Rick Thomas wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
Last night I tried installing both 2.4 and 2.6 on my OldWorld Beige G3.
(using the sarge netinst daily CD from 2004/07/07) Neither worked, but
for different reasons.
I've sent installation reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/powerpc/20040708/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
uname -a: didn't get far enough to get this...
Date: early AM EDT Saturday, July 10, 2004
Method: How did you install? What
Package: busybox-cvs
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'busybox-cvs' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error:
gcc -I./include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wshadow -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/powerpc/20040708/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.25-powerpc #1 mer avr 14 15:38:38 CEST 2004
ppc GNU/Linux
Date: 11 PM EDT July 9, 2004
Method: How
Restricted Attachment Type
The Hilton mail system currently restricts some email attachment types
that are at risk of containing viruses. One of these attachment types
was found in a message sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Given that some viruses include false
sender
Package: base-config
Version: 2.35
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Hello.
I attached update Polish translation (debian/po/pl.po)
regards
fEnIo
# SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE.
# Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE
Hello I'm new on this list and yet
initiatingto Debian.
I would like to install sata-modules-2.6.6(or
2.6.7)-powerpc-di, but on the package page (http://packages.debian.org/testing/debian-installer/sata-modules-2.6.6-powerpc-di)
it tells :
''Warning: This package is intended for the use in
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 03:09:14AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
The 0708 netinst CD using the 2.4 kernel is feeling much better
thankyou! The only strange thing it's done (so far) is to try to
install quik on my OldWorld (beige G3) PowerMac. It's not
supposed to do that, is it?
Umm ... what's
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:12:34PM +0200, Thomas S wrote:
I would like to install sata-modules-2.6.6(or 2.6.7)-powerpc-di, but
on the package page
(http://packages.debian.org/testing/debian-installer/sata-modules-2.6.6-powerpc-di)
it tells :
''Warning: This package is intended for the use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 10 July 2004 13:12, Thomas S wrote:
I would like to install sata-modules-2.6.6(or 2.6.7)-powerpc-di, but on the
package page
(http://packages.debian.org/testing/debian-installer/sata-modules-2.6.6-pow
erpc-di) it tells :
''Warning:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:12:34PM +0200, Thomas S wrote:
Hello I'm new on this list and yet initiating to Debian.
I would like to install sata-modules-2.6.6(or 2.6.7)-powerpc-di, but on the package
page
(http://packages.debian.org/testing/debian-installer/sata-modules-2.6.6-powerpc-di)
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:40:16PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 10 July 2004 13:12, Thomas S wrote:
I would like to install sata-modules-2.6.6(or 2.6.7)-powerpc-di, but on the
package page
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 03:46:29AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Everything went like clockwork except that it tried to install the
quik bootloader. IT's not supposed to do that for OldWorld
machines, is it? This is a beige G3 minitower.
quik is an OldWorld bootloader, so yes, it is supposed to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 258557 pending
Bug#258557: base-config: updated Polish translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tags 258557 pending
thanks
At Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:09:34 +0200,
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
I attached update Polish translation (debian/po/pl.po)
Commited.
Thanks,
--
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:13:46PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
Hello,
I have created a new version of pcmcia-cs now which defaults to not
bringing up new interfaces with ifup.
Thanks ... but
However, I am not currently on
an ethernet connection, so I'm unable to test it. I'm
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 05:50:04PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Any links to the documentation you are referring to? Maybe
I grabbed the wrong document (http://d-i.pascal.at/). I would
guess the exact syslinux.cfg would be _extremely_ important.
It looks like Pascal's
This message is an automated response from www.bpiexpressonline.com
acknowledging receipt of the e-mail you sent dated 7/10/2004 9:16:29 PM.
Please expect an email reply within 24 hours.
Thank you for banking online with us!
Sincerely,
BPI Express Online
[THREAD ID: 1-1QGJU0]
-Original
Christian Perrier :
Environment: VmWare
Platform : i386
Kernel : 2.4
Locale : sv_SE
Image : netinst sid_d-i 20040707
Priority : high
Result : No special problem
a ru_RU install however fails on horrible display in 2nd stage
Eugeniy, Recai, can you
Thomas Hood wrote:
Builds and works for me.
OK, thanks.
Remember that if this version of pcmcia-cs goes into sarge then
netcfg will have to be modified to mark 16 bit PCMCIA interfaces
as hotpluggable.
Sure.
--
Pelle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Ok thanks to everybody for answerings, I'd like now to respond to Sven :
Where would you like to install it ?
On a scsi drive, this is not a problem in istself (worked for installing
Woody)...
What kernel are you running on it anyway ?
How to know it ? Could it be the file
There have been many reports of PCMCIA freezing during
installation. The reason for PCMCIA freezing is that the resource
ranges don't match the hardware. It's not possible to make the default
resource ranges work with all hardware (AFAIK) but I have noticed one
particularly problematic resource
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you run buildscript from a pristine source (i.e svn status --no-ignore
shows no output) the build will fail with:
-
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:14:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:14:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 07:25:33AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
The debconf translation does not fit templates.pot. Attached is your
file after msgmerge with templates.pot. Can you please update?
