Hello,
I am going to be installing two new network cards soon, most likely
I'll be getting that cheap junk that is the rtl8139. How do I choose
which one must be eth0? Module parameters to the 8139too module? (In
the past I simply loaded the correct module first.)
Alternatively I could go
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 13:26, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
I am going to be installing two new network cards soon, most likely
I'll be getting that cheap junk that is the rtl8139. How do I choose
which one must be eth0? Module parameters to the 8139too module? (In
the past I simply loaded
I am going to be installing two new network cards soon, most likely
I'll be getting that cheap junk that is the rtl8139. How do I choose
which one must be eth0? Module parameters to the 8139too module? (In
the past I simply loaded the correct module first.
THey are detected in PCI order
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mark Janssen wrote:
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 13:26, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
I am going to be installing two new network cards soon, most likely
I'll
Title: 2 3com905b network cards - not recognized
Hi,
I have two 3com 905b in my box, but only one is recognized.
I compiled the drivers into the kernel since i'm not using modules at all.
What can I do so the two network cards to be recognized ?
I read somewhere that disabling the Pnp
This one time, at band camp, Mikael Jirari said:
Hi,
I have two 3com 905b in my box, but only one is recognized. I
compiled the drivers into the kernel since i'm not using modules at
all.
What can I do so the two network cards to be recognized ?
I read somewhere that disabling the Pnp
think the system is assigning the same irq to the network cards (really
not sure about what i'm saying)
If you are really talking about the 905 PCI and NOT the 509 ISA cards,
this should not be a problem.
Also, how can i do the irq setup manually ?
If you really think this is the probnlem, do some
Title: RE: 2 3com905b network cards - not recognized
Yes it's 905b net cards and i compiled the 509c driver in order to use them.
I thought the whole point about pci was to be recognized automaticly, so pnp ?
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Sebastiaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 11:46, Mikael Jirari wrote:
Hi,
I have two 3com 905b in my box, but only one is recognized.
I compiled the drivers into the kernel since i'm not using modules at all.
What can I do so the two network cards to be recognized ?
I read somewhere that disabling the Pnp
At 04:46 PM 11/7/2002 +, Mikael Jirari wrote:
Hi,
I have two 3com 905b in my box, but only one is recognized.
I compiled the drivers into the kernel since i'm not using modules at all.
What can I do so the two network cards to be recognized ?
You need to pass a parameter to LILO, either
the 3c59x driver.
What can I do so the two network cards to be recognized ?
I read somewhere that disabling the Pnp option could resolve the
problem but
is there a way to fix the problem without doing that ?
3c905b are PCI cards, so they are not PnP (at least, there is no option to
disable
since i'm not using modules at all.
What can I do so the two network cards to be recognized ?
I read somewhere that disabling the Pnp option could resolve the problem but
is there a way to fix the problem without doing that ?
I think the system is assigning the same irq to the network cards
3com905b network cards - not recognized
High,
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Mikael Jirari wrote:
Hi,
I have two 3com 905b in my box, but only one is recognized.
I compiled the drivers into the kernel since i'm not using modules at
all.
Which driver have you compiled in? These cards use
What is the official way to set up extra IP addresses on a single
PCMICA card?
I can obviously add a line like:
ifconfig eth0:1 10.2.3.4 netmask 255.0.0.0 up
to /etc/pcmcia/network.opts but:
(a) it would be invoked even in the case of a network stop
(b) doesn't remove the interface when
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:02:43AM +0100, Niall Mansfield wrote:
What is the official way to set up extra IP addresses on a single
PCMICA card?
I use this in /etc/network/interfaces:
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.124.34
network 192.168.124.0
netmask
hi,
I'm going from a Mandrake 8.1 system to debian. I've had there (some
weeks ago, not working anymore) internet sharing enabled. When
switching, I also want it to be correct again. The problem is My debian
does not recognize the second card (which is going to be the link to the
local
i think there is an option in lilo.conf ,something with append= ...
to make your system look for the second eth at boot time.
check the www.linuxdocs.org for the boot parameters
good luck.
