Re: Kde 4.10 in testing

On 16/07/2013 at 18:11, Erwan David wrote: > How can I upgrade swiftly ? On my testing, this command will pull in newer KDE SC (whether it will actually work is another question): aptitiude -t sid install ~i?or(?tag(suite::kde), .*plasma.*, libk.*) You have to install debtags package in order

Kde 4.10 in testing

I'd like to test KDE 4.10 in testing (among this the carddav/caldav support in akonadi). How can I upgrade swiftly ? (Or should I wait it arrives in testing ?) Thank you -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: KDE 4.10

On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 14:17:01 Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Mon, 15 Apr 2013, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > the kolab stuff has mostly been moved out to a separate set of libraries > > that aren't yet in debian (we are working towards it though). > > Do you have any progress status on that? Last I

Re: KDE 4.10

On Mon, 15 Apr 2013, Sune Vuorela wrote: > the kolab stuff has mostly been moved out to a separate set of libraries > that aren't yet in debian (we are working towards it though). Do you have any progress status on that? Thanks, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bon

Re: kphotoalbum crashes in kde 4.10-2

es used by kipi- plugins in experimental (the versions from kde 4.10) are different and incompatible, so cannot be loaded in the same process at the same due. Of course this will be solved cleanly once in unstable. -- Pino Toscano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debi

kphotoalbum crashes in kde 4.10-2

Hello, Sorry for double posting, but in my first mail I unfortunately hit the reply- to-list button. But this should become an extra topic. So once again: Does anyone experience the same behaviour of kphotoalbum? I updatet from wheezy over qt-experimental to experimental. I can start kphotoalbu

Re: KDE 4.10

> BUT: I noticed the Language package kde-l10-de was still from experimental > and lacked the translations for kmail to german, So kmail menues were in > English. > > So I downgraded also the language pack to the version from ubuntu > containing the German translations for kmail. And after a r

Re: KDE 4.10

Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Sune Vuorela: > On 2013-04-17, Aribert Biel wrote: > > I downgraded kdepim 4:4.10.2-1 from experimental back to kdepim > > 4:4.10.2-0ubuntu3 from ubuntu raring. > > Sorry, you just voided your warranty. Do not mix debian and ubuntu > packages. While I agree

Re: KDE 4.10

On 2013-04-17, Aribert Biel wrote: > I downgraded kdepim 4:4.10.2-1 from experimental back to kdepim > 4:4.10.2-0ubuntu3 from ubuntu raring. Sorry, you just voided your warranty. Do *not* mix debian and ubuntu packages. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: KDE 4.10

Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013, 07:43:18 schrieb Aribert Biel: > On Tuesday 16 April 2013 14:44:52 Diane Trout wrote: > > Try running akonadiconsole and looking at the > > > > On the agents tab make sure there's an Akonadi Nepomuk Feeder, that its > > online and says something about indexing complet

Re: KDE 4.10

On Tuesday 16 April 2013 14:44:52 Diane Trout wrote: > Try running akonadiconsole and looking at the > > On the agents tab make sure there's an Akonadi Nepomuk Feeder, that its > online and says something about indexing completed. > > I find that it sometimes disables itself. > > The Error mess

Re: KDE 4.10

Try running akonadiconsole and looking at the On the agents tab make sure there's an Akonadi Nepomuk Feeder, that its online and says something about indexing completed. I find that it sometimes disables itself. Diane On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 21:04:12 Aribert Biel wrote: > On Tuesday 16 Apr

Re: KDE 4.10

On Tuesday 16 April 2013 12:59:13 Thorsten Glaser wrote: >. > > I seem to recall a recent upload that disabled that component > anyway. In my current setup (still waiting for the groupware > components, but mail and xkcd feeds work) the feeder component > is disabled, and stuff still works. >

Re: KDE 4.10

Diederik de Haas dixit: >You need the 'debtags' package for that command to work though. And aptitude, which is among the first things I purge… >So, I'm rather interested in ways ppl have managed to upgrade to KDE 4.10. Well, what I did was first to install the metapa

Re: KDE 4.10

mental-snapshots, since that repo only > contains packages from kde, so "aptitude -t experimental-snapshots > full-upgrade" works rather nicely. But when you replace > experimental-snapshots with experimental, it'll 'upgrade' every package > which is available in exper

Re: KDE 4.10 (was Re: knode: trying to overwrite key.png, which is also in package libkpgp4)

> My suggestion for some of you who seems to have gotteng the system to > work after installing virtuoso, what happens if you disable nepomuk in > systemsettings afterwards? Does mail stop appearing? Mail still appeared though I couldn't use the search box to filter my mail. Using recent addres

