Hi,
Florian Goujeon wrote:
Rene Engelhard a écrit :
please keep the bug in the Cc otherwise stuff won't be recorded. Cc'ing the
bug now and
fullquoting for it.
Sorry, I clicked the wrong button :-/
And a full dist-upgrade? Maybe it worked just by chance for you in sid?
Still
severity 504323 important
thanks
Christian Perrier wrote:
I couldn't reproduce any crash here either, on a fresh install of
lenny (in French, which is even more likely to fit the bug submitter's
environment) during my tests of D-I.
Here again, I really se no reason for the bug to be release
severity 494644 important
tag 494644 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
Brendon Green wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:2.4.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
No. Just because a simgle documents (which even is guessed to be malfformed)
crashes is *NOT* a grave bug.
Hi,
Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
I suggest you start to create Debian-packages out of Subversion-sources.
In homepage of muttprint they show things like these:
i've another suggestion: Get the new maintainer actually do what he
should do and release a new version.
Regards,
Rene
--
To
Hi,
Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
Package: muttprint
Version: 0.72d-9
Severity: grave
No.
Whenever I try to print any E-Mail that uses some other charset than
US-ASCII, it shows just this text in dialog:
[...]
Sain is actually the first word in body of that E-Mail. Headers of that
E-Mail
Hi,
Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
So I guess the problem is that you got 8bit instead of quoted printable
mails?
When I read that file with less, it does not look like quote printable
at all. My E-Mail is perfectly readable, if I do like this:
iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8
tag 495694 + unreproducible
tag 495694 + moreinfo
thanks
Benoît Dejean wrote:
LC_ALL=C sudo dpkg -i
/var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-writer2latex_0.5-8_all.deb
(Reading database ... 239783 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace openoffice.org-writer2latex
Hi,
Benoît Dejean wrote:
And why do you think this is a writer2latex problem and not a
problem in whatever JVM you use?
Which one did you use (set it Tools-Options in OOo).
I haven't set anything. I used to have gcj but switched to cacao because
But what is set in OOos options? Please
août 2008 à 20:29 +0200, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
Hi,
Benoît Dejean wrote:
And why do you think this is a writer2latex problem and not a
problem in whatever JVM you use?
Which one did you use (set it Tools-Options in OOo).
I haven't set anything. I used to have gcj
Hi,
Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
For example if a script uses in its work a temp file which is created
in /tmp directory, then every user can create symlink with the same
name in this directory in order to destroy or rewrite some system
or user file. Symlink attack may also lead not
Hi again,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
I so far thought mktemp was safe enough? (of course, we get
senddoc.mutt.number, but...
Sorry, missed the final sentence: What do you propose instead?
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
found 496361 1:2.4.1-6
notfound 496361 1:3.0.0~beta2-1
notfound 496361 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch5
tag 496361 + pending
thanks
Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
#!/bin/sh
URI_ENCODE=`dirname $0`/uri-encode
echo $@ /tmp/log.obr.$$
echo $# /tmp/log.obr.$$
[...]
Oops, I didn't see it
Hi,
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
I so far thought mktemp was safe enough? (of course, we get
senddoc.mutt.number, but...
mktemp is safe enough. I think Dmitry refers to lines 3 and 4 of that script:
echo $@ /tmp/log.obr.$$
echo $# /tmp/log.obr.$$
which I agree
merge 496480 496698
thanks
Hi,
Jiří Paleček wrote:
openoffice.org in experimental failed to build with the following message:
for jar in xmerge.jar.1.jar; do \
/usr/bin/gcj-dbtool-4.3 -f xmerge.jar.db $jar \
/usr/lib/gcj/openoffice/xmerge.jar.so; \
done
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
How is that different to 496480 which already was filed days ago and is
marked pending right now?
Next time please actually look at the BTS before filing another bug. It's not
as if RC bugs Thanks.
^ are hard to see in the overview
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
# not appearing in 2.4, notfound does not work
fixed 464304 1:2.4.0~ooh680m5-1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dariusz Lomot wrote:
Version: 2.2.1-10
Not in testing anymore. Please try with something remotely recent.
(2.2.1-x isnÄt supported anymore since long anyway).
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Sure... I'd more blame your system...