At 10:23 AM 1/2/02, Pauwel Demeyer wrote:
hi,
I'm going from a Mandrake 8.1 system to debian. I've had
dig this, Pauwel http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue36/tag/21.html
search inside the page for append,i think is what you were looking for..
once again,good luck..
At 10:23 AM 1/2/02, Pauwel Demeyer wrote:
hi,
I'm going from a Mandrake 8.1 system to debian. I've had there (some
weeks ago,
On 02/01/02 Petre Daniel did speaketh:
i think there is an option in lilo.conf ,something with append= ...
to make your system look for the second eth at boot time.
check the www.linuxdocs.org for the boot parameters
good luck.
Strange. That's not required on my router using Linksys cards
yeah,like all new releases of mandrake,redhat autoconfigure 2 network
cards,but with our beautiful debian we gotta work it out,and feel the taste
of manual settings and confugiration..
perrsonally,i like this way best..
call me old fashion,i'll call you clickpointers :)))
At 12:03 PM 1/2/02
On Wednesday 02 January 2002 13:23, Pauwel Demeyer wrote:
hi,
I'm going from a Mandrake 8.1 system to debian. I've had there (some
weeks ago, not working anymore) internet sharing enabled. When
switching, I also want it to be correct again. The problem is My debian
does not recognize the
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 05:39:46PM -0500, Bob Underwood wrote:
| On Wednesday 02 January 2002 13:23, Pauwel Demeyer wrote:
| hi,
|
| I'm going from a Mandrake 8.1 system to debian. I've had there (some
| weeks ago, not working anymore) internet sharing enabled. When
| switching, I also want
Petre Daniel wrote:
yeah,like all new releases of mandrake,redhat autoconfigure 2 network
cards,but with our beautiful debian we gotta work it out,and feel the taste
of manual settings and confugiration..
perrsonally,i like this way best..
call me old fashion,i'll call you clickpointers
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 08:11:08PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
Matthew Sackman([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Weird! Both of you that replied talk of putting eth0 in /etc/modutils/
I've never done that at all - I just put in /etc/network/interfaces,
and it gets loaded and
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 11:00:22AM +0100, Matthew Sackman wrote:
| On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 08:11:08PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
| Matthew Sackman([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
| Weird! Both of you that replied talk of putting eth0 in /etc/modutils/
|
| I've never done that at
On Sat, 2001-10-06 at 10:48, dman wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 11:00:22AM +0100, Matthew Sackman wrote:
| On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 08:11:08PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
| Matthew Sackman([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
| Weird! Both of you that replied talk of putting eth0 in
Matthew Sackman wrote:
--snip--
It's a module. The natsemi module. It loads fine without there being
anything relating to eth0 anywhere under /etc/modutils.
Weird - I simply never knew this should be there. In fact, come to
think of it, on all the boxes I've set up I've never put eth0 in
is needed IIRC.
That would make sense - it is forced loaded at boot from /etc/modules. I
generally force load any module that I judge to be crucial (like all the
iptables modules and the network cards - I don't leave it up to the
kernel autoloader (although that is enabled and works for various FS
modules
Hi all,
I am new to using debian.
I have just finished installing ver 2.2 r3 and was wondering how I
go about setting up network cards?
I have a ne2000 in the machine, but when I type ifconfig, All
I see is the local loop back interface.
thanks, mike
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 08:37:48AM -0500, Mike Grover wrote:
| Hi all,
| I am new to using debian.
| I have just finished installing ver 2.2 r3 and was wondering how I
| go about setting up network cards?
|
| I have a ne2000 in the machine, but when I type ifconfig, All
| I see
Mike Grover([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Hi all,
I am new to using debian.
I have just finished installing ver 2.2 r3 and was wondering how I
go about setting up network cards?
I have a ne2000 in the machine, but when I type ifconfig, All
I see is the local loop
, Oct 05, 2001 at 08:37:48AM -0500, Mike Grover wrote:
| Hi all,
| I am new to using debian.
| I have just finished installing ver 2.2 r3 and was wondering how I
| go about setting up network cards?
|
| I have a ne2000 in the machine, but when I type ifconfig, All
| I see
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 11:27:38PM +0100, Matthew Sackman wrote:
Weird! Both of you that replied talk of putting eth0 in /etc/modutils/
I've never done that at all - I just put in /etc/network/interfaces,
and it gets loaded and works. Do you really need it in aliases?
