Ian Jackson writes ("Bug#1051137: bookworm-pu: package dgit/10.7+deb12u2"):
> Two users separately disscovered a misssing safety catch in dgit:
In the absence of a negative response, and conscious of the upcoming
stable release, I've uploaded this.
dgit push-source spotted that
076 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+dgit (10.7+deb12u2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Prevent pushing older versions than is in the archive.
+Closes: #1050711. [Reports from Helmut Grohne and Phil Hands]
+Backported from dgit 11.3.
+
+ -- Ian Jackson Sun, 0
oad to Bookworm has been approved. Would you mind to check?
Indeed so. Now done.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
or base64ct), but
without better tests and test vectors I am reluctant to switch right
now.
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
hanks for everyone's attention and advice/opinions.
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
24-g2f8851c37f-1_multi.changes REJECTED"):
> On 05-02-2023 14:06, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Sorry again for being an idiot, but where should we have checked, to
> > avoid such a mistake in the future ? I thought this kind of thing
> > would appear on tracker but
> > https
r being an idiot, but where should we have checked, to
avoid such a mistake in the future ? I thought this kind of thing
would appear on tracker but
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/xen
doesn't show it now.
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you
Sebastian Ramacher writes ("Re: Bug#1012496: Proposed inkscape reversion NMU"):
> On 2023-01-06 11:24:45 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > inkscape is currently uninstallable in sid on some release arches,
> > due to an FTBFS which seems to be an upstr
is knows, I will ask d-devel.
[5]
My interest in this is as sponsor/mentor for src:chroma, which
build-depends on inkscape (using it as an SVG renderer).
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private ad
e running gbp pq import
+ * git-debrebase: convert-from-dgit-view: Disable ignore-new where needed
+
+ Other changes:
+ * Fix typo in changelog for 9.14, noting that we closed #987304.
+ * playtrees (for dgit and git-debrebase): Provide a gbp.conf.
+ * tests: gdr: Provide a way to pass
hink are brought in by pydoctor...
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
here.
Thanks to Anthony Fok for fixing pydoctor but the py2 rot seems wider
including in gbp itself.
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
NMUing things in order to make them
migrate ? That seems like it might be plausible but from here
everything is mostly mysterious...
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
ing migration here.
3.3.2, which is now in testing, was *not* built on the buildds.
Yesterday's excuses gave that as the reason for vacation not
migrating. So I did a source-only re-upload, 3.3.3.
But it seems that britney has migrated 3.3.2.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/vacation
Ian.
--
Ian
DO list, except not at the top).
I already made grep-excuses print this information. It has been very
helpful to me. Maybe we should make --autopkgtests the default ?
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes ("Re: Bits from the Release Team:
ride like the wind, Bullseye!"):
> No, what I have been perceiving (and pretty please note that this is my
> personal "feeling") is that maintainers, specially library maintainers, have
> even more and more "stuff to
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Jonathan Wiltshire writes ("Re: Bug#929571: unblock: dgit/8.5"):
> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 11:12:28AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I attach the git commit which explains the details. Assuming you give
> > the go-ahead, I will upload this with
=C.UTF-8
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
>From d28467db161d0590469b5f8e1115f84858d66e06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Jackson
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 10:50:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Replace `confess $!' with `confess "$!"', to actually
(sending this because I got the release team address wrong)
Ian Jackson writes ("That merged-usr is mandatory is RC"):
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a
> base-installer option to allow installing bus
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Bug#926876: unblock: chiark-utils/6.0.4"):
> Please go ahead with the upload and remove the moreinfo tag when it is
> ready to be unblocked.
Done, and the buildds have finished. Thanks.
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opi
) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * sync-accounts: Fix perl syntax error. Closes:#865985.
+ * changelog: Document bug number for bugfix in 6.0.4~citrix1.
+
+ --
+
+chiark-utils (6.0.4~citrix1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * fishdescriptor: cast __errno_location correctly. Closes:#926858.
+
+ -- Ian Jac
to need any significant changes to the packaging. A
whole package debdiff is not likely to be very illuminating because
there will be a fair few upstream changes.
Regards,
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk
> a bug in dgit rather than in dpkg and I am treating it as an RC issue
> > which will be fixed soon.