OpenOffice Calc does not calculate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tag 464544 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
ii openoffice.org-common 1:2.3.1-3 OpenOffice.org office suite
archit
The only thing I can explain your behaviour is this, this actually
contains some important configs. OTOH, I
Package: python-odtwriter
Version: 1.1a-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
$ dpkg -L python-odtwriter
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/python-odtwriter
/usr/share/doc/python-odtwriter/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/python-odtwriter/odtwriter.odt.gz
found 462762 0.12.1-1
thanks
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
aria2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
Still happens.
* New upstream release (Closes: #455282, #462762)
And please next time a bit
close 462762 0.12.1-1
thanks
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
found 462762 0.12.1-1
thanks
[...]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
aria2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
Still happens.
uh, sorry. /me apparently too blind. It seems
severity 466200 important
tag 466200 + moreinfo
thanks
Eric Valette wrote:
Package: openoffice.org-writer
Version: 1:2.4.0~rc1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Uhm, no. For base you would have been right, but writer can also be used
without JRE, so it doesn't make
tag 466300 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Daniel Franganillo wrote:
Last openoofice uprade came with this new dependency, which does not
install:
Setting up openoffice.org-writer2latex (0.5-4) ...
Adding extension
/usr/lib/openoffice/share/extension/install/writer2latex.uno.pkg...
ERROR: JNI
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/tritt# LC_ALL=C update-alternatives --display java
java - status is manual.
link currently points to /usr/lib/j2sdk1.5-sun/bin/java
/usr/lib/j2sdk1.5-sun/bin/java - priority 315
slave java.1.gz: /usr/lib/j2sdk1.5-sun/man/man1/java.1.gz
/usr/bin/gij-4.1 -
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
# hmm.
close 451215 0.2.8.dfsg-1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Michael Koch wrote:
Thats due to the libfonts-java update from 0.2.6 to 0.3.3. We will
either need to patch jfreereport or remove it from the archive, we have
now its successor, pentaho-reporting-flow-engine, in the archive.
Indeed; I'd vote for the removal. The only thing still needing
tag 468202 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Steffen Moeller wrote:
Setting up openoffice.org-writer2latex (0.5-5) ...
Adding extension
/usr/lib/openoffice/share/extension/install/writer2latex.uno.pkg...
unopkg failed.
dpkg: error processing openoffice.org-writer2latex (--configure):
subprocess
tag 468202 - unreproducible
thanks
Rene Engelhard wrote:
tag 468202 + unreproducible
Ooops, sorry, left that in acctdentially.
Sigh. unopkgs not-existing error handling strikes again.
That said, a dpkg -i worked for me, but indeed on my ppc a dist-upgrade
fails...
And a dpkg -P
Amit Gurdasani wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sudo dpkg --force-depends --purge
openoffice.org-writer2latex
dpkg: openoffice.org-writer2latex: dependency problems, but removing
anyway as you request:
openoffice.org-writer depends on openoffice.org-writer2latex.
(Reading database ... 240675
Julien BLACHE wrote:
I'd happily remove writer2latex which I do not need, if only it wasn't a
Depends. Please demote it to a Recommends.
It is.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show openoffice.org-writer | grep writer2latex
Recommends: java-gcj-compat | icedtea-java7-jre | sun-java5-jre |
Hi,
Amit Gurdasani wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Amit Gurdasani wrote:
:It sounds like unopkg needs a lesson in manners. It should check for active
:users of the lockfile before dying abruptly, and why can't it do its work
when
:OpenOffice.org is running, anyway?
And what appears to be a
Hi,
Julien BLACHE wrote:
Of course, the openoffice.org dummy package depends on it because
writer2latex is shipped since 2.0.4 within OOo and people might wonder
where the functionality is now...
OK, and what about fixing that [EMAIL PROTECTED] bug ? I can reproduce it at
will
What do
Julien BLACHE wrote:
strace on the postinst script reveals that unopkg does most (if not all)
of its job but still fails (I can see it opening various XML and other OOo
files).
