Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 21:16 schrieb Thomas Viehmann:
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
No, but you could manually set all stuff in Depends to the needed
versions. That would also work for the buildds, I guess.
And break at the next opportunity (binNMU, recompile, update in a
Hi!
You wrote:
* videogen
(easy pickings)
If no one else is interested, I'd like to take this one.
It could take me a few weeks to find time to upload though, as Real Life
is getting in the way atm.
--
Kind regards,
++
On 29 May 2006, at 23:53, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Seg, 2006-05-29 às 22:08 +0100, Chris Boot escreveu:
SLIND sounds interesting indeed, I've been using a buildroot-built
system for mine so it was difficult getting dpkg built in the first
place, but I've got it mostly all going. All the
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:47:53PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Or just dump all packages into the buildds queue file (as
That would be ~buildd/build/REDO
package_version, one per line) and start it.
That would be
package_version
Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 21:16 schrieb Thomas Viehmann:
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
No, but you could manually set all stuff in Depends to the needed
versions. That would also work for the buildds, I guess.
And break at the next
On 30 May 2006, at 08:53, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 May 2006, at 23:53, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Yes, I can see that could be handy. I'm guessing SLIND is based on
woody?
No, it is based on testing/unstable. Host part is mostly sarge (it was
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:00:21AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
binNMU recompilation: won't break if the app really works with this
older
version and the lib must be ABI-compatible anyway.
... and this one is plainly wrong. binNMUs for rebuild against
dependency libs which have
Hi,
Andreas Fester schrieb:
I create a new package with the new name which will
get uploaded to the NEW queue. This package replaces the
old package and conflicts with the old package:
Replaces: oldPackage
Conflicts: oldPackage ( firstVersionOfNewPackage)
IIRC the correct way to do that is
Hi,
* NTP server
(some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
I'll take it.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 30 May 2006, at 09:12, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just make a list of everything you have installed and rebuild each
package one-by-one until you've covered everything. I can't see where
the problem is.
In the real world (tm) building things
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 May 2006, at 23:53, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Yes, I can see that could be handy. I'm guessing SLIND is based on
woody?
No, it is based on testing/unstable. Host part is mostly sarge (it was
in the 0.1 prerelease, now most of it is sid).
Well
On 5/30/06, Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I do think it would be really nice is to have a contrib-builds
SLIND repository (like backports do). This would make things easier for
sharing this effort.
Will be there Real Soon Now (tm). Hardware is already at the desk, I
just need to
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just make a list of everything you have installed and rebuild each
package one-by-one until you've covered everything. I can't see where
the problem is.
In the real world (tm) building things by hand is not acceptable because of
a) complicated
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:23:44AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
Andreas Fester schrieb:
I create a new package with the new name which will
get uploaded to the NEW queue. This package replaces the
old package and conflicts with the old package:
Replaces: oldPackage
Conflicts: oldPackage (
On 5/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sorry (and not happy with myself) that I've been procrastinating
about this for too long. This decision has not been easy. However,
I need to focus more on (a) work that actually feeds my kids, and
(b) time that is *not* spent hacking.
Morning...
Matthias, your From: line appears to be missing. Or my MUA is b0rked.
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, wrote:
* NTP server
(some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
I'd take my chance on this
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, but I'm just talking about getting a basic environment set
up from scratch. I realise slind removes the need for that now, but...
I'm not insisting on you using slind, I just want to convince people
to contribute to it. :)
--
I am
[Benjamin Seidenberg]
FYI:
12:33 Ganneff and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will
clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i
cant sleep (ie 1st - 2nd june, 2- 3) :)
Sounds good, but do not really addresses the fundamental problem here,
which
Hi,
Steve Langasek schrieb:
Package: oldpkg
Depends: newpkg
Description: transitional dummy package
Package: newpkg
Replaces: oldpkg
Conflicts: oldpkg
Description: ...
*NO* *NO* *NO* *NO* *NO*. Look closely at the package relationships you've
specified. Why would you upload a package
Hi,
Christoph Haas schrieb:
* NTP server
(some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number of bugs open and
I believe that this package is very important. Still I'd
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:25:58AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
Christoph Haas schrieb:
* NTP server
(some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number of bugs open
Hi
On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:22:51 +0200
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Steve Langasek schrieb:
Package: oldpkg
Depends: newpkg
Description: transitional dummy package
Package: newpkg
Replaces: oldpkg
Conflicts: oldpkg
Description: ...
*NO* *NO* *NO* *NO* *NO*. Look
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Andreas Fester schrieb:
I create a new package with the new name which will
get uploaded to the NEW queue. This package replaces the
old package and conflicts with the old package:
Replaces: oldPackage
Conflicts: oldPackage (
Hi!
