Am 21.06.2024 um 13:57:11 Uhr schrieb CHRIS M:
> And I like how for POP3 accounts, each email is stored as an
> individual file, vs being shoved into a binary .mbx file that could
> get corrupted at any time!
This is possible for IMAP too, e.g. with the Maildir format.
--
Gruß
Marco
Send unso
On Wednesday 19 June 2024 04:00:44 pm Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> My brain keeps wanting to note that e.g. Gmail used to make us jump
> through painful hoops to use desktop programs like Evolution. That
> didn't happen for me this time, but maybe other email providers still
> hav
On Wed, 2024-06-19 at 15:16 -0400, Jerry Mellon wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> New user having trouble with evolution. I think that I have it setup
> correctly, but it will not login
>
> to my email accounts. At the bottom of screen it is scanning the email
> server from my log
Hello,
New user having trouble with evolution. I think that I have it setup
correctly, but it will not login
to my email accounts. At the bottom of screen it is scanning the email
server from my login but then
a box pops up indicating that there was an error trying to login and
asks for
On Sat, 2023-05-06 at 14:03 +0200, Alex wrote:
> On Sat, 06 May 2023 20:59:38 +0900
> Byung-Hee HWANG (黃炳熙) wrote:
>
> > My point is that:
> > Evolution should do encoding by UTF-8 *really* like as Thunderbird.
>
> You should bring this up at
> https://gitlab.gnom
On Sat, 06 May 2023 20:59:38 +0900
Byung-Hee HWANG (黃炳熙) wrote:
> My point is that:
> Evolution should do encoding by UTF-8 *really* like as Thunderbird.
You should bring this up at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/issues, or at their mailing
list.
--
Current PGP
Hellow,
I was using Gnome Evolution for a while.
Most are good. But Headers' charset is odd.
Evolution's Content-Type is *always* UTF-8.
In my case, however, From's my name and Organization header and Subject
header, these headers are encoded by [EUC-KR].
That is feature? Or t
Le 04/05/2023 à 20:21, Jim Popovitch a écrit :
[...]
Excellent job Debian team!
+1 Great. Hats down to Debian folks :-)
2023-05-04 (목), 18:21 +, Jim Popovitch:
> On May 4, 2023 6:13:04 PM UTC, Cindy Sue Causey <
> butterflyby...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The security involvement appears to be that one current fix is to
> > downgrade which "leaves the user with an unpatched version of
> > WebKit".
> >
> > Cindy
On May 4, 2023 6:13:04 PM UTC, Cindy Sue Causey
wrote:
>
>The security involvement appears to be that one current fix is to
>downgrade which "leaves the user with an unpatched version of WebKit".
>
>Cindy :)
While that wasn't my intention when I wrote it, I'm happy to see the rush of
attention
On Thu, 2023-05-04 at 20:09 +0200, zithro wrote:
>
> A recent email from the Debian security team confirms this (Advisory
> DSA-5396-2) :
>
> "The webkit2gtk update released as 5396-1 introduced a compatibility
> problem that caused Evolution to display e-mail incorrectl
egtk-4.0-18
>> libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37
>
> Ah, thank you very much for that information. In the meanwhile, I found
> that there is already a bug report available at Debian about that.
Am almost simultaneously reading this thread AND the
Debian-Security-Announce post about the same:
ebian security team confirms this (Advisory
DSA-5396-2) :
"The webkit2gtk update released as 5396-1 introduced a compatibility
problem that caused Evolution to display e-mail incorrectly. Evolution
has been updated to solve this issue.
For the stable distribution (bullseye), this problem has bee
On Thu, 2023-05-04 at 12:07 +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> >
> Hello,
>
> > I have had just the same problem. I think it is caused by the last
> > security upgrade by unattended-upgrades of these packages:
> > gir1.2-javascriptcoregtk-4.0
> > gir1.2-webkit2-4.0
> > libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-18
didier gaumet writes:
> Le 04/05/2023 à 09:54, Christoph Pleger a écrit :
>> Hello,
>> suddenly, I have the problem in Evolution Email, that email bodies
>> are not shown anymore, but only the headers.