Have the strace, please? It doesn't really make sense talking about an
strace but then not attaching it, especially
Hi,
Julien BLACHE wrote:
In the meantime, your comment about the prerm makes it sound like the
package may not have been unregistered by the prerm, right ? unopkg
Or not unregistered correctly, yes.
list lists no installed extensions, but maybe that needs some options
to be really
Hi,
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
[10:20AM] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:oboe/apps/callexec $ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
icedove
Hi,
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:29:49AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
And you unregistered the extension manually to have a clean state if it
failed before? Read the buglog...
OK, I removed it (forgot the --shared in the last attempt
Hi,
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Thanks. The manual says that if the old prerm fails, dpkg should try the
same operation with the new prerm, which you said is fixed. I didn't see
it try to do this.
The problem here might be that the prerm didn't actually fail in
the sense that it returned an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
clone 467601 -1
submitter -1 Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
severity -1 important
retitle -1 ftp.debian.org: RM: jfreereport -- RoM; RC-buggy; superseded by
pentaho-reporting-flow-engine
thanks
Rene Engelhard wrote
found 476597 1:2.4.0-5
tag 476597 + lenny
thanks
Hi,
python2.5 (and OOo 2.4.0-5) was again forced it regardless of
gcc-defaults so the 2.4.0-5 which entered testing is still broken
(in testing, works fine on sid as the new gcc-defaults is there...)
Marking...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
)
+ * run make install in wml_common/filepathconcert manually as it
+somehow otherwise doesn't get installed anymore...
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 04 May 2008 23:51:49 +0200
+
wml (2.0.11ds1-0.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload
Hi,
just as a possible workaround:
maks asked me to try with MODULES=dep to make the created initramfs smaller,
- and indeed after changing it and regenerating the initramfs (and running
lilo ;) ) 2.6.25-2-amd64 booted fine on my MacBook (x86_64).
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: libstlport4.6ldbl
Version: 4.6.2-3.1
Severity: serious
Hi Pierre,
I guess your NMU misses (at least) a Replaces:
(Reading database ... 332011 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libstlport4.6ldbl (from .../libstlport4.6ldbl_4.6.2-3.1_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error
Hi,
Lukas: your patch is none. This is a workaround.
Anyways, this is now fixed since some time with 1:006-3~volatile1 from
volatile (volatile.debian.org.
Leaving this bug open, though, as it at still affects Debian stable but
an update for this won't be allowed into Debian stable (thus the
tag 476220 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Rasmus Bøg Hansen wrote:
python-uno depends on python 2.5; however python 2.5.2-0.1 was
uploaded to unstable.
This makes python-uno uninstallable (actually entire openoffice.org)
^^
Hi,
Hristo Hristov wrote:
I was wondering why don't you use a fix like in bug=475906 so that you
That's not a valid comparison. ctypes is a module formerly external and
now in the python core.
That fix was about that it's only built for python2.4 now, which the
tools fail to understand.
don't
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
It's a decision to just support the default python and I won't change
that (at least not in the near future).
Reason:
$ dpkg -L python-uno
/.
/usr
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/python2.5
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyuno.so
/usr/lib
severity 476352 serious
close 476352
thanks
Hi,
Giacomo Mulas wrote:
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Wrong. Package not installable. So it's serious, not grave.
renders package unusable would be when it was installed but has a bug
making it not work at all.
The new
Package: openoffice.org-voikko
Version: 2.2-2
Severity: serious
Unfortunately I didn't think about/notice this either, but a etch-sid
dist-upgrade with openoffice.org-voikko involved now fails with the
scriplets using -env.
Stripped log from the dist-upgrade:
Preconfiguring packages ...
[...]
Hi,
Vincent Smeets wrote:
I have found out that the package libgcj-bc (4.3.0-1) exists in
or in unstable. (4.3.0-4). That's where the openoffice.org packages were
built.
that version never made it into testing/lenny.
Indeed.
Can a package migrate to testing without all the dependency
clone 476678 -1
reassign -1 python-central
thanks
Hi,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
when updating python-uno I get an error on the first try:
Unpacking replacement openoffice.org ...
Preparing to replace python-uno 1:2.4.0-3 (using
.../python-uno_1%3a2.4.0-4_amd64.deb) ...
INFO: using old
Package: xulrunner
Version: 1.8.1.14-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi.
xulrunner FTBFSes on ia64 because it cannot find iostream.h which indeed
is obsolete and gone with gcc 4.3.0 AFAIS.