Sorry for late response.
* Nikita V. Youshchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-24 12:10]:
However, contrary to what the NM templates suggest, symbol versioning
is not a cure-all for all ABI incompatibilities. If libetpan returns
a DB_ENV * in its API, you need to port[1] all its
Have fun with updating the library, it won't affect depending packages.
:) Some times are that easy to solve, you know?
Ok, will upload today :)
pgpHAIvddyz9K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my point.
In the paragraph above, marked , which was written by you, you
speak of deception and forgery. Nothing in the reports of the
recent incident involving Martin suggests any deception and
On 30 May 2006, at 12:50, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Sorry for late response.
* Nikita V. Youshchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-24 12:10]:
However, contrary to what the NM templates suggest, symbol
versioning
is not a cure-all for all ABI incompatibilities. If libetpan
returns
a
On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane verbalised:
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 05:19:21PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane spake thusly:
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane stated:
The US constitution
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my point.
In the paragraph above, marked , which was written by you, you
speak of deception and forgery. Nothing in the
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Benjamin Seidenberg]
FYI:
12:33 Ganneff and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will
clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i
cant sleep (ie 1st - 2nd june, 2- 3) :)
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:57:04AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whether doing it this way is a good idea, though, I don't know. Buildd
surely wasn't designed for this.
It is much simpler than to set up wanna-build and a local archive but
you
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:05:26PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Timeline
Now, let's please take a more detailed look at the time line:
Thu 15 Jun 06:
last chance to switch to gcc 4.1, python 2.4
review architectures one more time
last chance to
On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my point.
In the paragraph above, marked , which was written by you, you
speak of
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:49:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my point.
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my point.
In the paragraph above,
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Christoph Haas schrieb:
* NTP server
(some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number of bugs open and
I believe that
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Benjamin Seidenberg]
FYI:
12:33 Ganneff and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will
clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:09:07AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Christoph Haas schrieb:
* NTP server
(some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
I'd take my
On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst stated:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:49:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
Perhaps my just-posted message
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:50:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst stated:
[...]
However, trusted processes do not lie with people who are trying
to convince you of their identity. If you trust anyone to tell the
truth about their identity, which is what your
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
Hi all,
As gcc-4.1 may be the default compiler soon (I hope so), I have tried to
build the glibc with it.
Currently it builds and works on the following architectures:
amd64, hppa, i386, mips, mipsel, sparc
The packages are available [1], but a but outdated. It
People, please move this thread over to -project
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:13:37AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Benjamin Seidenberg]
FYI:
12:33 Ganneff and for all those
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:31:33PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I haven't done a build on m68k yet.
I tried it on akire, but was interrupted by real world issues.
When you could give a more detailed HowTo (sbuild, dpkg-buildpackage,
whatever) I would retry...
--
Ciao...//
On 30 May 2006, Frank Küster told this:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see
Hi,
This is to forestall those of you who seem to be be arguing
that the debconf6 KSP crack was a red team attack -- here is how that
attack differed from a legitimate red team effort (I have been a
member of red teams before, and have lead a number of red team
attacks in my time).
Hie Gonéri and *,
Am 2006-05-19 12:26:23, schrieb Gonéri Le Bouder:
However, another solution would be just place these JPGs and PNGs flat
on the server and have apt just download them and save them
Yes, a public repository where people download the picture when they need it.
This was my
Ingo Juergensmann a écrit :
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:31:33PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I haven't done a build on m68k yet.
I tried it on akire, but was interrupted by real world issues.
When you could give a more detailed HowTo (sbuild, dpkg-buildpackage,
whatever) I would retry...
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libdata-dump-perl
Version : 1.06
Upstream Author : Gisle Aas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
http://mirrors.kernel.org/cpan/modules/by-module/Data/Data-Dump-1.06.tar.gz
*
Manoj,
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:52:11AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This is to forestall those of you who seem to be be arguing
that the debconf6 KSP crack was a red team attack -- here is how that
attack differed from a legitimate red team effort (I have been a
member of red
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What Martin Krafft showed you was,
How do I know that person actually was Martin Krafft?
This is getting ridiculuous.
With this I tend to agree. Your credulity is unbelievable.
If what I've read about the incident is correct, the same
Christoph Haas wrote:
Darcs looks like a nice competitor but has some issues regarding
checking in changes automatically (might as well be my ignorance but it
sounds like I need weird scripts and a .procmailrc to merge changes
automatically).
You don't *need* them; you can choose to do that,
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:44:49PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I tried it on akire, but was interrupted by real world issues.
When you could give a more detailed HowTo (sbuild, dpkg-buildpackage,
whatever) I would retry...