>> This affects my private email account as well as my email accoun
>
Hello,
> I have had just the same problem. I think it is caused by the last
> security upgrade by unattended-upgrades of these packages:
> gir1.2-javascriptcoregtk-4.0
> gir1.2-webkit2-4.0
> libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-18
> libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37
Ah, thank you very much for that information. In th
Le 04/05/2023 à 09:54, Christoph Pleger a écrit :
Hello,
suddenly, I have the problem in Evolution Email, that email bodies are not
shown anymore, but only the headers.
This affects my private email account as well as my email account for work.
Maybe I have changed some setting,
but I cannot
Hello,
suddenly, I have the problem in Evolution Email, that email bodies are not
shown anymore, but only the headers.
This affects my private email account as well as my email account for work.
Maybe I have changed some setting,
but I cannot remember to have done that.
Any idea?
Regards
Oh, I meant to add that compacting is typically useful when record (email?)
storage is in something like an mbox file -- it saves the need to rewrite the
file each time a single file is deleted (for example).
On the other hand, with storage in something like mdirr files (right name --
one em
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 06:24:14 PM Default User wrote:
> > What is 'compacting', what is it meant to do?
The definition of compacting as I "grew up" with it (not sure where I first
encountered it is the idea that in some applications, the act of "deleting"
something doesn't actually delete i
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 07:38:45AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 18:24 -0400, Default User wrote:
> > It does occur to me that Evolution may use the maildir format rather
> > than the mbox format [...]
> I thought we were talking about IMAP protocol access to Googl
On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 18:24 -0400, Default User wrote:
> It does occur to me that Evolution may use the maildir format rather
> than the mbox format. I just ASSumed that it used mbox, since in Menu
> > File, there is an option to save messages in mbox format. If
> Evolution u
reason.
This support page discusses behavior for local folders. This thread is
dedicated to specific of Gmail and Evolution interaction in respect to
IMAP protocols. I mentioned compacting of folders in Thnderbird because
earlier I have seen that performing "Compact" in Thunderbir
On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 20:47 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 06:26:53PM +0100, Tixy wrote:
> > On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 11:19 -0400, Default User wrote:
> > > (BTW, if anyone does have information about compacting folders in
> > > Evolution, I
gs for you as needed even if you don't
explicitly ask for it, so you don't need to worry about it.
Evolution doesn't bother the user with this, which is the better option.
Stefan
On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 18:26 +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 11:19 -0400, Default User wrote:
> > (BTW, if anyone does have information about compacting folders in
> > Evolution, I would love to hear about it!)
>
> What is 'compacting', what is it meant to
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 06:26:53PM +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 11:19 -0400, Default User wrote:
> > (BTW, if anyone does have information about compacting folders in
> > Evolution, I would love to hear about it!)
>
> What is 'compacting', what is it m
On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 11:19 -0400, Default User wrote:
> (BTW, if anyone does have information about compacting folders in
> Evolution, I would love to hear about it!)
What is 'compacting', what is it meant to do? Sounds like 'compressing'
to me, don't know if proto
On Sat, 2023-04-29 at 00:01 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> For those who missed start of the thread: it is dedicated to IMAP
> access
> to Gmail and Evolution behavior.
>
> On 27/04/2023 23:15, Default User wrote:
> > It stays in both folders, with
> > only the one
For those who missed start of the thread: it is dedicated to IMAP access
to Gmail and Evolution behavior.