Hi,
Actually it wasn't attached. Can you? I promise quick, free
updates! :)
--
Jordi Mallach
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:14:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:14:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Paul Gear wrote:
I'm still trying my hardest to migrate to Debian from Red Hat, and so i
bought two new Western Digital 200 Gb SATA hard disks. My goal is to
set them up as a software RAID 1 set. Unfortunately, i've had two
problems so far.
Firstly, it doesn't seem possible to use the
Per Olofsson wrote:
There have been many reports of PCMCIA freezing during
installation. The reason for PCMCIA freezing is that the resource
ranges don't match the hardware. It's not possible to make the default
resource ranges work with all hardware (AFAIK) but I have noticed one
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 04:39:28PM +0200, Thomas S wrote:
Ok thanks to everybody for answerings, I'd like now to respond to Sven :
[...]
What kernel are you running on it anyway ?
How to know it ? Could it be the file
''pool/main/P/patch_2.5.4-11_powerpc.deb'' situated in the CD (Woody
languagechooser_1.26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
languagechooser_1.26.dsc
languagechooser_1.26.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.26_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 04:39:28PM +0200, Thomas S wrote:
Ok thanks to everybody for answerings, I'd like now to respond to Sven :
Where would you like to install it ?
On a scsi drive, this is not a problem in istself (worked for installing
Woody)...
Err, on what kind of running system.
Robert Jakubowski wrote:
So there are two entries for SuSE because it found two different
initrds. Unless both are really links to the same file?
Yes, it is a link.
Ok, that's a bug, it should notice links.
The logs show that os-prober worked and found all OSes, including Fedora
and
Accepted:
languagechooser_1.26.dsc
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.26.dsc
languagechooser_1.26.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.26.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.26_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.26_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov :
Christian Perrier :
Environment: VmWare
Platform : i386
Kernel : 2.4
Locale : sv_SE
Image : netinst sid_d-i 20040707
Priority : high
Result : No special problem
a ru_RU install however fails on horrible display in 2nd stage
Eugeniy,
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:11:57 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#258251: initrd-tools cannot be installed during the base system
install.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, I have now finished the infrastructure using version maps, but
before I upload I would like to describe the process, for feedback,
comments etc.
Basically the dir structure is this:
/conffiles.d:
sarge/ woody/ xfree86-kbd.preinst
retitle 257302 xfree86: general complaint about XFree86 on Dell Latitude D400
tag 257302 + moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 10:18:05AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version
cdebconf_0.68_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.68.dsc
cdebconf_0.68.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.68_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.68_s390.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.68_s390.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.68_s390.deb
cdebconf-udeb_0.68_s390.udeb
Accepted:
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.68_s390.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.68_s390.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.68_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.68_all.udeb
cdebconf-text-udeb_0.68_s390.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-text-udeb_0.68_s390.udeb
Thanks a lot really,
- Generally : is it possible to know which version number corresponds to the
kernel OUT of Linux system itself (I mean is there some file on the install
CD which indicates it ?). Thanks for the usefull command anyway :-)
- Problem is that I tried once to install Sarge but it
rootskel_0.85_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_0.85.dsc
rootskel_0.85.tar.gz
rootskel_0.85_s390.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.85_s390.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.85_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 257426
Bug#257426: console-tools: incorrect koi8 to unicode mapping
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.85_s390.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_0.85_s390.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.85_s390.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.85_s390.udeb
rootskel_0.85.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.85.dsc
rootskel_0.85.tar.gz
to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
severity 250674 normal
Bug#250674: OS/2 support
Severity set to `normal'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
severity 250674 wishlist
Bug#250674: OS/2 support
Severity set to `wishlist'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
severity 255206 wishlist
Bug#255206: os-prober does not find solaris
Severity set to `wishlist'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
tags 250717 moreinfo d-i
Bug#250717: os-prober hangs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, d-i
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 10 July 2004 19:35, Thomas S wrote:
- Generally : is it possible to know which version number corresponds to
the kernel OUT of Linux system itself (I mean is there some file on the
install CD which indicates it ?). Thanks for the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 257794 -1
Bug#257794: Does not detect a Fedora installation
Bug 257794 cloned as bug 258623.
retitle -1 fails to parse SuSE grub menu.lst
Bug#258623: Does not detect a Fedora installation
Changed Bug title.
clone 257794 -2
Bug#257794: Does not
On Saturday, July 10, 2004, at 07:33 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 03:46:29AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Everything went like clockwork except that it tried to install the
quik bootloader. IT's not supposed to do that for OldWorld
machines, is it? This is a beige G3 minitower.
SuSe menu.lst attached as I've not had time to look at it yet.
