Hello all,
I have some questions, which appeared during the last weeks, maybe there is a
short answer possible.
1. I am using reportbug, but I never get a response on my mail addresse.
Although it seems, some reports are not send to the bugreport. What should I
check ?
2. Same thematics
Hi,
I recently bought a new hard drive. I alread have another big hard
drive for files so altogether they have 450 GB. I decided to set up
LVM on my system to make it easy to access both together and be able
to add more space in the future, but I am a bit wary because I know
little about LVM. Thi
Hi all,
I have a slight question:
Some times ago I needed chroot to get OpenOffice running. I still have some
32-Bit applications on my amd64-system. My question:
Is 32-bit chroot still needed ? I heard about some changes in the past, which
mentioneed, that compatibality-libs in amd64 shall ma
Hey guys,
We have purchased a 65 node cluster of Opterons last
December and I have been following the development of the port off and on since
then. I think that the port may be mature enough to put on our production environment
just because I think that our biology applications could be
Hello list,
I have an AMD64 dual-core cpu running debian-amd64. Now I have heard, that it
might be possible, to run applications on different cpus. One app is running
on cpu1 , the other on cpu2 at the same time. Or just using only one of the
two cpu-cores. Is that right ???
(I know, that in M
Hi all,
I am trying to understand, how "hal" is working. When I mount a device (in my
case it is an sd-card with ext2-filesystem) in KDE, I cannot copy files on
it. This is because of the wrong setting of the rights: they are all set
to "root".
I heard of hal using pmount somewhow ? Is this c
Craig Hagerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I recently bought a new hard drive. I alread have another big hard
> drive for files so altogether they have 450 GB. I decided to set up
> LVM on my system to make it easy to access both together and be able
> to add more space in the future, b
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 23:29 -0700, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> We have purchased a 65 node cluster of Opterons last December and I
> have been following the development of the port off and on since then.
> I think that the port may be mature enough to put on our production
> environmen
On Sat, 2004-12-04 23:29:48 -0700, Robert LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> First, a program needs to be specifically written for 64 bits? Or by
> just recompiling using 64-bit libs usually good enough?
A program needs to be *cleanly* written to compile on a 64 bi
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 14:37 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-12-04 23:29:48 -0700, Robert LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > First, a program needs to be specifically written for 64 bits? Or by
> > just recompiling using 64-bit libs usually good en
Robert LeBlanc wrote:
Hey guys,
We have purchased a 65 node cluster of Opterons last December and I
have been following the development of the port off and on since then.
I think that the port may be mature enough to put on our production
environment just because I think that our biology appli
Hi,
I am new user and want to install a debian linux version on my machine, that has following specifications.
1. CPU: AMD Athon 64 64 processor 3400+
2. NIC: Marvell Yukon Gigabit Ethernet 10/10/1000Base-T Adapter
3. VIdeo card: NVIDIA GeForc FX5200
4. Memory1.5 GB
and so on.
I am wonderi
On (13/02/05 11:43), Henry Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am new user and want to install a debian linux version on my
> machine, that has following specifications.
>
> 1. CPU: AMD Athon 64 64 processor 3400+
> 2. NIC: Marvell Yukon Gigabit Ethernet 10/10/1000Base-T Adapter
> 3. VIdeo card: NVIDIA GeF
Hello list,
since a real long time, two months or so, aptitude always wants to upgrade the
package
libselinux from version 1.30-1 to version 1.30-1
This is not bad, I think but anoying. Has someone an idea.
And another package is a bit strange. The new googleearth-package package. I
installed i
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 05:08:49PM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> I have an AMD64 dual-core cpu running debian-amd64. Now I have heard, that it
> might be possible, to run applications on different cpus. One app is running
> on cpu1 , the other on cpu2 at the same time. Or just using only one of
* Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-23 11:45:11 -0400]:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 05:08:49PM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> > I have an AMD64 dual-core cpu running debian-amd64. Now I have heard, that
> > it
> > might be possible, to run applications on different cpus. One app is
>
Lennart,
> probably don't have any good reason to. The scheduler does a great job
Do you know if the kernel tries to balance load really equally ?
For my 2core AMD64 it seems cpu0 has to be about >70% before cpu1 gets
involved.
