Re: [debian-mysql] mysql-5.1 or both mysql-5.5/1

2012-04-25 Thread Nicholas Bamber
Another approach is to hedge our bets a bit. 1.) complete nysql-5.5 going into unstable 2.) migrate dependents onto 5.5 (which AFAIK if it is just a rebuild is a job for the release team) and kick off the translation process. 3.) Then take a view on whether drop 5.1 or fix the RC bugs in 5.1

Re: debian-archive-keyring/experimental: fragments instead of symlinks?

2012-03-23 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:38:30AM -0500, David Kalnischkies wrote: Beware, I haven't tested the code so far and it includes two fixmes, so it's more of a proof of concept to get the ball rolling… FWIW: I'll work on this now and test it. ;-) Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc

Re: [Debian-uk] Time for another Bug Squashing Party

2012-01-30 Thread Mark Hymers
On Tue, 24, Jan, 2012 at 02:41:42PM +, Mark Hymers spoke thus.. I'm also considering holding an event up in York (obviously at a different time to the one in cambridge). Again, might be an idea if people could give some dates. I think we'd be limited to 12-15 people or so here

Re: [Debian-uk] Time for another Bug Squashing Party

2012-01-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 06:05:49PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: Hey folks, As I've just been discussing with folks on IRC, it's been a while since we had one in the UK, and we're going to freeze this summer according to the release team. So... I'm tempted to host a BSP one weekend in March

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] sra-sdk: should it be in Debian?

2012-01-03 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:09:18PM +, Steve McIntyre a écrit : Please re-consider if this package should be in the archive or not. Ping? Dear Steve and everybody, sorry, I have replied to the list only, probably due to my abuse of Alsacian wine in the previous weeks. My answer is

Re: Debian artwork for Wheezy

2011-12-15 Thread Claudio Filho
Hi 2011/12/14 Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org: If you do so, please be aware that it might be a slippery slope. In particular, please keep in mind that Debian has an ethical position on Free Software, but has no ethical position on topics like ecology, economy, world peace, religion, etc.

Re: Debian artwork for Wheezy

2011-12-14 Thread Will Set
 Tuesday, December 13, 2011 6:17 PMValessio Brito wrote: I think the attempt to tender / call for proposal has already happened more than once and did not work very well. My proposal would be the convening of interested people to work under the same concept and proposal. I like this idea

Re: Debian artwork for Wheezy

2011-12-14 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:17:39PM -0200, Valessio Brito wrote: I think the attempt to tender / call for proposal has already happened more than once and did not work very well. Well, it is also true we could have done more to advertise the call for proposals. For instance, it seems to me that

Re: Debian artwork for Wheezy

2011-12-13 Thread Valessio Brito
I think the attempt to tender / call for proposal has already happened more than once and did not work very well. My proposal would be the convening of interested people to work under the same concept and proposal. Would not the construction of several themes, all parties could work on a concept

Re: Debian artwork for Wheezy

2011-11-11 Thread ValessioBrito
Hello all, My contribution is that Debian has support for Theme Kit/Packages of themes. A structure[1] standard to be followed by changes in the Debian. Debian is not a single appearance. And multiple styles and worlds. It's proposed that in future the taskel installed can see a list of

Re: Debian artwork for Wheezy

2011-11-11 Thread Will Set
Thursday, November 10, 2011 5:01 PM Joey Hess wrote: Paul Wise wrote: The desktop artwork for wheezy was discussed last month: http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2011/10/threads.html#3 Here is my summary mail from that thread:

Re: Debian artwork for Wheezy

2011-11-11 Thread Will Set
Thursday, November 10, 2011 5:01 PMJoey Hess wrote: Paul Wise wrote: http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2011/10/threads.html#3 http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2011/10/msg00014.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2011/10/msg00022.html If we're removing spacefun then

Re: Debian artwork for Wheezy

2011-11-10 Thread Joey Hess
Paul Wise wrote: The desktop artwork for wheezy was discussed last month: http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2011/10/threads.html#3 Here is my summary mail from that thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2011/10/msg00014.html The KDE and GNOME teams both do not want

Re: Debian artwork for Wheezy

2011-11-10 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Donnerstag, 10. November 2011, Joey Hess wrote: Not quite, Joss doesn't want icon/theme changes but is open to a desktop background in http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2011/10/msg00022.html [...] If we're removing spacefun then d-i can revert to the old klowner boot logo,

