I'd like to try to compile my own kernel, using the realtime patch set. At
kernel.org, I see that the 6.6 kernel source is 6.6, but the 6.6 realtime
patch set is 6.6-rt12. Does that matter, or is it enough that both are
given as 6.6? Similarly, if I see that the 6.5 series is at 6.5.10 fo
My thanks to the developing classes of Debian who as together or as one (it only
takes one) fixed this package that fixed the module that fixed the nvidia
driver.
Good show.
--
CK
where should my humble contribution be directed?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
y the patches I run
- fakeroot debian/rules source
Now I can see that the patches are applied. According to
http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html the
patched kernel source is now at debian/build/source. So all I must do
is to create a tarball of that subdirectory. Am I corre
On 9/21/2010 7:27 AM, Curt Howland wrote:
> On Monday 20 September 2010, Arthur Machlas was heard to say:
>> My guess is you need to build the header at least, and perhaps the
>> source. It depends on how you're building the modules I suppose. In
>> any case, you'll have to run either
>> fakeroot m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 20 September 2010, Arthur Machlas was heard to say:
> My guess is you need to build the header at least, and perhaps the
> source. It depends on how you're building the modules I suppose. In
> any case, you'll have to run either
> fakeroot ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 20 September 2010, Arthur Machlas was heard to say:
> And install the debs. Alternatively, build both just to be safe
> fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version -curt1.0 kernel_headers
> kernel_image
Very interesting. Any idea why "building th
ror
>2
>make[2]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>NVIDIA: left KBUILD.
>nvidia.ko failed to build!
>make[1]: *** [module] Error 1
>make: *** [module] Error 2
> -> Error.
> ERROR: Unable to build the NVIDIA kernel module.
> ==
>
> Which I guess
re that you don't have CONFIG_LOCALVERSION or CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO
set in your kernel configuration file and make sure that you specify
--append-to-version and --revision on *every* invocation of make-kpkg. How
are you creating the virtualbox and nvidia packages? Are you using
module-assistant? O
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:25:45 -0400 (EDT), Curt Howland wrote:
>
> Hi. Up to date Squeeze, compiling the latest 2.6.36-rc4 kernel.
>
> Last time the problem was compiling the kernel at all, which is
> working just fine now thank you Debian-User.
>
> fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version -curt1.0
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:25:45PM -0400, Curt Howland wrote:
> Last time the problem was compiling the kernel at all, which is
> working just fine now thank you Debian-User.
>
> fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version -curt1.0 --initrd kernel_image
>
> creates the .deb file just fine, it installs
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Curt Howland wrote:
> Hi. Up to date Squeeze, compiling the latest 2.6.36-rc4 kernel.
>
> Last time the problem was compiling the kernel at all, which is
> working just fine now thank you Debian-User.
>
> fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version -curt1.0 --initrd ke
.
nvidia.ko failed to build!
make[1]: *** [module] Error 1
make: *** [module] Error 2
-> Error.
ERROR: Unable to build the NVIDIA kernel module.
==
Which I guess means I have to wait for Nvidia to fix a signed vs
unsigned change in the kernel source.
Can folks suggest if it would
inux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64
>> State: installed
>> Automatically installed: no
>> Version: 2.6.30-8
>> [...]
>>
>> nvidia-kernel-source:
>> [...]
>> Version: 180.44-2
>> [...]
>>
>> Okay, here my steps:
>> Installing the kernel+headers
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Thomas Jackowski wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I am just wondering if the problem is me or the package.
>
> Kernel Package:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64
> State: installed
> Automatically installed: no
> Version: 2.6.30-8
>
Hey,
I am just wondering if the problem is me or the package.
Kernel Package:
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 2.6.30-8
[...]
nvidia-kernel-source:
[...]
Version: 180.44-2
[...]
Okay, here my steps:
Installing the kernel+headers and
quot; way to use the kernel source ...