Another idea is, i always see cpu0 is the most busy one. But would
I would like to know that also, my cpu0 is always under some load, and
the cpu1 usually just sit tight... when I am not running some
simulation.
2007/8/23, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Lennart,
>
> > probably don't have any good reason to. The scheduler does a great job
>
> Do you know if the k
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 01:04:16AM +0200, Michael wrote:
> Do you know if the kernel tries to balance load really equally ?
> For my 2core AMD64 it seems cpu0 has to be about >70% before cpu1 gets
> involved.
> Another idea is, i always see cpu0 is the most busy one. But wouldn't
> switching the
On 08/24/07 01:04:16AM +0200, Michael wrote:
> Lennart,
>
> > probably don't have any good reason to. The scheduler does a great job
>
> Do you know if the kernel tries to balance load really equally ?
> For my 2core AMD64 it seems cpu0 has to be about >70% before cpu1 gets
> involved.
> Anoth
* Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-24 09:27:34 -0400]:
> In fact if you have three processes to run and in total they need 90% of
> one cpu, then it is better to run it all on one cpu and let the other
> one go to power saving mode rather than running half the load on each.
> That doe
Thanks Lennart, thanks Jim, for the good points.
I think i can accept the matter of facts ;)
It's generally a great fun to read your postings.
Just let me say thx here for sharing your insight.
That should apply to all those real freaks on this list.
kr micha
ps. I imagine quadcore (and beyo
On 08/25/07 01:22:50PM +0200, Michael wrote:
>
> Thanks Lennart, thanks Jim, for the good points.
> I think i can accept the matter of facts ;)
>
> It's generally a great fun to read your postings.
> Just let me say thx here for sharing your insight.
> That should apply to all those real freaks
Just to avoid confusion...cpuset seems to be the kernel thing, and taskset is
the related userspace tool ?
> What is an 'optical imbalance'?
If one pane of the load-monitor is green and the other is black ;)
It looks like it's not 'balanced' but you really clarified that issue now.
--
To UNS
On 08/26/07 11:26:27PM +0200, Michael wrote:
>
> Just to avoid confusion...cpuset seems to be the kernel thing, and taskset is
> the related userspace tool ?
>
Yes taskset is the userland tool for setting CPU affinity but it's only
for setting CPU affinity while cpusets also restrict the nodes
Just FYI - a nice one is
$ taskset 01 yes | sha1sum
versus
$ taskset 03 yes | sha1sum
to see a dualcore's different affinities in a load monitor.
(Regards to Bob Prolux)
m°
Hans,
HAL does not depend on pmount, but pmount depends on libhal-storage.
KDE kio-plugins use pmount, while Gnome use gnome-volume-manager and gnome-vfs.
pmount installs an additional warpper pmount-hal.
According to the pmount manpage, you need users in the group 'plugdev'
(debian.)
But HAL
Hi.
First of all. Until now (I've just switched from i386 to a amd64 Debian)
I've always used the vanilla files from nvidia.com (and their installer).
The problem of course is that this passes the package systems,
overwrites Xlibs etc. etc.
So I'd like to use the Debian way now :-)
However, I m
> Currently, apps like mplayer and OpenSSL run much
faster on x86-32
> because such core routines are in hand-coded assembler.
> For most other things, though, GCC 3.4 uses the extra 8
registers
> to good effect.
I think that is where we will see most of our improvements
is in
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 11:01 -0700, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> > Currently, apps like mplayer and OpenSSL run much faster on x86-32
> > because such core routines are in hand-coded assembler.
>
> > For most other things, though, GCC 3.4 uses the extra 8 registers
> > to good effect.
>
> I think that
I am new user and trying to install Debian AMD64
through "Sid -AMD64-netinst" CD on my machine that has
following specifications.
1. CPU: AMD64 3400+
2. Marvel Yukon Gigabit Ethernet 10/100/1000Base-T
Adapter
3. Video card: GeForce FX5200
Currently I installed a new kernel 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8
and al
Wolfgang Mader wrote:
Hello list,
since a real long time, two months or so, aptitude always wants to upgrade the
package
libselinux from version 1.30-1 to version 1.30-1
This is not bad, I think but anoying. Has someone an idea.