>
> And you ought to treat it like that :)
Indeed; that is a consequence of the above.
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @
which will be fixed soon.
But, the new dpkg ought not to migrate to testing before the fix in
dgit, because I think the bug makes dgit fairly broken with the new
dpkg.
Regards,
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk
m the AH team, with advice on process from the DPL.
I think if you disagree, you may escalate to the TC or to a GR.
> Sometimes it really feels bad to be in Debian…
I'm sorry you feel that way. I don't think it was possible to resolve
this disagreement without making someone feel like that
f I am wrong.)
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
new ones.
So, should the next thing be an RM bug requesting the package be
removed from unstable ?
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?"):
> I look forward to hearing from the Debian maintainer, who I think is
> the first point of contact for the management of the package in
> Debian.
I am concerned about the lack of progress. I would be
Martín Ferrari writes ("Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?"):
> I am writing on behalf of the Anti-Harassment team, as our input has
> been requested on this issue.
Thanks for your considered and helpful response.
>our recommendation would be to either work with
> upstream on
Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Are we ready to block on autopkgtest regressions?"):
> Ok, I have drafted a section about this in the gobby for a d-d-a mail
> covering this (among other). Please consider reviewing it:
>
> https://gobby.debian.org/export/Teams/Release/Bits
>
> I intend to submit this
Paul Gevers writes ("Are we ready to block on autopkgtest regressions?"):
> Three days ago I opened a merge request against brintey2 [1] to
> enable britney2 to block migrations that cause regressions in
> autopkgtest results in testing. Niels copied it to the IRC channel,
> but we saw no
e.g.
> with r packages the test dependencies can be versioned as well.
I don't know much about autodep8. It sounds like maybe autodep8
should be a way to automatically maintain or help maintain
d/t/control, rather than some post-hoc thing. But I guess everyone
hates committing generate
review from someone of my proposed messages.
> You also do not appear to have looped AH in on this, despite them being
> almost-certainly having some kind of viewpoint and de facto weight,
> if not a de jure one.
Did you overlook this email ?
From: Ian Jackson
To: lea...@debian.org
CC: a
would not want to try
to decide this on a supermajority.
> Note: Personally, I would very much prefer that upstream accepted
> https://git.weboob.org/weboob/devel/issues/154 and removed the remaining
> insults (if any), so we could put all of this behind us.
That would indeed be great.
Ian Jackson writes ("weboob, Gratuitous sexual references"):
> Dear Release Team, would you please decide whether
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906119
> is, in your opinion, RC ?
Hi. Are you still thinking about this, please ? How long should I
wait fo
the Release Team might want to informally consult the TC, or other
relevant people in Debian such as the DPL, ftpmaster or the
antiharassment team.
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which by
cision to the TC.
Or, the Release Team might want to informally consult the TC, or other
relevant people in Debian such as the DPL, ftpmaster or the
antiharassment team.
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address w
encourage everyone who can do so, to jump on this bandwagon.
Development is so much faster and easier when a solid set of tests
stand between you and releasing bugs.
Ian.
[1] I'm using grep-excuses --autopkgtests for this, which is in very
recent versions of devscripts.
--
Ian Jackson
Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Etiquette about test regression, bug severities,
etc."):
> Ian Jackson:
> > There are some problems with this, though:
> >
> > * The only available bug severity is `serious' which also triggers
> >testing autoremovals. [...]
&
Julien Cristau writes ("Bug#831699: release.debian.org: urgency is sticky
across dists - low urgency on sid upload ignored"):
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 15:55:31 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I experimented and dpkg-genchanges -vX provides a Changes file with
> > t
ho are doing their development on stable.
> Hopefully that clarifies the situation.
Thanks, yes, I feel less confused.
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Adam D. Barratt writes ("Bug#831699: release.debian.org: urgency is sticky
across dists - low urgency on sid upload ignored"):
> On 2018-06-20 15:55, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > What I don't understand is why it is not correct for britney to use
> > the urgency of the actual
rgency of the particular package, only.
(It may already do this.)
An in-archive copy should not be done to move a package into testing,
since doing so does not afford anyone the opportunity to specify the
proper urgency. (I don't think we do this.)
What do others think ?
Ian.
--
Ian Jack
in the next day or two).