Re: Debian artwork for Wheezy

2011-11-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: let this be a gentle reminder that if you are deciding that we should switch away from Spacefun, that work on it should start soon and a decision be taken a bit before we actually freeze. The desktop artwork for wheezy was discussed last

Re: debian armel recertification status

2011-08-15 Thread Andreas Barth
* Riku Voipio (riku.voi...@iki.fi) [110815 11:42]: buildds: 5 - arcadelt and argento are no longer in use buildd redundancy: partial - 1 in different location but would struggle to keep up alone buildd-dsa: yes - All armel buildd are under DSA control fixed. Andi -- To

Re: debian-edu squeeze release

2011-06-04 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 10:53:11PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: h01ger hi. would you accept heavily updated debian-edu, debian-edu-config, debian-edu-install and debian-edu-doc packages for 6.0.2 (or .3) so that we can do our squeeze release fully within debian squeeze? The changes are not

Re: debian-edu squeeze release

2011-06-04 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Philipp, On Samstag, 4. Juni 2011, Philipp Kern wrote: Sorry, but we cannot judge this request from the information we received. I guess the only answer so far would be we might. At least the nature of the changes would be interesting. Mostly configuration changes to our setup of

Re: Debian 5.0.6

2011-05-17 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 17.05.2011 13:49, schrieb Colm Hurley: I’m looking for a direct link to download Debian 5.0.6, but to no avail so far. Can you help? As 5.0.6 is not the current stable release (not even the current oldstable; are you sure you don't want 5.0.8??) they are in the archive section.

Re: Debian 5.0.6

2011-05-17 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 17/05/2011 13:49, Colm Hurley wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a direct link to download Debian 5.0.6, but to no avail so far. Can you help? All images are available at: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/ 5.0.6 can be downloaded from:

Re: Debian 5.0.6

2011-05-17 Thread Brett Parker
On 17 May 04:49, Colm Hurley wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a direct link to download Debian 5.0.6, but to no avail so far. Can you help? From www.debian.org, you go to CD ISO Images under Getting Debian, on there you'll find a link to older releases, follow that, then click on the link to

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#611008: does not run with current version of R in squeeze

2011-01-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:50:08AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi release heros, while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package (see debdiff). Hi Andreas, Steffen and release team, are you sure

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#611008: does not run with current version of R in squeeze

2011-01-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:00:27PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package (see debdiff). Hi Andreas, Steffen and release team, are you sure that

Re: Debian Installer required unblocks

2010-11-24 Thread Luk Claes
On 11/24/2010 04:27 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: Hello, Please unblock and age following packages: user-setup hw-detect os-prober unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Debian Volatile IPv6

2010-11-14 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi, (I don't see how it's related to the release, follow up to -mirrors). On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 09:16:50PM +0100, Wolfram Pienkoss wrote: host volatile.debian.org says: [..] Access by using the IPv4 adresses works fine. A ping6 to 2001:858:2:2::2 works also fine but a ping6 to

Re: [Debian] Re: Please unblock vzctl

2010-11-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 21:35 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: I'm now re-requesting to unblock vzctl. I have uploaded an updated version with a correction to the problem you noted. This correction was not enough though. So I have applied a few more things. 1) The init script return with error

Re: [Debian] Re: Please unblock vzctl

2010-11-01 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Great! Thanks a lot! // Ola On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 06:49:03PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 21:35 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: I'm now re-requesting to unblock vzctl. I have uploaded an updated version with a correction to the problem you noted. This correction

Re: [Debian] Re: Please unblock vzctl

2010-10-29 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
Mehdi, Thanks for reporting that! It's my bug :( and I am also unsure how this went unnoticed. Fixed in vzctl git: http://git.openvz.org/?p=vzctl;a=commit;h=3527cc269bb51d48e0f511fbf7a807ad56c223d5 On 10/29/2010 04:16 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Mehdi Thanks. Will upload a new corrected

Re: [Debian] Re: Please unblock vzctl

2010-10-29 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Kir When I tested this it was obvious that this did not work as well as it should. I have applied two more patches to make it work as it should. This problem must have been masked by the other problem. A bugreport will be sent shortly. Best regards, // Ola On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at

Re: [Debian] Re: Please unblock vzctl

2010-10-29 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Mehdi I'm now re-requesting to unblock vzctl. I have uploaded an updated version with a correction to the problem you noted. This correction was not enough though. So I have applied a few more things. 1) The init script return with error 1 when already started or already stopped. This makes

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#600997: imagej: cannot quit imagej when an image was changed

2010-10-27 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 06:58:05PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit : On 27/10/2010 17:48, Charles Plessy wrote: I attached the debdiff. Would it be suitable for an upload to testing-proposed-updates ? Version 1.44e, still affected, is already in Unstable… It looks ok but the changelog

Re: Debian squeeze theme: dead in the water?