Very easy:
dget
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I really think either you are deliberately being obtuse, or
nothing I can say will get this through to you. I fail to see how
one can assert that there was no forgery going on -- do you
automatically assume that if a shiney laminated
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I claim to be president George Clooney, and show you a
document that proves I am such, and I earnestly claim it was not
forged, but Bubba looked at all kinds of documentation that says I am
such a person, you would proclaim from the
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess You can't read. I have never stated that I know it is
a forgery: I can't since I do not have that data. I have stated I
have absolutely no trust path to the identity proclaimed, so I am
going to treat it as though it were; since
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is to forestall those of you who seem to be be arguing
that the debconf6 KSP crack was a red team attack -- here is how that
attack differed from a legitimate red team effort (I have been a
member of red teams before, and have lead a
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, wrote:
* libdigest-hmac-perl, libdigest-sha1-perl, libdigest-md2-perl,
libdigest-perl, libio-interface-perl, libio-socket-multicast-perl,
libnet-xwhois-perl, libvideo-capture-v4l-perl
(easy pickings; check for new Upstream)
I guess these
On Mon, 29 May 2006 21:29:34 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unknown) said:
* ufraw (need to package new Upstream; easy)
I can take this if nobody else wants it.
--
Hubert Chan - email Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at
On 30 May 2006, Frank Küster verbalised:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What Martin Krafft showed you was,
How do I know that person actually was Martin Krafft?
This is getting ridiculuous.
With this I tend to agree. Your credulity is unbelievable.
If what I've read about
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Based on this thread, I would think that Stave Langasek was
dead on: any transitive trust in Debian's keyring is
non-existenet. So, using the signed key as a mesure of trust in the
identity of a NM candidate by the DAMS is probably
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:46:30AM -0700, Zak B. Elep wrote:
* libdigest-hmac-perl, libdigest-sha1-perl, libdigest-md2-perl,
libdigest-perl, libio-interface-perl, libio-socket-multicast-perl,
libnet-xwhois-perl, libvideo-capture-v4l-perl
I'd like to take these up.
Oops, I just saw your
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:28:19AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is to forestall those of you who seem to be be arguing
that the debconf6 KSP crack was a red team attack -- here is how that
attack differed from a legitimate red
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Claiming that what Martin did was good since he was showing
something useful for our community is equivalent to saying it was a
red team attack. Nobody used that term explicitly probably because
they are unfamiliar with it. I know what
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Claiming that what Martin did was good since he was showing something
useful
for our community is equivalent to saying it was a red team attack.
Nobody
used that term explicitly probably because they
Christoph Haas wrote:
I'm currently looking into several systems. Usually I use Subversion and
svn-buildpackage but due to a lot of trouble with svn-buildpackage I
have moved away from repositories for my Debian packages lately.
Out of curiousity, what problems have you encountered with
Dear Debian Devel,
Im personally emailing you today to discuss a partnership. I noticed
that your web site debian.org has linked to Tel3. Pingo is a virtual
VoIP calling card service that helps the world save on there long
distance and international calls.
I'm sending you this invitation
Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, if KSPs are not changed, then the Web of trust becomes
effectively worthless. Manoj should be far more concerned about
that, then about Martin's demonstration of this.
Personally, I'm especially worried about the developers who were taken
in by the
also sprach Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.05.30.1920
+0200]:
I do agree with Manoj that this was *not* a legitimate experiment (i.e.
not a red team test) and that Martin *did* abuse our [0] trust [1]
I acknowledge this and would like to apologise to everyone.
My
also sprach Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.05.30.2002 +0200]:
Personally, I'm especially worried about the developers who were
taken in by the Transnational Republic ID. So, can we have
a fess up time now? Manoj, did you sign the key on this basis?
He did not.
--
Please do not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
On (29/05/06 21:29), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
* gnutls, gcrypt, libtasn1, libksba
(security-critical, some work required, having a team for these
packages would
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:45:10PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
I'm currently looking into several systems. Usually I use Subversion and
svn-buildpackage but due to a lot of trouble with svn-buildpackage I
have moved away from repositories for my Debian packages
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 10:40, Joe Smith wrote:
But Martin decided to publish this experiment.
Is this really a bad thing? He proved that KSP are bad for the web of
trust.