If so why?
Is the
Matthew Sackman([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Weird! Both of you that replied talk of putting eth0 in /etc/modutils/
I've never done that at all - I just put in /etc/network/interfaces,
and it gets loaded and works. Do you really need it in aliases?
If so why?
Only if you
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 03:26:50PM +0100, Jon Masters wrote:
On 02 Sep 2001 11:29:23 +0200, Joerg Huber wrote:
But I wasn?t right, when saying that eth0 works properly. When I deconfigure
eth1 with ifconfig eth1 down eth0 is stopping to work, too. All
connections
freeze and I have to
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 09:14:02PM -0400, Greg Buchanan wrote:
dman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 11:51:57PM +0200, Joerg Huber wrote:
| ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up
This doesn't look right to me. 0.0.0.0 would be the broadcast address
for the 0.0.0.0/8 class A network. Try
On 02 Sep 2001 11:29:23 +0200, Joerg Huber wrote:
But I wasn´t right, when saying that eth0 works properly. When I deconfigure
eth1 with ifconfig eth1 down eth0 is stopping to work, too. All connections
freeze and I have to bring down eth0 and up again to make them work again.
This was a
Hi,
After the configuration of a second ethernet network card
I got the following error messages in /var/log/messages:
eth0: unexpected TX-done interrupt, lasttx=20
eth0: mismatched read page pointers 4c vs 51
But eth0, the first network card, seems to work properly.
These messages are
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 11:51:57PM +0200, Joerg Huber wrote:
| ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up
This doesn't look right to me. 0.0.0.0 would be the broadcast address
for the 0.0.0.0/8 class A network. Try picking a different IP address
here. I know nothing of pppoe though.
-D
also sprach dman (on Sat, 01 Sep 2001 07:08:38PM -0400):
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 11:51:57PM +0200, Joerg Huber wrote:
| ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up
This doesn't look right to me. 0.0.0.0 would be the broadcast address
^
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 01:22:31AM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
also sprach dman (on Sat, 01 Sep 2001 07:08:38PM -0400):
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 11:51:57PM +0200, Joerg Huber wrote:
| ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up
This doesn't look right to me. 0.0.0.0 would be the broadcast address
dman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 11:51:57PM +0200, Joerg Huber wrote:
| ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up
This doesn't look right to me. 0.0.0.0 would be the broadcast address
for the 0.0.0.0/8 class A network. Try picking a different IP address
here. I know nothing of pppoe though.
-D
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 07:08:56PM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
| On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 01:22:31AM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
| also sprach dman (on Sat, 01 Sep 2001 07:08:38PM -0400):
| On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 11:51:57PM +0200, Joerg Huber wrote:
|
| | ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up
|
also sprach dman (on Sat, 01 Sep 2001 09:17:59PM -0400):
Err, right, I meant the network address :-).
i know you did.
| Actually, in older BSD net code the network was also the broadcast
| address. This still works on some IP stacks (try pinging your network
| address sometime).
Actually,
I am done with my linux gateway with only one network
card, buth it will go faster if use 2 network card in
the same computer one card to my home network and
other to cabel-modem.
How will I setup this other card and it's ip, how can
I make difrence between them.
difrence between them.
Network cards are named eth0, eth1, eth2, ... in the order the drivers are
loaded. You can load the module by using 'modconf' and then edit
/etc/network/interfaces and add an entry like:
iface eth1 inet static
address 192.168.1.1
netmask 255.255.255.0
Hay all (again),
I've got to install a box with two network cards. I've got a nasty feeling that
I'm going to end up with an ISA and a PCI both of which are compatible with the
ns2000 driver module.
So, onto my questions: both of them are PnP (oh really? - the ns2000 driver is
not plug and play
I have seen network cards which plug into the serial or parallel port
(I forget which, now). Basically I want to connect a laptop to a
network (both of which are running Debian), and
a) there is no room to fit a card in inside; and
b) the PCMCIA slot seems to be bug^H^Hroken.