Regards,
Peter
For a long time, I always used traditional "hand-made" kernels, so
whenever I needed it (compiling modules from external sources, changing
something in the kernel, ...), I naturally had the source tree
).
I also experimented with "kernel-package" (with similar results). For
the most common case of compiling an external module, I found that
the package "linux-headers-2.6.26-2-", symlinked to "/usr/src/linux"
will do what I need.
I am still looking for a way to get t
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:51:19AM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 03:31:38PM -0800, Mike McClain wrote:
> > I've a mostly etch system and wanted to try the 2.6 kernel.
> 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 are from Sarge. 2.2.25 is even older.
Thanks for the tip, I hadn't realized 'apt-get up
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:31:38 -0800
Mike McClain wrote:
> I've a mostly etch system and wanted to try the 2.6 kernel.
...
> root@/deb40a:~> apt-get update
> root@/deb40a:~> grep "Package: kernel-source" /var/lib/dpkg/available
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.2
deb http://www.backports.org/debian etch-backports main contrib non-free
>
> root@/deb40a:~> apt-get update
> root@/deb40a:~> grep "Package: kernel-source" /var/lib/dpkg/available
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Package: kernel-source-2.2.25
> Package: kernel-source
40a:~> grep "Package: kernel-source" /var/lib/dpkg/available
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Package: kernel-source-2.2.25
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
root@/deb40a:~> apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.8
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Package kernel-source-2
2008/11/27 boss ganesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i pasted the config file of 18th kernel to kernel source of 26 & I ran "make
> oldconfig" , eventhough it is querying for the new options present in that
> source for that i didnt know what to do.. i simply gave enter
i pasted the config file of 18th kernel to kernel source of 26 & I ran "make
oldconfig" , eventhough it is querying for the new options present in that
source for that i didnt know what to do.. i simply gave enter to that
options.
Simply pressing enter will enable the options
boss ganesh wrote:
> I have pasted the config file of 2.6.18 (already compiled working kernel
> config file) to kernel source of version 2.6.26 , after that also it is
> asking queries without compiling it when i ran the command "make" ..
>
> why is it happening like th
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:59:26AM +0530, boss ganesh wrote:
> I have pasted the config file of 2.6.18 (already compiled working kernel
> config file) to kernel source of version 2.6.26 , after that also it is
> asking queries without compiling it when i ran the command "make"
On 2008-11-24 09:13 +0100, Adrian Levi wrote:
> 2008/11/24 boss ganesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I have pasted the config file of 2.6.18 (already compiled working kernel
>> config file) to kernel source of version 2.6.26 , after that also it is
>> asking queries without
2008/11/24 boss ganesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have pasted the config file of 2.6.18 (already compiled working kernel
> config file) to kernel source of version 2.6.26 , after that also it is
> asking queries without compiling it when i ran the command "make" ..
>
I have pasted the config file of 2.6.18 (already compiled working kernel
config file) to kernel source of version 2.6.26 , after that also it is
asking queries without compiling it when i ran the command "make" ..
why is it happening like that?
--
bossganesh
BOSSTeam
CDAC
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 22:06 +0900, J.H.Kim wrote:
> Is the debian kernel source and the kernel source of same version in
> kernel archive(www.kernel.org) same?
I believe there may be some patches involved.
> If I want to get debian kernel source code, which source code cd-rom
> is n
If you go over to http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages you should be able to
search for linux-source which will show you the current version of kernel
source available. I think this version will vary depending upon the release you
are searching under.
You might also want to look at the Wiki
J.H.Kim wrote:
> Hi, everyone
>
> Is the debian kernel source and the kernel source of same version in kernel
> archive(www.kernel.org) same?
No, Debian applies some set of patches.
> If I want to get debian kernel source code, which source code cd-rom is
> needed out of 21C
Hi, everyone
Is the debian kernel source and the kernel source of same version in kernel
archive(www.kernel.org) same?
If I want to get debian kernel source code, which source code cd-rom is
needed out of 21CDs?
Thanks in advance.