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=xulrunner;ver=1.8.1.14-1;arch=ia64;stamp=1208499195:
[...]
make[8]:
tag 477168 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Mike Hommey wrote:
xulrunner FTBFSes on ia64 because it cannot find iostream.h which indeed
is obsolete and gone with gcc 4.3.0 AFAIS.
What is to be used instead ?
Sorry, I apparently missed one sentence: iostream.
I am not exactly sure either, but I know
clone 477168 -1 -2
reassign -1 iceape
reassign -2 icedove
thanks
Mike Hommey wrote:
How come iceape didn't fail to build but had a warning instead ? (using
gcc 4.3)
Correct. g*cc* 4.3, not g*++*-4.3. What you compile is C++ file using c++,
though, so what gets used is g++.
If you looked at the
found 477289 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch4
severity 477289 important
thanks
Hi,
Szalay Attila wrote:
I downgraded to the version 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch4 but the problem
remains. :(
Aha. As I guessed. And you should have guessed that too given what was
fixed in -7etch5.
Regards,
Rene
--
To
Hi,
SZALAY Attila wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch5
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
It's may cause data loss, because I couldn't save my changes.
Err, not true. I believe you could save locally and move it to the smb
share later?
The
Package: python2.5
Version: 2.5.2-7
Severity: grave
Hi,
it seems 2.5.2-7 broke python2.5 on mipsel (at least in some cases)
See the sucessful build of openoffice.org 2.4.1-3 with python2.5 2.5.2-6
(http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=openoffice.orgver=1%3A2.4.1-3arch=mipselfile=log)
and the
tag 488972 - moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
how is $2 expanded?
AC_DEFUN([AM_PYTHON_CHECK_VERSION],
[prog=import sys, string
# split strings by '.' and convert to numeric. Append some zeros
# because we need at least 4 digits for the hex conversion.
minver = map(int,
severity 484116 wishlist
# This will be removed when someone actually ports OOo to hppa (at which
# time this bug will fix itself automatically)
tag 484116 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:2.4.1~rc2-1
Severity: serious
No. Not at all. It's not
Package: gcj, gij, libgcj-bc
Version: 4:4.3.0-7
Severity: serious
$ apt-cache show gcj | grep Depends
Depends: cpp (= 4:4.3.0-8), gij (= 4:4.3.0-8), gcj-4.3 (= 4.3.0-5)
gcj-4.3 |4.3.0-3 | testing | source, amd64, armel, i386, ia64,
mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
gcj-4.3 |
Package: libdb4.6-dev
Version: 4.6.21-10
Severity: serious
Hi,
I see that libdb4.6-dev dropped its conflict against libdb-dev. Which
makes my aptitude install of libdb4.6-dev run into the following
(libdb-dev was installed due to an upgrade..)
(Sorry, german, but should be clear)
Entpacke
Package: hunspell-se
Version: 1.0~beta1.20080601-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
* This package only work with OpenOffice.org version 2.4 or newer,
as the required language code was added to OOo in that version.
Not conflicting with openoffice.org-core ( 1:2.4) to enforce
this, to
[ Daniel: [EMAIL PROTECTED] does NOT go to the submitter ]
Hi,
Daniel Moerner wrote:
I cannot reproduce this--the openwrt mirror is slow but still have the
necessary files:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dwm-5.1$ sudo aptitude install b43-fwcutter
[...[
Setting up b43-fwcutter (1:011-5) ...
Package: libdaemon0
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: grave
[ seen on 0.13-1 but I have no reason to believe older versions
are unaffected ]
Hi,
From an application here using libdaemon:
Sep 29 10:02:21 frodo nfschecker[26995]: open(/usr/var/run/nfschecker.pid): No
cuch file or directory
Sep 29
severity 501664 grave
merge 501664 501667
thanks
Hi,
g.gragnani wrote:
Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 1:2.4.1-10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
last version of openoffice comes with a soffice script
that fail with the following error:
/usr/bin/soffice:
severity 501755 grave
merge 501664 501755
thanks
Craig Sanders wrote:
$ oocalc
javaldx failed!