- Forwarded message from Robert Jakubowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Robert Jakubowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 21:39:23 -0400 (EDT)
To: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#257794: Package:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:26:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:19:24AM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
The 20040707 image does seem to fix this specific problem, and it now
gets into the installer. It still locks up later while handling the
disks, in the same
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 12:56:06PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
It seems bad to me for one of these scripts to be so sure that it can
load a particular module, when the rest of the install is pretty
careful to allow a user in expert mode to override module selection.
Of course, loading a module
main-menu_0.070_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
main-menu_0.070.dsc
main-menu_0.070.tar.gz
main-menu_0.070_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Accepted:
main-menu_0.070.dsc
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.070.dsc
main-menu_0.070.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.070.tar.gz
main-menu_0.070_s390.udeb
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.070_s390.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to
discover1-data_1.2004.07.10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1-data_1.2004.07.10.dsc
discover1-data_1.2004.07.10.tar.gz
discover1-data_1.2004.07.10_all.deb
discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.07.10_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Brad Boyer wrote:
I found the crash. One of the partman scripts does a modprobe floppy
without any way around it. Since all the legacy drivers that poke ISA
addresses crash a G5, this module is instant death. I was able to get
past this step by removing floppy.o (or floppy.ko with 2.6) before
Accepted:
discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.07.10_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.07.10_all.udeb
discover1-data_1.2004.07.10.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data_1.2004.07.10.dsc
discover1-data_1.2004.07.10.tar.gz
to
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jul 2004 16:47:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#258428: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.07.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
languagechooser_1.26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
languagechooser_1.26.dsc
languagechooser_1.26.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.26_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
languagechooser_1.26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
languagechooser_1.26.dsc
languagechooser_1.26.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.26_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
os-prober_0.13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
os-prober_0.13.dsc
os-prober_0.13.tar.gz
os-prober_0.13_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Rejected: languagechooser_1.26_i386.changes: a file with this name already exists in
the Done directory.
Rejected: languagechooser_1.26_all.udeb: old version (1.26) in unstable = new version
(1.26) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: languagechooser_1.26_all.udeb: can not overwrite existing copy
After having booted with floppies, on old world
powerpc,when I choose ''CD'' for installing the Sarge's kernel, the
installer tells me thatit can't findrescue.bin and
powermac/drivers.tgz on the CD. What to do ? I haven't found any answer to this
question on the Sarge Installation page for
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:32:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#255206: fixed in os-prober 0.13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:32:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#257794: fixed in os-prober 0.13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:32:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#258624: fixed in os-prober 0.13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Accepted:
os-prober_0.13.dsc
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.13.dsc
os-prober_0.13.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.13.tar.gz
os-prober_0.13_i386.udeb
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.13_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 255206 257794 258624
Rejected: languagechooser_1.26_i386.changes: a file with this name already exists in
the Done directory.
Rejected: languagechooser_1.26_all.udeb: old version (1.26) in unstable = new version
(1.26) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: languagechooser_1.26_all.udeb: can not overwrite existing copy
Package: discover1
Version: 1.6.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch sid l10n
Hello,
Please consider applying the attached patch in order to bring
discover1's Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation
back to 100%.
Regards,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:58:11AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 01:50:16AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:39:53PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I'm aiming to create a new webpage like:
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ibook/
I got a
partman-target_24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-target_24.dsc
partman-target_24.tar.gz
partman-target_24_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Accepted:
partman-target_24.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_24.dsc
partman-target_24.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_24.tar.gz
partman-target_24_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_24_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 11:36:10AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I've noticed the dell problems as well. I suppose there's not a way to
somehow autodetect these laptops by something else and change the
resource range only there?
FWIW, it isn't just on Dell laptops -- my Dad's HP/Compaq laptop
Package: base-config
Version: 2.35
Severity: normal
'apt-get install foo bar' only succeeds if foo and bar are both
available; if bar is missing, it doesn't install foo.
At the moment, read-edid only exists on i386.
The combination of these two facts means that
base-config/lib/menu/pkgsel never
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 11:43:02AM -0700, Karl Hegbloom wrote:
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 11:09 -0700, Karl Hegbloom wrote:
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 12:22 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
This feature is orthogonal to grub's first stage loader residing on
XFS.
ext2/3 leave 4KB of empty space
Joey Hess wrote:
Paul Gear wrote:
I'm still trying my hardest to migrate to Debian from Red Hat, and so i
bought two new Western Digital 200 Gb SATA hard disks. My goal is to
set them up as a software RAID 1 set. Unfortunately, i've had two
problems so far.
Firstly, it doesn't seem possible
Hi,
I've been trying to install Debian using the latest available boot
floppies. It fails on the partition manager and there seems to be no way
to recover from the error.
I should note that the machine is an old IBM Thinkpad 560, 3.5 inch
floppy external, no CDROM, 48 Mb RAM, 1G hd.
If it is
80 matches
Mail list logo