Does anyone have
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Chris Mason ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Everytime I try to modprobe my linksys network cards or use modconf to
intsall the module into the kernel, it fails. I am using the tulip driver
that comes with the 2.2.17 kernel. I installed the kernel binary.
I
Everytime I try to modprobe my linksys network cards or use modconf to
intsall the module into the kernel, it fails. I am using the tulip driver
that comes with the 2.2.17 kernel. I installed the kernel binary.
I have tried with 3c509b cards also using the 3c509.o module to no avail
either. WHat
Hello all,
I was wondering if someone out there can tell me if there is a
difference between the D-Link DE-530 and the D-Link DFE-530tx and the D-
link DFE-530tx+
The reason for this is because I tried to use the de4x5 module and it
would work.
Thanks.
Allen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2000 1:53 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Network cards
Hello all,
I was wondering if someone out there can tell me
I have a quick qestion, I want my nic cards (eth0 and eth1) to keep the
setting I configure such as ip, netmask after rebooting. Each time I reboot
eth1 dumps all the information I put in the ifconfig setup. How can I get it
to store and keep the information for both nic cards?
Thanks
Jay Kelly wrote:
I have a quick qestion, I want my nic cards (eth0 and eth1) to keep the
setting I configure such as ip, netmask after rebooting. Each time I reboot
eth1 dumps all the information I put in the ifconfig setup. How can I get it
to store and keep the information for both nic
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 01:42:35PM -0500, Bolan Meek wrote
Jay Kelly wrote:
I have a quick qestion, I want my nic cards (eth0 and eth1) to keep the
setting I configure such as ip, netmask after rebooting. Each time I reboot
eth1 dumps all the information I put in the ifconfig setup. How
file its empty. But when I do a ifconfig I can see
both card. Will I need to transfer all the ip information over?
Jay
-Original Message-
From: John Pearson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 5:35 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Network Cards
On Fri, May
* Jay Kelly in RE: Network Cards dated 2000/05/26 17:52 wrote:
If I have my ip addresses set in the /etc/init.d/network (for slink), then
upgrade to potato, do I need to redo the ifconfig but in
/etc/network/interface. I use to run slink I configures my cards in the
/etc/init.d/network then I
Dear all,
I have 2 3com network cards (3c509B and 3c905). I plugs the 3c905 first
and install the linux. It can work and can connect to the Internet.
Then , i plugs the 3c509B. However, when the machine boot up. It only can
detect the eth0 which is 3c509 card, no eth1 or 3c905 is detected.
How
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Liu Chung Him wrote:
Dear all,
I have 2 3com network cards (3c509B and 3c905). I plugs the 3c905 first
and install the linux. It can work and can connect to the Internet.
Then , i plugs the 3c509B. However, when the machine boot up. It only can
detect the eth0 which
use :
dmesg
and look for info about eth0, eth1 or the name of your card
How are you determining if which cards are being detected?
--
Ray
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I appreciate all the help I received about my original problem. I have
determined that one of the ethernet cards (Asante ISA) does not like
working in linux. So I yanked it out and replaced it. Now I have 2 Intel
EtherExpress 16 cards in the machine. Now, one is at io 0x300, irq 11 and
the
You'll need to pass params to your kernel. If you're booting with lilo you'll
need to
edit add:
append = ether=11,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x240,eth1
If I got the eth0, eth1 right...
MR wrote:
OK, I appreciate all the help I received about my original problem. I have
determined that one of the
/etc/lilo.conf now looks like:
boot=/dev/hda1
root=/dev/hda1
install=/boot/boot.b
map=/boot/map
vga=normal
delay=20
image=/vmlinuz
label=Linux
read-only
append=ether=11,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x240,eth1
ran liloconfig and let it install a boot block using the current lilo config.