On 27/04/2023 23:15, Default User wrote:
It stays in both folders, with
only the one in "All Mail" having a line through it, showing that is
marked for deletion, but is not delet
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 17:17 +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-04-26 at 11:05 -0400, Default User wrote:
> > Even if it did not work from a Live Debian session, it makes no
> > sense
> > to me that Evolution could be designed this way. I see no good
> > reason
> &
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 17:26 +0200, Michel Verdier wrote:
> Le 27 avril 2023 Default User a écrit :
>
> > Anyway, it would be interesting to hear from Evolution users, to
> > see if
> > others experience the situation I have described. I would find it
> > hard
>
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 17:26 +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 12:15 -0400, Default User wrote:
> > If a message is in both of the folders "Inbox" and "All Mail", it
> > CAN
> > NOT be directly deleted from "All Mail". It stays in both folders,
> > with
> > only the one in "All Mail" having
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 12:15 -0400, Default User wrote:
> If a message is in both of the folders "Inbox" and "All Mail", it CAN
> NOT be directly deleted from "All Mail". It stays in both folders, with
> only the one in "All Mail" having a line through it, showing that is
> marked for deletion, but
On Wed, 2023-04-26 at 11:05 -0400, Default User wrote:
> Even if it did not work from a Live Debian session, it makes no sense
> to me that Evolution could be designed this way. I see no good reason
> that messages can be directly deleted from any other folder, but not
> [Gma
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 22:25 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 27/04/2023 21:38, Default User wrote:
> > "All Mail" apparently assigned to all messages
>
> Do you expect that deleting from "All Mail" removes message from
> another
> folder to which you moved it earlier? I am in doubts it should be
>
Le 27 avril 2023 Default User a écrit :
> Anyway, it would be interesting to hear from Evolution users, to see if
> others experience the situation I have described. I would find it hard
> to believe that no one else on debian-user@lists.debian.org uses
> Gnome/Evolution on Debian
On 27/04/2023 21:38, Default User wrote:
"All Mail" apparently assigned to all messages
Do you expect that deleting from "All Mail" removes message from another
folder to which you moved it earlier? I am in doubts it should be done
without a dialog to confirm such operation. However I just re
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 09:22 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 26/04/2023 22:05, Default User wrote:
> > it absolutely refuses to delete email
> > messages directly from the [Gmail]/All Mail folder of any email
> > account.
>
> Disclaimer: I do not use evolution.
>
&g
On 26/04/2023 22:05, Default User wrote:
it absolutely refuses to delete email
messages directly from the [Gmail]/All Mail folder of any email
account.
Disclaimer: I do not use evolution.
Do you use IMAP for your gmail account? Notice that IMAP assumes
tree-like structure of folders and
; >
> > I run Debian 11 (Bullseye) Stable, up to date, Gnome 3 desktop
> > environment.
> >
> > I recently set up Evolution email. Works okay.
> >
> > Two days ago, I realized that it absolutely refuses to delete email
> > messages directly from the
Can't explain it, but it strikes me it's almost certainly a permissions
problem.
Patrick
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:06 AM Default User
wrote:
> Strange . . .
>
> I run Debian 11 (Bullseye) Stable, up to date, Gnome 3 desktop
> environment.
>
> I recently set up
Strange . . .
I run Debian 11 (Bullseye) Stable, up to date, Gnome 3 desktop
environment.
I recently set up Evolution email. Works okay.
Two days ago, I realized that it absolutely refuses to delete email
messages directly from the [Gmail]/All Mail folder of any email
account. To delete a
On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 15:04 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> You can probably use 'deb [arch=amd64,i386]' instead of duplicating
> some of the sources.
/etc/apt/sources uses deb [arch=amd64,i386]. The packages listed in
/var/lib/apt/lists/*Packages are the ones that are installed.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 2:47 PM Van Snyder wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 13:54 +1100, David wrote:
>
> The command I suggested reports packages whose origin is unknown to the apt
> database. There's 118 of them in your output, including g++-9, many libs
> and 6 kernels, pythons 2.7 and 3.9 and
On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 13:54 +1100, David wrote:
> The command I suggested reports packages whose origin is unknown to
> the apt
> database. There's 118 of them in your output, including g++-9, many
> libs
> and 6 kernels, pythons 2.7 and 3.9 and perl 5.
>
> My understanding of the origin = (inst
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 12:51, Van Snyder wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 11:39 +1100, David wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 09:21, Van Snyder wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 16:13 -0500, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Van Snyder wrote:
> You are mixing way too many things here. Better tell us the
> contents
On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 11:39 +1100, David wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 09:21, Van Snyder
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 16:13 -0500, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Van Snyder wrote:
>
> > You are mixing way too many things here. Better tell us the
> > contents of all your /etc/apt/sources.list and
>
Hi Van Snyder
You replied to my mailing list message by sending
a file attachment directly to me only.
It would be better if you send that information to the
mailing list, so that other readers are not excluded
from seeing your reply, and you can benefit from group
discussion.
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 09:21, Van Snyder wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 16:13 -0500, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Van Snyder wrote:
> You are mixing way too many things here. Better tell us the
> contents of all your /etc/apt/sources.list and
> /etc/apt/sources.list.d/* files.