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 367: syntax error near unexpected
token `fi'
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 367: `fi'
problem is due to mistaken use of 'fi' to terminate
tag 502422 + help
thanks
Hi,
Philipp Kern wrote:
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of openoffice.org_1:3.0.0-2 on alkman.ayous.org by
sbuild/ia64 98-farm
[...]
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
I know. But I don't get the build-deps installed on merulo so I can
try it myself
Got them installed.
It might have to do with the switch to openjdk, so also Ccing the
openjdk maintainer. But for the aformentioned reason I also can't verify
that by trying
severity 469465 important
tag 469465 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Bernhard Rieder wrote:
Severity: grave
Eh? So you say Impress is *completely* unusable?
Because one specific document, and then even a ppt one seems to have problems?
No, sorry.
When opening a ppt file ooimpress eats up all
severity 470904 important
tag 470904 + unreproducible
tag 470904 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Max Alekseyev wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:2.4.0~rc4-1
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
No. Read the bug severities again. How does it break your whole system?
Hi,
Max Alekseyev wrote:
I've just recalled that in 2006 I observed somewhat similar problem with
accessing menu in OpenOffice. But it was not that severe.
Freeze != Crash... But it might be related, yes...
Please see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=395354 for
details.
severity 470904 important
thanks
Max Alekseyev wrote:
And it's not grave either because if it happened for loads of people
it would have been reported ealier.
The grave description does not say anything about the minimum number of
people required to report the bug of this severity.
tag 471458 + moreinfo
tag 471458 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Ďoďo wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:2.3.1-5
please try with something supported (means: 2.4 from sid). 2.3.1 is not
suppoted/supportable anymore. It should vanish from testing better
earlier than later but
Regards,
forwarded 471458 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69993
thanks
Ďoďo wrote:
Sometimes - still not clear when - I can not save the file. After
pressing Ctrl+S I get:
Error saving the document. Write Error. The file could not be written.
It happend already in Writer and in Calc.
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.19
# happens only on parallel builds and this bug otherwise would block the
suitesparse transition
severity 471633 important
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
retitle 472826 fails to start up with arphic ukai font
reassign 472826 openoffice.org-core
thanks
David Koo wrote:
Package: openoffice.org-writer
Version: 1:2.3.1-5
Severity: grave
I disagree, sorry. But it doesn't really matter anyway, see below.
Justification: renders package unusable
severity 473097 important
thanks
chryjs wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:2.4.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Reality check, please.
No. It does not make the whole office suite unusable.
PS : I don't know how to attach a file but I can provide
Hi,
David Koo wrote:
I disagree, sorry. But it doesn't really matter anyway, see below.
I'm embarrased to say but I agree with your tests now. This morning I
gave it one more shot and renamed the arphic directory back to its
original name and openoffice started up!
With 1:2.3.1-5 or sids
Package: gnu-efi
Version: 3.0d-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Preparing to replace gnu-efi 3.0d-1 (using .../gnu-efi_3.0e-1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement gnu-efi ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gnu-efi_3.0e-1_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib32', which is
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Preparing to replace gnu-efi 3.0d-1 (using .../gnu-efi_3.0e-1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement gnu-efi ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gnu-efi_3.0e-1_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib32', which is also in package libc6-i386
Package: dmaths
Version: 3.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
as this package just entered sid and is a OOo extension I briefl looked over
its packaging and wondreed why it didn't register at all.
I then saw that you need to run a install-dmaths script. That isn't even
told to the user. How should he
Hi,
Grzegorz Szyszlo wrote:
It's impossible to start all open office applications in Gnome
environment. Cause is, not installed package openoffice.org-gnome.
Gnome support is not installed, because is installation problem with
openoffice.org-gtk.
This doesn't make sense. The menu entries
Hi,
VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN wrote:
[ snip ]
Your subject is bullshit. Do you really think nothing happens?
After some days of searching we found the cause and the fixed
package is building.
Gr��e/Regards,
Ren�
--
.''`. Ren� Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' :
Hi,
VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN wrote:
[ snip ]
Your subject is bullshit. Do you really think nothing happens?
After some days of searching we found the cause and the fixed
package is building.