Hi all,
I'm facing a problem to build a non-pae kernel from debian kernel
source.
Here's what i have done:
#apt-get source linux-2.6
#cd linux-2.6-2.6.18.dfsg.1
#./debian/rules debian/build debian/stamps
#make -f debian/rules.gen setup-i386-xen-686
#cd build/build-i386-xen
> Can anyone shed any light on the differences between the
> > various kernel source packages in the repository,
>
> kernel-source-* are for sarge and below
> linux-source-* are for etch and beyond
> Then do
> apt-cache show $PACKAGE
> and read the Description:
> (for
also sprach Digby Tarvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.14.0252 +0200]:
> The example in my Martin Kraft book refers to:
> apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.8
> but I can't find a 'kernel-source-anything'..
Try linux-source-*. The kernel packaging has changed s
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:52:41AM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
> Can anyone shed any light on the differences between the
> various kernel source packages in the repository,
kernel-source-* are for sarge and below
linux-source-* are for etch and beyond
Then do
apt-cache show $PACKAGE
and re
> Can anyone shed any light on the differences between
> the various kernel source packages in the
repository,
> and which is the best choice for just being able to
> reproduce the running kernel?
>
> The example in my Martin Kraft book refers to:
> apt-get instal
Can anyone shed any light on the differences between the
various kernel source packages in the repository, and which is
the best choice for just being able to reproduce the running kernel?
The example in my Martin Kraft book refers to:
apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.8
but I can't
; gcc version:
> > gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)
> >
> > When I run the nvidia-installer ("sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-169.09-pkg1.run")
> > It tries to find kernel source from "ftp://download.nvidia.com"; and
> > fails, then
as '.config', ran 'make oldconfig' to use
> this configuration then ran the kernel compile for a few minutes to make
> the necessary files for the Nvidia driver builder, then run the Nvidia
> driver
> program with the --kernel-source-path=KERNEL-SOURCE-PATH command
compile for a few minutes to make
the necessary files for the Nvidia driver builder, then run the Nvidia
driver
program with the --kernel-source-path=KERNEL-SOURCE-PATH command
line option so it finds the kernel source.
Pending any minor missing items that were show stoppers but easy to find
and inst
gt; kernel version:
> Linux version 2.6.18-6-686 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1)
>
> gcc version:
> gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)
>
> When I run the nvidia-installer ("sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-169.09-pkg1.run")
> It tries to find kernel source fr
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:14:38PM +0100, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> In Sarge, in order to configure Debian for my modem, I started with:
>>
>> # apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.27
>>
>> . Now, in Etch, what should the package be in place of that? I couldn'
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:14:38PM +0100, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi to all Debian users.
>
> In Sarge, in order to configure Debian for my modem, I started with:
>
> # apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.27
>
> . Now, in Etch, what should the package be in place of that?
On 22:14 Mon 31 Dec , Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi to all Debian users.
>
> In Sarge, in order to configure Debian for my modem, I started with:
>
> # apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.27
>
> . Now, in Etch, what should the package be in place of that? I couldn'
Hi to all Debian users.
In Sarge, in order to configure Debian for my modem, I started with:
# apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.27
. Now, in Etch, what should the package be in place of that? I couldn't find
it! I tried with ...2.6, ...2.6.18,... but none was the right one.
Thanks fo
On 08/28/2007 02:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting "Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 08/28/2007 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or wou
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:15:08 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting "Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On 08/28/2007 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
> >> debian patch
Quoting "Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 08/28/2007 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would
one need to patch it with all of the include
On 08/28/2007 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would one
need to patch it with all of the included debian patches when building a
custom kernel?
It's al
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would
one need to patch it with all of the included debian patches when
building a custom kernel?
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, bu
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of debian
patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would one need to
patch it with all of the included debian patches when building a custom
kernel?
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not si
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:11:08 +0200
Marcus Blumhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, please CC me when replying, since I am not subscribed to
> this list.
>
> > [...]
