Re: Next Debconf

2002-08-19 Thread Joe Drew
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 12:20, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > since nobody else has taken up the thread: I long ago declared my intention to organize debconf 3 in montreal or vancouver, but I am absolutely not opposed to having the "in-between" debconf outside of Canada. > I am planning Debconf 3 to be

Re: New ALSA packages (0.9.0rc3) for test

2002-08-19 Thread Masato Taruishi
cool. I'm quite a busy to maintain alsa. If you want, could you take over them? At Sun, 18 Aug 2002 19:30:25 +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > I compiled for myself the new ALSA rc3 packages and put them into > deb http://people.debian.org/~calvin/debian/ ./ > deb-src http://people.debian.org/~

Re: New ALSA packages (0.9.0rc3) for test

2002-08-19 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 03:55:33PM +0900, Masato Taruishi wrote: > > cool. I'm quite a busy to maintain alsa. If you want, could you > take over them? Only if you sponsor me. My GPG key has expired on the keyring and the new one (this is the one I am signing this mail with) is not yet accepted. So

Re: list of valid distributions in Debian changelog file.

2002-08-19 Thread Martin Schulze
Peter S Galbraith wrote: > Hi, What are the currently valid distribution to which we can make > uploads to? > > debian-changelog-mode.el currently allows the user to set the > distribution field for an upload to multiple distributions, e.g. > > xwatch (2.11-8) frozen unstable; urgency=low > > T

redistribution of M$ fonts [nelson@crynwr.com: [Familiar] fonts]

2002-08-19 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
FYI - Forwarded message from Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 14:34:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Familiar] fonts http://corefonts.sourceforge.net/ distributes the Microsoft core fonts. -- -russ nelson

Re: HELP - Screen is flooded with DHCP messages.

2002-08-19 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 11:17:03PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 20:56:48 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > Now flooded with screens full of > > IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:04:76:de:b9:53:08:00 SRC=0.0.0.0 > > DST=255,255,255,255 LEN=328 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x00

Bug#157248: ITP: zthread -- C++ thread library

2002-08-19 Thread Ivo Timmermans
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-19 Severity: wishlist * Package name: zthread Version : 2.2.9 Upstream Author : Eric Crahen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://zthread.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL Description : C++ thread library The ZThr

Re: GCC 3.2 transition

2002-08-19 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Panu A Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard Kettlewell wrote: >> I think you've answered your own question; it _can_ known which >> soname to use, and to discover it, it should check the version of >> the compiler. > > I'm not sure whether you're actually proposing changing the SONAM

Re: Bug#156852: ITP: ttf-dustismo -- general purpose gpl'ed truetype sans serif font

2002-08-19 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 12:12:41AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > That doesn't mean we have to mindlessly stick to it when packaging a 100k > font though. We also have the example of freefont, which used uner 3 mb for > 79 smaller type 1 fonts. No, but neither does it mean we need to follow the freefon

Re: HELP - Screen is flooded with DHCP messages.

2002-08-19 Thread Martin Schulze
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 11:17:03PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 20:56:48 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > Now flooded with screens full of > > > IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:04:76:de:b9:53:08:00 SRC=0.0.0.0 > >

Re: debian-security-announce and bugtraq

2002-08-19 Thread Martin Schulze
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 09:46:42PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > > it seems like people still don't get that bugtraq is subscribed to > > debian-security-announce... > > And bugtraq seems unable to add some Footer to the posts that clarifies > > this... > > > > Couldn't

Re: GCC 3.2 transition

2002-08-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:32:24AM +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > Panu A Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well, it is sufficient that the linker gets the additional > > information from somewhere. Of the two ways (hacking the linker to > > use different versions depending on the ABI,

Fwd: Bug#157231: devfsd: perms for the rio500 device

2002-08-19 Thread Russell Coker
Could you please send me suggestions (off-list) as to which would be the best default group for such a device, audio or disk. -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Bug#157231: devfsd: perms for the rio500 device Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 05:51:04 +0100 From: Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROT

man/tbl portability

2002-08-19 Thread Mikael Hedin
Hi, I've enhanced oglerc(5) by adding a tbl section (.TS and .TE and the things in between). On my system (sid) it is preproccessed by tbl(1) when I run 'man ./oglerc.5', but on the upstream author's sytem (solaris something), the tbl preprocessing does not happen. Did I miss some magic to inser

Re: HELP - Screen is flooded with DHCP messages.