And another package is a bit strange. The new googleearth-packag
> My german is not that good, but I think that, for googleearth, the
> installer is looking for xserver or something similar, and it does not
> fing it because you are running ./googleearthbin from root. Try it
> as a normal user, should work
> Thierry
I tried as user and as root with exported
Am Mittwoch, 19. Juli 2006 20:05 schrieb Wolfgang Mader:
> > My german is not that good, but I think that, for googleearth, the
> > installer is looking for xserver or something similar, and it does not
> > fing it because you are running ./googleearthbin from root. Try it
> > as a normal user,
Wolfgang Mader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello list,
>
> since a real long time, two months or so, aptitude always wants to upgrade
> the
> package
> libselinux from version 1.30-1 to version 1.30-1
> This is not bad, I think but anoying. Has someone an idea.
Run aptitude clean and remove s
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 04:49:16PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hi.
>
> First of all. Until now (I've just switched from i386 to a amd64 Debian)
> I've always used the vanilla files from nvidia.com (and their installer).
>
> The problem of course is that this passes the package system
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 16:49 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> 1) I'm using my own kernel created with make-kpkg.
> With my old i386 system I've always used the vanilla sources but now
> I'll give the debian sources a try.
> So I've installed linux-tree-something.
>
> First of all is there
Hello all,
I saw lots of patches in /usr/src/kernel-patches. How do I have to understand
this ?
- Are the original debian-kernel-sourcen already patched or do I have to patch
a kernel myself ?
- Is this syntax correct (i.e. debianlogo):
"make-kpkg --append-to-version -1-amd64-k8 --added_patc
Hi Goswin,
I installed as suggested your new package amd64-archive_0.2_amd64.deb.
Question:
Are the packages debian-keyring and reprero needed ?
I read somwhrere, debian-keyring should no be used.
Question:
In sources.list i added this entry:
# Goswins
# deb http://amd64.debian.net/~goswi
Hello all,
I managed today to get Debian installed on my desktop pc.
Said pc is an ABIT KN9-SLI board with an AMD 64x2 AM2 cpu.
I upgraded to Sid, and then went on to compile a custom kernel. I think I got
nearly everything right, but there are some things that I find very strange,
and would
Dear Folks,
I tried using wine after a long time. I installed it using synaptic and
nosed around to see what had happened. I am running squeeze amd64 on a
newish amd64 novatech box.
I noticed that under the system tools menu window a wine configuration icon
appeared. I clicked on it and I got
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 03:35:07PM +0100, Hans wrote:
> I saw lots of patches in /usr/src/kernel-patches. How do I have to understand
> this ?
>
> - Are the original debian-kernel-sourcen already patched or do I have to
> patch
> a kernel myself ?
As far as I can tell, debian kernel-source/li
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 11:01 -0700, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
I guess I would have to
run tests to see. Another problem is that these programs can be memory
hogs and the nodes only have 512 MB of RAM which is another concern.
Lack of sufficient RAM seems like a much bigger issue than
questions as I have some problems
configuring the WIFI:
1) have installed this package as I have an AMD64
* kernel-image-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8
is it a 32 bit package or 64bits?
Anything special to this kernel ?
Am I better of using a really x386 package for now?
2) I need to use the
Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Goswin,
>
> I installed as suggested your new package amd64-archive_0.2_amd64.deb.
>
> Question:
>
> Are the packages debian-keyring and reprero needed ?
>
> I read somwhrere, debian-keyring should no be used.
I need the ftpmaster 2005 archive key from
/usr/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> Wolfgang Mader wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> since a real long time, two months or so, aptitude always wants to
>> upgrade the package
>> libselinux from version 1.30-1 to version 1.30-1
>> This is not bad, I think but anoying.
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:40:04 +0200, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> Any pointers are most welcome!
The first question is: why do you compile your own kernel? Isn't the
Debian one enough? Does everything work OK with the Debian kernel?
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux o
On Sunday 27 August 2006 20:48, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:40:04 +0200, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> > Any pointers are most welcome!
>
> The first question is: why do you compile your own kernel? Isn't the
> Debian one enough?
I tend to follow-up a bit more quickly with new kernel
Jan De Luyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 27 August 2006 20:48, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:40:04 +0200, Jan De Luyck wrote:
>> > Any pointers are most welcome!
>>
>> The first question is: why do you compile your own kernel? Isn't the
>> Debian one enough?
