On Sunday 08 May 2005 5:22am, mtms wrote:
Who needs nvidia-glx or other non-free packages can (still) find them
adding these lines to sources.list:
### non-free
deb http://bytekeeper.as28747.net/debian-amd64-alioth-old/pure64/ sarge
non-free deb
On Sunday 08 May 2005 9:27am, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10283 March 1977, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Whats going on == someone needs to check it. Thats it.
That was the point made by Ed Cogburn. Its already been checked in the
other arch! If this is not the case please explain why. Without
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 11:19am, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ed Cogburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 08 May 2005 9:27am, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
In fact, looking through the non-free docs section, most of that can go
in right now because they don't require anyone's permission
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 12:44pm, Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
I don't know why some of you are making all that noise... if I have
understood correctly, non-free will be made available after sarge release
(which is supposed to happen within 3 or 4 weeks)... so... why bother the
developers instead of
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 1:33pm, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:12:22PM -0400, Ed Cogburn wrote:
Just trying to be helpful and point out to those developers that's there
no reason to hold back non-free at all. There isn't a problem, except
the one they are conjuring up
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 2:09pm, Alexander Rapp wrote:
Ed Cogburn wrote:
If you had read my response to Goswin, you would know we aren't talking
about release dates for anything, I'm talking about Sid, which will
eventually become Etch, but obviously will exist for a long time before
Etch
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 3:22pm, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10285 March 1977, Ed Cogburn wrote:
Will you pay us for the work and cover legal fees if any should arise?
Sure. Because any rational person knows it won't happen.
Laywers arent rationale.
Give us one reasonable example of why
On Sunday 08 May 2005 4:23pm, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 08 May 2005 09:27, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10283 March 1977, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Whats going on == someone needs to check it. Thats it.
That was the point made by Ed Cogburn
On Friday 06 May 2005 6:22am, Alexander Fieroch wrote:
(II) LoadModule: v4l2
(WW) Warning, couldn't open module v4l2
(II) UnloadModule: v4l2
(EE) Failed to load module v4l2 (module does not exist, 0)
I'm guessing this is for video for linux (v4l), right?Don't know anything
about v4l, but
On Sunday 08 May 2005 05:02, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10283 March 1977, Ed Cogburn wrote:
Note: non-free is NOT provided yet. We need to decide what we do with
it, as we may be forbidden to distribute some of the software in it (we
aren't Debian).
Wait a second, if you *aren't* Debian
On Sunday 08 May 2005 09:27, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10283 March 1977, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Whats going on == someone needs to check it. Thats it.
That was the point made by Ed Cogburn. Its already been checked in the
other
arch! If this is not the case please explain why. Without
Hi,
Where would I find source for the experimental glade 2.5 stuff that I can built
for amd64?
Second whats the process to build the binary package (or point me to an faq).
TIA
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 6:23pm, Alexander Fieroch wrote:
Hello,
I've tried again the 64bit version of debian (kernel
2.6.11-9-em64t-p4-smp) but failed again with building the nvidia driver.
There is a link /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGL.so.1 to the existing
library libGL.so.1.0.7174, so why
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 11:08pm, Alexander Fieroch wrote:
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 05:41:20PM +0200, Alexander Fieroch wrote:
x.org just adds more complexity and is yet another unknown. If
nvidia-kernel-source is installed and built against your current
kernel's
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 5:34am, Clive Menzies wrote:
Debian and Ubuntu appear to have a symbiotic relationship, at least
well kinda
I regard them as complementary rather than competing offerings. Many of
the live CDs and desktop distros are debian based and not only expand
user
.
Cheers,
Ed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 4:30am, A E Lawrence wrote:
Jacob Larsen wrote:
Alexander Fieroch wrote:
So whats the problem with the proprietary nvidia driver? The module can
be loaded with modprobe and lsmod shows me that it is loaded, but xorg
says (EE) Failed to load module nvidia (module does
On 4/9/05, Thomas Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, I agree with the proposal on
http://www.linuxbase.org/futures/ideas/multiarch/, but I think it is
missing a crucial step: /bin also needs to be separated.
The difference between stuff in /bin and /lib is that the names of
On Monday 18 April 2005 10:44am, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:07:55AM -0400, Ed Cogburn wrote:
And if Ubuntu takes hold Debian may *never* become a good choice for the
desktop, that is what I fear, and that would mean abandoning Debian. :(
There are many people
On Monday 18 April 2005 4:54pm, Niklas Ögren wrote:
What do you mean by core archives server? Isn't that what
(us.)debian.org is, and what I'm referring to? Despite whatever the ping
times are with debian.org (when I was using i386 I was using a faster
mirror too), it doesn't have pauses
On Monday 18 April 2005 6:31pm, Christopher Browne wrote:
On 4/18/05, Ed Cogburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I full agree here: Ubuntu is more attractive to the average end user.
