On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
Source: sopwith
Version: 1.7.4-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Ok, looks like I can
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Didier Raboud o...@debian.org wrote:
Package: python-epydoc
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: important
Hi,
python-epydoc currently recommends gs-common, which is a transitional package.
The next upload of ghostscript (currently) plans to drop both gs-common and
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Nigel Evans
nigelev...@postmaster.co.uk wrote:
Package: pychecker
Version: 0.8.18-7
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When using the -q / --stdlib option, the method getStandardLibraries() in
warn.py gets library
names from site-packages, but not the new
Sorry, I missed that a patch was available. It looks reasonable to
me. I'll apply it sometime soon and upload a new package.
KEN
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Guido,
I'm responding here to both bug #647833 and #647834.
I don't envision implementing changes like these in the Debian package
for pychecker. These really are enhancement requests for upstream,
and they don't have anything to do with how the Debian package is
utilized. The binary Debian
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Peter Slickers pe...@web.de wrote:
Package: pychecker
Version: 0.8.19-2
pychecker Version 0.8.19 crashes with an INTERNAL ERROR if it encounters a
python statements where an assignment to a slice of a list is done.
Hi,
Thanks for the bug report. I'll
Hi Mike,
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Mike Gabriel
mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de wrote:
mike@minobo:/usr/share/pyshared/epydoc/docwriter$ diff -ur latex.py.orig
latex.py
--- latex.py.orig 2011-02-22 11:57:33.0 +0100
+++ latex.py 2011-02-22 11:55:00.0 +0100
@@
Ok, thanks for the patch. I will look at integrating it in not too long.
KEN
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
Package: pychecker
Version: 0.8.19-2
Severity: minor
The __import__ function has been accepting keyword arguments since Python
2.5. However, pychecker warns that it does not:
Ok, I've forwarded it upstream as SF issue
Hi Jakub,
I have a new pychecker package put together, but I am going to have to
wait before uploading. The upstream 0.8.19 release removes the
pychecker2 package, which SPE depends on. I don't want my upload to
break SPE, so I need to wait and see whether Thomas is willing to put
this code
According to upstream, pychecker 0.8.19 is compatible with Python 2.7 and
indeed I cannot see this traceback with this version anymore.
Ok. 0.8.19 has only been out for a day or so. I'm planning to upload soon.
KEN
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Kenneth Pronovici prono...@debian.org wrote:
Seems pychecker has a hard time finding out that 'l' is a dictionary in
the first case.
Hmm. Might be a Python 2.6 issue? I'll report it upstream.
It turns out that a similar bug was filed upstream about a year
Seems pychecker has a hard time finding out that 'l' is a dictionary in
the first case.
Hmm. Might be a Python 2.6 issue? I'll report it upstream.
Thanks,
KEN
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Kenneth Pronovici prono...@ieee.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Jesse Smith jessefrgsm...@yahoo.ca wrote:
The oil tank explosions should now be a little more intense than before.
They have larger explosions than the other buildings
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Jesse Smith jessefrgsm...@yahoo.ca wrote:
The oil tank explosions should now be a little more intense than before.
They have larger explosions than the other buildings. This is as of
Sopwith 1.7.4.
I think we can close this bug now.
Ok, I will mark this bug
This bug is now tracked in the upstream bug tracker:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3058916group_id=24686atid=382217
I thought it was there previously, but I couldn't find anything quite like
it in the list. So, I added a new bug report.
KEN
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:21 PM, W. Martin Borgert deba...@debian.org wrote:
For automatically testing Python code in a CI test, it is
useful to ignore any errors or problems in Python itself.
If I understand correctly, with -q or --stdlib pychecker
should ignore warnings from files under
Ok, I uploaded 3.0.1-8 including the patch. If you have a few
minutes, please confirm that the new patched package is working for
you.
Thanks,
KEN
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org wrote:
There's a known bug with epydoc and python 2.6 (the tokenizer has
changed in 2.6, and epydoc hasn't been updated to account for
it). While upstream seems dormant, a patch is available on the
sourceforce tracker, see
Hi Hamish,
I've taken over the Debian packages for Sopwith, and I've been working my
way through the bug list. As of right now, the only open bug is yours, from
way back in 2003:
#188298: oil tanks should blow big
Are you still interested in having this bug fixed? If so, I will tie this
Hi Jakub,
Sorry to be replying to this bug so late. I thought I had already done so
months ago, but realized I hadn't when I was reviewing the open bugs in all
of my packages.
