Hi,
Anyone know why kernel-source-2.6.x was renamed to linux-source-2.6.x
for 2.6.12?
Google didn't reveal a reason.
Ron
--
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.
"Facts do no
[edited for brevity]
On Saturday 23 July 2005 15:39, Gayle Lee Fairless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Jules Dubois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Do the Debian kernel source packages use a new naming convention or
>> is this new pa
Jules Dubois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm running Sid -- up-to-date except for a small number of held and broken
packages -- and have two questions about kernel source and compiling.
1) I have previously gotten, built, and used Debian's kernel source
packages, such as kern
I'm running Sid -- up-to-date except for a small number of held and broken
packages -- and have two questions about kernel source and compiling.
1) I have previously gotten, built, and used Debian's kernel source
packages, such as kernel-source-2.6.10 and kernel-source-2.6.11.
I
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 16:32, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:57:05AM +0100, Simon Rees wrote:
> > Could you let me know the md5sum of the bzip file
> > (kernel-source-2.6.8.tar.bz2) on your system, I get:
> > 242b931b892
Hi and thanks for aswering...
> You are correct that the kernel-source has not yet been updated. Don't
> forget that Debian has to coordinate the build and simulataneous release
> of lots of kernel-image-* packages. Even with that, serious and
> critical vulnerabilities (of
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 06:39:38PM -0300, Martin C. wrote:
> Hi all... I have a doubt about is kernel-source-2.6.8 package old or it is
> not.
> I usually use that package for my custom kernels, downloading it with
> apt-get from official debian repository.
> Days ago, i sa
Is the bug critical to your usage of the system? All software
is prone to bugs! Choice is yours to make.
-ishwar
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Martin C. wrote:
> Hi all... I have a doubt about is kernel-source-2.6.8 package old or it is
> not.
> I usually use that package for my custo
Hi all... I have a doubt about is kernel-source-2.6.8 package old or it is not.
I usually use that package for my custom kernels, downloading it with
apt-get from official debian repository.
Days ago, i saw a new bug for kernels 2.6.x
(http://secunia.com/advisories/15812/) but nobody in debian
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:57:05AM +0100, Simon Rees wrote:
>
> Could you let me know the md5sum of the bzip file
> (kernel-source-2.6.8.tar.bz2) on your system, I get:
> 242b931b892e40125592886c374a35ad
>
0083745bf9a6452588d2250b71ce479a /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.8.ta
On Monday 27 June 2005 19:21, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> That sounds quite strange. However, I don't have that error at all. I
> have kernel-source-2.6.8 version 2.6.8-16 installed. It could be
> possible that the file was placed across a bad sector on your harddrive.
> Try ru
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:37:12PM +0100, Simon Rees wrote:
> > Simon Rees wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I'm having problems unpacking the kernel-source-2.6.8 package. Aptitude
> > > unpacks the deb package and places it in /usr/src but attempt
Hi,
have you tried to uncompress with
tar --bzip2 -xvf kernel-source-2.6.8.tar.bz2
Regards,
MC
Simon Rees wrote:
Hello
I'm having problems unpacking the kernel-source-2.6.8 package. Aptitude
unpacks the deb package and places it in /usr/src but attempting:
tar xjvf kernel-source-
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:59:09 +0100
Simon Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm having problems unpacking the kernel-source-2.6.8 package. Aptitude
> unpacks the deb package and places it in /usr/src but attempting:
> tar xjvf kernel-sourc
> Simon Rees wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm having problems unpacking the kernel-source-2.6.8 package. Aptitude
> > unpacks the deb package and places it in /usr/src but attempting:
> > tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.8.tar.bz2
> > returned:
> >
Hello
I'm having problems unpacking the kernel-source-2.6.8 package. Aptitude
unpacks the deb package and places it in /usr/src but attempting:
tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.8.tar.bz2
returned:
-
bzip2: Data integrity error when decompressing.
Input file = (stdin), output
Norberto Altalef wrote:
Hi.
I need the kernel-source-2.6.8, but no the last release.
