ebian/pool/main/h/hcloud-python/hcloud-python_1.10.0-1.dsc
Cheers,
Leo Antunes
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP
out.
> Another one: It seems that the CI configuration on salsa is broken; please
> check
> if the right yaml file is selected (I've forked the project to check it and on
> my site it looks ok: https://salsa.debian.org/tobi/hcloud-python/-/pipelines)
Ah, good catch! Thanks.
Cheers,
Leo
ang-github-stevenroose-gonfig/golang-github-stevenroose-gonfig_0.1.5-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #963576)
Regards,
--
Leo Antunes
/pool/main/g/golang-github-mdlayher-netlink/golang-github-mdlayher-netlink_1.1.0-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #963592)
Regards,
--
Leo Antunes
ebian/pool/main/h/hcloud-python/hcloud-python_1.8.0-1.dsc
Cheers,
Leo Antunes
ebian/pool/main/h/hcloud-python/hcloud-python_3.1-4.dsc
Cheers,
Leo Antunes
5 janvier 2018 12:33 "Tobias Frost" a écrit:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 10:41:49AM +, l...@ndrs.fr wrote:
>
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> It's fixed now, source package is uploaded [0]. Wrong e-mail in d/changelog,
>> so it was rejected by
>> debexpo.
>>
>> [0]: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gn
Hi Tobias,
It's fixed now, source package is uploaded [0]. Wrong e-mail in d/changelog, so
it was rejected by debexpo.
[0]: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnome-shell-extension-radio
-- Léo
Hi Tobias,
I fixed the version and the changelog, I was not sure about it when I bumped it.
I also fixed d/copyright.
Thanks for the review.
I uploaded a new version to mentors.d.n. but it's not showing for the moment,
will wait and see.
Maybe I did something wrong when I deleted the package a
extension for listening to Internet radio streams
To: 849...@bugs.debian.org
Just uploaded a new version of the package, fixing the Vcs-Browser url.
The source package can be found on mentors.d.n [0].
[0]: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnome-shell-extension-radio
-- Léo ANDRÈS (zapashcanon)
retitle 849691 RFS: gnome-shell-extension-radio/8-1 [ITP] -- GNOME shell
extension for listening to Internet radio streams
tags 849691 - moreinfo
Hi,
I created a new package, it's available on my git server [0].
[0]:
https://git.zapashcanon.fr/zapashcanon/gnome-shell-extension-radio-packaging
Hi,
Le 2017-01-01 21:31, Andreas Henriksson a écrit :
Hello Leo,
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 09:22:23PM +0100, l...@ndrs.fr wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"gnome-shell-extension-radio",
[...]
Thank
able at [3].
Everything is ready except a few contributors informations missing in
`debian/copyright` but I hope it'll to be fixed soon, see [4].
This is my first Debian package, sorry if I'm doing something wrong...
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849522
[2] http:/
] add systemd support (closes: #729663)
* [197eb24d] init: add dependency on $remote_fs
* [848daeab] add hardening flags
* [5c686b87] remove knock client docs from installation
* [805dec71] debian/control: add VCS URL
* [14a9bb3f] add watch file
Cheers
Leo "costela" Antunes
Hi there!
The Problem: When was the last month without browser vulnerability? Ah, never.
This tiny tool can secure users' most important online assets: browser is only
able to access HTTPS of whitelist domains.
Details:
(http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Mar/1)
When we browse the web, to
Hi Fernando,
AFAIK nobody in JavaScript Team is working on.
Consider to join us[0] if you want to package it.
Cheers!
Leo.
[0] - https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
xx/healpix-cxx_3.11.2-1.dsc
Regards,
Leo Singer
Graduate Student @ LIGO-Caltech
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/40a5b3e0-95af-4e91-a894-ffd122ef7...@ligo.org
-status-menu) and this should be much
> better.
User-theme might also be a good candidate, since it's unintrusive and
gnome-tweak-tool already expects to find it.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-r
inconsistency)
If no pkg-gnome maintainer objects, I could upload it in the coming week.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On 13/08/11 15:03, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> But vnstat is already present:
But it's maintained by the QA team, so maybe an adoption would be in order?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists
least - for all but the
most pathological cases) you're always relying on something you probably
don't understand completely and making rules files more explicit, while
still using wrappers and helpers, has no direct effect on this. It only
makes for more text to parse.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/iv9oln$1k5$1...@dough.gmane.org
ally save a significant amount of time by not
using dh/cdbs/whatever during package builds (and by significant I mean
more than just a couple of seconds per build).