2002-08-19 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 01:04:39PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 11:17:03PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 20:56:48 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > > Now flooded with screens full of > > > > IN

Re: man/tbl portability

2002-08-19 Thread Daniel Kobras
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 01:25:26PM +0200, Mikael Hedin wrote: > I've enhanced oglerc(5) by adding a tbl section (.TS and .TE and the > things in between). On my system (sid) it is preproccessed by tbl(1) > when I run 'man ./oglerc.5', but on the upstream author's sytem > (solaris something), the t

Re: man/tbl portability

2002-08-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 01:25:26PM +0200, Mikael Hedin wrote: > I've enhanced oglerc(5) by adding a tbl section (.TS and .TE and the > things in between). On my system (sid) it is preproccessed by tbl(1) > when I run 'man ./oglerc.5', but on the upstream author's sytem > (solaris something), the t

Re: man/tbl portability

2002-08-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 01:43:01PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote: > See the NOTES section in man(7). You need '\ t' at the beginning of the > man page. But also have a look at section SAFE SUBSET, which suggests > to not use those macros in the first place. It does say "if you must, go ahead and us

Re: man/tbl portability

2002-08-19 Thread Mikael Hedin
Turned out to be "apostrophe, backslash, dubblequote, space, t". Fun and insane! Tanks, Micce -- Mikael Hedin, MSc +46 (0)8 344979 (home) +46 (0)70 5891533 (mobile) [gpg key fingerprint = 387F A8DB DC2A 50E3 FE26 30C4 5793 29D3 C01B 2A22]

Re: man/tbl portability

2002-08-19 Thread Mikael Hedin
Oh, I tried not using tbl, but could not find anything else to produce something sensible. If there is an alternative, please educate me. /Micce -- Mikael Hedin, MSc +46 (0)8 344979 (home) +46 (0)70 5891533 (mobile) [gpg key fingerprint = 387F A8DB DC2A 50E3 FE26 30C4 5793 29D3 C01B 2A22]

Re: man/tbl portability

2002-08-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 02:33:08PM +0200, Mikael Hedin wrote: > Oh, I tried not using tbl, but could not find anything else to produce > something sensible. If there is an alternative, please educate me. In the cases where you find yourself wanting to use tbl because doing it in plain nroff is to

Re: GCC 3.2 transition

2002-08-19 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
>> "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was toying with that idea in my head. There's no need for a > special C++ compiler, is there? "linker" I meant, obviously. > Just the normal linker with a different set of default paths. This > is like using an -rpath. The pro

Re: GCC 3.2 transition

2002-08-19 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That problem shouldn't arise if the hack is done the other way > round: new libraries go to /usr/lib/gcc3.2, say, in cases where the > ABI differs. It does mean we can never get rid of it, but if the C++ > ABI changes in later versions of G++ then we may h

Re: GCC 3.2 transition

2002-08-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 02:41:44PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > >> "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Just the normal linker with a different set of default paths. This > > is like using an -rpath. The problem with -rpath is that it has > > precedence over LD_LIBRA

Yet another stupid suggestion (Re: GCC 3.2 transition )

2002-08-19 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Friday 16 August 2002 15:51, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > - > The Debian GCC 3.2 Transition Plan > > This is a proposal. You will be notified when this is a real plan > Nice plan all in all, although I am going to hate the new package names. Some people talked about av

/bin/login hanging around

2002-08-19 Thread Russell Coker
Why is it that /bin/login seems to hang around for the duration of the user's session on other distributions but not on Debian? Why do other distributions choose to have it keep running until the end of the session while we did not? -- I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software. If

[OT] MES-2 [Was: Re: Linux Fonts]

2002-08-19 Thread Drew Parsons
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:25:28PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote: > free high quality variable width font. Dustimo could become > base of such a font, if it covered at least MES-2 repertoire (maybe > without Georgian and Armenian characters for the beginning). Just out of interest, what is MES-2?

