Hi,
I intend to package snap 0.02a, a Perl-based Napster client for console.
The package is actually already made, but I have just applied to become
a Debian maintainer, thus it will probably still be quite some time till
I can upload the package (unless I will find a sponsor).
Cheers, Guenter
--
Andreas Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Good enough for you? Good enough for anyone? ajt? (-:
Bad idea.
Then you also want every X11-app to ask if it should install itself in
/usr/X386/bin or somewhere else and every game-like app if it should
instaal it self in /usr/bin or /usr/games?
Eit
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please also note that other daemons conflict with each other well, e.g.,
> inn & cnews, sendmail & postfix.
I am aware of that, and it's a shame, there is no real reason that
they cannot coexist.
apt-move 4.1.9
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 ~ $ sudo apt-move localupdate
/usr/bin/apt-move: line 122: syntax error near unexpected token ('
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 ~ $
the script contains some `(' and `)' where it should be `{' and `}' (??)
but if this is the case, then how came that `()' became `{}' ??
i
Hi,
I just uploaded my first five Debian packages. They include the console
programs journal, mrename, ncps, saydate, and snap.
The URL is http://www.bechly.de/debian/.
I also included a Packages file generated with dpkg-scanpackages, thus the
site should be apt-getable.
Since I am no official main
Andreas Fuchs writes:
> Hm. So why not make it the admin's choice? How about'
>
>
> Setting up netbase (version) ...
>
> In the standard configuration, some binaries of netbase are installed
> in /usr/sbin, which is, by default, not included in the user's search
> paths. Do you want to create a
I originally ITPed bochs. Unfortunately it would have to go in non-free.
the VGA-BIOS included is licensed only for use and distribution with
bochs. It therefor cannot be seperated into a seperate package from
bochs (and if bochs is packaged, it should ge removed from the source
archive.
Andrew
Hi,
A while back there was mention of developing a display manageer that
could select a host to login to. What ever became of this?
I am setting up a small group of machines for our physics/engineering
depts. and would like to have this available. Is this still just
ideaware?
My apologies if thi
Hi,
>>"John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Please also note that other daemons conflict with each other well, e.g.,
>> inn & cnews, sendmail & postfix.
John> I am aware of that, and it's a shame, there is no real reason that
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 ~ $ sudo apt-move localupdate
> /usr/bin/apt-move: line 122: syntax error near unexpected token ('
See the following:
http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=67519
http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=67522
http://cgi.debian.org/
On Monday, 14 August 2000 at 14:20, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>"John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Please also note that other daemons conflict with each other well, e.g.,
> >> inn & cnews, sendmail & postfix.
>
>
Hi,
I just uploaded my first five Debian packages. They include the console
programs journal, mrename, ncps, saydate, and snap.
The download URL is http://members.tripod.de/GBechly/debian/.
I also included a Packages file generated with dpkg-scanpackages, thus the
site should be apt-getable with
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John> Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Please also note that other daemons conflict with each other well, e.g.,
> >> inn & cnews, sendmail & postfix.
>
> John> I am aware of that, and it's a shame, there is no real reason that
> John>
xdm already has this feature, I believe.
-- John
esoR ocsirF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> A while back there was mention of developing a display manageer that
> could select a host to login to. What ever became of this?
>
> I am setting up a small group of machines for our physics/engin
Hi,
the entire gnu develoopnet environment is ported to the avr arcitecture and
runs nicely under debian. Currently all that excists as debian packages are
a few asmeblers and programmers. I intend to create the following debain
packages:
avr-binutils
avr-gcc
avr-libc
avr-monitor (code mon
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 11:04:15PM +0200, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> Hi,
> the entire gnu develoopnet environment is ported to the avr arcitecture and
> runs nicely under debian. Currently all that excists as debian packages are
> a few asmeblers and programmers. I intend to create the following debain
>
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> As Goswin mentioned earlier it's also possible to use bochs with some
> other bios
[snip]
I´m not sure if this even touches this discussion but what about using the bios
that is already present on most computers?