Cheers
[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_Invented_Here
[1] http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/4e176b0d.8060...@debian.org
--
Le
Hello David
On 10.06.2010 10:18, David Paleino wrote:
Hello Leonid,
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 18:36:27 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> [RFS quote skipped]
>
While I'm interested in the package, I can't really sponsor it -- I have almost
no knowledge of CDBS to help you there.
Nevertheless, thank
lists.d.o page.
>
> Update the IRC channel topic.
>
> Search the website for the old link and update all the links.
I'd consider doing these after the wiki version gathers at least a bit
of support. My point was just taking a bit of the responsibility off of
Mathew's b
ry end.
Mathew had answered saying I was free to do so, I just hadn't realized
his reply was private and not on-list. I interpreted this answer as
permission, but perhaps an explicit (and public) one would be better.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
-
Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
>> In addition, the FAQ for this list:
>> http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html might answer some
>> of your questions.
>
> As a side note, wouldn't the wiki be the perfect place
t just seems like a
bit of a waste of potential help, having it in a different place.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ntually
a DD, right? So you need the practice!
I just wanna have a hand in it. Practically just a psychological thing! :)
If you still wanna maintain it, incorporate the mentioned fixes and I'll
upload it!
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNS
ld have
thought of that... :)
Still, probably wouldn't cause build issues, but it sure is ugly!
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
r.gz.
I don't think I'm seeing the issue here. Care to elaborate a bit more?
Isn't that the whole idea behind patching and running autoreconf in the
first place? If we wanted the changed files produced by autoreconf in
the debian.tar.gz we wouldn't need to run it, right? What a
Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
>> Was 0.3 already released somewhere? I can find no traces of it either on
>> the homepage, the maemo.org project page or SVN.
>
> No and yes. There are no 0.3 binary releases but I found this [1]: 7
> wee
an.net/debian/pool/main/n/numptyphysics/numptyphysics_0.3-1.dsc
>
> I would be glad if someone reviewed and uploaded this package for me.
I'll take a look at it ASAP and get back to you.
Cheers
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/496586
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty ret
ld time: they're arch-indep and
could be generated just as well before each new release.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
proximity) I'd gladly advocate his DM status,
should he want to apply for it.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
problem with it, then I've unknowingly been
making this mistake for years... :)
Cheers
[0]http://changelog.complete.org/archives/910-how-to-think-about-compression
[1]http://changelog.complete.org/archives/931-how-to-think-about-compression-part-2
--
Leo "costela" Antun
t format is perfectly in order in this case and
the name of the base source directory doesn't really matter much.
Or did I misunderstand your question?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
t more informative about what the program can do.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Francesco Namuri wrote:
> Hi Leo,
> thanks for the interest... :)
Thanks for the quick action! :)
> Why not, in this moment, I'm very busy so the help is very appreciated,
> I've added you to uploaders...
Thanks!
Package uploaded. You should receive the usual emails
ackage really interesting, if you ever need a
co-maint, let me know! :-)
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rator? But I don't really know if uscan even recognizes it...
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
#x27;, as pointed out by others! :-)
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
pplication, without having
to read the technical fine print to figure it out (it sounds like cheap
advertising: "it's graphical! ... but technically, it's not" ;-) ).
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
header, I found them
via a dirty 'licensecheck -r ./ | grep UNKNOWN | cut -d: -f1 | while
read file; do grep -L "General Public Licence" $file; done'
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Felipe Sateler wrote:
> This can be triggered with the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage
Live and learn. Never noticed that one before! :-)
Uploading.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rom
doing this, but I'd personally say you don't need to bump versions
before the package actually gets into the archive, so you could just
stick with '-1' for a Debian version, so merging the changelog entries
should do the trick.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antu
quick check with debc, aside from lintian is
always a good idea, but the package seems good.
After you take a look at these issues (or just justify them) I can
sponsor you, if no one with more expertise in this sort of package pops
up until - let's say - monday.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela&
evocation certificate in safe, offline places, in case of emergency.
Do some research on the topic. Wikipedia is your friend (even if it's
not always particularly right about everything). It might ease your life
if you intend on becoming a Debian Maintainer or Developer.
Cheers and
Russ Allbery wrote:
> lintian.debian.org only checks i386.
Oh, now that makes sense!