2010-10-18 Thread Jon Dowland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi -release, I'll be aiming any further discussion at -desktop only after this message. Thanks! But first, I do have a release-specific question. desktop-base contains the current default Debian lookfeel. It strikes me that a theme could (or even

Re: Debian squeeze theme: dead in the water?

2010-10-18 Thread Valessio Brito
I like the idea of having packages to install new themes and the user sets the easy way. http://wiki.debian.org/DebianArt/StructureThemePackage There are many pieces of themes packaged separately and without a pattern. I believe the proposal is to improve in the future. offer the user the

Re: Debian squeeze theme: dead in the water?

2010-10-11 Thread Valessio Brito
I've been working on a theme funny (SpaceFun[0]), but I guess not appeal to everyone (businesses, severe environments, etc.). I made the effort to hear other proposals, it seems that only had two proposals: Debian Ciel[1] and Nightly[2]. Can I work on another proposal by adding the simplicity

Re: Debian squeeze theme: dead in the water?

2010-10-11 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Valessio Brito (cont...@valessiobrito.info): I've been working on a theme funny (SpaceFun[0]), but I guess not appeal to everyone (businesses, severe environments, etc.). I made the effort to hear other proposals, it seems that only had two proposals: Debian Ciel[1] and Nightly[2].

Re: Debian squeeze theme: dead in the water?

2010-10-11 Thread Michael Biebl
On 11.10.2010 21:13, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Valessio Brito (cont...@valessiobrito.info): I've been working on a theme funny (SpaceFun[0]), but I guess not appeal to everyone (businesses, severe environments, etc.). I made the effort to hear other proposals, it seems that only had

Re: Debian squeeze theme: dead in the water?

2010-10-11 Thread Luis Matos
I agree with Christian, i believe Ciel is a neutral one, but i also liked spacy very much!!! I would decide to have Ciel as default and spacy as included theme (available). Seg, 2010-10-11 às 21:13 +0200, Christian PERRIER escreveu: Quoting Valessio Brito (cont...@valessiobrito.info): I've

Re: Debian squeeze theme: dead in the water?

2010-10-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote: Quite true. In the past the RT never opposed theming changes in the freeze time so I don’t think it is too late, but we should act soon. It might be good for wheezy to get a new theme in the 6 months after the release of

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] Bug#561944: GNUstep transition

2010-08-09 Thread Federico Giménez Nieto
Hi Yavor, 2010/8/8 Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org: [...] The fix for #581934 (gnustep-dl2) depends on -base/-gui versions from experimental, plus a fixed gorm.app.  I don't know how the maintainer is planning to deal with it, I hope he's waiting for a fixed gorm.app + Debian-specific soname

Re: [debian-mysql] Transition plans for MySQL-5.1

2009-08-02 Thread Luk Claes
Christian Hammers wrote: Am Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:00:36 +0200 schrieb Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org: Christian Hammers c...@debian.org (25/07/2009): Nobody answered so I'm going to upload MySQL this evening and then file bug report with priority serious against the 142 packages currently

Re: debian 5.02 install

2009-07-06 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 03:55:22PM +0100, Allan Fearon wrote: after doing clean install of Debian 5.02 desktop found that network-manager and update-manager no longer included by default. is there a reason for this. Rerouting to debian-boot, where this discussion is more appropriate,

Re: Debian Archive Signing Key to be changed

2009-06-10 Thread Philipp Kern
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 04:01:17PM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote: It appears that http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/Release.gpg is only being signed with the new key, not the old, so it is not trusted. Lenny security updates are being signed with both keys, but there does not seem to be a