Wouldn´t that reduce the dependen
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 03:22:43PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 12:47:34AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
> > Anthony Towns writes:
> > > Well, if you wanted half the people running unstable to just
> > > blithely upgrade and have all their firewalling disappear, you could
>
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 05:07:29PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 11:04:15PM +0200, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the entire gnu develoopnet environment is ported to the avr arcitecture and
> > runs nicely under debian. Currently all that excists as debian packages are
> > a fe
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> xdm already has this feature, I believe.
>
> -- John
>
> esoR ocsirF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > A while back there was mention of developing a display manageer that
> > could select a host to login to. What ever became of this?
> >
> >
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 12:47:29AM -0400, David Grill Watson wrote:
> It wasn't like that before - and should something be done about that? It
> seems pretty broken to me.
you can just link root's xauthority file to yours. or use XAUTHORITY=
Greetings
Bernd
>
> binutils is part of the actual upstream source version 2.10 gcc is
> distributed as a patch to version 2.95.2 and gdb as a patch to 4.18, the
> rest is not related to actual gnu sources.
>
Excellent. Then most likely all you need to do is get the target added to
the binutils-multiarch packa
I guess nobody's actually announced it on the list, but the FTP sites
seem to have moved the link for stable to potato! 2.2 must, logically,
be released!
Shocking. :) Congrats to everyone! (How come it wasn't announced
on the list?)
Ben
--
Brought to you by the letters E and J and the number 6.
> No real reason? Only one package can listen in on port 25, and
Only one package can listen on port 25 of one IP. It is possible to
have multiple packages listening on different ports or different IPs.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 05:44:29PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > binutils is part of the actual upstream source version 2.10 gcc is
> > distributed as a patch to version 2.95.2 and gdb as a patch to 4.18, the
> > rest is not related to actual gnu sources.
> >
>
> Excellent. Then most likely
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Hakan Ardo
> Sent: None
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: ITP: gcc, binutils, libc, gdb for Amtel AVR microcontrollers
>
>
> Hi,
> the entire gnu develoopnet environment i
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 07:42:05PM -0300, Frank Smith wrote:
>
> As part of the Embedded Debian Project (see http://www.emdebian.org) I've
> made modifications to the binutils and gcc source packages to support the
> building of cross compilation environments.
>
> Perhaps there is some overlap
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 07:42:05PM -0300, Frank Smith wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the entire gnu develoopnet environment is ported to the avr
> > arcitecture and
> > runs nicely under debian. Currently all that excists as debian
> > packages are
> > a few asmeblers and programmers. I intend to create the
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
>
> I guess nobody's actually announced it on the list, but the FTP sites
> seem to have moved the link for stable to potato! 2.2 must, logically,
> be released!
>
> Shocking. :) Congrats to everyone! (How come it wasn't announced
> on the list?)
>
> Ben
>
I just receive
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 02:23:50PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
>
> In /etc/X11/wdm/wdm-config, add:
>
> ! Use our chooser
> DisplayManager*chooser:
>
> Start X with "X -indirect localhost" and voila.
Ok, this sounds like like what I am looking for but, I seem to be brain
dead.
Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> > As Goswin mentioned earlier it's also possible to use bochs with some
> > other bios
> [snip]
>
> I´m not sure if this even touches this discussion but what about using the
> bios
> that is already
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 05:52:07PM -0700, esoR ocsirF wrote:
:# /etc/init.d/wdm stop
:# X -indirect localhost
:
:and I get an X background with a mouse cursor but no wdm panel. I, once
:again, assume that this is the correct behavior. So I am now thinking,
:do I pass these options to X via the /et
> "esoR" == esoR ocsirF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
esoR> On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 02:23:50PM -0700, Philippe Troin
esoR> wrote:
>> In /etc/X11/wdm/wdm-config, add:
>>
>> ! Use our chooser DisplayManager*chooser:
>>
>> Start X with "X -indirect localhost" and voil
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
esoR> # /etc/init.d/wdm stop # X -indirect localhost
esoR> and I get an X background with a mouse cursor but no wdm
esoR> panel. I, once again, assume that this is the correct
esoR> behavior. So I am now thinking, do I pass th
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 09:19:41PM -0400, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
> this means either:
>
> there are no host on the local subnet which are willing to let you
> connect via XDMP or some thing is scrod in your config files (like wdm
> is looking at xmd's config or some other random weirdness).