Guess the obvious sometimes slips by unnoticed :-)
But anyway, I have an amd64 server and a package with the same problem
which chrpath solved, so my argument stands.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" An
you're NOT rebuilding the
configure script.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Anibal Avelar wrote:
> On 12/5/07, Leo costela Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> - And, of course, using 'chrpath' on debian/rules
>
> No, it doesn't work for AMD. I tried to use chrpath directly to
> binaries files, but it didn't work.
Ar
Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
>
> The way I see it the options for dealing with RPATH are:
>
- And, of course, using 'chrpath' on debian/rules
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
d-time
- Patch the configure script on build-time
Any other ideas?
I'll probably update the wiki[0] with these suggestions and give it a
little cleanup, while I'm at it! :-)
Cheers
[0] http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ain, I will send you the
> whole stuff. Thanky for this !
That doesn't sound very optimistic.
But even if you do "fail" (by your standards) there's no need to send me
the packages. I can get them from the original website.
Cheers and good luck
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reading them in a different place? Just the work of the
person writing you an answer (in this case: me).
At any rate, if you're not interested in making an effort with this
package, I might take it over and package it myself. It seems
interesting, but I'll need to take a better look before commi
ed the rules file to a file named '\' on the
base source code dir.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Paul Wise wrote:
> Obviously that is a hack/workaround for upstream's buggy build system,
> be sure to send a patch upstream that fixes it.
Yup, agreed.
This shouldn't be too hard since upstream is (was?) a DD (hadess).
The package has been uploaded with the workaround for now.
>
Precisely, this did the trick. Just add 'chrpath' to the build-deps too.
Update it in the SVN and I'll upload it.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
use chrpath to clean it after the build
and advise upstream to cleanup the configure script.
What do you think?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ian.org/debian-devel/2007/11/msg00722.html
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Mike O'Connor wrote:
> src/gconf-bridge.* and most of the files in the telepathy directory
> have copyright holders not mentioned in debian/copyright.
Francesco, will you take a look at these, before I sponsor the package?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[inser
Francesco Namuri wrote:
> I'm looking for a temporary sponsor for gnome-phone-manager 0.40-3,
Still need this? Can I check it out from svn.d.o, or do you have any
uncommited changes somewhere?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
De
d have a few minutes to
chat, let me know off-list.
Cheers.
--
Leo Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
your
postinst or preinst script.
Cheers
--
Leo Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
not release a new tarball you repackage
it yourself and use the same naming convention as above.
Hope it helps.
Cheers
--
Leo Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Philipp
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 11:51 +0200, Philipp Benner wrote:
> I tried to contact Leo Antunes because he seems to be responsible for
> uploading the package but didn't get a response. Although no one
> responds to the question of Joshua Kwan which he posted a month ago.
I d
ld be appreciated.
Files: http://www.ivanwong.info/gaim-hotkeys/
Cheers,
Ivan.
GPG: 1024D/4A9A664A 2004-10-04
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a her
gree, but I don't think this should be put in a
separate package. Sounds very kludgy.
The "none" option could be included with X itself, this way you'd be
able to use the alternatives system without the need for a hack and the
setting would persist.
This could be a wishlist bug fo
[no need to CC me, I'm subscribed to d-mentors]
On Seg, 2004-10-18 at 11:01, Chris Vanden Berghe wrote:
> Hi Leo,
Hi
> I decided to make my own gaim-encryption package, since:
Your motives are perfect. I agree with all of them.
> You're right about the gaim headers: it wou
[no need to CC me, I'm subscribed to d-mentors]
On Seg, 2004-10-18 at 11:01, Chris Vanden Berghe wrote:
> Hi Leo,
Hi
> I decided to make my own gaim-encryption package, since:
Your motives are perfect. I agree with all of them.
> You're right about the gaim headers: it wou
like your plan, but
you're free to try to convince me, prove me wrong, or just ignore me and
upload it anyway.
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
like your plan, but
you're free to try to convince me, prove me wrong, or just ignore me and
upload it anyway.
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
version?
Yes, both -1 and -2 versions were built with the exact same file. The
.dsc's both have the same md5sum.
But thanks anyway.
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the for
Hi all
What can I do about the forwarded problem?
I tried reuploading the files + the orig.tar.gz, but it generated the
same problem.
Any pointers?
Cheers and thanks
-Forwarded Message-
> From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED
version?
Yes, both -1 and -2 versions were built with the exact same file. The
.dsc's both have the same md5sum.
But thanks anyway.
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the for
Hi all
What can I do about the forwarded problem?
I tried reuploading the files + the orig.tar.gz, but it generated the
same problem.
Any pointers?