Re: Debian Archive Signing Key to be changed

2009-06-10 Thread Ivan Jager
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:41:18AM +0200, Philipp Kern scribbled thusly: On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 04:01:17PM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote: It appears that http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/Release.gpg is only being signed with the new key, not the old, so it is not trusted. Lenny

Re: Debian Archive Signing Key to be changed

2009-06-09 Thread Ivan Jager
Hi, It appears that http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/Release.gpg is only being signed with the new key, not the old, so it is not trusted. Lenny security updates are being signed with both keys, but there does not seem to be a newer version of debian-archive-keyring there, so I'm not

Re: Debian 5.0

2009-05-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 26 mai 2009 à 16:14 -0400, Adrian G. Mowrey a écrit : I'd like to install Debian 5.0 (lenny), but I'm scared of these: Security Advisories [24 May 2009] DSA-1806 cscope - buffer overflows You’re scared of the fact that we fix security issues in software we ship instead of letting

Re: Debian 5.0

2009-05-26 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 04:14:57PM -0400, Adrian G. Mowrey wrote: I'd like to install Debian 5.0 (lenny), but I'm scared of these: snip I'm a newbie, and I don't know a lot of things to be able to do skillful things to prevent myself. What do you recommend on that? Thank you. Also, A Debian

Re: Debian 5.0

2009-05-26 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:58:52PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: You’re scared of the fact that we fix security issues in software we ship instead of letting them in the wild? Oh $DEITY. Way to encourage a guy sheesh. It would have taken you thirty more seconds to type 'please ask on

Re: Debian 5.0

2009-05-26 Thread JD. Brown
Let me be the first to say, Welcome to Debian! Also, let me full warn you of some grumpies that you will encounter such as Josselin whom do not like to follow code of conduct. Just, do not let them bother you at all. I would like for you to learn the lists and yes, it is extensive and can be

Re: Debian CUPS transition in progress

2009-05-06 Thread Adeodato Simó
Hello, Martin-Éric. You wrote on Planet (http://bit.ly/TUFYI): Since Lenny was the first Debian release to feature CUPS under its new package naming strategy, I started going through 'rdepends' results to see which packages in Squeeze still present dependencies for *cupsys* packages. Much

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-05-04 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Hubert Chathi (Sat, 02 May 2009 20:32:22 -0400): On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:28:34 +0200 Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote: The poppler transition is almost ready, and the popplerkit.framework upload you made to fix the linkage issue has been built everywhere. This means you can go

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-05-04 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Adeodato Simó (Mon, 04 May 2009 19:25:42 +0200): Has new upstream version -- will upload shortly, no bin-NMU needed: - gnustep-dl2 - gorm.app - gworkspace - price.app None of these scheduled. Note, however, that not all the new GNUstep libraries are available on hppa and powerpc.

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-05-04 Thread Yavor Doganov
Adeodato Simó wrote: + Yavor Doganov (Mon, 04 May 2009 22:12:10 +0300): (Hubert, the gnustep-base powerpc issue is due to #523869, I believe.) I gave it back a bit earlier, so as it seems it should succeed now. Unfortunately it failed again because the fix for the above bug is in

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-05-04 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Yavor Doganov (Mon, 04 May 2009 23:34:53 +0300): Adeodato Simó wrote: + Yavor Doganov (Mon, 04 May 2009 22:12:10 +0300): (Hubert, the gnustep-base powerpc issue is due to #523869, I believe.) I gave it back a bit earlier, so as it seems it should succeed now. Unfortunately it failed

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-05-02 Thread Hubert Chathi
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:28:34 +0200 Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote: The poppler transition is almost ready, and the popplerkit.framework upload you made to fix the linkage issue has been built everywhere. This means you can go forward with starting the GNUstep transition in unstable,

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-03-30 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Hubert Chathi [Sun, 08 Mar 2009 22:28:09 -0400]: Hello again, Second, the above means we have to either to skip poppler.framework from the initial set of Bin-NMUs, but that's messy since other packages depend on it; or to allow it to migrate to testing and possibly break GNUstep in

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-03-27 Thread Hubert Chathi
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:01:34 +0200 Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org wrote: Adeodato Simó wrote: Now that a sourceful upload of popplerkit.framework is needed, would it be appropriate to incorporate the fix that we discussed If the changes are ready to be uploaded and would not introduce