>
On 11-Aug-00, 19:04 (CDT), Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> debview - Emacs mode for viewing Debian packages
>
> > (And I, for one, would not object to debview being folded into dpkg.)
>
> As a vi user, I would.
Why? Oh, I see, because it d
>>"John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> No real reason? Only one package can listen in on port 25, and
John> There is no real reason that all must listen on port 25.
Then you and I have very different opinions on what a working
MTA is. Indeed, the SMTP RFC's differ wit
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 10:27:22AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Branden> Of course. The obvious answer is that programs that have
> Branden> some utility to unprivileged users should go in /bin (or
> Branden> /usr/bin).
>
>
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 09:54:28AM -0400, Chad Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 09:22:27AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > Perhaps not. But a traceroute in /usr/bin would satisfy more people than
> > a traceroute in /usr/sbin.
>
> Hear, hear! It would be a flag day for a few poorly written
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 12:47:29AM -0400, David Grill Watson wrote:
> I've noticed that some time recently (not sure when) when I su to root while
> I'm in X, I no longer have access to the X session - I have to do an xhost
> +localhost as the current user.
>
> It wasn't like that before - and s
On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 11:51:52PM -0700, Henry Jones wrote:
[...]
Your lines are so
short that they are
difficult for me to
read. It's like
listening to a
56kb/s stream
through a 14.4
modem. How about
setting your line
width to between 65
and 75 characters?
--
G. Branden Robinson |
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 07:02:54PM -0700, esoR ocsirF wrote:
:OK I tried
:
:X -indirect myXhost.edu
:and it just resarts over and over but, if I do
your host is not accepting indirect connections, this is a
configuration issue (perhaps a weird one). Since the following works,
atleast myXhost.ed
> > I'm packaging Moscow ML. I'm not an expert in this language (but I know a
> > little of it). Somebody talked to me about this package in a GNU/Linux event
> > here in Argentina (where I gave a Debian talk that went very well!!!) and I
> > commited myself to package this. I will have a package
> Branden> Of course. The obvious answer is that programs that have
> Branden> some utility to unprivileged users should go in /bin (or
> Branden> /usr/bin).
>
> The problem with that is that it is all so very subjective,
> and it all depends on the ``unprivileged user''. Under this tac
> Then you also want every X11-app to ask if it should install itself in
> /usr/X386/bin or somewhere else and every game-like app if it should
> instaal it self in /usr/bin or /usr/games?
Worse: There's a package which asks the sysadmin where is dpkg in the
sustem..!
Hi all. A quick report on Linuxworld expo before I try to get Debian
Weekly News done and go to bed.
The Booth
... Is mostly set up. We still have a Sun box we need to get X on, and a
PPC that needs Debian installed on it. We will be able to give out test
cycle 3 cd's to the ravening hordes for a
Anthony Towns wrote:
> By omission, this does a fairly impressive injustice to everyone else
> who helped with development, testing, fixing bugs, documenting problems
> and work arounds, giving support, and everything else everyone's done
> in the past months, so, well, thanks everyone!
Seconded!
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Joey Hess wrote:
> > * Tasks are great, but task-* packages suck when some of the
> > packages included have release critical bugs. (Remove the
> > package, the entire task breaks)
>
> You know, if apt could only support Reccommends, task packages could be
>
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> If there is an alternate mechanism in place it would be time
> to make it policy. But debconf is not required yet, and it may not
> fit all potential cases anyway (more on it below).
I read your entire message and could not find any examples of things
that debconf
49 matches
Mail list logo