> > And as I rarely decompress files, I have forgotten the command to
> > decompress tar/bz2 files .
> > [...]
Hi,
First of all, please CC me when replying, since I am not subscribed to
this list.
> [...]
> And as I rarely decompress files, I have forgotten the command to
> decompress tar/bz2 files .
> [...]
I just wanted to add my ¢2. You may want to evaluate the package named
"unp" and you will never
Ed Jabbour([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Tuesday 14 August 2007 21:27, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > >Anybody? Where do people dump their kernel source anyway???
> >
> > I have always put my kernels in /usr/src. First time I've _ever_
> > hear
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 21:27, Wayne Topa wrote:
> >Anybody? Where do people dump their kernel source anyway???
>
> I have always put my kernels in /usr/src. First time I've _ever_
> heard of " DO NOT USE THE /usr/src area". Just what readme did you
>
emember doing the symlink to /usr/src/linux from your
> >>> kernel-source.
> >>
> >> Well then why the warning from the Kernel developers? And what's
> >> this about symlinking? Symlinking what to what ?
>
> I don't know why. but the ker
here ?
>> >
>> > Well, I always store there all the sources related with my kernel,
>> > modules, etc... I haven't get any problem... BTW, remember doing the
>> > symlink to /usr/src/linux from your kernel-source.
>>
>>Well then why the warni
Frank McCormick wrote:
>>> Well, I always store there all the sources related with my kernel,
>>> modules, etc... I haven't get any problem... BTW, remember doing
>>> the symlink to /usr/src/linux from your kernel-source.
>>
>> Well then why the wa
ink to /usr/src/linux from your kernel-source.
Well then why the warning from the Kernel developers? And what's
this about symlinking? Symlinking what to what ?
Anybody? Where do people dump their kernel source anyway???
Cheers
Frank
When I compile my own kernels, I usually put them
is up here ?
> > >
> > > Well, I always store there all the sources related with my kernel,
> > > modules, etc... I haven't get any problem... BTW, remember doing the
> > > symlink to /usr/src/linux from your kernel-source.
> >
> >Well
; modules, etc... I haven't get any problem... BTW, remember doing the
> > symlink to /usr/src/linux from your kernel-source.
>
>Well then why the warning from the Kernel developers? And what's
> this about symlinking? Symlinking what to what ?
Anybody? Where do pe
s store there all the sources related with my kernel,
> modules, etc... I haven't get any problem... BTW, remember doing the
> symlink to /usr/src/linux from your kernel-source.
Well then why the warning from the Kernel developers? And what's
this about symlinking? Symlinking
says is " DO NOT USE THE /usr/src area" because that is
> where the headers for libc I guess are stored. What is up here ?
Well, I always store there all the sources related with my kernel,
modules, etc... I haven't get any problem... BTW, remember doing the
symlink to /usr/src/lin
I have taken the first steps towards compiling an Nvidia module for my
Quadro-pro card...
I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel, which
aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the readme, one of the first
things it says is " DO NOT USE THE /usr/src area" because that is
whe
Le Saturday 19 May 2007 11:49:55 Mihamina (R12y) Rakotomandimby, vous avez
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I am running Sid + Xen and I am used to patch the nvidia-kernel-source [1]
> in order to make it Xen friendly [2].
> I was surprised to see, when I appliyed the patch that the source are
&g
Hi,
I am running Sid + Xen and I am used to patch the nvidia-kernel-source [1] in
order to make it Xen friendly [2].
I was surprised to see, when I appliyed the patch that the source are already
patched: I mean "patch" command tells me so.
Is Xen compliance included or is it just a
On 19/04/07, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 11:52 +0100, Emmanuele Massimi wrote:
>
> I have read somewhere that the pen tablet should work out of the box,
> after modprobing it. So I did a clean re-installation (since in my
> previous one I did not install the Des
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 11:52 +0100, Emmanuele Massimi wrote:
>
> I have read somewhere that the pen tablet should work out of the box,
> after modprobing it. So I did a clean re-installation (since in my
> previous one I did not install the Desktop Environment by default)
> including the Desktop Env
ib/dpkg/info/wacom-kernel-source.postinst has a couple of
> mistakes
> > > > > relating to recent kernels.
