Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 365086 important
Bug#365086: upgrade-reports: keyboard misleaded (console and X) after upgrading
from sarge to etch on sparc64
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
severity 365086 important
thanks
Hi,
This is not RC by any standard, so lowering the severity down a notch.
A few questions regarding your report:
* Are you absolutely sure that you get the same broken keyboard layout
both in console and X? Those two have very different input layers, so
Package: php5
Version: 5.1.2-1
Severity: grave
Three security vulnerabilites have been found in php.
See http://www.infigo.hr/en/in_focus/advisories/INFIGO-2006-04-02
i. PHP4/PHP5 wordwrap() buffer overflow
CVE-2006-1990:
Integer overflow in the wordwrap function in string.c in PHP 4.4.2 and
Package: php4
Version: 4:4.4.2-1
Severity: grave
Three security vulnerabilites have been found in php.
See http://www.infigo.hr/en/in_focus/advisories/INFIGO-2006-04-02
i. PHP4/PHP5 wordwrap() buffer overflow
CVE-2006-1990:
Integer overflow in the wordwrap function in string.c in PHP 4.4.2 and
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (gmane.linux.debian.devel.x) you wrote:
Hi, I need some help or suggestions or something. My package WMRack
builds fine here--but I haven't yet upgraded to the new modular X.
It fails to build on Debian's autobuilders though, and I'm darned if I
have any idea why.
On 2006-04-29 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (gmane.linux.debian.devel.x) you wrote:
[cannot find X]
The build-dependencies (which worked before) are: libx11-dev,
libxext-dev, libxpm-dev, xutils, debhelper (= 4.0.0) and the
autoconf stanza (from
Package: kaudiocreator
Version: 4:3.5.2-2+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
When I launch kaudiocreator :
kaudiocreator: error while loading shared libraries: libkcddb.so.1: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
Installing libkcddb1 solve this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 365312 + security
Bug#365312: CVE-2006-1990/CVE-2006-1991: Security vulnerabilities in php
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
tags 365311 + security
Bug#365311: CVE-2006-1990/CVE-2006-1991: Security vulnerabilities in php
There were no
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:47:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#365217: fixed in open-cobol 0.32-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:47:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#365177: fixed in open-cobol 0.32-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package wmrack
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wmrack
tag 365126 - help
Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!
Tags were: help
Tags removed: help
tag 365126 + pending
Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:30:51AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
I know now why it has worked previously: You are build-depending on
xutils, which used to contain xmkmf. [...] In modular xmkmf lives in
xutils-dev.
AHA! That would definitely explain it. Thanks very much. I will
make that
Hi,
thanx for the patch, I'll apply it later today.
On 4/29/06, Aaron M. Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: xfaces
Version: 3.3-25
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Greetings.
As you may have heard, Debian is in the midst of a transition to
X11R7. One
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:03:26 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#362451: gtk+2.0: FTBFS: Needs update to Build-Depends
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
I get the same problem using
% dpkg -l libdvdread3 dvdbackup
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:03:26 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#362451: gtk+2.0: FTBFS: Needs update to Build-Depends
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: mozilla-firefox-adblock
Severity: grave
Setting up mozilla-firefox-adblock (0.5.2.039-4) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-firefox-adblock.postinst: line 8:
update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: command not found
dpkg: error processing mozilla-firefox-adblock (--configure):
subprocess
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:53:55PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Hi there--
This bug (and its merged fellow) appears to be the only thing keeping
Thunderbird 1.5 out of etch. It has now been tagged pending since 19
March, which is well over a month ago. Can we expect a version with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 364972
Bug#364972: symbol lookup error: dvdbackup: undefined symbol: UDFFindFile
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
reassign 365332 libdvdread3
Bug#365332: undefined symbol: UDFFindFile
Bug reassigned from package `dvdbackup' to
Hi,
I get a simular error message when starting it, but it ends like
this for me:
synfig(29704): info: dock_book_list.size()=1
synfig(29704): info: dock_book_list.size()=2
synfig(29704): info: dock_book_list.size()=3
synfig(29704): warning: Caught exception when attempting to load settings.
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:55:16AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
AC_PATH_X searches[1] for [Xt],[X11/Intrinsic.h],[XtMalloc (0)] by
default, so this shouldn't have worked[2], as you do not build-depend on
libxt-dev. Try purging libxt-dev and rebuild after
dpkg-source -x.
Er, no, that's
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 01:48:30PM +0200, Daniel Baumann said:
Stephen Gran wrote:
This version still doesn't export the symbol for some reason. Dan, can
I be of assistance here in any way? Let me know if you need me to do
some whacking on libdvdread to make it export the symbol again.