You probably well tested
notfound 390992 2.0.4~rc3-1
Am Mittwoch, 4. Oktober 2006 10:45 schrieb Manuel Silvoso:
Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 2.0.4~rc3-3909921
Followup-For: Bug #390992
Of course you still have the problem because the fix is in the arch-dep parts
of OOo
and i386 is not yet uploaded by the
severity 391430@ important
tag 391430@ + unreproducible
tag 391430@ + moreinfo
thanks
Andre Timmermann wrote:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel:
tag 391908 + moreinfo
thanks
Am Montag, 9. Oktober 2006 13:52 schrieb Jan Evert van Grootheest:
When I open a document that should be writable, the document is opened
Why do you think so?
read-only (the title-bar shows this and I can't make changes). I can,
however, create and modify files
#deprecated but does work here and is better than two mails :)
close 391908
severity 391911 important
retitle 391911 freezes when closing file not locked on nfs
thanks
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2006 09:39 schrieb Jan Evert van Grootheest:
The bug about opening it read-only (391908), of
Package: libstlport5.0-dev
Version: 5.0.2-10
Severity: grave
$ ls -l /usr/lib/libstlport.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2006-10-10 15:26 /usr/lib/libstlport.so -
libstlport.so.5
which of course doesn't exist, but what exists is
$ ls -l /usr/lib/libstlport.so.5.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19
tag 392065 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi,
known bug in 2.6.18 AFAIS. SHould be fixed in 2.6.18.1 according to
the bcm43xx developers.
Regards,
René
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 392698 + help
thanks
Hi,
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Base:
- Run a query in Base. Close the query window. Crash.
- Edit a query in Base. Hit run. Everything is fine. Hit run a
second time. Crash.
- All of these are with the libmysql-java JDBC connector.
This is
tag 392401 - patch
thanks
gregor herrmann wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:58:34 +0200, Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) wrote:
/usr/share/doc/liblpsolve55-dev/examples/demo must be moved to something
like /usr/bin/liblpsolve-demo or somewhere in /usr/lib.
Cf. the attached patch.
Broken
Package: enchant
Severity: serious
Version: 1.3.0-1
Hi,
libhunspell-dev is (and never was, so it's not RC) not available on ARM
because it fails the testsuite:
$ rmadison libhunspell-dev
libhunspell-dev |1.1.4-3 | testing | alpha, amd64, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
2.0.4-1 is in unstable noe also for ppc so this is fixed if you do
a upgrade; I'll bump the dependency for the next upload, though.
Ah, no. The new (-core obviously at your reporting time not installed by
you although
severity 393490 important
tag 393490 + unreproducible
tag 393490 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2006 17:20 schrieb Daniel Serpell:
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
huh? It doesn't cause data loss since OOo would restore
the document next time, does it?
Anyway...
To
Hi,
Am Freitag, 13. Oktober 2006 00:41 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Spreadsheet
- When inserting a chart, it somehow brought up the insert chart
dialog twice. Crash.
Doesn't here.i Although it *might* be related with speed-chart.diff,
please check again when 2.0.4-1 is in sid
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2006 16:06 schrieb Tomas Pospisek:
[ snip ]
I've been seeing this behaveour with 2.0.4~rc3 and now, worse and more
often with 2.0.4-1.
Can you please try on a clean testing / clean sid first?
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Testing doesn't have
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2006 17:00 schrieb Tomas Pospisek:
Btw. the crash message said:
$ /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 254: 12032 Segmentation fault
$sd_prog/$sd_binary $@
No bt? This one is really not very helpful...
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard --
reassign 393909 fontconfig
thanks
Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 14:01 schrieb Ryan:
budha:~# apt-get install ttf-opensymbol/unstable
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Selected version 2.0.4-1 (Debian:unstable) for ttf-opensymbol
ttf-opensymbol is already the
Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 15:42 schrieb Paolo Cavallini:
2.0.4-1 seems ok
What exactly? The chart issue(s) you mean?
Or both?
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Hi,
Paolo Cavallini wrote:
sorry - I meant both.
Anthony, can you confirm? I can still reproduce the databse things with
2.0.4-1, though (on sid/ppc), but that hopefully will be fixed in 2.0.4-2
(at least works here with with the version I just built for testing)
But what about the Chart
101 - 200 of 1300 matches
Mail list logo