Re: KDE 4.10 (was Re: knode: trying to overwrite key.png, which is also in package libkpgp4)

On Monday, 2013-04-15, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2013-04-15, Diane Trout wrote: > > My understanding is that kmail2 needs nepomuk and akonadi to work, and > > its Nepomuk that has a hard dependency on virtuoso. Akonadi is > > incompatible with > > kmail2 needs nepomuk to work in all regards, like

Re: KDE 4.10

On Monday 15 April 2013 20:26:53 Edward J. Shornock wrote: > My way (suggested by Modestas Vainius a few years ago at > ): > > aptitude -t experimental install '~V4:4.10.2 ~i' That's rather awesome, thanks! > His explanation: > > Che

Re: KDE 4.10

* Diederik de Haas [15-04-2013 19:19 EEST]: > [..snip..] > So, I'm rather interested in ways ppl have managed to upgrade to KDE 4.10. My way (suggested by Modestas Vainius a few years ago at <http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2009/07/msg00087.html>): aptitude -t experime

Re: KDE 4.10

Hello, On 2013 m. of April 15 d., Monday 17:25:28 Thorsten Glaser wrote: > But in general, this is pretty smooth. Better than people say Debian’s > KDE packaging is (I’ve no idea why they say so, see Tanglu). Thanks! And what do they say? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.deb

Re: KDE 4.10 (was Re: knode: trying to overwrite key.png, which is also in package libkpgp4)

On 2013-04-15, Diane Trout wrote: > My understanding is that kmail2 needs nepomuk and akonadi to work, and its > Nepomuk that has a hard dependency on virtuoso. Akonadi is incompatible with kmail2 needs nepomuk to work in all regards, like searching for emails and distribution lists and some bi

Re: KDE 4.10 (was Re: knode: trying to overwrite key.png, which is also in package libkpgp4)

On Monday, April 15, 2013 13:18:14 Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2013-04-15, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Maybe kdepim should Depends virtuoso-minimal and either > > depend on akonadi 1.9 or break akonadi < 1.9 ? > > At least something related to akonadi has already been committed to the > git packaging

Re: KDE 4.10

ther nicely. But when you replace experimental-snapshots with experimental, it'll 'upgrade' every package which is available in experimental, probably not what you'd want. So, I'm rather interested in ways ppl have managed to upgrade to KDE 4.10. Cheers, Diederik

Re: KDE 4.10

On 2013-04-15, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Okay. I’m running into some issues too, kmail 2 is apparently a very > different beast… but yes, it doesn’t start at all without virtuoso, > something about requiring the soprano virtuoso plugin (or the other > way round, don’t remember precisely). Ok. then

Re: KDE 4.10

Sune Vuorela vuorela.dk> writes: > At least something related to akonadi has already been committed to the > git packaging repository. There is likely a few other rough ends here > and there. Is virtuoso-minimal a hard requirement for kdepim? Okay. I’m running into some issues too, kmail 2 is a

Re: KDE 4.10 (was Re: knode: trying to overwrite key.png, which is also in package libkpgp4)

On 2013-04-15, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Maybe kdepim should Depends virtuoso-minimal and either > depend on akonadi 1.9 or break akonadi < 1.9 ? At least something related to akonadi has already been committed to the git packaging repository. There is likely a few other rough ends here and there.

KDE 4.10 (was Re: knode: trying to overwrite key.png, which is also in package libkpgp4)

Dixi quod… >When trying to upgrade KDE from sid to experimental >(by means of installing the metapackages kde-full >kde-plasma-desktop kdepim) Turns out I have to install virtuoso-minimal (for the first time) and also “install” akonadi-backend-postgresql (so that all akonadi packages get upgraded

Re: KDE 4.10

On 05/01/13 08:48, Diane Trout wrote: So I built the kubuntu 4.9.97 kde4libs with the official kde source tarball. Probably not a good idea - only to the fact that It was>40C here. All that was required was: *attica from debian/experimental *soprano from ubuntu/raring Might just wait for a few 4

Re: KDE 4.10

> So I built the kubuntu 4.9.97 kde4libs with the official kde source > tarball. > Probably not a good idea - only to the fact that It was >40C here. > All that was required was: > *attica from debian/experimental > *soprano from ubuntu/raring > > Might just wait for a few 4.9.97 commits (that fix

Re: KDE 4.10

On Friday 04 January 2013 17:16:11 Julian wrote: > Where did you get 2.8.90? http://soprano.sf.net ? See also http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/2013-January/003686.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: KDE 4.10