On 2006-04-29 Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:55:16AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
AC_PATH_X searches[1] for [Xt],[X11/Intrinsic.h],[XtMalloc (0)] by
default, so this shouldn't have worked[2], as you do not build-depend on
libxt-dev. Try purging libxt-dev
Le mercredi 19 avril 2006 à 15:01 +1000, Peter Moulder a écrit :
I'd guess that an appropriate versioned Depends would be
libx11-dev (= 2:1.0.0).
libx11 should update its shlib rather, so libgtk2.0-0 will Depends on a
new libx11 and -dev which is in sync with lib will be correct too
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:52:41AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
mgapdesk fails to build because it can't find xf86Parser.h. It used to
be in xlibs-static-dev, but doesn't seem to be in any of the Xorg 7.0
packages.
[...]
make[3]: Entering directory
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:47:28AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 26 avril 2006 à 00:22 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit :
When I try to log in to Gnome, the X server segfaults (leaving my
console in a very bad state, I have to shell in from another machine
to fix it).
Attached is
Attached is a diff of the exported symbols between versions 0.9.4-5.1
and 0.9.5-3. this should really have had a soname bump, I think,
judging by the amount of changes. I got the diff with the ugly
construct:
diff -u (objdump -T
libdvdread-0.9.4/debian/libdvdread3/usr/lib/libdvdread.so.3.0.0
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.15
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package uninstallable
The debconf question xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping
is needed by xserver-xorg's preinst, yet its template is missing. Without
it, installation fails on new installs unless
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this link is also needed in /usr/lib/xorg/modules/linux
libfglrxdrm.so - /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libfglrxdrm.so
It is required for what?
Please provide an explanation and version information on the packages you
are using. I suspect you're using old or
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 335719 patch
Bug#335719: etw_3.0.cvs20050714-1(m68k/experimental): missing uudecode
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 350033 patch
Bug#350033: binary in orig.tar.gz
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Hi,
The problem seems to be that dvdread/Makefile.in is not updated
after the patch is applied to dvdread/Makefile.am so the old value
is used to decide the exports.
After fixing that manually dvdbackup seems to be working again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 21:12 +0100, Regis Boudin wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 18:28 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
-no crash with the nvidia proprietary driver, display is happy.
When I tried using gdb to get a backtrace(attached), all I got was a
long list of calls involving
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package xserver-xorg
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xserver-xorg
severity 365282 grave
Bug#365282: xserver-xorg 7.0.15 fails installation (pre-inst exit status 10)
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 365282 365353
Bug#365282: xserver-xorg 7.0.15 fails
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This seems to be missing a corresponding update for the prerm script?
Oops, yeah, I do seem to have overlooked that by mistake. Here's the
requisite one-liner, for the record:
--- src/vtwm/vtwm-5.4.7.orig/debian/prerm 2006-04-19
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 07:47:03 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#347176: fixed in gnome-menus 2.14.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi
Here is the patch for the build-dependency to make sure that your package
builds from source. The problem is that uudecode is not available which is
part of the package sharutils.
Here is the change in the control file:
--- control.old 2006-04-29 15:44:19.0 +0200
+++ control
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:02:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#363445: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.8.17-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Stephen Gran wrote:
Attached is a diff of the exported symbols between versions 0.9.4-5.1
and 0.9.5-3. this should really have had a soname bump, I think,
judging by the amount of changes.
Well, ack.. but I don't want to bump it async of upstream, so I informed
him in a separate mail.
What
Package: beagle
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
CVE-2006-1865
Beagle before 0.2.5 can produce certain insecure command lines to
launch external helper applications while indexing, which allows
attackers to execute arbitrary commands. NOTE: it is not immediately
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:47:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#364832: fixed in fuse 2.5.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: nmapfe
Version: 4.00-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Preparing to replace nmapfe 4.00-2 (using .../nmapfe_4.03-2_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement nmapfe ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/nmapfe_4.03-2_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:47:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#364968: fixed in fuse 2.5.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 350550 + fixed
Bug#350550: libcomedi0: incorrect package name and shlibs file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:08:59 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359845: fixed in koffice-l10n 1.5.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On 2006-04-13 Mike Brodbelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: xfs
Version: 1:1.0.1-4
Severity: normal
With previous versions of xfs, the config file used by default was
/etc/X11/fs/config, however the newly packaged version now defaults to
using /usr/lib/X11/fs/config.