Is there any site to download old versions or is there any way to obtain
from the present release ?
Present package: kernel-source-2.6.8 (2.6.8-10)
I need: kernel-source-2.6.8 (2.6.8-3)
I appreciate very much any
Hi.
I need the kernel-source-2.6.8, but no the last release.
Is there any site to download old versions or is there any way to obtain
from the present release ?
Present package: kernel-source-2.6.8 (2.6.8-10)
I need: kernel-source-2.6.8 (2.6.8-3)
I appreciate very much any advice.
Thanks in
thanks Joerg,
When I do apt-get update using unstable, I see kernel-source-2.6.8-8
as most
recent version. I didn't know 2.6.9.deb was available, and didn't know
where
to find it.
thanks again,
Russ
Joerg Johannes wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 16.11.2004, 15:59 -0600 schrieb Russ
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:01:26 -0600, Jeremy Turner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:59:11PM -0600, Russ Cook wrote:
> > Will the linux-* source files compile and build properly using
> > the kernel-package tools?
>
> Yes, they do. I use them on my own machines. I usually do
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:59:11PM -0600, Russ Cook wrote:
> Will the linux-* source files compile and build properly using
> the kernel-package tools?
Yes, they do. I use them on my own machines. I usually download the
bz2 kernel and compile from there. I'm not sure what the debian patches
to
Am Dienstag, den 16.11.2004, 15:59 -0600 schrieb Russ Cook:
> I generally compile my own kernel using kernel-package and the
> kernel-source packages from the debian sites. But, at ftp.kernel.org
> are source files that are 2.6.9 vs 2.6.8.
> These files are labeled linux-2.6.9 vs k
I generally compile my own kernel using kernel-package and the
kernel-source packages from the debian sites. But, at ftp.kernel.org
are source files that are 2.6.9 vs 2.6.8.
These files are labeled linux-2.6.9 vs kernel-source-2.6.8. My question
is: are the
linux-* source files modified when
Another interesting question: if i install "kernel-source-2.6.8" and at
the same time "kernel-header-2.6.7", what will happen?
When I installed the 2.6 kernel on my sarge system (coz I didn't realize I
could have installed it from the CD, shoulda read the help), it wa
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 11:22:33PM +0800, lianliming wrote:
> Hi all,
> i want to compile and install a new kernel. Using aptitude to search the
> "kernel" package, i find there are "kernel-source" and "kernel-header"
> packages.
> Should i
Hello
lianliming (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> i want to compile and install a new kernel. Using aptitude to
> search the "kernel" package, i find there are "kernel-source" and
> "kernel-header" packages. Should i install the both kernel "sourc
On Monday 01 November 2004 15:22, lianliming wrote:
> Hi all,
> i want to compile and install a new kernel. Using aptitude to search
> the "kernel" package, i find there are "kernel-source" and "kernel-header"
> packages.
> Should i install the
Hi all,
i want to compile and install a new kernel. Using aptitude to search the
"kernel" package, i find there are "kernel-source" and "kernel-header"
packages.
Should i install the both kernel "source" and "header" to install the n
Thanks for explanation,
Thus I have to live with "unsupported" configuration for a some time :(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Mirek, hello list!
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 05:04:32PM +0100, Mirek Stefanski wrote:
> month or two ago Ive got from propsed-updates for woody packages:
> kernel-image-2.4.26-2-386 and kernel-source-2.4.26 and successfully
> instaled. Today after apt-get update I notice that this
Hi,
month or two ago Ive got from propsed-updates for woody packages:
kernel-image-2.4.26-2-386 and kernel-source-2.4.26 and successfully
instaled. Today after apt-get update I notice that this packages are not
available for woody (nor main non proposed-updates) - the latest
kernel available
Oliver Fuchs wrote:
Hi,
at the moment I am trying to update (change would the the better word)
my kernel from version 2.2.20 to 2.4.18.
I am using the debian packages kernel-source-2.4.18 and have compiled and
installed it - using the configuration file from the kernel-image-2.4.18
package - I
Hi,
at the moment I am trying to update (change would the the better word)
my kernel from version 2.2.20 to 2.4.18.