On 04/01/13 19:19, Diane Trout wrote: Yes thats what I did. The kubuntu packages are at: Vcs-Browser:http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kdelibs Vcs-Bzr:https://code.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kdelibs Thanks. I got the kubuntu bzr and debia

Re: KDE 4.10

On Fri 04 Jan 2013 05:21:16 Diane Trout escribió: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 07:46:03AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2013-01-04, Diane Trout wrote: > > > Even in the case where nepomukcommon is really only being > > > used by the plugins, and isn't being linked anywhere else? > > > > yes. use

Re: KDE 4.10

On 2013-01-04, Diane Trout wrote: >> If you btw want to help and work with the kde team in debian, feel free >> to drop by #debian-qt-kde on irc.debian.org (oftc) and say hi. > > Ok. Though I'm UTC-8. Are you likely to be around the channel in 8-9 hours? On most days I'd say yes. But today is fri

Re: KDE 4.10

On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 07:46:03AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2013-01-04, Diane Trout wrote: > > Even in the case where nepomukcommon is really only being > > used by the plugins, and isn't being linked anywhere else? > > yes. users of such things usually changes faster than one expects. e.g.

Re: KDE 4.10

On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 06:43:53PM +1100, Julian wrote: > Hi Diane, > I was curious as to what you started as a base. > Essentially I would start with browsing the official repo here: > Bare repositories: > http://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-kde/ > gitweb (browse tree(s)): > http://anonscm.debian.or

Re: KDE 4.10

On 2013-01-04, Diane Trout wrote: > Even in the case where nepomukcommon is really only being > used by the plugins, and isn't being linked anywhere else? yes. users of such things usually changes faster than one expects. e.g. the plugin api is - if it isn't already - going to be public soon. If

Re: KDE 4.10

On 04/01/13 13:26, Diane Trout wrote: Hi Diane, Custom 4.10 KDE deb packages is also on my TODO list. As far as an equivalent to ubuntu's PPA - one can host a repo of unofficial builds and interested people can add it to their apt sources. What is your packaging code based off? (wheezy, kubuntu?

Re: KDE 4.10

> What is your packaging code based off? (wheezy, kubuntu?) > It would be an idea to get the code for either and host it on > github perhaps (target wheezy) then people can start tweeking > for 4.10. > Just an idea. > Jules. Oh I forgot to answer one of your questions. I'm building on wheezy star

Re: KDE 4.10

On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 09:11:55AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2013-01-02, Diane Trout wrote: > > So you'd have something like: > > > libnepomukcore4 > > lib/libnepomukcore.so.4.10.0 > libnepomukcommon4 > > lib/libnepomukcommon.so.4.10.0 > > one library in one package is much preferred Ev

Re: KDE 4.10

> Hi Diane, > Custom 4.10 KDE deb packages is also on my TODO list. > As far as an equivalent to ubuntu's PPA - one can host a repo of > unofficial builds and interested people can add it to their apt > sources. > What is your packaging code based off? (wheezy, kubuntu?) > It would be an idea to g

Re: KDE 4.10

On 03/01/13 09:02, Diane Trout wrote: Hi, I was trying to build KDE 4.10 packages (4.9.95 version) for wheezy and had some question about how shared libraries are supposed to be versioned in Debian. And was thinking you'll eventually face this package so it's not a waste of your ti

Re: KDE 4.10

On 2013-01-02, Diane Trout wrote: > So you'd have something like: > libnepomukcore4 > lib/libnepomukcore.so.4.10.0 libnepomukcommon4 > lib/libnepomukcommon.so.4.10.0 one library in one package is much preferred /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a s

Re: KDE 4.10

> > > So, in a proper debian package would the libraries all get so > > version, be placed into a subdirectory like > > /usr/lib/nepomuk-core-4.10, or something else I don't understand? > > No, only nepomukcore would get its on package, and the rest most > probably in a runtime package. Note that I

Re: KDE 4.10

Alle mercoledì 2 gennaio 2013, Diane Trout ha scritto: > By default nepomuk-core builds several libraries but only one has a > so version. > > The libraries are: > > usr/lib/libnepomukcore.so.4.10.0 > usr/lib/libnepomukcommon.so ... just these. nepomukcore is a real public shared library, while

KDE 4.10

Hi, I was trying to build KDE 4.10 packages (4.9.95 version) for wheezy and had some question about how shared libraries are supposed to be versioned in Debian. And was thinking you'll eventually face this package so it's not a waste of your time to talk about it now. If you want I