MR wrote:
/etc/lilo.conf now looks like:
boot=/dev/hda1
root=/dev/hda1
install=/boot/boot.b
map=/boot/map
vga=normal
delay=20
image=/vmlinuz
label=Linux
read-only
append=ether=11,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x240,eth1
ran liloconfig and let it install a boot block using
/etc/lilo.conf now looks like:
boot=/dev/hda1
root=/dev/hda1
install=/boot/boot.b
map=/boot/map
vga=normal
delay=20
image=/vmlinuz
label=Linux
read-only
append=ether=11,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x240,eth1
ran liloconfig and let it install a boot block using the current
On %M 0, MR wrote
/etc/lilo.conf now looks like:
boot=/dev/hda1
root=/dev/hda1
install=/boot/boot.b
map=/boot/map
vga=normal
delay=20
image=/vmlinuz
label=Linux
read-only
append=ether=11,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x240,eth1
ran liloconfig and let it install a boot block using
MR [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
append=ether=11,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x240,eth1
[...]
I moved my append line to the top and tried yours also and it still does
not pick up the second card. I know the card works as it was pulled from
another system so it shouldn't be the hardware.
Sorry, I should have read your email more closely. You did say How do I get the
eexpress module to recognize both cards and set the first to eth0 and the second
to eth1? Using append= in lilo would only apply if the devices you're trying to
configure are compiled into the kernel, not as a module.
I've come in late on this message, so I'm not sure I'm catching it all,
but you should be able to assign your two network cards eth0 and eth1 in
your /etc/conf.modules. In there, you should see something like:
alias eth0 whatever module you have for nic (eexpress in this case)
options eth0 io
On %M 0, Oz Dror wrote
I have a similar problem, But instead of having 2 network cards I have
one card using IP aliasing ( two subnets on the same card/network, one for
DSL and the
second local 192.168.0.x).
as soon as I start ipmasq I cannot ping beyond the local subnet of each
card
I fixed the problem by purging the ipmasq package
and instead writing my own ipchain commands in a local file at
/etc/init.d
-Oz
On %M 0, Oz Dror wrote
I have a similar problem, But instead of having 2 network cards I have
one card using IP aliasing ( two subnets on the same card/network
On Sat, 8 May 1999, MR wrote:
I have two network cards (1 Intel etherexpress 16, 1 NE2000) in a debian
system. Both are detected on boot up and both are ifconfig'd. This system
will be used to connect my little LAN through IP masq to the Internet. For
various reasons, I am only able to have 1 IP
I have a similar problem, But instead of having 2 network cards I have
one card using IP aliasing ( two subnets on the same card/network, one for DSL
and the
second local 192.168.0.x).
as soon as I start ipmasq I cannot ping beyond the local subnet of each
card, thus I cannot access the DNS
I have two network cards (1 Intel etherexpress 16, 1 NE2000) in a debian
system. Both are detected on boot up and both are ifconfig'd. This system
will be used to connect my little LAN through IP masq to the Internet. For
various reasons, I am only able to have 1 IP, so that is why I am messing
On Sat, 8 May 1999, MR wrote:
I have two network cards (1 Intel etherexpress 16, 1 NE2000) in a debian
system. Both are detected on boot up and both are ifconfig'd. This system
will be used to connect my little LAN through IP masq to the Internet. For
various reasons, I am only able to have 1
At 01:58 PM 5/9/99 +0200, you wrote:
On Sat, 8 May 1999, MR wrote:
I have two network cards (1 Intel etherexpress 16, 1 NE2000) in a debian
system. Both are detected on boot up and both are ifconfig'd. This system
will be used to connect my little LAN through IP masq to the Internet
Hi everyone,
Can anyone tell me if there is a standard way that Debian handles
multiple network cards with respect to configuration files, network
scripts, etc.?
Thanks,
Carlo.
it
to /etc/init.d/network so it is started automatically.
HTH.
-Ian
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Carlo Robazza wrote:
Hi everyone,
Can anyone tell me if there is a standard way that Debian handles
multiple network cards with respect to configuration files, network
scripts, etc.?
Thanks,
Carlo
Carlo Robazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone tell me if there is a standard way that Debian handles
multiple network cards with respect to configuration files, network
scripts, etc.?
All I had to do is enter all appropriate configuration commands for
the second card to
/etc/init.d
I'm having a problem getting an NE2000 compatible network card to be
recognized by the current distribution. I have a Linksys Ether16 ISA card,
and am attempting to get the module loaded onto a TI486DLC40 with 8Mb RAM.