[...]
Hello,
Afaict
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:14:00 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#360218: fixed in monodevelop 0.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:14:00 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#351344: fixed in monodevelop 0.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:14:00 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#353984: fixed in monodevelop 0.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 351145 + fixed
Bug#351145: Please stop build modules for python2.1/python2.2
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:36:21PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[1] The original problem does not exist anymore, woody-sarge is done
and sarge-won't suffer from it because exim4-base{,-config} are no
more new, unseen packages of priority important for dselect. Therefore
these ugly conflicts
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 269725 + fixed
Bug#269725: python-oss: README.Debian is about python-ldaptor
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
tag 351146 + fixed
Bug#351146: Please stop build modules for python2.1/python2.2
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
quit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 351137 + fixed
Bug#351137: Please stop build modules for python2.1/python2.2
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Hi
I managed to build a list of configuration files in /etc that are
changed/replaced by debian-edu-config. Though not all of them are
conffiles... Note that some of them were conffiles in recent versions
(xfs in testing for instance). A list of the conffiles is also included.
This should at
Debian Bug Tracking System schrieb am Wed 26. Apr, 22:48 (-0700):
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gone now
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:43:32 -0700
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Version: 1.9.5-1
Whatever caused
hi everybody
as a prospective Release Assistant, I am in charge of seeing that
this bug 354650 be fixed somehow
I see that this is now considered to be a bug in libgtk1.2 ...
is it really worthy to spend a lot of time debugging it, since
libgtk1.2 is obsolete and not mantained upstream?
so
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:32:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#365191: fixed in dhcp3 3.0.3-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: xprint
Version: 1:1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
cd build-tree/xorg-server-1.0.1 \
sh ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man \
--infodir=\${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc \
Hello,
I've just tried to build gpcl on alpha and ia64 boxes, and I got this
results:
% dpkg -c libgpcl-dev_2.32-1_ia64.deb |grep '\.h$'
-rw-r--r-- root/root 4921 2006-04-29 17:56:29 ./usr/include/gpcl/gpc.h
% dpkg -c libgpcl-dev_2.32-1_alpha.deb |grep '\.h$'
-rw-r--r-- root/root 4921
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.4.debian-2
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations
This package includes libfaad* and libx264* which implement the MPEG-4
Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately, these
are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and
Package: gcj-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following
error:
mv stamps/07-install-stamp stamps/07-install-stamp-tmp
dh_installdirs -plib32gcj7 \
usr/lib32
dh_installdirs -plib32gcj7-dev \
usr/lib32
mv
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:03:28PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2006-04-29 Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er, no, that's AC_PATH_XTRA. AC_PATH_X searches for
[X11],[X11/Xlib.h],[XrmInitialize ()].
[...]
Only in Debian (yet) and only since since autoconf 2.59a-4 (#327655).
Package: libxine1
Version: 1.1.1-1.1
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations
This package includes libfaad* and libx264* which implement the MPEG-4
Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately, these
are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 309932 + fixed
Bug#309932: boot-admin should not be in unstable
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:24:56 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#356062: fixed in tktable 2.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:24:54 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#356062: fixed in tktable 2.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:24:56 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#339056: fixed in tktable 2.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:24:56 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#343138: fixed in tktable 2.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Am Samstag, den 29.04.2006, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Matthew William Solloway
Bell:
Package: libxine1
Version: 1.1.1-1.1
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations
This package includes libfaad* and libx264* which implement the MPEG-4
Advanced Audio Coding and
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:45:34 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Package: user-mode-linux
Version: 2.6.16-1um-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I reported on the UML mailing list that I was unable to boot from an ISO
image, even after various gyrations. Jeff Dike suggested that the binary
was probably compiled without proper block
Hi Julien,
Maybe a simple binNMU will be now solve this issue ?
Since gpcl is in non-free, the autobuilders won't pick it up for building;
binNMUs are possible here, so if they'll fix the problem, perhaps you could
build and upload them?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
* Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-29 20:10]:
I've just tried to build gpcl on alpha and ia64 boxes, and I got this
results:
% dpkg -c libgpcl-dev_2.32-1_ia64.deb |grep '\.h$'
-rw-r--r-- root/root 4921 2006-04-29 17:56:29 ./usr/include/gpcl/gpc.h
% dpkg -c
Package: libavcodec0d
Version: 0.cvs20060329-4
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations
This package includes libfaad* and an H.264 CoDec which implement the
MPEG-4 Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately,
these are patent encumbered in at
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:12:18PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le mercredi 19 avril 2006 à 15:01 +1000, Peter Moulder a écrit :
I'd guess that an appropriate versioned Depends would be
libx11-dev (= 2:1.0.0).
libx11 should update its shlib rather, so libgtk2.0-0 will Depends on a
new
I've also posted a bug for vlc; Checking mad and ffmpeg now too.