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-03-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
Adeodato Simó wrote: Btw, popplerkit.framework is failing to build on some arches, could you take a look? Yes, I saw that and already fixed in my working copy. The bug is in bindings/GNUmakefile, now exposed with gnustep-make 2.0.8. It is pointless to trick the build system to handle C++

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-03-20 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Yavor Doganov [Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:06:39 +0200]: Adeodato Simó wrote: Btw, popplerkit.framework is failing to build on some arches, could you take a look? Yes, I saw that and already fixed in my working copy. The bug is in bindings/GNUmakefile, now exposed with gnustep-make 2.0.8. It

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-03-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
Adeodato Simó wrote: Now that a sourceful upload of popplerkit.framework is needed, would it be appropriate to incorporate the fix that we discussed If the changes are ready to be uploaded and would not introduce further delays, sure. Everything is ready, pending Hubert's approval (as

Re: Debian and Jboss

2009-03-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jesse Mirza j.mi...@jamesnet.nl wrote: Can someone help me out! Your question is off-topic for this list, please contact debian-user: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-03-08 Thread Yavor Doganov
Adeodato Simó wrote: (BTW, the GNUstep transition is also tied to the libpoppler3-libpoppler4 transition via popplerkit.framework.) No, it is not, at least not as far as my SQL-fu can see. libpopplerkit0 does not depend in any of the renamed libraries in the GNUstep transition, so it's

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-03-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Yavor Doganov [Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:13:47 +0200]: Adeodato Simó wrote: (BTW, the GNUstep transition is also tied to the libpoppler3-libpoppler4 transition via popplerkit.framework.) No, it is not, at least not as far as my SQL-fu can see. libpopplerkit0 does not depend in any of the

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-03-08 Thread Yavor Doganov
Adeodato Simó wrote: So, now my question is: what happens if you rebuild those three packages against the new GNUstep libraries, and they migrate to testing on their own, before said base libraries and the rest of the migrated packages? This has happened before (i.e. they almost always

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-03-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Yavor Doganov [Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:23:28 +0200]: Adeodato Simó wrote: So, now my question is: what happens if you rebuild those three packages against the new GNUstep libraries, and they migrate to testing on their own, before said base libraries and the rest of the migrated packages?

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-03-08 Thread Yavor Doganov
Adeodato Simó wrote: First, that I'm sure you're aware that's a serious bug that ought to be fixed. Full ACK. Isn't just linking to the GNUstep libraries as a Debian patch an option? Yes, it's as trivial as that. I'll provide patches after the transition. Second, the above means we have

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep libraries soname bump

2009-03-08 Thread Hubert Chathi
[Removing bug #487641 from the Cc: list because it's not relevant] On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:06:47 +0100 Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote: Okay. So, two things. First, that I'm sure you're aware that's a serious bug that ought to be fixed. I don't want to put pressure on you, since I

Re: Debian Live

2009-02-01 Thread Daniel Baumann
W. Martin Borgert wrote: Can somebody update/correct the Debian live paragraph in the release notes, please? See #493931. Currently it says: section id=live-cd condition=fixme titleDebian Live-CD/title programlisting condition=fixmeTODO: What's the state?/programlisting para With

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#512371: Please allow biofox 1.1.5-1 in Lenny.

2009-01-27 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: As I understand it the best gain this change in the debhelper compatibility level at this point could bring us, is that the package builds just as well as with the existing level. So why did you do that now instead of after the freeze? Well, there

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#512371: Please allow biofox 1.1.5-1 in Lenny.

2009-01-27 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 01:17:15PM +, Neil McGovern a écrit : Changing to a new version of a build system really isn't something that's garunteed to be 100% trouble free. Your other packages will have had more than a month, and I'd like to shin

Re: Debian 5.0 (lenny) release notes: Call for translations, again

2009-01-25 Thread Thomas Mueller
Is someone working on the de-translations? Need help? This is the only langauge I can offer support. Just let me know! take care Tom Am Samstag, 24. Januar 2009 schrieb W. Martin Borgert: Hello world, sorry for repeating myself: It's high time to translate the release notes. The current

Re: Debian 5.0 (lenny) release notes: Call for translations, again

2009-01-25 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Thomas, On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:22:32AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote: Is someone working on the de-translations? Yes. Need help? Yes. Please join the work on debian-l10n-german. In essence: a) Checkout the current version (see below, i.e. svn co