I am using the debian packages kernel-source-2.4.18 and have compiled and
installed it - using the configuration file from the kernel-image-2.4.18
package - I only enable virtual
build-essential , for missing build
tools...)
Hasan Degismez.
Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro) wrote:
Hello,
I'm pretty new to driver installations.
I downloaded with apt-get nvidia-kernel-source and now it is in my
/usr/src path.
How do i install it ?
Grtz,
Phil.
Disclaimer :
This e-mail is int
> I downloaded with apt-get nvidia-kernel-source and now it is in my
> /usr/src path.
> How do i install it ?
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/Debian-nVidia/index.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 22 October 2004 16:42, Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm pretty new to driver installations.
> I downloaded with apt-get nvidia-kernel-source and now it is in my
> /usr/src path.
> How do i install it ?
I wrote a short howto last time I installe
> I'm pretty new to driver installations.
> I downloaded with apt-get nvidia-kernel-source and now it is in my
> /usr/src path.
> How do i install it ?
phil,
you should check out http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net .
they have a section all about kernel compiling (and add on modul
Hello,
I'm pretty new to driver installations.
I downloaded with apt-get nvidia-kernel-source and now it is in my
/usr/src path.
How do i install it ?
Grtz,
Phil.
Disclaimer :
This e-mail is intended for the exclusive use by the person(s) mentioned as
recipient(s).
If you are no
what exactly does the "with debian patches" entail in the
kernel-source-2.6.7 package (what was put in/taken out). I had heard
that the debian hackers were stripping the kernel of the bytecode in it,
so is this a castrated version for those who must be pure GPL?
--
Ryan
--- * Tong* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Thomas,
>
> are you saying that I don't need kernel-source at all, and
> merely the correct kernel-header would be enough?
Should be.
-- Thomas Adam
=
"The Linux Weekend Mechanic" -- ht
ll the 'kernel-header--1-' package, where:
>
> is the version of your kernel, and is the architecture
> type, be it 386,486, etc.
Thanks Thomas,
are you saying that I don't need kernel-source at all, and
merely the correct kernel-header would be enough?
--
To UN
--- * Tong* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But when I compile my pctel modem driver, I get the "no
> modversions.h file found" error:
>
> $ ./configure -auto
Install the 'kernel-header--1-' package, where:
is the version of your kernel, and is the architecture
type, be it 386,486, etc.
Also,
Hi,
I'm preparing my Debian kernel-source so that I can compile my
pctel modem driver.
I've done the kernel-source-preparing before in RedHat, basically:
make mrproper
# get the configuration file ready, then
make dep
But when I compile my pctel modem driver, I get the "no
mod
--- bob parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The update / upgrade downloaded kernel-source-2.4.18 2.4.18-14.3
>
> What is the debian way to compile this kernel? I checked out man apt-get
> but
> it's not clear to me.
You'll want to install the packages:
buil
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 01:53:20 +1000
bob parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The update / upgrade downloaded kernel-source-2.4.18 2.4.18-14.3
>
> What is the debian way to compile this kernel? I checked out man
> apt-get but it's not clear to me.
Here's a great tutori
The update / upgrade downloaded kernel-source-2.4.18 2.4.18-14.3
What is the debian way to compile this kernel? I checked out man apt-get but
it's not clear to me.
Thanks
Bob Parker
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
cecil wrote:
> I need to know so the nvidia driver can install. Anyone know?
dpkg -l | grep "kernel-source"
This will show if it's installed. If it is, it's in /usr/src.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 15:14, welly hartanto wrote:
> --- cecil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I need to know so the nvidia driver can install.
> > Anyone know?
>
> Are you sure you have installed kernel-tree of your
> current kernel ??? ( apt-get install
> kernel-tree-2.4.26 for 2.4.26 kernel )
>
--- cecil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to know so the nvidia driver can install.
> Anyone know?