This is an upstream bug, and upstream isn't very active right now. I'll
enter a SourceForge issue and tie it to this
This has been filed as SourceForge issue #3025876:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3025876group_id=24686atid=382217
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici prono...@ieee.org
http://www.cedar-solutions.com/
Update: Jesse (the new upstream maintainer) told me a few minutes ago that
this enhancement is on his list. So, let's keep the bug open. I added a
new SourceForge issue to track it, and I'll tag the bug as upstream in a few
minutes here.
I'm planning to take over this package.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici prono...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Many years later, I'm now applying the following patch to Policy for the
next release, which spells out the existing naming convention more
explicitly. Thanks!
Thanks! I appreciate the follow-up. After I saw your
Hi Dan,
GTML has been orphaned for a while. Since I still use it actively, I've
decided to take it over.
Bug 192663 has been open since 11 May 2003, with no other comments in it.
The last activity was when you changed your submitter address in July of
2003. Does this bug still need to be open?
Hi Dan,
I guess you're getting two emails from me today. For the sake of the bug
report, I'll repeat myself. :)
GTML has been orphaned for a while. Since I still use it actively, I've
decided to take it over.
Bug 192664 has been open since 11 May 2003, with no other comments in it.
The last
Hi Dan,
I guess you're getting two emails from me today. For the sake of the bug
report, I'll repeat myself. :)
GTML has been orphaned for a while. Since I still use it actively, I've
decided to take it over.
Bug 192664 has been open since 11 May 2003, with no other comments in it.
The last
I'm planning to take over this package.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici prono...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
This bug has been submitted to SF as bug #2929446:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2929446group_id=210468atid=1013862
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici prono...@ieee.org
http://www.cedar-solutions.com/
This bug has been submitted to SourceForge as bug #2929447:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2929447group_id=210468atid=1013862
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici prono...@ieee.org
http://www.cedar-solutions.com/
Ok, this turned out to just be stupidity on my part. I was printing the
message at the bottom of the loop rather than the top. It will be in
2.19.5-1, which I'll hopefully upload later tonight.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici prono...@ieee.org
http://www.cedar-solutions.com/
I have added retry logic to the write process, and it seems to work the way
I would expect. Try it out, and if it doesn't meet your needs let me know.
I only tested with the CD writer, but since I didnt modify anything about
the write itself, only the error handling around it, I don't anticipate
Sure, that's fine. The main question is whether it does what you want, but
I think it matches up pretty well with your request.
KEN
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Jan Medlock medl...@clemson.edu wrote:
On Sunday 10 January 2010 05:58:21 pm Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
I have added retry logic
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the bug report. Sorry that you're seeing problems writing the
disk... I haven't heard of that happening before. I will look at these
enhancements when I find a little time.
Would you be willing to submit this bug at SourceForge? That's usually
where I track bug reports that
Hi Jan,
Yeah, that sounds like a glitch. cback-span shouldn't ask the last time...
there's no point.
Would you be willing to submit this bug at SourceForge, along with the other
one?
Thanks,
KEN
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jan Medlock
medlock-deb...@turboshower.netwrote:
Package:
Thomas,
Ok, I have finally had time to review your patch and test it. Sorry this
took me a while.
This bug is now linked with 560624, 560659 and 560606, which are FTBFS bugs
for python-couchdb, dbus-python and pymvpa. I was able to reproduce the
build problems with those packages using
Don't worry about the unit tests for now. It's been a while since I looked
at this code, and I thought I recalled a unit test suite that I was running
as part of the package build process. I was thinking of pychecker instead.
KEN
Hi,
I haven't had time to look at this yet, and I might not have time until
after the holidays due to work schedule and travel. Sorry about that.
I have pinged Edward (upstream) to see whether I can get some feedback from
him before I consider applying the patch. I don't have a a problem
Ok, thanks for filing the bug. I would be happy to apply a patch if one
becomes available.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici prono...@ieee.org
http://www.cedar-solutions.com/
Hmm. Good point. I wrote that comment myself, and then proceeded to put
the file in the distribution anyway. :)
I should probably just try to exclude that file from being installed via
setup.py. I'll take a look and see if I can figure out how to make that
happen.