Praise & Thanks

2002-08-19 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
Dear Debian developers I am currently running seven Debian machines both at home and at work (with another one at work coming soon). I have just upgraded my headless (!) gateway machine at home from potato to woody without any problem at all: The upgrade went entirely well including extremely usa

Re: xmms needs rebuild in sid

2002-08-19 Thread Adam Heath
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Jack Howarth wrote: > Josip, > Changing the font didn't help, but deleting my .xmms > directory in my account seemed to have cured it. Odd. > Jack Never delete. Rename/move/copy. Make backups. Even of bad stuff.

Re: GCC 3.2 transition

2002-08-19 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
>> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That could be interesting. How far back is RUNPATH supported? (I seem to > recall that it's a relatively new introduction to ELF, but if it's in > stable then that's good enough for me.) Good question. Looking at the changelogs: 1999-07-24 Ulr

Apache2

2002-08-19 Thread Matt Kern
I have just installed apache2 (out of sid onto a woody based system) and am having a little trouble understanding the new methodology. I can see the advantages of all the separate configuration directories, but cannot see quite how everything fits together. I understand the include mechanism and

Why am I receiving still mails from this list?

2002-08-19 Thread Arvid Warnecke
Hello, I try to unsubscribe from this list for about a week now. I just got the message that I am no member of the list anymore, but still get the mails. I tried to unsubscribe again, but I got the message, that this is not possible because I am no member. Why do I still get the mails? Cheers, Ar

Re: Why am I receiving still mails from this list?

2002-08-19 Thread Erich Schubert
> I try to unsubscribe from this list for about a week now. I just got the > message that I am no member of the list anymore, but still get the > mails. I tried to unsubscribe again, but I got the message, that this is > not possible because I am no member. > Why do I still get the mails? We are n

Re: Menu system rewrite update (Aug 6 2002)

2002-08-19 Thread Joey Hess
Andreas Tille wrote: > In fact you are right. I would vote for a mandatory menu entry for every > program which has a user interface. I "vote" that you get to write the menu file for gnuplot, which after all has a graphical user interface, if it's fed the proper data file. -- see shy jo, handin

Re: Why am I receiving still mails from this list?

2002-08-19 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:18:52PM +0200, Arvid Warnecke wrote: > I try to unsubscribe from this list for about a week now. I just got the > message that I am no member of the list anymore, but still get the > mails. I tried to unsubscribe again, but I got the message, that this is > not possible

Re: Why am I receiving still mails from this list?

2002-08-19 Thread Arvid Warnecke
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:27:12PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > > I try to unsubscribe from this list for about a week now. I just got the > > message that I am no member of the list anymore, but still get the > > mails. I tried to unsubscribe again, but I got the message, that this is > > not po

Re: Yet another stupid suggestion (Re: GCC 3.2 transition )

2002-08-19 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Allan Sandfeld Jensen [Mon, Aug 19 2002, 02:58:06PM]: > libraries are placed under /usr/lib/g++2.95 and the new ones under > /usr/lib/g++3.1. The defaults are symbolic linked from /usr/lib. We can > either hack ld.so to search the correct path (using some g++ calling cards) > or reco

Re: Apache2

2002-08-19 Thread Thom May
* Matt Kern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > I have just installed apache2 (out of sid onto a woody based system) > and am having a little trouble understanding the new methodology. > > I can see the advantages of all the separate configuration > directories, but cannot see quite how everything fits

Re: Why am I receiving still mails from this list?

2002-08-19 Thread Federico Sevilla III
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:37:07PM +0200, Arvid Warnecke wrote: > Okay then, here is the header of your mail which came through the list. > And I unsubscribed with this address. I don't think the headers you're quoting are of the email from Erich Schubert that came through the list, but the one th

Re: GCC 3.2 transition

2002-08-19 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Saturday 17 August 2002 19:28, you wrote: > > I am currently doing this experiment on s390 without uploading of course. I > have grepped the build logs of about 4000 packages that I have access to > for g++|c++ and about 900 packages qualified. I am currently rebuilding > these packages with gcc

Re: [OT] MES-2 [Was: Re: Linux Fonts]

2002-08-19 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:11:06PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:25:28PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote: > > free high quality variable width font. Dustimo could become > > base of such a font, if it covered at least MES-2 repertoire (maybe > > without Georgian and Armenian

More GPL fonts

2002-08-19 Thread Dustin Norlander
I have GPL'ed many of my freeware fonts. They are all decorative fonts, so they wont be of much use as screenfonts, but are good for logos, design stuff ect.. A couple of them are quit old and not that great, but someone might be able to make some use of them :) Michael - I'll leave it up to

Re: Why am I receiving still mails from this list?