Are you sure you have installed kernel-tree of your
current kernel ??? ( apt-get install
kernel-tree-2.4.26 for 2.4.26 kernel )
If so, then go to /var/cache/apt/archieves. You'll
probably find i
I need to know so the nvidia driver can install. Anyone know?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 06 June 2004 10:59 am, Craig Genner wrote:
> I'm no expert but you could try:
>
> agt-get install kernel-source
>
> Thanks
>
> Craig
>
> On Sunday 06 Jun 2004 18:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi
> > I have Kernel-2.6.3-1-386 (Sarge) installe
I'm no expert but you could try:
agt-get install kernel-source
Thanks
Craig
On Sunday 06 Jun 2004 18:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
> I have Kernel-2.6.3-1-386 (Sarge) installed
>
>
> Need to download the source to put the Nvidiai driver into it.
>
>
>
Hi
I have Kernel-2.6.3-1-386 (Sarge) installed
Need to download the source to put the Nvidiai driver into it.
Where and how do I get this?
(Pithy enough?? :) :) )
Jim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Piniella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:1VQR4-76L-27
@gated-at.bofh.it:
> I'm running 2.4 now and would like to /try/ to get 2.6 on my
> machine. I've had problems with apt-getting images, but doing an
> "apt-cache search kernel" showed me a package "kernel-tree-2.6.5" --
> will th
Hello!
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 03:54:26PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 03:48:29PM -0400, David Piniella wrote:
> >I'm running 2.4 now and would like to /try/ to get 2.6 on my
> > machine. I've had problems with apt-getting images, but doing an
> > "apt-cache search kern
.2.17pre11 vm-global patch,
modified for 2.2.17
kernel-patch-2.2.18-vm-global - Andrea Archangeli's 2.2.18pre25 vm-global patch
kernel-patch-2.2.19-reiserfs - ReiserFS support for Linux 2.2.19
kernel-patch-2.2.20-arm - Diffs to the Linux kernel source 2.2.20 for ARM
kernel-patch-2.2.20-p3 - Do
I'm running 2.4 now and would like to /try/ to get 2.6 on my
machine. I've had problems with apt-getting images, but doing an
"apt-cache search kernel" showed me a package "kernel-tree-2.6.5" --
will this install the kernel or try to patch an existing 2.6 kernel or
something else? How can I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello I am looking for linux kernel source any version
Check www.kernel.org - the official repository.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello I am looking for linux kernel source any version I am not sure what the magic words are, but from what I have been able to gather it is the source trees. I have seen the free dos kernel source for the command shell command.com io.sys dos.sys, but I am not sure if linux is the same. I am
I've been happily using the Debian nvidia packages for some time
(nvidia-kernel-source and nvidia-glx). Currently, I have the versions
from unstable. However, I recently upgraded to kernel 2.6.6 and so had
to re-compile the kernel modules provided by the package. Compilation
and install
I lost the ability to read the hardware sensors via lmsensors a while
ago, and I just started looking into it. I think it used to work with
one of the 2.6.x kernels, but I can't be sure. The first thing I noted
was that /proc/bus/i2c doesn't exist. I tried enabling all the debugging
messages, and h
> Hi, I have run into nvidia trubbles!
>
> It seems like the package 'nvidia-kernel-src' has
> changed to 'nvidia-kernel-source'.
> How do I build this new one? As detailed as you can please.
The current official nvidia drivers do work with kernel 2.6.x.
Emil Hägerlund wrote:
> Hi and thanks for all your replies.
>
> Though many different bids on what I should do!
>
> VSJ, do the debian nvidia packages work with 2.6.3-1-k7?
>
I don't use precompiled kernels, I use the Debian kernel-source packages to
compile my own kern
Hi and thanks for all your replies.
Though many different bids on what I should do!
Is there a FINAL approach for people running 2.6.3?
VSJ, do the debian nvidia packages work with 2.6.3-1-k7?