>
> I t
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
For amd64 there is no benefit in optimization for the specific cpu
since there aren't any more different models than amd64 and em46t
anyway. So the "only" benefit you get from a custom kernel is possibly
no initrd (that's why I use my own kernel)
I have had the most luck with the PlayOnLinux wrapper for Wine. It
allows for running multiple Wine versions as some version seem to
work better for some programs. It also handles the installation of
those extra binary versions. It has a list of supported apps to
ease
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Robert Goley wrote:
> I have had the most luck with the PlayOnLinux wrapper for Wine. It
> allows for running multiple Wine versions as some version seem to work
> better for some programs. It also handles the installation of those extra
> binary versions. It
Hi Michael
Wine is constantly rolling forward, with releases monthly and more. The
do differentiate between 'stable' and 'development' releases - though in
almost every case the 'development' release is what people are running.
Unfortunately debian tends to stick with the 'stable' release, which i
29.12.2011 18:43, Michael Fothergill пишет:
Dear Folks,
I tried using wine after a long time. I installed it using synaptic
and nosed around to see what had happened. I am running squeeze amd64
on a newish amd64 novatech box.
I noticed that under the system tools menu window a wine configu
Hello Manu,
El lun, 21-03-2005 a las 10:03 -0800, Manu escribiÃ:
> 1) have installed this package as I have an AMD64
> * kernel-image-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8
>
> is it a 32 bit package or 64bits?
> Anything special to this kernel ?
As far as I know it's a 64-bit kernel with IA32 emulation. In o
Hi Javier
>
> As far as I know it's a 64-bit kernel with IA32
> emulation. In other
> words, the kernel is 64-bit, but it supports a
> 32-bit user-land.
Ah , that explains all the problem I had... I am not
ready to fully move to 64 bits as not all the packages
are working.. I need to run openo
Hi Manu,
El lun, 21-03-2005 a las 10:31 -0800, Manu escribiÃ:
> Hi Javier
>
> >
> > As far as I know it's a 64-bit kernel with IA32
> > emulation. In other
> > words, the kernel is 64-bit, but it supports a
> > 32-bit user-land.
>
> Ah , that
... partially...
> explains all the problem I ha
Dear AMD folks,
I use the i386 versions of Sarge 3.1r3 and lately Etch RC1.
I thought to buy myself an AMD 64 bit machine.
I want to get a box that can have e.g. 10GB of RAM added to it.
I noticed that some opteron machines exist on the internet with 10GB of RAM
on them.
Someone said that y
Thanks for the reply and explanation. I understand better now. Are you
sure that Debian takes care of mounting the new LVM share on boot? It
didn't work for me. From what I have read online you have to create
your own startup script.
I had LVM set up successfully on my new HD, copied all the data
Craig Hagerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> WARNING: Re-reading the partition table failed with error 16: Device
> or resource busy.
> The kernel still uses the old table.
> The new table will be used at the next reboot.
> Syncing disks.
This just means what is says. The disk is in use and the
> Debian will activate the VG but it will not mount the LVs automatically.
> You still have to add them to /etc/fstab.
If you're using root-on-lvm you may also need to regenerate your initrd before
rebooting.
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On 10/20/05, Matthias Julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This just means what is says. The disk is in use and the kernel can
> not reread the partition table. You have to reboot to do that.
Unfortunately I did reboot before I noticed the typo. After the reboot
neither disc can be seen.
> Ac
Craig Hagerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But sdb1 had ALREADY been set up. Actually I had formatted it with
> ext3, then followed the howto (pvcreate, vgcreate, lvcreate, mount) to
> set up LVM and then copied all my old data over. So I then set the
> partition type to LVM on a disc that alrea
On 10/20/05, Matthias Julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LVM does not find sda2. What does pvdisplay /dev/sda2 say?
% pvdisplay /dev/sda2
No physical volume label read from /dev/sda2
Failed to read physical volume "/dev/sda2"
I guess LVM only scans devices that have its type set to LVM. So i
Craig Hagerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/20/05, Matthias Julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>LVM does not find sda2. What does pvdisplay /dev/sda2
> say?
>
>
> % pvdisplay /dev/sda2
> No physical volume label read from /dev/sda2
> Failed to read physical volu
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 03:54:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Mounting totaly ignores the partition type anyway. So that did
> nothing. But running pvcreate will have overwritten some data.