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Paul Gevers writes ("Summary of discussion regarding improvements needed in
autopkgtest and britney"):
> 2.a. If autopkgtest is told which packages are needed from unstable
> (even with the exact version) to have a coherent set, it doesn't need to
> guess what is a reasonable solution for
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Proposed (lib)curl switch to openssl 1.1"):
> Adrian Bunk writes ("Re: Proposed (lib)curl switch to openssl 1.1"):
> > What I suggest above would be a transition that should be coordinated
> > with the release team like other transitions.
I don't feel I understand the tradeoffs well.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
8572f5bff93734624fc214a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:49:08 +
Subject: [PATCH] Change build-depends to list libssl-dev first. Outcome in
sid/buster is to switch to openssl 1.1. I am not changing the sonam
?
Regards,
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: stretch-pu: package flatpak, maybe want debdiff
against security?"):
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 at 22:13:14 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * document-portal/xdp-dbus.c was generated by a version of
> >gdbus-codegen which seems to be on
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: stretch-pu: package flatpak, maybe want debdiff
against security?"):
> Yes, this update was proposed while stretch was still in freeze,
> and I didn't want to annoy the release team with more pings if they
> were deliberately leaving it dormant until after r1. Diff
I am not an RM. I have been reviewing some stretch-pu requests in an
effort to help out the release managers. I have reviewed this bug
log, and taken a look at the debdiff.
tl;dr: IMO this update needs better justification. It also requires a
greater level of frankness about the downsides or
(resending with right list address)
Maximiliano Curia writes ("stretch-pu: plasma 5.8.7 LTS pre-approval"):
> The source packages that I would like to update in stretch are:
Thanks. I am not a RM but I am trying to help out by providing review
comments. I have reviewed this request.
tl;dr:
Maximiliano Curia writes ("stretch-pu: plasma 5.8.7 LTS pre-approval"):
> The source packages that I would like to update in stretch are:
Thanks. I am not a RM but I am trying to help out by providing review
comments. I have reviewed this request.
tl;dr: Most of them are very good. Two are
the proponent to explain
what the upstream changes are and why (or whether) they are desirable.
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my
feel I understand. Is there any
more discussion of that ?
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
pabilities
for a stable update.
I'm not an ftpmaster and have no formal status. I'm just hoping to be
helpful.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address w
ndex 392f1291..51e03acc 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,36 @@
+dgit (3.11~deb9) stable; urgency=high
+
+ * Rebuild and upload to stretch.
+
+ -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> Tue, 11 Jul 2017 09:28:15
+0100
+
+dgit (3.11) unstable; urgency=high
+
+
100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+xen (4.8.1-1+deb9u1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Security fixes for XSA-213 (Closes:#861659) and XSA-214
+(Closes:#861660). (Xen 4.7 and later is not affected by XSA-215.)
+
+ -- Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 1848e82..f002642 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+chiark-tcl (1.2.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Multiarch: Use correct M-A triplet (DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) for
+libsubdir. Closes:#856526.
+
+ -- Ian
Adam D. Barratt writes ("Bug#857257: Re: Supporting configuration file changes
between versions in unstable/testing"):
> On 2017-03-09 9:41, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > I request CTTE to declare this bug as not RC.
>
> That's not something that the Technical Committee has a remit to do.
>
> The
Santiago Vila writes ("Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly"):
> The following packages FTBFS for me randomly. First column is the bug
> number, second column is the estimated probability of failure in my
> build environment, which is described here:
IMO all of these bugs should be RC.
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Jonathan Wiltshire writes ("Re: Bug#854358: unblock: dgit/3.10"):
> On 2017-02-06 11:30, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I would like fix some bugs by providing a new dgit in stretch. I have
> > not yet uploaded this package to sid, in case you disli
the same authorship set.)
+ * import-maintmangle: New test for changelog Maintainer mangling.
+
+ Documentation:
+ * Fix typos. Closes:#853125. [Nicholas D Steeves]
+
+ -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> Sun, 05 Feb 2017 20:50:34
+
+
dgit (3.9) unstable; urgency=medi
Hi, Guillem. I'm afraid I find myself writing a critical email.