I continue to receive the error message that the resource or devise is busy
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Which is the earliest kernel that will work with 3-Com
: 3c905B cards? And is there any documentation on the Net that
: tells which kernels support which hardware? ...trying to help
: a schoolteacher get his network going here.
2.0.34, I
Thank you all for the help in regards to the 3-Com
network card and the kernels. It was for an off-list
friend who is trying to set up a network in a high
school here, in Colorado. I am running the 2.1.132 kernel,
myself, but there are a couple of 3c905B cards here, waiting
to be
Which is the earliest kernel that will work with 3-Com
3c905B cards? And is there any documentation on the Net that
tells which kernels support which hardware? ...trying to help
a schoolteacher get his network going here.
Oh, and also, which modules need to be compiled into the
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 23:15:34 +
Resent-from: debian-user@lists.DEBIAN.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Precedence: list
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: debian-user@lists.debian.org
: Which Kernel for 3c905B Network Cards?
Which is the earliest kernel that will work with 3-Com
3c905B cards? And is there any documentation on the Net that
tells which kernels support which hardware? ...trying to help
a schoolteacher get his network going here.
Oh, and also
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 1999 12:16 PM
To:debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc:recipient list not shown
Subject: Which Kernel for 3c905B Network Cards?
Which is the earliest kernel that will work with 3-Com
3c905B cards? And is there any
]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 9:23 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: recipient list not shown
Subject: RE: Which Kernel for 3c905B Network Cards?
I have a machine here with two 3c509's in it, there's a standard
driver
for them named as 3c509 in the kernel
Just go for an Adaptec. You will have problems that you never dreamt
of.
The topic was about ethernet cards!
paul
On Sun, 13 Dec 1998, wb2oyc wrote:
:
: Just go for an Adaptec. You will have problems that you never dreamt
: of.
: The topic was about ethernet cards!
http://www.adaptec.com/products/index.html#fastethernet
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet 410 South Phillips Avenue Sioux Falls, SD
http://www.adaptec.com/products/index.html#fastethernet
Nathan,
oopps, guess I missed that myself!
paul
On 12 Dec 1998 13:38:56 -0800, you wrote:
I believe Donald Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said that he
believes that every 10/100 Mbps ethernet card on the market is now
supported for Linux. :-)
He believes. Though he knows that later Adaptec ANA6911A cards don't
work.
You have to be pretty unlucky
Some PCI NICs may be troublesome, but you can count on most
older 3Com's or Intel. Personally, I have several 3Com cards,
and a few LinkSys that are NE2000 clones, and none of them have
failed to work with any Linux. I'd check out the source of your
rumor.
Sounds like crap to me!
Paul
Brent McMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll be setting up a network between my linux box and 2 other
machines for a cable modem. I hear that there are some network cards
that just don't work for linux. Crazy I know, but that's the rumour.
Does any one know off any cards I
I'll be setting up a network between my linux box and 2 other
machines for a cable modem. I hear that there are some network cards
that just don't work for linux. Crazy I know, but that's the rumour.
Does any one know off any cards I should avoid or any they would
recomend? Thanks
hear that there are some network cards
that just don't work for linux. Crazy I know, but that's the rumour.
Does any one know off any cards I should avoid or any they would
recomend? Thanks.
Brent.
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null
Bob
On 11-Dec-98 Brent McMillan wrote:
I'll be setting up a network between my linux box and 2 other
machines for a cable modem. I hear that there are some network cards
that just don't work for linux. Crazy I know, but that's the rumour.
Does any one know off any cards I should avoid
machines for a cable modem. I hear that there are some network cards
that just don't work for linux. Crazy I know, but that's the
rumour.
Does any one know off any cards I should avoid or any they would
recomend? Thanks.
Brent.
==
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT d-(+) s
Hi
I just bought a new network card. But it is not include in the modconfig
program. The card is a 3com905B-TX. Could your please tell me how I could
inlcude the drivers in may shell.
I don't have to packages to make a new shell. If you could outline the files
and the process for recompiling the
-Original Message-
From: George Bonser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Wilson Tuma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Friday, October 09, 1998 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: Configuring Network Cards
Most new 3Com network cards default to IO=0x300 and IRQ
101 - 200 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