Matthew W. S. Bell
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 21:09 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
Am Samstag, den 29.04.2006, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Matthew William Solloway
Bell:
Package: libxine1
Version: 1.1.1-1.1
Severity: Serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 364819 + unreproducible
Bug#364819: gij-4.1: bus error on hppa.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: rgl
Version: 0.66-3
Severity: serious
sbuild automatically selects the first of an or'ed build-depends, so
it needs to be a valid (real) package which is in the archive and
AFAICS libgl-mesa-dev isn't/doesn't.
| Automatic build of rgl_0.66-3 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 85
| Build
tags 364819 + unreproducible
thanks
works for me.
Kurt Roeckx writes:
Package: gij-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
When building ecj-bootstrap on hppa, we get the following error:
gij-4.1 \
-classpath build/bootstrap/ecj.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant.jar \
Package: kinput2
Version: 3.1-8
Severity: serious
libxaw8-dev is deprecated and going away soon, please use libxaw7-dev
instead.
| Automatic build of kinput2_3.1-8 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 85
| Build started at 20060428-2206
|
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:25:12PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Yes, could you please do it?
Yes, I just did a binNMU for alpha and ia64.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
.''`. Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid
`- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974
severity 365395 important
thank
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:48:16AM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
Package: user-mode-linux
Version: 2.6.16-1um-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
it's not really unusable, severity is inappropriate IMO.
I reported on the UML mailing list
Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.26-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to modify an entry, slapd crashes with the error:
slapd: /build/buildd/openldap2.2-2.2.26/servers/slapd/mods.c:55:
modify_add_values: Assertion `0' failed.
-- System Information:
Debian
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:01:52 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#365390: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and
libx264*
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:01:52 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#365390: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and
libx264*
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:03:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#365126: fixed in wmrack 1.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:01:52 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#365390: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and
libx264*
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 361680 serious
Bug#361680: atk1.0: Typo in rules file results in incorrect shlibs file
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 01:55:55 +0200 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Do I need to get the copyright holder of the documents to
relicense it under the GPL? It seems clear to me that it
already is covered by the GPL, but it shouldn't be a
problem to get the copyright holder to explicitly state
that.
Yes,
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:40:10 -0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed by yelp 2.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
I forgot to attach the patch in the previous email, here it is.
/Bj|rn
--- dvdbackup.c.orig2006-03-02 19:09:52.0 +0100
+++ dvdbackup.c 2006-03-02 20:14:25.0 +0100
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include unistd.h
#include string.h
#include limits.h
+#include stdint.h
#include
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:24:25PM +0300, Katriel Traum wrote:
Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.26-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to modify an entry, slapd crashes with the error:
slapd: /build/buildd/openldap2.2-2.2.26/servers/slapd/mods.c:55:
Sat Apr 29 2006, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Hi,
we have some problems[0] in Debian with the libdvdread 0.9.5. It seems,
that the UDFFindFile (and some others) are no longer exportet. Is this
done intenionally or accidently?
If intenionally, how about bumping the soname to reflect this changes?
Package: console-tools
Version: 0.2.3dbs-61
Severity: serious
Upgrade of console-tools (and therefore console-common) fails because
console-screen.sh throws an error when started:
$ ./console-screen.sh start || echo FAIL $?
+ '[' -r /etc/console-tools/config ']'
+ . /etc/console-tools/config
++
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:40:10 -0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed by yelp 2.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:40:10 -0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed by yelp 2.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#365111: fixed in python-support 0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Le samedi 29 avril 2006 à 14:48 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System a
écrit :
De: Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sujet: fixed by yelp 2.14
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:40:10 -0300
This was apparently not a bug on scrollkeeper?
This was a bug in scrollkeeper,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 359904 [CVE-2006-1490] Binary safety issue in html_entity_decode()
may leak information
Bug#359904: Security: Binary safety issue in html_entity_decode() may leak
memory
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:55:39PM -0700, Ian Bruce wrote:
I'd like to confirm the seriousness of this bug. I have a pre-Xorg
X-server, but I thought I would try upgrading xdm to see if that would
fix some minor problems associated with /etc/init.d/xdm restart.
Instead, it broke the X-server
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