Isn't what Martin and this thread actually demonstrated is that signing keys
based on IDs you cannot reasonably
also sprach Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.05.30.2120 +0200]:
Even the guy at 7-Eleven has the big book of north american ID cards with
pictures and descriptions of what makes a real one for when they encounter an
ID that they've never seen before. Surely Debian can do as well as the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for all your answers, my package successfully transformed
to its new name with apt-get dist-upgrade in my test environment :-)
One last question: would it be safe to say
Architecture: all
in the dummy transition package since it does not
* Andreas Fester [Tue, 30 May 2006 21:42:27 +0200]:
One last question: would it be safe to say
Architecture: all
in the dummy transition package since it does not contain
any architecture specific files anymore, or is it better to
leave it as it is with Architecture: any to create
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:20:14PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Even the guy at 7-Eleven has the big book of north american ID cards with
pictures and descriptions of what makes a real one for when they encounter an
ID that they've never seen before. Surely Debian can do as well as the guy
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:48:14PM +0200, I (Christoph Haas) wrote:
* svn-inject
Injecting new packages through svn-inject fails here. I get errors about
the MKCOL method not being allowed on the remote WebDAV server. Perhaps
it's a problem that the Apache runs on Sarge while I'm developing
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
On Alpha the problem is:
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:341: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in effect
{standard input}:374: Error: macro requires $at
Hi,
* Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-30 22:19]:
[ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu; replies please to -devel ]
at the moment, we have two types of Live CD images:
* the small one which contains only packages of standard priority,
* and three larger ones, each of which
Is it posible to have a minimum size image with a WM that can stay
below 125MB? This would be a great size for USB versions and versions
running under Qemu or VMWare. Just a thought.
desNotes
On 5/30/06, Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu; replies
Falk Hueffner a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
On Alpha the problem is:
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:341: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in effect
{standard input}:374:
On 5/30/06, Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu; replies please to -devel ]
Hi all,
at the moment, we have two types of Live CD images:
* the small one which contains only packages of standard priority,
* and three larger ones, each of which
wrote:
* gnulib
(easy pickings; need to package new Upstream from CVS, every month or so)
I'll take that.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Falk Hueffner a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
On Alpha the problem is:
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:341: Error: macro requires $at register
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:20:14PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Even the guy at 7-Eleven has the big book of north american ID cards with
pictures and descriptions of what makes a real one for when they
encounter an ID that they've never seen
Christoph Haas wrote:
Yes, of course. Besides some minor things I don't quite like about
Subversion (merging looks like black magic for me and getting out old
revisions of a file means typing the full URL for no reason) these are
the actual problems I encountered with svn-buildpackage:
*
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:50:16PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:05:26PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Timeline
Now, let's please take a more detailed look at the time line:
Thu 15 Jun 06:
last chance to switch to gcc 4.1, python 2.4
[ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu; replies please to -devel ]
Hi all,
at the moment, we have two types of Live CD images:
* the small one which contains only packages of standard priority,
* and three larger ones, each of which contains one of the common
desktop-environments on it
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
* gnulib
(easy pickings; need to package new Upstream from CVS, every month or so)
I ported quite a lot of C software between IRIX/SunOS/AIX/Linux, so
I'll take it.
* tcng
(some clean-up required)
I have some idea about
Falk Hueffner wrote:
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Falk Hueffner a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
On Alpha the problem is:
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:341: Error:
Paul Johnson wrote:
See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian accent
can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than $50. Several
years ago, a friend of mine actually asked someone at the Stadion
10-lecia in Warsaw, and was led to a guy with a number of blank
This one time, at band camp, Paul Johnson said:
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian
accent can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than $50.
Several years ago, a friend of mine actually asked someone at
Nico Golde wrote:
Would be useful if you could provide the package lists for
the two images so we can see whats already included and send
you patches.
The small one contains the standard system only, means, packages which
have Priority: standard and nothing more. That's about 80MB (the image
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:57:18PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian accent
can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than $50. Several
years ago, a friend of mine actually
Michael Fisher wrote:
Is it posible to have a minimum size image with a WM that can stay
below 125MB? This would be a great size for USB versions and versions
running under Qemu or VMWare. Just a thought.
Yes, but those mini-images are separate thing we do anyway (or provide
an easy possiblity
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Heikki Henriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: evolution-jescs
Version : 2.6.2
Upstream Author : Several Authors
* URL : http://www.go-evolution.org/Evolution_JESCS
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
On 29-May-06, 03:57 (CDT), Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, libtool scripts are a bit more complex. Unrelated though,
Libtool records the shell and its features; if you change /bin/sh
from bash to dash, the installed /usr/bin/libtool will have its
$echo setting wrong, and break
Eric Cooper wrote:
I suggest that you provide the same packages that Knoppix does (as long
as they're free), since Knoppix has been out there with a real user
community for several years now. No need to reinvent the wheel.
True, but knoppix is i386/amd64 only. Debian Live works on i386/amd64
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 14:26, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:57:18PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian accent
can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 14:15, Linas Žvirblis wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian accent
can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than $50. Several
years ago, a friend of mine actually asked someone at the Stadion
10-lecia in
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