KEN
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Christoph Burgmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: python-epydoc
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: normal
Please suggest (or whatever is appropriate) Debian package python-profiler
which includes module pstats needed for building call-graphs. The package is
in
Looks like this got fixed in the new 0.8.18 release:
/home/pronovic/tmp cat bug.py
try:
pass
except (KeyboardInterrupt, SystemExit):
pass
/home/pronovic/tmp pychecker bug.py
Processing module bug (bug.py)...
Warnings...
None
I'll upload later today.
KEN
Probably because those two are derived from BaseException, while
everything else is derived from Exception in Python 2.5. There
is a patch around, which I did not test:
https://thomas.apestaart.org/thomas/trac/changeset/938?format=diffnew=938
This patch does fix the bug for Python 2.5.
I think this is the same as upstream bug #2008061.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have submitted this as SF bug #2018349.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have submitted this as SF bug #2018350.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There hasn't been an upstream release in quite a while, although there
were a number of checkins recently, so the project is semi-active.
I'll ping upstream and see what they think.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cedar-solutions.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
OK, I'll pass this along upstream.
KEN
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: pychecker
Version: 0.8.17-8
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
On Feb 8, 2008 9:10 AM, Guido Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:39:27AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
Maybe we should clone 406357? You can fix your FTBFS by removing
pychecker from debian/rules, and I'll keep this bug against pychecker
open until we
Christoph - I'll hopefully get 3.0 uploaded later today or tomorrow.
After it hits the archive, please re-test the stacktrace.txt scenario.
If the new version doesn't fix that problem, please file a separate
bug.
Edward - I'll leave this bug open while you're looking into
wrong-versions issue.
On Feb 3, 2008 5:46 PM, Marco Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
You should check this one.. Debian have done this request for this package,
and
so many others in Debian. You're right not to recommend a package that isn't
at
Debian, but with ... | firefox | ... it doesn't hurt.
On Feb 2, 2008 2:01 PM, Christoph Burgmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: python-epydoc
Version: 3.0~beta1-5
Severity: normal
If a package is available globally to the system in addition to the version
in the local directory epydoc seems to prefer the global file over the local
in some
On Jan 14, 2008 10:36 AM, Guido Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:34:44AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
I'll take a look at this, but it's unlikely I'll find a solution very
soon. Upstream doesn't have a lot of time right now, and I'm not an
expert
Interesting. It worked at my last upload.
The unit tests are still valid, and the only problem is the location
of the file the warning is coming from. I'll change the test
expectations and upload later this weekend.
KEN
On Jan 12, 2008 4:21 AM, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'll take a look at this, but it's unlikely I'll find a solution very
soon. Upstream doesn't have a lot of time right now, and I'm not an
expert in the codebase (though sometimes I do get lucky).
I think that it's probably best for you to fix your FTBFS by removing
pychecker from
On Dec 20, 2007 7:51 PM, Dan O'Huiginn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am attaching a patch to update the man page.
Thanks! I am preparing an upload now. I always appreciate it when
users are willing to provide patches.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 13, 2007 7:15 AM, Dan O'Huiginn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The man page for pychecker omits many of the command-line switches
which are listed in 'pychecker --help'. It would be nice to:
a) update the man page to point users at --help for more complete
documentation
b) include more of
I heard back from Neal, and he doesn't mind me including pychecker2 in
the Debian package. So, I have made the changes and I will upload
0.8.17-5 later this evening.