2002-08-19 Thread Erich Schubert
> Received: from sphinx.rz.tu-clausthal.de > Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com (mailout01.sul.t-online.com > Received: from fwd04.sul.t-online.de > Received: from bombadil.xmldesign.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) that obviously is the copy of the mail i sent to you directly. it never used a debian

Bug#157294: ITP: ion-sfx -- keyboard friendly wm, includes support for menues, docks and tasklists

2002-08-19 Thread andreashappe
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-19 Severity: wishlist * Package name: ion-sfx Version : 20020706 Upstream Author : Andreas Happe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/ion/ * License : Artistic Description : keyboard friendly wm

Re: More GPL fonts

2002-08-19 Thread Michael Cardenas
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 12:34:40PM -0700, Dustin Norlander wrote: > I have GPL'ed many of my freeware fonts. They are all decorative fonts, so > they wont be of much use as screenfonts, but are good for logos, design > stuff ect.. A couple of them are quit old and not that great, but someone >

Re: Apache2

2002-08-19 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:12:55PM +0100, Matt Kern wrote: > I can see the advantages of all the separate configuration > directories, but cannot see quite how everything fits together. I > understand the include mechanism and most of the files under > /etc/apache2, but where are the referred to b

Re: More GPL fonts

2002-08-19 Thread Erich Schubert
> I will be packaging a number of truetype fonts for inclusion in debian > somehow, but the details are not fully worked out yet. I'll take a > look at these for to include in that package, or in a package of just > your fonts. When packaging many fonts with defoma, could you please tell me if yo

Re: Upcoming bug mass-filing re. non-free TrueType fonts in main

2002-08-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mer 14/08/2002 à 20:48, Ben Armstrong a écrit : > I'd like to educate about DFSG-free licensing. Unfortunately, it's going to > be rough sledding unless I can find a license that is likely to address the > problems fontographers typically face when deciding how to license their > work (like: "

Re: Upcoming bug mass-filing re. non-free TrueType fonts in main

2002-08-19 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 10:43:06PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > I think something like the LPPL would merely do the trick. Modifying the > font would be allowed, but would also require a name change. After looking over the LPPL, it looks like it would do the job. Do you know of any precedent

Re: Upcoming bug mass-filing re. non-free TrueType fonts in main

2002-08-19 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 06:03:12PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > I think something like the LPPL would merely do the trick. Modifying the > > font would be allowed, but would also require a name change. > > After looking over the LPPL, it looks like it would do the job. Do you know > of any pre

Re: GCC 3.2 transition

2002-08-19 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
On Friday 16 August 2002 21:47, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > How would this work? Would those using gcc-2.95 software have to set an > > rpath or $LD_LIBRARY_PATH to take advantage of the compat libs? If so, > > it hardly seems worth the effort; manual

Re: tenative ITP linux-wlan-ng; soliciting advice

2002-08-19 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Hedderly) writes: > No. the hostap dirver is excellent. Written by Jean Tour... something. > He works for SSH Corp. google for "linux prism2 driver". It does pcmcia > and pci brilliantly but doesnt support usb yet. works with prism2/2.5/3 > cards - and most orinoco cards too

Re: How to transition to G++ 3.2 wthout any breakage

2002-08-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le sam 17/08/2002 à 18:50, Luca Barbieri a écrit : > I forgot an important thing: all new non-C++ packages should be tagged > as non-C++ in some way so that dpkg doesn't need to scan them. > > This should of course be done by having the build tools scan the package > build directory and set either

David D.W. Downey - libpam-pgsql Maintainer/Upstream (Status Update)

2002-08-19 Thread David D.W. Downey
Evening ladies and gents, OK, I know I've been an on again/off again maintainer so far. Unfortunately, that trend will continue for a bit longer. (even longer than *I* expected). I've had quite a few In Real Life problems surface that are demanding 100% of my time at the moment. (I don't even ha

Re: tenative ITP linux-wlan-ng; soliciting advice

2002-08-19 Thread Ian Eure
On Monday 19 August 2002 02:39 pm, Michael Alan Dorman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Hedderly) writes: > > No. the hostap dirver is excellent. Written by Jean Tour... something. > > He works for SSH Corp. google for "linux prism2 driver". It does pcmcia > > and pci brilliantly but doesnt support

Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?