But I do not understand why everybody is so upset about this. After
all, there is no one size fits all
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 10:33am, Marcin Dbicki wrote:
I've just installed Sarge. I want to upgrade it to Sid (previously I did
all deb upgrades for Sarge). I am replacing sources.list entries, apt-get
update and then apt-gate dist-upgrade. Nothing happens. It seems like Sarge
and Sid have the
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 11:08am, Olleg Samoylov wrote:
Package: ia32-libs-openoffice.org
Version: 1.0.1
Severity: serious
Conflict witn ia32-libs:
incorrect. Must I rewrite bug report to maintainer of ia32-libs or you
will fix this?
I won't. As I said I once made a unofficial package
On Monday 18 April 2005 4:35am, Thomas Steffen wrote:
On 4/18/05, Ed Cogburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alioth doesn't perform as well as us.debian.org for me for some reason,
Neither does the core archives server, but that is what mirrors are for :-)
What do you mean by core archives server
On Monday 18 April 2005 9:39am, Max wrote:
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Sure, the libs should work fine, but who owns the conflicting files now?
the oo libs or the ia32 libs package or both or neither?
Who cares? As soon as you know what and where might be a problem, it is
I think Lennart is
On Monday 04 April 2005 3:16pm, Javier Kohen wrote:
Hi,
I've been using the /gcc-3.4 archive from Alioth. Is there any
difference among that one, debian-gcc-3.4 and debian-pure64-3.4? I mean
a user-noticeable difference, I've read archive-structure and I think I
understand, but gcc-3.4 isn't
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 4:38pm, John Goerzen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 01:18:34PM -0800, Ryan Lovett wrote:
Now that debian-amd64 is successful enough that newbies have managed to
get it working, could the list be split into something like -user and
-devel? I'm more interested in the
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 7:32pm, Theodore Kisner wrote:
I have appended the message below.
Thanks Theodore.
3. The documentation should clearly state that the 'pure64' archive
is the 'official' one for the amd64 port which will be
integrated into the Debian archive after sarge is
On Thursday 24 March 2005 7:16am, Oliver Korpilla wrote:
I hate this $%?!@ board!!! (I've overlooked the fact that ATI made not
only the onboard graphics but the chipset as well!) Nothing works as
intended...
If MSI or ATI would be so kind to give me some documentation so I could fix
this
On Thursday 24 March 2005 8:07am, Alexander Rapp wrote:
In my experience, if you don't have a complete chroot in
/emul/ia32-linux/, you can, after installing ia32-libs, just getting the
necessary i386 debs for whatever other libraries you need and run sudo
dpkg -x foo.deb /emul/ia32-linux/
On Monday 14 March 2005 5:05pm, Taketoshi Sano wrote:
Hi.
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just plain lseek will do. With _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 that is all you
need. I don't see the point of using the lseek64 alias.
I don't know much about that. My experience told me
that
but in
64 bit playback is lagguy and blocky, it's totaly unuseable.
I don't know if it's a problem with libdv or kino itself.
I've also noticed that when encoding it fails to use sse and so is much slower
than 32bit.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
. It works flawlessly under 2.6.10
Regards
Ed.
Velocity is AUTO mode
eth0: Link autonegation speed 100M bps full duplex
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 21:54 -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
Joshua Moore wrote:
FYI, I've heard several people have been having trouble getting the
onboard ethernet on the Abit
a bunch of warnings an errors.
Googling a bit shows that there are some ongoing attempts at fixing
gcc-4.0 miscompilations of the kernel, but I'd like to hear what you're
experience on AMD64 was. I'm still using 2.6.10.
It *can* be done:
11:20am ed (pts/2) :~ cat /proc/version
Linux version
Hi,
Thought the advice was to use aptitude because it will remove unused
packages... Well
it seems to think xfs is unused, guess that ps is must be wrong... Me thinks
I'll revert to
apt-get - aptitude seems very broken.
Anyone else see this sort of error on pure64?
Ed
grover:/usr/bin
On Saturday 05 March 2005 17:31, Mike Reinehr wrote:
Ed,
There are times that I certainly wondered what the h___ was going on!
The first thing that comes to mind is that xfs was installed automatically to
satisfy a dependency of some other program, which subsequently has been
removed
I can run and use K3B with no problem. I am using the ide-cd module not
scsi emulation. Version:
k3b 0.11.20-1
HTH
Regards
Ed
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 20:20 +, Dr Gavin Seddon wrote:
Hi
I have a dvd writer on this new amd so I need software to run it.
However K3B
Just thought I post the result of some problems with MythTV to the
list.
It appears that there are still some problems with AMD64 the libc library?
Ed.
Hi Kyle. I forwarded on your patch to a guy on the Debian AMD64 List.
It
fixed his problem.
There is a bug in the pthread_rwlock code
I am struggling against a fairly unstable Mythtv.
Is anyone using the debian mythtv packages (Compiled using the source
version) on pure64 ?
I have been going at it for
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