Well if pvcreate was run, and that is all, perhaps looking at the lvm
backup data in /etc can tell
On 10/20/05, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mounting totaly ignores the partition type anyway. So that did
> nothing. But running pvcreate will have overwritten some data.
>
> Try mounting with an alternate superblock and mount read-only and save
> whatever you can.
>
What does
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 03:54:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Mounting totaly ignores the partition type anyway. So that did
>> nothing. But running pvcreate will have overwritten some data.
>
> Well if pvcreate was run, and that is all, pe
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:35:22PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> If I read that very confusing mail right then he did run pvcreate on
> an ext3 filesystem. So the first superblock is probably wiped.
Oh on a disk he already had data on and didn't want to use for lvm?
Yeah taht would be bad.
Craig Hagerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/20/05, Matthias Julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> LVM does not find sda2. What does pvdisplay /dev/sda2 say?
>
> % pvdisplay /dev/sda2
> No physical volume label read from /dev/sda2
> Failed to read physical volume "/dev/sda2"
>
> I guess
Now using
deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian/ sid main contrib
An upgrade wants to remove base-files and bash. Digging deeper, I see
base-files is being removed because:
base-files pre-depends on libc6 (< 2.3.2.dsl-20.0.1)
I saw some traffic on the list that looked similar. But I don't
understa
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:00:09 +0100, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> But there is an old opteron 940 pin board that is going out of fashion
> and a new AM2 940 pin board coming in
>
> Can both of these let you add a wad of RAM to them?
Yes. I'd go for the AM2 though.
> How hard is it to instal
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 11:51:57AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> Dear AMD folks,
>
> I thought to buy myself an AMD 64 bit machine.
>
> I want to get a box that can have e.g. 10GB of RAM added to it. I
> noticed that some opteron machines exist on the internet with 10GB of
> RAM on them. S
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 11:51:57AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> I use the i386 versions of Sarge 3.1r3 and lately Etch RC1.
>
> I thought to buy myself an AMD 64 bit machine.
>
> I want to get a box that can have e.g. 10GB of RAM added to it.
>
> I noticed that some opteron machines exist
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen)
To: Michael Fothergill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: a few simple questions about AMD64 version of Debian
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:49:14 -0500
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 11:51:57AM +, Michael Fothergill
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 05:27:42PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> Thanks, but suppose that I don't have enough money to buy the Core 2 Duo
> barebones box at ?350 ($700) but I can afford an AMD Sempron 3000 box at
> ?139 ($280). Would you prefer the AMD Sempron over a similarly priced
> Int
On Sunday 17 December 2006 03:51 am, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> I thought to buy myself an AMD 64 bit machine.
> I want to get a box that can have e.g. 10GB of RAM added to it.
> I noticed that some opteron machines exist on the internet with 10GB of
> RAM on them.
Depending on the motherboard ch
On Monday 18 December 2006 08:49 am, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 11:51:57AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> Well most modern motherboards for Athlon64 and Core 2 Duo can take 4
> DIMMs, of up to 2GB each (if you can find them and afford them). So
> that is 8GB ram.
>
> Opt
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:16:56AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
> For laptops and desktops, you really can't beat the Core architecture (for
> which Intel has stupidly named the CPUs Core2). In single-core and
> dual-core setups, these are the best CPUs around.
>
> For servers, though, I still pr
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:52:13AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
> Depending on the motherboard chipset, AMD64-based systems can have up to
> 64 GB of RAM (that's the highest I've seen so far, in theory it can
> address a lot more than that). This is highly chipset-dependent, though,
> and you'll
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:36:17PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 05:27:42PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > Thanks, but suppose that I don't have enough money to buy the Core 2 Duo
> > barebones box at ?350 ($700) but I can afford an AMD Sempron 3000 box at
> > ?13
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 01:50:01PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:52:13AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
> > Depending on the motherboard chipset, AMD64-based systems can have up to
> > 64 GB of RAM (that's the highest I've seen so far, in theory it can
> > address a lot
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 08:47:33PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> Does this mean that when 4 GB sticks come out I can have 16 GB on my
> Athlon 3800+?