> opm-ubuntu-ppa-kinetic.li
On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 16:13 -0500, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Van Snyder wrote:
>
> You are mixing way too many things here. Better tell us the
> contents of all your /etc/apt/sources.list and
> /etc/apt/sources.list.d/* files.
>
> -dsr-
Dan:
Thanks for the reminder to look in /etc/apt/sources.d
I
Van Snyder wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 15:42 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 06:34:27 (+1000), David wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 12:09 -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When I installed Debian 11, I didn't destroy Debian 10. I still
> > > > have
> > > > Debia
On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 06:07 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:09:30PM -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
> > I just upgraded to Debian 11. I had been using Debian 10. I've used
> > Evolution for many years. The version in Debian 11 is 3.48.
> >
> >
On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 15:42 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 06:34:27 (+1000), David wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 12:09 -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
> > >
> > > When I installed Debian 11, I didn't destroy Debian 10. I still
> > > have
> > > Debian 10 on a different drive. In att
Hello,
Le mardi 21 février 2023 à 12:09 -0800, Van Snyder a écrit :
> I just upgraded to Debian 11. I had been using Debian 10. I've used
> Evolution for many years. The version in Debian 11 is 3.48.
Evolution in Debian Stable (11, Bullseye) is 3.38
[...]
> But the messages d
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:09:30PM -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
> I just upgraded to Debian 11. I had been using Debian 10. I've used
> Evolution for many years. The version in Debian 11 is 3.48.
>
> I use KDE Plasma version 5.26.90. The KDE Frameworks version is
> 5.102.0.
>
On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 15:42 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 06:34:27 (+1000), David wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 12:09 -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
> > >
> > > When I installed Debian 11, I didn't destroy Debian 10. I still
> > > have
> > > Debian 10 on a different drive. In att
On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 06:34:27 (+1000), David wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 12:09 -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
> >
> > When I installed Debian 11, I didn't destroy Debian 10. I still have
> > Debian 10 on a different drive. In attempting to repair an entirely
> > different problem, I had done
> >
> >
On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 12:09 -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
> I just upgraded to Debian 11. I had been using Debian 10. I've used
> Evolution for many years. The version in Debian 11 is 3.48.
>
> I use KDE Plasma version 5.26.90. The KDE Frameworks version is
> 5.102.0.
>
> I
I just upgraded to Debian 11. I had been using Debian 10. I've used
Evolution for many years. The version in Debian 11 is 3.48.
I use KDE Plasma version 5.26.90. The KDE Frameworks version is
5.102.0.
I get pop-up notes from KDE that evolution has received new messages.
But the messages
Hi all,
I recently installed a Debian testing (Bookworm). The system seems to
work quite fine. However, I stumbled upon a rather stragen problem with
Evolution. When I add new CalDav calendards and tasks lists Evolution
does not whos already existing entries from these calendars and task
lists
Hmm!
Ok before saying there is a possible bug, I will try to remove evolution-data-
server, install it again, and check!
Currently with Sid I have:
patrice@kos-moceratops ~> LANG=C apt --installed list "evolution*"
Listing... Done
evolution-common/unstable,unstable,now 3.42.3-1 a
Le vendredi 28 janvier 2022 à 14:32 +0100, Patrice Duroux a écrit :
[...]
> Just in case that that a package version as introduce some change to
> the
> following:
>
> patrice@kos-moceratops ~> ls -l /usr/libexec/camel-lock-helper-1.2
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 22784 14 janv. 13:15 /usr/libexec
Hello,
That more or less exactly the same on my side.
I should have wrote /var/mail/ in fact.
(The old bug affected me too much! :-D)
And it is just to read all the emails (root) aliased to my user.
Just in case that that a package version as introduce some change to the
following:
patrice@kos-m
Hello,
Pretty old bugs you dug up: more than 10 and 20 years old ;-)
Here (Bullseye, Evolution 3.38, Exim standard setup (local only)), with
an Evolution dedicated local account set up to send (server type:
sendmail) and receive (server type: local distribution in
/var/mail/didier), I have no
Hi,
I use Sid but this problem came back to me a while ago now.
Searching the internet for a solution, I dug around and ended up in the
following:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/640705
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=107881
https
te:
>> Hello,
>> I have been using Debian 10 now for about 6 months and all of a sudden
>> Evolution will not allow me to login.