I changed my mind and decided to add the new code to the existing
Debian package, rather than making a special library package to
On Nov 27, 2007 5:15 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ CCing bug 453092, request for pychecker2 packaging ]
Kenneth Pronovici:
You've probably already checked before filing this bug report... but
has the Spe version of this code diverged at all from the Pychecker
On Nov 27, 2007 4:20 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We at the PythonApplicationsPackagingTeam are updating [1] the spe package,
but
it needs pychecker2, which is included in pychecker's tarball. Actually Spe
provides the module in its source tree, but we would like to get
On Nov 6, 2007 4:12 AM, Michael Hanke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: python-epydoc
Version: 3.0~beta1-4
Severity: normal
please add a package dependency recommendation to the 'python-docutils'
package. epydoc can understand restructured text as Python docstring
format, but the API docs
Attached is a patch from upstream's Subversion for this fix.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: epydoc/docwriter/html.py
===
--- epydoc/docwriter/html.py (revision 1602)
+++ epydoc/docwriter/html.py (revision
Attached is a patch from upstream's Subversion for this fix.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: epydoc/apidoc.py
===
--- epydoc/apidoc.py (revision 1605)
+++ epydoc/apidoc.py (revision 1606)
@@ -111,11 +111,12 @@
Darn, I missed that. I was just looking at the diff from the previous
svn revision. I'll get this applied ASAP.
I'm looking forward to the 3.0 release. Have a good weekend!
KEN
On 9/30/07, Edward Loper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
Attached is a patch from upstream's
This is fixed upstream in svn 1606. I'm not sure when beta 2 will be
coming out.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Upstream says this is fixed in svn 1603. I'm not sure when beta2 is
coming out.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Ok, I'll push this upstream.
KEN
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This has been filed as SF bug #1791281.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 8/10/07, Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: ncompress
Version: 4.2.4.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
ncompress reffers to /usr/doc/ncompress/README.Debian in its package
description. This should be changed to
/usr/share/doc/ncompress/README.Debian, as documentation has been
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:23:41PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
On 7/19/07, Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: epydoc
Version: 3.0~beta1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
please ask upstream to drop the '-u' option from the manpage, since it
is no longer supported. I
Just a note to indicate that I tested this with 3.0 beta 1 and it's
still true. I filed SF bug #1760007 to track the problem upstream.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:38:20AM -0700, Cameron Dale wrote:
Package: python-epydoc
Version: 3.0~beta1-1
Severity: minor
A python file can import a module whose name contains a - (dash), using
the __import__ builtin function (just doing a normal import fails, as
identifiers cannot
Stephane -
I think that this old Epydoc bug should be addressed in the new 3.0 beta
1 release. Do you still have a test case around that you could check
against?
Upstream says:
The intended behavior is that epydoc should *not* ignore the encoding
of the source code, but it *should*
On 7/19/07, Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: epydoc
Version: 3.0~beta1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
please ask upstream to drop the '-u' option from the manpage, since it
is no longer supported. I discovered that by fixing some FTBFS due to
'-n' being dropped, and needed to
On 5/27/07, Kenneth Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/19/07, Cameron Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: epydoc
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
There is a new upstream release available since February 2007 that has some
interesting enhancements for epydoc. I know it's a beta release
Eypdoc depends on the following utilities for its LaTeX functionality:
/usr/bin/latex
/usr/bin/makeindex
/usr/bin/dvips
/usr/bin/ps2pdf
The following packages provide these dependencies:
texlive-latex-base: /usr/bin/latex
texlive-base-bin: /usr/bin/makeindex, /usr/bin/dvips
I also had to use a weird version number (2.1+3.0beta1) so that later
upgrades to 3.0 will be automatic.
Incidentally, there's no need for weird version numbers like this.
Version numbers now support ~ to cover exactly this circumstance.
See:
http://lwn.net/Articles/194664/
A version
On 6/3/07, Cameron Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/3/07, Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes:
epydoc (2.1-12) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Bring Recommends dependencies up to date with lenny (closes: #425077).
- Recommend texlive-latex-base rather than
On 6/3/07, Cameron Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/3/07, Kenneth Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't use the latex output much either. I'm certainly open to
listing texlive-latex-extra rather than just texlive-latex-base, as
long as I can understand why it would be required. I'll
On 6/3/07, Kenneth Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I definitely need texlive-latex-extra, but it's worse than that. The
new texlive infrastructure isn't quite a true superset of tetex, so I
also had to patch latex.py to remove references to the fancyheader
package, which isn't available
On 5/19/07, Cameron Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: epydoc
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
There is a new upstream release available since February 2007 that has some
interesting enhancements for epydoc. I know it's a beta release, but as there
haven't been any releases in quite some time,
On 5/18/07, Cameron Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: python-epydoc
Version: 2.1-11
Severity: normal
Epydoc recommends the now obsolete tetex-extra. Perhaps this could be updated
to recommend some new texlive packages (such as texlive-latex-extra). I am
unwilling to install tetex-extra as
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please remove the babygimp package from the archive. It doesn't work,
upstream is dead and unresponsive, no one has stepped forward to fix any
of the bugs with it, and I am really not interested in debugging nasty
Perl-Tk incompatibilities. :)
In
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am orphaning babygimp.