Paul, I did find a branch discussing nvidia/ati with 2.6.5...
but so many different divirting opinions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 11:18:12PM +0100, James Keasley wrote:
>> Just because you have answered the question four or five times doesn't make
>> you any less wrong. While the nvidia-drivers in the apt reposi
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 11:18:12PM +0100, James Keasley wrote:
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Read the archives next time, please, I've answered this question four
> > or five times now. nVidia's drivers do not work with Linux 2.6. You
> > have to go get unofficial versions of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Emil Hägerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi, I have run into nvidia trubbles!
>>
>> It seems like the package 'nvidia-kernel-src' has
>> changed t
Emil Hägerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I have run into nvidia trubbles!
>
> It seems like the package 'nvidia-kernel-src' has
> changed to 'nvidia-kernel-source'.
> How do I build this new one? As detailed as you can please.
> I am run
Emil Hägerlund wrote:
> Hi, I have run into nvidia trubbles!
>
> It seems like the package 'nvidia-kernel-src' has
> changed to 'nvidia-kernel-source'.
> How do I build this new one? As detailed as you can please.
>
untar the nvidia-kernel-source.tar.gz
Hi, I have run into nvidia trubbles!
It seems like the package 'nvidia-kernel-src' has
changed to 'nvidia-kernel-source'.
How do I build this new one? As detailed as you can please.
I used to do a "debian/rules binary_modules" operation
before but that dont work
2.4.22/, it contains "Makefile" and
> Rules.make,
Yes. That is the situation.
>
> and when you issue "make-kpkg modules-image" it still says:
> > > "We do not seem to be in a top level linux kernel source
> > > directory tree..."
Yes
e-kpkg modules-image
> >
> > and you get the error:
> > > > > > "We do not seem to be in a top level linux kernel source
> > > > > > directory tree..."
>
> Exactly so.
>
> >
> > And yet /usr/src/linux-2.4.22 con
he error:
> >
> > And yet /usr/src/linux-2.4.22 contains your kernel source?
> > Is this correct?
>
> Before making, be sure that you have a symlink in /usr/src
> to /usr/src/linux-2.4.22.
There is a symlink to it called 'linux'
--
richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
04-03-04, Richard Lyons penned:
[...]
> > > > > Can someone kindly tell me what is meant by "the root of the
> > > > > source tree"?
> > >
> > > The top level directory of the kernel source. E.g.
> > > /usr/src/linux-2.4.22/ or /home/me/
> > > > want to compile modules, e.g., /usr/src/linux. Run 'make-kpkg
> > > > --rootcmd=fakeroot modules-image'..." I innocently assumed the
> > > > root of the source tree would be /usr/src/linux-2.4.22. But when
> > > > I do 'make-k
keroot modules-image'..." I innocently assumed the
> > > root of the source tree would be /usr/src/linux-2.4.22. But when
> > > I do 'make-kpkg modules-image', I get:
> > > "We do not seem to be in a top level linux kernel source
> > >
/usr/src/linux-2.4.22. But when I
> > do 'make-kpkg modules-image', I get:
> > "We do not seem to be in a top level linux kernel source
> > directory tree..."
> > So I am evidently wrong. I tried installing (via aptitude) the
> > kernel-sourc
> would be /usr/src/linux-2.4.22. But when I do 'make-kpkg
> > modules-image', I get:
> > "We do not seem to be in a top level linux kernel source directory
> > tree..."
> > So I am evidently wrong. I tried installing (via aptitude) the
&g
which you want to compile
> modules, e.g., /usr/src/linux. Run 'make-kpkg --rootcmd=fakeroot
> modules-image'..." I innocently assumed the root of the source tree
> would be /usr/src/linux-2.4.22. But when I do 'make-kpkg
> modules-image', I get:
> &
Run 'make-kpkg --rootcmd=fakeroot
modules-image'..." I innocently assumed the root of the source tree
would be /usr/src/linux-2.4.22. But when I do 'make-kpkg
modules-image', I get:
"We do not seem to be in a top level linux kernel source directory
tree..."