>> I am getting a box while Evolution is starting and loading that says
>> "Please enter the password for @xxx"
&
Hi,New to Debian, have been using for 6 months and Evolution has now stopped
connecting to network for email.On startup of Evolution I get a box telling me
that evolution cannot connect to my email address. It asks me for my password
for the my email account. I enter the password and it pause
ed Gnome into the basket around 2001 (now exactly 20y later it is
still in the basket)
Especially Evolution never kept the promise - no idea why gnomes are doing
this. IMO they like it and never learn from the mistakes. Another thing I
can imagine is that you can write a driver in C but not a GUI, b
On 4/27/21, deloptes wrote:
>
> If you want a stable desktop you know there is one called Trinity Desktop
> (TDE) - it just works. But upfront the Evolution monster will behave the
> same if you insist using it :D
While attempting to find something calendar-like, I tried Evolution on
Jerry Mellon wrote:
> Hello,I have been using Debian 10 now for about 6 months and all of a
> sudden Evolution will not allow me to login.I am getting a box while
> Evolution is starting and loading that says "Please enter the password for
> @xxx"an below is my user
On Tue, 27 Apr, 2021 at 18:49:55 +, Jerry Mellon wrote:
>Hello,
>I have been using Debian 10 now for about 6 months and all of a sudden
>Evolution will not allow me to login.
>I am getting a box while Evolution is starting and loading that says
>"Pleas
Hello,I have been using Debian 10 now for about 6 months and all of a sudden
Evolution will not allow me to login.I am getting a box while Evolution is
starting and loading that says "Please enter the password for @xxx"an
below is my user ID and the password as dots. I r
On 15/09/2020 10:44, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Another choice would be to run Debian stable, but don't install Debian's
> version of nginx. Use upstream's releases, compile them yourself, and
> update them yourself whenever you need to (for security reasons or
> otherwise).
If one chooses to do so,
On 15/09/2020 10:38, Klaus Singvogel wrote:
> No: no new version.
>
> If you're unhappy with that, think about these choices:
>
> - install upcoming Debian 11 (Testing, Bullseye) and live with the changes
> of packages and possible errors in the system. Release date unknown.
>
> - install Debi
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:38:33PM +0200, Klaus Singvogel wrote:
> No: no new version.
>
> If you're unhappy with that, think about these choices:
>
> - install upcoming Debian 11 (Testing, Bullseye) and live with the changes
> of packages and possible errors in the system. Release date unknown
Hi Revanth,
Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> Just needed to re-confirm couple of things here
>
> 1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
> be updated with patches should there be some security issues. But my question
> is, Can we expect the lat
Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> Just needed to re-confirm couple of things here
>
> 1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
> be updated with patches should there be some security issues. But my question
> is, Can we expect the latest version of NGINX(i.e. v1
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:23:11PM +, Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> Just needed to re-confirm couple of things here
>
> 1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
> be updated with patches should there be some security issues. But my question
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:23:11PM +, Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> 1. I understand that the NGINX version shipped by default is secured and will
> be updated with patches should there be some security issues. But my question
> is, Can we expect the latest version of NGINX(i.e. v1.18.x) to be
available in Debian 10?
Thanks,
Revanth.
-Original Message-
From: Klaus Singvogel
Sent: 15 September 2020 15:10
To: Suryadevara, Revanth
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Security Vulnerabilities with Nginx v1.14.2 and GNOME Evolution
Hi Revanth,
as you might have
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:13:04AM +, Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
> 1.) Pertaining to Nginx there is no CVE-ID, main concern is,
> According to nginx download page, (http://nginx.org/en/download.html) Nginx
> 1.14.x is no longer supported and will not be getting regular patches. So, if
> any
Debian Security team for there excellent job they
did in the past and the future. Thank you.
Regarding missing CVE-2020-11879 for GNOME Evolution: I don't have the
proof, but I think this points out to the fact the shipped version isn't
affected.
Best regards,
Klaus.
Suryadev
nginx shows, they've fixed some CVEs in past,
trice for the duration of buster.
> 2.) Pertaining to GNOME Evolution , the CVE-ID is CVE-2020-11879 .
> This ID isn't present in the links which you've shared.
Buster's evolution is vulnerable indeed - [1]. Security imp
high risk as the
vendor no longer provide updates.
2.) Pertaining to GNOME Evolution , the CVE-ID is CVE-2020-11879 . This ID
isn't present in the links which you've shared.
