"Dwayne C. Litzenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Turn on forwarding:
>
> echo "1" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
That's already done. As I said, I can connect to remote systems
through the firewall machine, and data flows back and forth. It's
just that it freezes up within a couple of mi
Oh yeah, instead, you can edit /etc/network/options and change:
ip_forward=no
to
ip_foward=yes
Then, either run "/etc/init.d/networking restart", or reboot the system.
--
Dwayne C. Litzenberger - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp6ccRNFlCig.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Turn on forwarding:
echo "1" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
--
Dwayne C. Litzenberger - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgphUNIWDB0hH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
My main machine, scratchy, is connected to the net using PPPOE (PPP
over ethernet) over DSL. I have another machine, cheddar, connected
to a second ethernet card on scratchy with an ethernet crossover
cable. I am trying to using netfilter (iptables) to masquerade
cheddar behind scratchy, and it i
A list of steps you've already performed would be useful in order to pinpoint
where things are going wrong.
Cheers,
Jason.
--On Wednesday, August 9, 2000 6:22 -0500 Jason Schepman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HELP!! I can't get IPMASQ working. I've recompiled my kernel to add MASQ
support a
What does it say when you do: ipchains -L
Ron Rademaker
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Jason Schepman wrote:
> HELP!! I can't get IPMASQ working. I've recompiled my kernel to add MASQ
> support and I'm pretty sure that I got it right. I've read through the
> HOW-TO but I had problems following along (I
HELP!! I can't get IPMASQ working. I've recompiled my kernel to add MASQ
support and I'm pretty sure that I got it right. I've read through the
HOW-TO but I had problems following along (I think it was written with BSD
in mind.not Sys5). Anywaysany ideas or suggestions would be
helpful.
Thanks for assistance!
Following you advices I moved toward 1.3 and was happy to looking on
"upgrate without rebooting". It was great!
On Mon, 26 May 1997, A. M. Varon wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> >> Long answer: You have to say yes to the experimental drivers in orde
On Mon, 26 May 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> Long answer: You have to say yes to the experimental drivers in order for
>> the option ip masq to appear. kernel 2.0.27 partially supports ip masq, so
>> you have to patch the kernel with some files to fully use it. If possible,
>> get the kernel 2.0.
>
>
> I also was advised to use ip-masq. to solve some routing problems, but
> when I tried to compile kernel (2.0.27) enabling ip-masq. I found that
> this option could not be activated from 'make xconfig' menus. Why?
> How should I activate this option?
You should have been first enable prom
On Tue, May 27, 1997 at 11:23:36AM +0800, A. M. Varon wrote:
> Long answer: You have to say yes to the experimental drivers in order for
> the option ip masq to appear. kernel 2.0.27 partially supports ip masq, so
> you have to patch the kernel with some files to fully use it. If possible,
> get th
On Mon, May 26, 1997 at 01:33:03PM +0400, Eugene Sevinian wrote:
>
> I also was advised to use ip-masq. to solve some routing problems, but
> when I tried to compile kernel (2.0.27) enabling ip-masq. I found that
> this option could not be activated from 'make xconfig' menus. Why?
> How should I
On Mon, 26 May 1997, Eugene Sevinian wrote:
> I also was advised to use ip-masq. to solve some routing problems, but
> when I tried to compile kernel (2.0.27) enabling ip-masq. I found that
> this option could not be activated from 'make xconfig' menus. Why?
> How should I activate this option?
I also was advised to use ip-masq. to solve some routing problems, but
when I tried to compile kernel (2.0.27) enabling ip-masq. I found that
this option could not be activated from 'make xconfig' menus. Why?
How should I activate this option?
Thanks,
Eugene Sevinian
-
On Wed, 21 May 1997, Lars Hallberg wrote:
> Craig, sorry, got to ask You one thing...
>
> Humm, I use diald. It do for some reason lose the first package
> on a new fresh conection. My ugly workaround is to have no
> local nameresolving and the nameserver listed multiple times in
> /etc/resolv.co
On Wed, 21 May 1997, Francois Gouget wrote:
> > Most Linux documentation advises against running bind, saying that it's
> [...]
> > get it workingit only takes a few minutes at most.
>
> I would rather say that it took me a several hours but perhaps I'm
> worse than average.
for a site
On Wed, 21 May 1997, Francois Gouget wrote:
> > Yep, I have the same situation, and name resolution works fine. The
> > only things I've found that don't work are ftp (dir listings only,
> > file gets by wget and netscape work fine (which I don't understand))
> > and ping.
>
> This must be related
On 21 May 1997, Rob Browning wrote:
> Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have the same setup as Benjamin T except that I have two Linux
> > machines. I could not prove it right now because I have installed a DNS
> > server on the Linux doing the masquerading but if I remember
Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have the same setup as Benjamin T except that I have two Linux
> machines. I could not prove it right now because I have installed a DNS
> server on the Linux doing the masquerading but if I remember well my 486
> was able to do DNS resolution
Lars Hallberg writes:
> As I understands it this is a problem allot of peple on this list have
> and I wonder: Do You know a way to 'cleanly' configuer diald/pppd? Or do
> You know a less expensiv/ugly workaround?
Have you tried request-route?
John HaslerThis posting is in the pub
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Craig San
ders writes:
[...]
> IMO, the benefits of having a local caching name server far outweigh the
> "difficulty" of installing it.
[...]
> BTW, if you're using diald you'll probably want to configure it so that
> it doesn't bring up the link every time you want
On Wed, 21 May 1997, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 1997, Benjamin T. White wrote:
>
> > **I can not do domain name resolution with my new setup** The ip
[...]
> DNS is one of the limitations of masquerading. It doesn't work.
I have the same setup as Benjamin T except that I have
On Wed, 21 May 1997, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 1997, Benjamin T. White wrote:
>
> > **I can not do domain name resolution with my new setup** The ip
... other stuff deleted ...
> > The kicker: booting with my old slackware setup fixes this problem,
> > without changing anything on the
On Tue, 20 May 1997, Benjamin T. White wrote:
> **I can not do domain name resolution with my new setup** The ip
> masquerading seems to work with most network traffic. Packets sent by
> IP number are forwarded appropriately. I can telnet and use my web
> browser on my macs if I use IP numbers. DN
Hello all,
I have an interesting problem. I have a small LAN based on ethernet with
a Linux box with a ppp connection to the internet acting as a gateway for
two Macintosh computers:
---
| Linux ||---Powermac with OpenTransport
25 matches
Mail list logo