Guillem Jover writes ("Accepted dpkg 1.18.19 (source) into unstable"):
> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:43:36 +0100
> Source: dpkg
> Binary: dpkg libdpkg-dev dpkg-dev libdpkg-perl dselect
AIUI this has missed the deadline for migration
uld explicitly state whether you want this NMU to be DELAYED.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+dgit (2.14) unstable; urgency=critical
+
+ CRITICAL BUGFIX:
+ * Do not generate bogus commits with --overwrite or import-dsc.
+Closes:#849041.
+
+ Test suite:
+ * Run a lot of git-fsck.
+
+ -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> Wed, 04 Jan 2017 22:52:55 +
+
Jonathan Wiltshire writes ("Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0"):
> On 2016-11-16 12:26, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > If we are going to wind back on this change we should do it ASAP. We
> > should not allow ourselves to make the decision to press on, simply by
> > failing to decide o
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0"):
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0"):
> > Lots of people have posted in this thread that they see problems with
> > our current approach to the openssl transition.
> >
> > Do the openssl maintainers h
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0"):
> Lots of people have posted in this thread that they see problems with
> our current approach to the openssl transition.
>
> Do the openssl maintainers have an response ?
I count the following people who expressed concern[1] about
Control: fixed 812166 4.8.0~rc3-0exp1
Control: fixed 812166 4.8.0~rc5-1
Control: unblock 827061 by 812166
Control: clone 812166 -2
Control: retitle -2 consider dropping libssl-dev build-dep
Control: severity -2 normal
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes ("Re: Bug#827061: Processed (with 1 error):
Debian Bug Tracking System writes ("Processed (with 1 error): block 827061 with
828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277"):
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412
> > 828298
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: failed armhf build of xen 4.8.0~rc3-1 [and 1 more
messages]"):
> I just gave back xen and set an extra depends for the fixed
> version.
>
> The chroots get updated on sunday and wednesday. It seems to be
> easier to just wait for wednesday and give back those few that
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: failed armhf build of xen 4.8.0~rc3-1 [and 1 more
messages]"):
> I just gave back xen and set an extra depends for the fixed
> version.
Thanks.
> The chroots get updated on sunday and wednesday. It seems to be
> easier to just wait for wednesday and give back those few
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: failed armhf build of xen 4.8.0~rc3-1 [and 1 more
messages]"):
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:05:22PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Have I done something wrong ? Do the buildd chroots need to be
> > updated ?
>
> The buildd chroots are auto
Debian buildds writes ("failed armhf build of xen 4.8.0~rc3-1"):
> * Source package: xen
> * Version: 4.8.0~rc3-1
> * Architecture: armhf
> * State: failed
> * Suite: sid
> * Builder: hartmann.debian.org
> * Build log:
>
-4.6. IOW, only qemu and libvirt will be rebuilt.
Please go ahead (unless it needs to wait for xen itself to clear the
buildd queues).
(There are no sourceful uploads needed for this transition.)
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions ar
debian.org>
> To: 842919-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#842919: ld spins eating cpu
> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:41:11 +0100
>
> Version: 2.27.51.20161105-2
Wrong bug number ?
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opi
CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
14434 ian 20 0 19652 7844 3208 R 100.0 0.0 40:21.81 ld
This is blocking the xen-4.8 transition.
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @eva
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes ("Re: Bug#842919: transition: xen"):
> On 05/11/16 01:00, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Thanks. For the avoidance of doubt, was that an instruction to upload
> > the new version of xen to unstable ?
>
> It is.
Thanks. I will do this as s
Colin Watson writes ("Re: Bug#842919: transition: xen (vs. grub2)"):
> In any case, I don't think grub2 needs to be rebuilt for this
> transition.
Noted, thanks.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes ("Re: Bug#842919: transition: xen"):
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
...
> Sounds good to me. Please go ahead.
Thanks. For the avoidance of doubt, was that an instruction to upload
the new version of xen to unstable ?
Ian.
--
Ia
b2 Build-Depends libxen-dev then
there is no need to rebuild grub2.
It seems unlikely to me that grub2 could somehow statically link
actual libxen-dev library code (and statically embed it into a grub
binary), but perhaps I'm just not being imaginative enough.
And I guess it is possible that grub2 has
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes ("Re: Bug#842919: transition: xen"):
> On 02/11/16 11:47, Ian Jackson wrote:
...
