Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2014-02-11 Thread Heiko Fiergolla { xmachina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I have the same problem on two different wheezy hosts with aptitude safe-upgrade (both fresh installed wheezys and no distupgrade from squeeze) and the package libapache2-svn was, and is, not installed on both hosts. But I have other fresh inst

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-08-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 11:50:09AM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 7. August 2013, 20:39:25 schrieb Julian Gilbey: > > Or are you saying that a Breaks would be needed on every depending > > package in stable? > > We would also need to add breaks for all packages depending on > apache2

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-08-11 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Am Mittwoch, 7. August 2013, 20:39:25 schrieb Julian Gilbey: > Or are you saying that a Breaks would be needed on every depending > package in stable? We would also need to add breaks for all packages depending on apache2.2-common that have been in Debian since Debian etch and have been removed

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-08-07 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:07:28PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > >> That would be 100+ Breaks. I do not think that is feasible but that may > >> need a wider discussion. > > > > How did you reach that conclusion? I looked at the current testing > > distribution, and the only direct dependency on apac

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-08-07 Thread Arno Töll
On 07.08.2013 21:39, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 02:39:41PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: >>> * The only way to ship a package named apache2.2-common is to add a >>>Breaks header listing every single reverse dependency with correct >>>version information. >> >> That would be 1

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-08-07 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 02:39:41PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > > * The only way to ship a package named apache2.2-common is to add a > >Breaks header listing every single reverse dependency with correct > >version information. > > That would be 100+ Breaks. I do not think that is feasible b

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-07-14 Thread Stefan Fritsch
clone 716880 -1 retitle -1 apache2 package upgrade fails if the configuration is inconsistent thanks Am Sonntag, 14. Juli 2013, 01:51:55 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: > Purging configuration files for apache2.2-common ... > The problem seems to come from the following > /var/lib/dpkg/info/apache2.pos

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-07-14 Thread Arno Töll
On 14.07.2013 12:38, Helmut Grohne wrote: > My point was that if modules had their dependencies satisfied in such a > way, then dependencies are wrong even for a wheezy -> jessie upgrade, > because as you later point out it would break the whole server. They are wrong and this can get really nasty

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-07-14 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Control: retitle -1 apache2 upgrade fails when apache2.2-common is purged in the process On 2013-07-14 09:47:04 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > You are likely using --purge-unused something similar causing the no > longer needed package apache2.2-common to be purged. Yes, actually I marked it as p

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-07-14 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 12:14:04PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > Pretending we provided apache2.2-common, modules depending on the 2.2 > version of the server had their depdencies satisfied. Thus, they would > be co-installable with Apache 2.4, they would migrate to Testing and so on. My point was tha

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-07-14 Thread Arno Töll
On 14.07.2013 12:08, Helmut Grohne wrote: > I do not see how the transition is affecting this option. If it breaks > during the transition, it can also break a partial upgrade. Introducing > apache2.2-common later can cause a broken wheezy->jessie upgrade when a > user fails to upgrade the correspo

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-07-14 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:50:55AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > we cannot do this as long as the transition is ongoing. Sadly lots of > packages reverse-depends on on apache2.2-common. Satisfying this > dependency would create (even more) havoc on such systems as apt would > not force a removal of pac

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-07-14 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 14.07.2013 09:47, Helmut Grohne wrote: > As far as I can tell the only way to fix this issue is to introduce a > transitional apache2.2-common package containing no files. apache2 would > need to depend on apache2.2-common for one release (skipping a release > is not supported). we cannot

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-07-14 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: severity -1 important Thanks for the detailed log, because it highlights the cause. On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 01:51:55AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Purging configuration files for apache2.2-common ... > dpkg: warning: while removing apache2.2-common, directory '/usr/lib/cgi-bin' > no

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-07-13 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2013-07-14 01:51:55 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Package: apache2 > Version: 2.4.4-6 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > The apache2 upgrade failed: [...] And when I tried to remove it, this failed: The following packages will be REMOVED: apache2* apache2-bin*

Bug#716880: apache2 upgrade failed

2013-07-13 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: apache2 Version: 2.4.4-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The apache2 upgrade failed: (Reading database ... 475293 files and directories currently installed.) Removing libapache2-svn ... Module authz_svn already disabled Module dav_svn already disabled Purging conf