Re: Debian 5.0 (lenny) release notes: Call for translations, again

2009-01-25 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:10:46PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote: Hello world, sorry for repeating myself: It's high time to translate the release notes. The current statistics doesn't look good: (...) es: 0 translated messages, 734 untranslated messages. The current stats for Spanish are

Re: Debian 5.0 (lenny) release notes: Call for translations, again

2009-01-24 Thread Klebson Porfirio
How can I get information about pt_BR translations status? I am with free time to help in what will be necessary. Klebson Porfirio DCE-UFAL 2009 E-mail/MSN: klebs...@gmail.com - Jabber: kleb...@jabber.org Usuário Linux #481658

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#509863: epigrass: depends on python-matplotlib

2008-12-31 Thread Luk Claes
Charles Plessy wrote: severity 509863 serious thanks Le Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:58:26PM -0800, Nick Ellery a écrit : Package: epigrass Version: 1.5.1-3 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu jaunty Originally reported at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295625. A

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#509863: epigrass: depends on python-matplotlib

2008-12-28 Thread Charles Plessy
severity 509863 serious thanks Le Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:58:26PM -0800, Nick Ellery a écrit : Package: epigrass Version: 1.5.1-3 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu jaunty Originally reported at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295625. A dependency on

Re: debian-installer unblock

2008-11-02 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Otavio Salvador [Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:55:21 -0200]: Hello, Please migrate debian-installer to lenny so we can release d-i RC1. Migrated now. Please coordinate with ftpmaster to update the installer-*/current symlinks. Thanks, -- Adeodato Simó dato at

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#496366: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages

2008-08-25 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Monday 25 August 2008 05:56, Charles Plessy wrote: I have not followed the discussions on -devel closely. What is the relevance of this bug for the releasability of the package? Upstream is already at a much higher version number and I am not able to solve the prolem by myself. Since the

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#496366: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages

2008-08-24 Thread Charles Plessy
tag 496366 help thanks Le Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:05:28PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov a écrit : Package: mafft Severity: grave In some packages I've discovered scripts with errors which may be used by a user for damaging important system files or user's files. Hi all, I have not followed

Re: Debian day Argentina

2008-08-15 Thread Emiliano Piscitelli
En este Link tenes toda la data, nos vemos ahi!! http://debconf8.debconf.org/debianday.xhtml El 15 de agosto de 2008 22:13, linuxknow [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Digo depronto me parece quienes asisten al Debian Day en Buenos Aires Argentina.? alguien sabe. saludos y nos vemos ahi. --

Re: [Debian-l10n-devel] Package description translations for Lenny

2008-08-10 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently it would be strange to do description translation updates for stable outside point releases, so if that's wanted, that would need more discussion... Given the pecentage of packages translated for some languages it

Re: [Debian-l10n-devel] Package description translations for Lenny

2008-08-10 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:55:08PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently it would be strange to do description translation updates for stable outside point releases, so if that's wanted, that would need more

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] 1st batch of binNMUs for GNUstep transition

2008-07-06 Thread Yavor Doganov
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 03:06:25PM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote: - gnustep-netclasses - pantomime1.2 - popplerkit.framework Doesn't look like these need to be binNMUed as no binary packages are directly depending on core gnustep libraries? Yeah, there are some issues with GNUstep

Re: [Debian-haskell] ghc6 transition overview (update)

2008-05-25 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, according to http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghc6 the package migrated today, and quite some packages along, it seems. Thanks to all involved, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: [EMAIL

Re: [Debian-haskell] ghc6 transition overview (update)

2008-05-22 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, as far as I can tell, all left to be done for the transition is: Am Dienstag, den 20.05.2008, 22:29 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: Upload packages: The following packages have been built by the buildds and should be uploaded, all on powerpc: haskell-anydbm ftphs haskelldb haxml

Re: Debian Installer Kernel Migration

2008-05-20 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Adeodato Simó [Mon, 19 May 2008 23:12:31 +0200]: linux-2.6_tpu approved for migration (will hopefully migrate with the next britney run) Meh, there were some old 2.6.18 and 2.6.22 packages in t-p-u that made britney think 2.6.24-7 was out of date. Cruft removed by ftpmaster now, it'll