> > All that is needed from the build-rdeps is a rebuild. That is, of:
> > libvirt qemu xenwatch python-pyxenstore collectd grub2
> >
> > I hav
Ian Jackson writes ("transition: xen"):
> I am filing this transition bug now even though the armhf buildd has
> yet to get to the package. It seems like it nearly 4 days behind
> right now. Instead, I have verified on a porterbox that the armhf
> build is successful. I h
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi. This is the update from Xen 4.6 to Xen 4.8, as previously
discussed. (Currently, Xen 4.8.0 RC3. I expect the Xen 4.8.0 release
to be out by the time Debian freezes.)
libxen-*
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes ("Re: Xen in stretch - 4.7 or 4.8 ?"):
> On 19/10/16 17:37, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > There are no changes between 4.7 and 4.8 that would upset any of the
> > rdeps. So, great, thanks.
>
> What about between 4.6 and 4.[78]? As we cu
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes ("Re: Xen in stretch - 4.7 or 4.8 ?"):
> On 19/10/16 16:54, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Sorry to hassle you, but I would appreciate an opinion so that I can
> > get started on the integration work etc.
>
> Assuming the rdeps are fin
Ian Jackson writes ("Xen in stretch - 4.7 or 4.8 ?"):
> Hi. I was wanting an initial opinion from the Release Team, about the
> Xen packages. Currently they are in bad shape in stretch and I intend
> to fix them ASAP.
>
> The question is whether I should move to Xen
Jun 2019
Xen 4.8 May/Jun 2019 [2] Nov/Dec 2019 [2]
[1] Currently in stretch, in bad shape, we shouldn't release with
this.
[2] Xen 4.8 support dates are not formally promised yet and will
depend on the Xen 4.8.0 release date.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ij
. Please would you confirm that this bug is RC.
To the lightdm maintainers: I intend to NMU (to DELAYED/7) to apply
the patch, unless you object.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.
Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Bug#830978: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2"):
> [stuff]
There is much that you've said that I don't necessarily disagree with,
but:
> Part of having good governance is to have those discussions on devel.
The problem isn't having the discussion.
The problem is that
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#830978: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2"):
> I would like to comment briefly
I'm sorry that I so evidently failed !
Ian.
Sam Hartman writes ("Bug#830978: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2"):
> Speaking as an individual TC member, here's my personal reading of the
> TC discussion.
>
> It's not clear that the TC is the right body for this discussion. We
> certainly could offer advice, but it's not clear that the
Niels Thykier writes ("GCC-5 transition will move to testing tonight"):
> Thanks to Adam, Julien, Jonathan, Matthias, Scott, Simon and many
> others, we are ready to migrate the bulk of the GCC-5 transition and
> related sub-transitions to testing tonight. Apologise for the short notice.
Wow,
Tcl packages do not provide tcl-dev, and no
+earlier version than 8.5 is, in fact, in jessie (8.4 was removed in
+April 2014). Closes:#775635. (FTBFS)
+
+ -- Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk Thu, 22 Jan 2015 19:00:22
+
+
chiark-tcl (1.1.2) unstable; urgency=low
Niko Tyni writes (Re: new pre-dependency: perl{,-base,-modules} - dpkg (=
1.17.17)):
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:15:04AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
I've not looked into the details yet, but just to comment that there's
been talk about possibly reverting that fix, because in some error
Guillem Jover writes (Re: new pre-dependency: perl{,-base,-modules} - dpkg
(= 1.17.17)):
On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 20:12:55 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
In order to fix trigger related wheezy-jessie upgrade failures in
xfonts-traditional (#774844, cc'd), I intend to make the main perl
binary
) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Camale?n noela...@gmail.com ]
+ * Spanish debconf translation update. Closes: #669375.
+
+ -- Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk Mon, 05 Jan 2015 14:39:53 +
+
xfonts-traditional (1.7) unstable; urgency=low
* Use interest-noawait to fix dpkg trigger
(dual MIT/GPL3+). Closes:#773650.
+ * git-cache-proxy: Mention in debian/copyright.
+ * git-cache-proxy: Update copyright year list to include 2014.
+
+ -- Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk Sun, 21 Dec 2014 15:07:20
+
+
chiark-utils (4.4.1) unstable; urgency=low
Safety
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