I've been trying to compile the video modules in drivers/media/video, specifically
videodev.c. I'm using kernel-source-2.4.24-3. When it tries to compile videodev.c, I
get a compile error complaining the videodev.c is trying to use member "release" of
video_device
Thanks to all for the interesting discussion. I'll contitue to use patch and
make-kpkg then.
Nothing to do till Sarge becomes stable :-)
By the way,
I didn't know it is so complicated to post to a mailing-list witout giving out my main
e-mail.
I thought it was a good idea to have exim set the F
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 02:31:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks to all for the interesting discussion. I'll contitue to
> use patch and make-kpkg then.
> Nothing to do till Sarge becomes stable :-)
>
> By the way,
> I didn't know it is so complicated to post to a mailing-list witout
>
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 12:34:54AM -0500, David Clymer wrote:
> The "Debian Way", as I think i've heard it refered to, is merely the way
> its done using Debian's particular tools (i.e. make-kpkg rather than the
> all manual kernel compile, using .debs rather than installing from
> source, etc). I
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 12:12, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:31:26AM -0500, Ed Cogburn wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >3) Perhaps there is an easier/better way to do this
> >
> > Well, not necessarily "better", but the simpler thing to do is just
> > not use apt and Debia
On 2004-02-24, Colin Watson penned:
>>
>> Well, not necessarily "better", but the simpler thing to do is just
>> not use apt and Debian's packages for kernel management. Instead,
>> manage that yourself, especially if you recompile your own kernel
>> anyway. I'll be flamed for going against the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2004 17:31 schrieb Ed Cogburn:
> > My questions are:
> > 1) Is there a chance I did something wrong and end up having the security
> > flaw not corrected or something broken in my kernel
>
> No, the kernel will be fine, but th
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:31:26AM -0500, Ed Cogburn wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >3) Perhaps there is an easier/better way to do this
>
> Well, not necessarily "better", but the simpler thing to do is just
> not use apt and Debian's packages for kernel management. Instead,
> manage that y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ! I'm running woody and try to stay up to date with security updates.
We had recently 2 updates for the kernel. Downloading 24 MB over modem takes a bit of patience, so I tried to download only the diffs.gz file and patch it.
First reverse patch from old debian versio
Hi ! I'm running woody and try to stay up to date with security updates.
We had recently 2 updates for the kernel. Downloading 24 MB over modem takes a bit of
patience, so I tried to download only the diffs.gz file and patch it.
First reverse patch from old debian version to orig files, then pa
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 01:15, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> Olle Eriksson (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> > What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and
> > the Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about
> > that is some discussio
The differance between vanilla kernels and debian kernels is that Debian
a) removes stuff it believes to not be sufficiently free - something
about patches to eeproms
b) adds some patches - e.g. some additional network card drivers
Also in my experiance they don't create the /usr/src/linux symlink
On 2004-02-19, Olle Eriksson penned:
> Hi
>
> What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and
> the Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about
> that is some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no
> difference except that t
Hello
Olle Eriksson (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and
> the Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about
> that is some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no
> difference exce
Olle Eriksson wrote:
Hi
What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and the
Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about that is
some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no difference except
that the debian packages handles the /usr/src/linux
Olle Eriksson wrote:
> Hi
>
> What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and
> the Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about
> that is some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no
> difference except that the debian package
Hello Olle!
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:04:48AM +0100, Olle Eriksson wrote:
> What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and the
> Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about that is
The README.Debian lists several changes, including additions, p
Hi
What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and the
Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about that is
some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no difference except
that the debian packages handles the /usr/src/linux symlink for you.
Sorry
I am trying to compile nvidia-kernel-source for a 2.4.22-1-386, but I
must be doing something wrong. I would be very grateful for a hint
Niels
nissefisken% uname -r
2.4.22-1-386
nissefisken# cd /usr/src/nvidia-kernel-source
cd: no such file or directory: /usr
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 10:00:48AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >In the file included from ksym.c:50:
> >/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.18/include/asm/checksum.h:72:30: missing
> >termintating " character
>
> If you are using gcc 3.3, which you are if you ran dist-u
201 - 300 of 742 matches
Mail list logo