2002-08-19 Thread Luca Barbieri
According to Junichi's manual they should be in -dev packages (that makes sense, since they are only used by libtool builds). The following packages might be affected. The list only includes packages from unstable in libs/ with digits in the name. hamlib1 kdelibs3 kdelibs3-cups libaspell10 libcap

Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?

2002-08-19 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 01:50:22AM +0200, Luca Barbieri wrote: > According to Junichi's manual they should be in -dev packages (that > makes sense, since they are only used by libtool builds). Yes, it's a bug. Consider that the .la file is usually without soname (e.g. libfoo.la) it will clash when

Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?

2002-08-19 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote: > Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in > the primary runtime. ltdl needs them at runtime.

Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?

2002-08-19 Thread Christian Marillat
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote: > Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in > the primary runtime. > ltdl needs them at runtime. and librep9 too. Christian

Re: tenative ITP linux-wlan-ng; soliciting advice

2002-08-19 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 19 August 2002 02:39 pm, Michael Alan Dorman wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Hedderly) writes: > > > No. the hostap dirver is excellent. Written by Jean Tour... something. > > > He works for SSH Corp. google for "linux prism2 driver". It does pcmc

Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?

2002-08-19 Thread Luca Barbieri
> ltdl needs them at runtime. If so, how should parallel installation be handled? How does one decide whether the .la file should be put in the main package or the dev one? The shared library packaging manual should be updated to included this information if this is the case. signature.asc Des

Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?

2002-08-19 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 07:29:23PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote: > > > Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in > > the primary runtime. > > ltdl needs them at runtime. Then ltdl is broken. How does one install libfoo.so.1 and li

Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?

2002-08-19 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote: > Then ltdl is broken. How does one install libfoo.so.1 and libfoo.so.2 > and only have libfoo.la, and ltdl expect to work? libtool itself is broken, but I digress.

business assistance

2002-08-19 Thread Mustapha Mutala
Petroleum (Special) Trust Fund Contract Award Committee National Secretariat Victoria-Island Lagos-Nigeria. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATTENTION: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, The Petroleum Special Trust Fund was set up by the late Head of State General Sani Abacha who died on 8th June 1998, to manage

Re: list of valid distributions in Debian changelog file.

2002-08-19 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > Hi, What are the currently valid distribution to which we can make > > uploads to? > > > > debian-changelog-mode.el currently allows the user to set the > > distribution field for an upload to multiple distributions, e.g. >

[no subject]

2002-08-19 Thread Æ®À©½º

[no subject]

2002-08-19 Thread Æ®À©½º

Re: Menu system rewrite update (Aug 6 2002)

2002-08-19 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Tille wrote: > > In fact you are right. I would vote for a mandatory menu entry for every > > program which has a user interface. > > I "vote" that you get to write the menu file for gnuplot, which after > all has a graphical user interface, if it's

Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?

2002-08-19 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 09:22:54PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 07:29:23PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote: > > > Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in > > > the primary runtime. > > ltdl needs them at runti

Re: tenative ITP linux-wlan-ng; soliciting advice

2002-08-19 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:39:56PM -0400, Michael Alan Dorman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Hedderly) writes: > > No. the hostap dirver is excellent. Written by Jean Tour... something. > > He works for SSH Corp. google for "linux prism2 driver". It does pcmcia > > and pci brilliantly but doesnt

Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?

2002-08-19 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote: > > > Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in > > > the primary runtime. > > > > ltdl needs them at runtime. > > Then ltdl is broken. How does one install libfoo.so.1 and libfoo.so.2 > and only have libfoo.la, and ltdl expec

Re: Why am I receiving still mails from this list?

2002-08-19 Thread Joe Drew
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 11:34, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:18:52PM +0200, Arvid Warnecke wrote: > > I try to unsubscribe from this list for about a week now. I just got the > > message that I am no member of the list anymore, but still get the > > mails. I tried to unsubscribe