> > > > >
> > > > > line 48 needs to look like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > kvers="`head -n 1 $ksrc/include/linux/utsrelease.h |
look like this:
> > > >
> > > > kvers="`head -n 1 $ksrc/include/linux/utsrelease.h | cut -c 22- | rev |
> > > > cut -c 2- | rev`"
> > > >
> > > > But the build still fails for anything after 2.6.16... since that is the
> > >
> > >
> > > > line 48 needs to look like this:
> > > >
> > > > kvers="`head -n 1 $ksrc/include/linux/utsrelease.h | cut -c 22- |
rev | cut -c 2- | rev`"
> > > >
> > > > But the build still fails for anything after 2.6.16... si
the build still fails for anything after 2.6.16... since that is
the
> > last update for the wacom-kernel-source and 2.6.18 (or 20 for me)
> > doesn't exist.
> >
> > Plus, AFAICS, it isn't needed anymore.
> >
> > modprobe tells me:
> >
> &
rev |
> > > cut -c 2- | rev`"
> > >
> > > But the build still fails for anything after 2.6.16... since that is the
> > > last update for the wacom-kernel-source and 2.6.18 (or 20 for me)
> > > doesn't exist.
> > >
> > > Plus,
akes
> > relating to recent kernels.
> >
> > line 48 needs to look like this:
> >
> > kvers="`head -n 1 $ksrc/include/linux/utsrelease.h | cut -c 22- | rev | cut
> > -c 2- | rev`"
> >
> > But the build still fails for anything after 2.6.
>
> kvers="`head -n 1 $ksrc/include/linux/utsrelease.h | cut -c 22- | rev | cut
> -c 2- | rev`"
>
> But the build still fails for anything after 2.6.16... since that is the
> last update for the wacom-kernel-source and 2.6.18 (or 20 for me)
> doesn't exist.
| rev`"
But the build still fails for anything after 2.6.16... since that is the
last update for the wacom-kernel-source and 2.6.18 (or 20 for me)
doesn't exist.
Plus, AFAICS, it isn't needed anymore.
modprobe tells me:
/lib/modules/2.6.18-4-k7/kernel/drivers/usb/input/wacom.ko
Als
; two lines. I guess it's time to buy new glasses...
>
> Anyways, this is what I get when I run dpkg-reconfigure
> wacom-kernel-source:
>
> /usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: wacom-kernel-source is broken or not fully
> installed
Try
dpkg-reconfigure --force wacom-kernel-source
; Anyways, this is what I get when I run dpkg-reconfigure
> wacom-kernel-source:
>
> /usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: wacom-kernel-source is broken or not fully
> installed
Try
dpkg-reconfigure --force wacom-kernel-source
If anything goes wrong then please copy the complete output of th
Ok, thanks for your delucidation, I looked at both the lines, but I must
have skipped that word, in fact I couldn't tell the difference between the
two lines. I guess it's time to buy new glasses...
Anyways, this is what I get when I run dpkg-reconfigure wacom-kernel-source:
/usr
within 10
>> minutes. ]
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 15:35:35 +0100, Emmanuele Massimi wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> > I've been browsing around, but I couldn't find anything related to this.
>> > I have been trying to install the wacom-kernel-source p
this.
> I have been trying to install the wacom-kernel-source package on Etch,
but
> it fails with the following error:
>
> Setting up wacom-kernel-source (0.7.4.1-5) ...
>> /var/lib/dpkg/info/wacom-kernel-source.postinst: line 49: [: too many
>> arguments
>> Warning: ke
d anything related to this.
> I have been trying to install the wacom-kernel-source package on Etch, but
> it fails with the following error:
>
> Setting up wacom-kernel-source (0.7.4.1-5) ...