It doesn't work, upstream is dead and unresponsive, no one has stepped
forward to fix any of the bugs with it, and I am really not interested
in debugging nasty Perl-Tk incompatibilities. :)
I have also requested that babygimp be removed
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:25:07PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
Package: pychecker
Version: 0.8.17-3
Severity: normal
warning on a well-defined python program
$ cat bug.py
def main():
' '.join(str(x) for x in range(10))
' '.join(str(x) for x in range(11))
$ pychecker bug.py
On 12/27/06, Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any update on babygimp's status? If it no longer works and cannot be
fixed, maybe the best course of action is to remove it from Etch?
AFAIK, babygimp should already be removed from Etch per an email I
sent earlier to the release team. I
Package: cron
Version: 3.0pl1-86
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
It's sometimes difficult to distinguish between output from the
different jobs run as part of cron.daily. For instance, a recent email
I received contained these lines:
run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/bugzilla exited with return code 1
On 12/17/06, Dmitry Rutsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: cedar-backup2
Version: 2.8.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
ide-scsi is obsolete on 2.6 kernels, cdrecord
(presently known as wodim in Debian by the way) can use recorders just like
wodim dev=/dev/hdc ...
and cannot (as
On 12/18/06, Dmitry Rutsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: cedar-backup2-doc
Version: 2.8.1-1
Severity: wishlist
In the descriptions of typical configuration process in chapter 4, sections
Setting up ..., there is step 5 in which suggests adding/enabling cron jobs.
I think
this step is too
On 12/18/06, Dmitry Rutsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It turns out that I'd overlooked relevant sections in the documentation
(Linux Notes in Chapter 4) and there is (or at least was) a way to use ATAPI
interface. Still it doesn't work for me, and
What happens when you execute this?
Hi Jörg,
I do appreciate the bug feedback -- but since this is a Debian bug
report, we have to deal with it in context of the packages available
in Debian, meaning wodim. I realize this is probably not a situation
you are happy with, and I do sympathize -- but the additional
advertisements for
On 12/18/06, Kenneth Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/18/06, Dmitry Rutsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It turns out that I'd overlooked relevant sections in the documentation
(Linux Notes in Chapter 4) and there is (or at least was) a way to use ATAPI
interface. Still it doesn't work
I'm going to dig a little further into your patch now and see what I
can do about supporting dev=/dev/cdrom and the like.
Upstream Subversion revision 1016 contains functionality equivalent to
your patch. I made the target_scsi_id parameter optional, and added
a hardwareId attribute on CdWriter
Hi,
Thanks for the bug report and the patch. Interestingly, I just fixed
the platfomr typo myself yesterday in the upstream source. I'll fix
the other typo upstream too.
Note: I won't upload a new Debian package just to fix these typos.
Instead, the fixes will arrive in Debian with the next
On 11/12/06, Florent Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
package babygimp
tags 395917 + patch
thanks
Hi,
here is a patch to fix this bug.
Hi, Florent,
Thanks for the patch!
You definitely solved the problem with starting the script. I made a
few other changes, and was then able to successfully
On 10/28/06, Kenneth Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/28/06, Wolfgang Karall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 13:21 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
Odd, I filed the same bug just minutes before you did. I'll mark this
one as a duplicate.
Yeah, consecutive bug
Package: babygimp
Version: 0.42-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I heard about this in private email from a user a month or so ago. I
realized today while fixing #395577 that this user never bothered to
file an official bug report as requested (I was out of the country
Odd, I filed the same bug just minutes before you did. I'll mark this
one as a duplicate.
Yeah, I agree, it does look like a perl-tk incompatibility.
Thanks for the report.
KEN
On 10/28/06, Wolfgang Karall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: babygimp
Version: 0.42-1
Severity: grave
101 - 200 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