Thanks,
Revanth.
-Original Message-
From: Klaus Singvogel
Sent: 15 September 2020 13:32
To: Suryadevar
Suryadevara, Revanth wrote:
>
> We have a system running on Debian 10 with Nginx v1.14.2, GNOME Evolution
> v3.30.5-1.1 installed along with other packages.
>
[...]
> When can we expect latest versions of Nginx and GNOME Evolution to be
> available in Debian 10 ?
Which se
Hi,
We have a system running on Debian 10 with Nginx v1.14.2, GNOME Evolution
v3.30.5-1.1 installed along with other packages.
1. Security Vulnerability with Nginx v1.14.2:
THREAT:
According to nginx download page, (http://nginx.org/en/download.html) Nginx
1.14.x is no longer supported
Popovitch έγραψε:
> > > > > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 14:07 +, Nektarios Katakis wrote:
> > > > > > Στις 2020-02-03 12:59, Jim Popovitch έγραψε:
> > > > > > > Hello!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is the
+, Nektarios Katakis wrote:
> > > > > Στις 2020-02-03 12:59, Jim Popovitch έγραψε:
> > > > > > Hello!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there a way in Buster+Cinnamon to disable evolution-
> > > > > > (calendar|addressb
t; > >
> > > Is there a way in Buster+Cinnamon to disable evolution-
> > > (calendar|addressbook)-factory until after a VPN has connected?
> > >
> > > Everytime I login and start Evolution I have a handful of blue
> > > warnings,
> > >
> > Is there a way in Buster+Cinnamon to disable evolution-
> > > > (calendar|addressbook)-factory until after a VPN has connected?
> > > >
> > > > Everytime I login and start Evolution I have a handful of blue
> > > > warnings,
> > >
Στις 2020-02-03 14:24, Jim Popovitch έγραψε:
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 14:07 +, Nektarios Katakis wrote:
Στις 2020-02-03 12:59, Jim Popovitch έγραψε:
> Hello!
>
> Is there a way in Buster+Cinnamon to disable evolution-
> (calendar|addressbook)-factory until after a VPN h
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 14:07 +, Nektarios Katakis wrote:
> Στις 2020-02-03 12:59, Jim Popovitch έγραψε:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Is there a way in Buster+Cinnamon to disable evolution-
> > (calendar|addressbook)-factory until after a VPN has connected?
> >
> >
Στις 2020-02-03 12:59, Jim Popovitch έγραψε:
Hello!
Is there a way in Buster+Cinnamon to disable evolution-
(calendar|addressbook)-factory until after a VPN has connected?
Everytime I login and start Evolution I have a handful of blue
warnings,
that I must clear, because Evolution was unable
Hello!
Is there a way in Buster+Cinnamon to disable evolution-
(calendar|addressbook)-factory until after a VPN has connected?
Everytime I login and start Evolution I have a handful of blue warnings,
that I must clear, because Evolution was unable to connect to services
only available over a VPN
On 2019-07-13, Shahryar Afifi wrote:
> Modifying .config/evolution/accels does not take effect and every time
> evolution runs the modification gets over writing by evolution.
> Please advise.
> Thank you.
>
All I know is the file is apparently (over)written at exit time, so
any
On 2/1/17, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> River Chiang writes:
>
>> Hello List,
>>
>> I use Firefox to read lists, when I clicked the link
>> debian-user@lists.debian.org and tried to reply the message,
>> Evolution's setup window showed. I tried to setup Evol
River Chiang writes:
> Hello List,
>
> I use Firefox to read lists, when I clicked the link
> debian-user@lists.debian.org and tried to reply the message,
> Evolution's setup window showed. I tried to setup Evolution to use
> Gmail.
> Unfortunately I didn't make i
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:47:09 +0900
Mark Fletcher wrote:
Hello Mark,
>Yes, you are not the first person to say this -- but I didn't have to
I thought it worth mentioning, "just in case" it proved of use.
>do anything like this to get Evolution to work. I suspect the n
gle'. Where the setting resides within their prefs pages,
> I have no idea.
>
Yes, you are not the first person to say this -- but I didn't have to do
anything like this to get Evolution to work. I suspect the need for this
is less widespread than is being put about on the 'net.
Mark
1 - 100 of 1297 matches
Mail list logo