Cheers and thanks
-Forwarded Message-
> From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED
, so, does it need
to stay in contrib?
Maybe it's still time to contact the archive admins and change the
section before the first version hits unstable (during security
scrutiny).
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
, so, does it need
to stay in contrib?
Maybe it's still time to contact the archive admins and change the
section before the first version hits unstable (during security
scrutiny).
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ish manually the new
database
3) do not delete the old one without asking explicitly, with a high
debconf priority (IMHO that's the best threshold between user
interaction and space bloat)
Remember to have a sensible enough preinst to detect the need for
migration.
Cheers
--
Leo Cost
ish manually the new
database
3) do not delete the old one without asking explicitly, with a high
debconf priority (IMHO that's the best threshold between user
interaction and space bloat)
Remember to have a sensible enough preinst to detect the need for
migration.
Cheers
--
Leo Cost
load anything.
Good luck
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
thing.
Good luck
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ontrib free
My sources.list has:
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Change "unstable" for the distribution you use.
Why the hell did you put "free" in there? That's redundant! =]
Hope this works out for you.
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
ontrib free
My sources.list has:
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Change "unstable" for the distribution you use.
Why the hell did you put "free" in there? That's redundant! =]
Hope this works out for you.
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
y.
I'm not sure about the gzip direct usage though (but assume It's OK).
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key Fingerprint: 8AE6 CDFF 6535 192F B5B6 5921 2262 D36F 7ADF 9466
"you must cut down
y.
I'm not sure about the gzip direct usage though (but assume It's OK).
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key Fingerprint: 8AE6 CDFF 6535 192F B5B6 5921 2262 D36F 7ADF 9466
"you must cut down
not in
> Debian, although I don't know if this is is the reason. Anybody
> familiar with this terrain feel like commenting?
For your second problem, I think debian-legal is a better place to ask,
though I assume you will encounter resistance in your path...
Worst case scenario: packa
not in
> Debian, although I don't know if this is is the reason. Anybody
> familiar with this terrain feel like commenting?
For your second problem, I think debian-legal is a better place to ask,
though I assume you will encounter resistance in your path...
Worst case scenario: packa
t;
> Should I release the doc html and txt version with my package?
> Make doc-linux-html a dependency doesn't seems good to me due the size.
>
> Best cheers,
>
> --
> --
> Michelle Ribeiro
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | &
t;
> Should I release the doc html and txt version with my package?
> Make doc-linux-html a dependency doesn't seems good to me due the size.
>
> Best cheers,
>
> --
> --
> Michelle Ribeiro
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | &
ions are not open and archives are not available.
>
> Can anyone tell me if I might qualify for access to these machines for
> debugging packaging portability problem purposes, and if how, how to
> get it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike Schacht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Leo Coste
ions are not open and archives are not available.
>
> Can anyone tell me if I might qualify for access to these machines for
> debugging packaging portability problem purposes, and if how, how to
> get it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike Schacht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Leo Coste
r to do this I need to do different things for
> each of the browsers in postinst and postrm. Basicaly what I'd like to
> know is if theres a nicer way to test if a package is installed than
> just testing the existance of files that the package would create if it
> was instal
y.
> I have put packagename-version.orig.tar.gz in the parent directory, per the
> manual pages/howto/.. [can't remember now]
The file should be called packagename_version.orig.tar.gz. Mind the
underscore, that's a subtle and common mistake.
Also be sure to use the right version notati
me time, and had the possibility of many sonames in the 2.2 branch and
many others in the 2.3 branch, for example (like libgtk1.2 and libgtk2.0
I guess).
All of this is better explained in policy and maybe I'm wrong with some
assumptions, so do your reading =]
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PRO
ngerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644
> fab7 |
> ++
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key Fingerprint: 8AE6CDF
emoved on
the same run.
Hope I've been helpful
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key Fingerprint: 8AE6CDFF6535192FB5B659212262D36F7ADF9466
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herrin
ns out that the problem is sourceforge itself, we
> could host the project on alioth, no?
It really doesn't look like a SF issue, IMHO
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key Fingerprint: 8AE6CDFF6535192FB5B659
y to store
pkg-config output. Is there a way to tell Make to append to the CFLAGS
variable?
Thanks for the attention
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key Fingerprint: 8AE6CDFF6535192FB5B659212262D36F7ADF9466
"you mu
nging the sources to something
> suitable.
File a RFP on your own program, wait for a suitable Debian Developer (or
wannabe Developer) to become interested.
IMO, it's easier that way! =]
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