>> /var/lib/dpkg/info/wacom-kernel-source.postinst: line 49: [: too many
>> arguments
&
Hi all,
I've been browsing around, but I couldn't find anything related to this.
I have been trying to install the wacom-kernel-source package on Etch, but
it fails with the following error:
Setting up wacom-kernel-source (0.7.4.1-5) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/wacom-kernel-source.postins
Hi all,
I've been browsing around, but I couldn't find anything related to this.
I have been trying to install the wacom-kernel-source package on Etch, but
it fails with the following error:
Setting up wacom-kernel-source (0.7.4.1-5) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/wacom-kernel-source.postins
Hello all,
I am trying to use m-a to install ndiswrapper. I am using debian stable
with backports for module-assistant,build-essential,xorg,kde. m-a
prepare says everything is great and I made sure its getting the
linux-headers from backports. My kernel is stock from backports
2.6.18-4-k7
Hello all,
I am trying to use m-a to install ndiswrapper. I am using debian stable
with backports for module-assistant,build-essential,xorg,kde. m-a
prepare says everything is great and I made sure its getting the
linux-headers from backports. My kernel is stock from backports
2.6.18-4-k7 #1 S
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:30:58 +, Alle Meije Wink wrote:
> Apologies if this question has already been answered, but I have not
> been able yet to get ANY version of nvidia-glx back on my system!
>
> I run a mix of testing and experimental (?), see my sources.list below.
> The nvidia drive
ttp://www.debian-multimedia.org etch main
# root dirs that may contain packages
# deb file:/root/ debs/
Subject: Re: when will nvidai-glx and nvidia-kernel-source hit etch?
From: Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 9 Nov
2006
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 10:38:23 +0100, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >Now I am confused:
> me too...
>
> >$ apt-file search nvidia_drv
> >nvidia-glx: usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.o
> >nvidia-glx: usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.o
> >nvidia-glx-legacy: usr/lib/xo
Florian Kulzer wrote:
Now I am confused:
me too...
$ apt-file search nvidia_drv
nvidia-glx: usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.o
nvidia-glx: usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.o
nvidia-glx-legacy: usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.o
i get empty output from apt-file.
Maybe t
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 08:00:34 +0100, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
> hi,
>
> >>actually, where does /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so come
> >>from? (i hope i wrote the path correctly) is it part of the binary files
> >>from nvidia.com? 'apt-file search' didn't reveal anything relevant.
> >
>
hi,
actually, where does /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so come
from? (i hope i wrote the path correctly) is it part of the binary files
from nvidia.com? 'apt-file search' didn't reveal anything relevant.
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so is indeed part of the nvidia
binar
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 19:40:39 +0100, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
> >nvidia-glx is a package, created from the nvidia-graphics-drivers source
> >package. nvidia-graphics-drivers contains the binary .run files from
> >nvidia.com plus some scripting voodoo used in package creation.
> >http://packages.debian
nvidia-glx is a package, created from the nvidia-graphics-drivers source
package. nvidia-graphics-drivers contains the binary .run files from
nvidia.com plus some scripting voodoo used in package creation.
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/nvidia-graphics-drivers shows
the four packages c
ChadDavis wrote:
Thanks man. I was trying to find "kernel-source", to no avail.
That one has caught me out too. Somewhere along the way it changed from
kernel-source-tumptytum to linux-source-tumptytum.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:07:55AM -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
> Thanks man. I was trying to find "kernel-source", to no avail.
at some point in the past few months, the renamed the kernels as there
is now a BSD version of Debian. all linux kernel stuff is now
linux-[image|source|hea
Thanks man. I was trying to find "kernel-source", to no avail.
On 11/5/06, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 10:54:31AM -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
> Where's my source tree? How do I get one if I don't have one?
>
[apt-get|
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 10:54:31AM -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
> Where's my source tree? How do I get one if I don't have one?
>
[apt-get|aptitude|whatever] install linux-source-
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Where's my source tree? How do I get one if I don't have one?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 742 matches
Mail list logo