Re: [Debian-haskell] ghc6 transition overview

2008-05-20 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:40:14AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: Here is a small overview of the ghc6 related packages. I'm a bit confused - is this meant to be a complete list? It doesn't mention, e.g., haskell-cgi on powerpc, which AFAICS has all its deps satisfied and just needs to be

Re: [Debian-haskell] ghc6 transition overview

2008-05-20 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 20.05.2008, 18:55 +0100 schrieb Ian Lynagh: On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:40:14AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: Here is a small overview of the ghc6 related packages. I'm a bit confused - is this meant to be a complete list? I was hoping so – it’s from

Re: [Debian-haskell] ghc6 transition overview

2008-05-20 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Ian Lynagh wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:40:14AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: Here is a small overview of the ghc6 related packages. I'm a bit confused - is this meant to be a complete list? It doesn't mention, e.g., haskell-cgi on powerpc, which AFAICS has all its deps satisfied

Re: [Debian-haskell] ghc6 transition overview

2008-05-20 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:02:58PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: haskell-cgi is not in lenny ATM (although it’s in etch). Oh yes, silly me! Thanks Ian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Debian-haskell] ghc6 transition overview (update)

2008-05-20 Thread John Goerzen
Joachim Breitner wrote: libghc6-hdbc-sqlite3-dev libhugs-hdbc-sqlite3 hpodder (which is the only reverse dependency) Makes sense to me. -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian Installer Kernel Migration

2008-05-19 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Otavio Salvador [Mon, 19 May 2008 17:50:23 -0300]: Hello RM team, Thanks to the work mostly done by Dann and Frans, new linux-2.6 target to D-I Beta2 are ready. Yay. Please accept linux-2.6 package from lenny-proposed-updates queue and also sync following udeb packages:

Re: Debian Installer Lenny Beta1: Status Update 4

2008-03-14 Thread Andreas Barth
* Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080313 02:36]: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: +--+---+ | Date | What happens |

Re: Debian Installer Lenny Beta1: Status Update 4

2008-03-14 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 14 March 2008, Andreas Barth wrote: Currently we're trying to get final images built but the building machine has hardware issues and it's being worked on to get it solves as soon as possible. I'll mail you all once it has been solved and images are available for final tests.

Re: Debian Installer Lenny Beta1: Status Update 4

2008-03-12 Thread Otavio Salvador
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: +--+---+ | Date | What happens | +--+---+ |March 8, 2008 |test of images starts

Re: Debian 4.1 and Python 2.5

2008-03-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt writes: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes. If outstanding issues are solved; people want make you believe that NMUs are enough to complete the transition. What needs to be done: - Look for code which frees memory with PyMem_DEL, which was

Re: Debian 4.1 and Python 2.5

2008-03-01 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes. If outstanding issues are solved; people want make you believe that NMUs are enough to complete the transition. What needs to be done: - Look for code which frees memory with PyMem_DEL, which was allocated with PyObject_NEW (must use

Re: Debian 4.1 and Python 2.5

2008-03-01 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes. If outstanding issues are solved; people want make you believe that NMUs are enough to complete the transition. What needs to be done: - Look for code which frees memory with PyMem_DEL, which was allocated with PyObject_NEW (must use

Re: Debian Installer Lenny Beta1: Status Update 1

2008-02-15 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Otavio Salvador wrote: Kernel status = * linux-modules-di-m68k-2.6 isn't uploaded due the lack of loop-aes and squashfs since linux-headers lack modules.lds files (#402061). * Installation over firewire is currently not possible (#450836) Greetings Helge --

Re: Debian 4.1 and Python 2.5

2008-02-14 Thread Matthias Klose
From: =?utf-8?q?Adri=C3=A1n_Ribao_Mart=C3=ADnez?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Debian 4.1 and Python 2.5 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:40:26 +0100 Hello, I'd like to know if Python 2.5 will be the default version of python in Debian 4.1. Thank you. Yes. If outstanding

Re: debian-40r1-i386-CD-1.iso and debian-40r2-i386-CD-1.iso

2008-01-14 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Александр Быстров wrote: Доброго времени суток. Я скачал образы debian-40r1-i386-CD-1.iso, debian-40r2-i386-CD-1.iso, debian-40r1-i386-kde-CD-1.iso, debian-40r2-i386-kde-CD-1.iso. Ни в одном случае несмог завершить установку. Все прекращалось на моменте выбора установки системного загрузчика

<    1   2   3   4   5   >