Well every board I have seen so far says that you can only use up to 2GB
sticks, so I would say the answer is probably no. I don't actually know
wh
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 07:00 am, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 08:47:33PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> > Does this mean that when 4 GB sticks come out I can have 16 GB on my
> > Athlon 3800+?
>
> Well every board I have seen so far says that you can only use up to
> 2GB st
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:29:13AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
> I haven't noticed any desktop-class motherboards that support larger than
> 2 GB DDR DIMMS. But I don't follow desktop-class hardware too closely.
>
> The Tyan Thunder K8S/K8SR/K8SD Pro (S2882) server boards that we have here
> (pu
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 16:29, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 December 2006 07:00 am, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 08:47:33PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> > > Does this mean that when 4 GB sticks come out I can have 16 GB on my
> > > Athlon 3800+?
> >
> > Well every
--- LeLennartoSorensenlslsorensescsclubwuwaterlooa>
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:29:13AM -0800, Freddie
> Cash wrote:
> > I haven't noticed any desktop-class motherboards
> that support larger than
> > 2 GB RIDIMMS But I don't follow desktop-class
> hardware too closely.
> >
> > The T
Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess many manufacturers won't claim support for a particular dimm size
> until they've actually tested them. I'd expect that many/most boards will
> work with them once they are available, maybe requiring a bios upgrade.
>
> I've used 512Mb dimms in an
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 10:03 am, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> --- LeLennartoSorensenlslsorensescsclubwuwaterlooa>
> I agree about Tyan, though the staff refused to talk
> with Linux users, which I did not appreciate much). A
Like they say, YMMV, results not typical. :)
I've had excellent excha
--- Freddie Cash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 December 2006 10:03 am, Francesco
> Pietra wrote:
> > ---
> LeLennartoSorensenlslsorensescsclubwuwaterlooa>
> > I agree about Tyan, though the staff refused to
> talk
> > with Linux users, which I did not appreciate
> much). A
>
> Like
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:39:16AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
> I've spent the last three years doing absolutely everything possible to
> avoid the nForce chipsets (which is getting increasingly harder to
> do). :) We don't have any servers running nVidia chipsets, I'm proud to
> say (going al
Freddie Cash wrote:
> I've spent the last three years doing absolutely everything possible to
> avoid the nForce chipsets (which is getting increasingly harder to
Yeah, I agree.
> do). :) We don't have any servers running nVidia chipsets, I'm proud
> to say (going all the way back to our dual-
David Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now using
>
> deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian/ sid main contrib
>
> An upgrade wants to remove base-files and bash. Digging deeper, I see
> base-files is being removed because:
>
> base-files pre-depends on libc6 (< 2.3.2.dsl-20.0.1)
>
> I saw some traff
And for this, I get the response above.
You probably think I don't know what it's like to be in your shoes and
do a lot of work for nothing and have to answer stupid questions all the
time. You're wrong. I know what it's like. But do you know what it feels
like to try to use
David Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now using
>
> deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian/ sid main contrib
>
> An upgrade wants to remove base-files and bash. Digging deeper, I see
> base-files is being removed because:
>
> base-files pre-depends on libc6 (< 2.3.2.dsl-20.0.1)
>
> I saw some traff
El lun, 09-05-2005 a las 18:51 -0400, David Wood escribiÃ:
> On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 23:21 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > And yet another person that hasn't been reading the ML for the last
> > half year. Go fish.
>
> I know I'm ignorant and I screwed up, that much is obvious. But can I at
ead the list.
Definitely time for a FAQ or wiki update, then. ;-) You might cut
these questions off before they're even asked.
--
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wookimus.net/
assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
u are unsure.
> Why don't I ask, just to be sure.
>
> And for this, I get the response above.
>
> You probably think I don't know what it's like to be in your shoes and
> do a lot of work for nothing and have to answer stupid questions all the
> time. You'
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 01:18 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I just told you where to look. Nothing against you. The ML archive is
> full about this so everyone should be able to find it. The last big
> thread was when the new libc6 got uploaded.
Nothing against you either! I just wanted to tr
On Aug 24 2007, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> I found this recent article (by a Microsoft guy!) in Dr. Dobbs to be
> interesting:
>
>http://www.ddj.com/hpc-high-performance-computing/201202924
(...)
> * Comparing O(1) and O(K)
Ugh! This article just shows that the Microsoft people should take
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
