desktop or what other software did you install - XFCE, or Gnome
> or KDE? Then folks might be able to help ...
>
> Also, how would you -like- to configure your networking?
Hi Zenaan, :-)
the desktop environment is Xfce and I'd love to configure the networking via
shell.
Thanks and regards
Il giorno martedì 14 agosto 2018 10:20:04 UTC+2, john doe ha scritto:
> On 8/14/2018 9:05 AM, Remigio wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > recently I installed Debian 9 Stretch and I noticed that the network
> > configuration management method was substantially changed.
> > I
..-
> What desktop or what other software did you install - XFCE, or Gnome
> or KDE? Then folks might be able to help ...
>
> Also, how would you -like- to configure your networking?
Hi Zenaan, :-)
the desktop is Xfce and I'de love to configure the networking via shell.
Thanks and regards
On 8/14/2018 9:05 AM, Remigio wrote:
Hi there,
recently I installed Debian 9 Stretch and I noticed that the network
configuration management method was substantially changed.
Infact the file /etc/network/interfaces is almost empty despite I've inserted
the network parameters during
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:05:34AM -0700, Remigio wrote:
> Hi there,
> recently I installed Debian 9 Stretch and I noticed that the network
> configuration management method was substantially changed.
> Infact the file /etc/network/interfaces is almost empty despite I've inserted
&
Hi there,
recently I installed Debian 9 Stretch and I noticed that the network
configuration management method was substantially changed.
Infact the file /etc/network/interfaces is almost empty despite I've inserted
the network parameters during the installation process and network works now.
I
On 8/6/2018 9:15 PM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote:
# Generated by NetworkManager
Ok -- The app "NetworkManager" is managing your interfaces.
To deal with NetworkManager through the CLI and config files you will
need to do some reading:
Thank's John :) :)
Le lun. 6 août 2018 à 21:40, john doe a écrit :
> On 8/6/2018 9:15 PM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote:
> > # Generated by NetworkManager
> >
>
> Ok -- The app "NetworkManager" is managing your interfaces.
>
> To deal with NetworkManager through the CLI and config files you will
> need
# Generated by NetworkManager
nameserver 8.8.8.8
Le lun. 6 août 2018 à 14:01, john doe a écrit :
> On 8/6/2018 12:12 PM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote:
> > I configured my network here (see attached picture please)
> >
> > [image: Capture d’écran 2018-08-06 à 12.12.06.png]
> >
>
> I don't have access
On 8/6/2018 12:12 PM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote:
I configured my network here (see attached picture please)
[image: Capture d’écran 2018-08-06 à 12.12.06.png]
I don't have access to images.
What is the output of:
$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
--
John Doe
On 8/6/2018 11:16 AM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote:
Thank you for all your reply,
I configured the network via the GUI during installation, the network works
perfectly.
I just want to know if I want to change the address or ..., without going
through the GUI, where I can make my changes, knowing that
, Curt a écrit :
> On 2018-08-06, Joe wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 04:01:44 -0400
> > Jude DaShiell wrote:
> >
> >> If you do a command line install with no graphics, you end up with no
> >> network configuration once installation completes.
> >
On 2018-08-06, Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 04:01:44 -0400
> Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
>> If you do a command line install with no graphics, you end up with no
>> network configuration once installation completes.
>
> Not in my experience.
>
> At one time
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 04:01:44 -0400
Jude DaShiell wrote:
> If you do a command line install with no graphics, you end up with no
> network configuration once installation completes.
Not in my experience.
At one time, if you did a non-expert install with no network DHCP
server, then y
If you do a command line install with no graphics, you end up with no
network configuration once installation completes.I left some writing on
wiki.debian.org for how to configure wifi to work for command line
installs on post-install boot and that uses ifup and ifdown. I don't
know what happened
On 8/6/2018 1:53 AM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote:
If I choose to configure the network during installation, where can I
configure the network after?
on which file, because in /etc/network/interfaces I don't see the ip
address, subnetwork ...
It depends which pkg you choose to install during
If I choose to configure the network during installation, where can I
configure the network after?
on which file, because in /etc/network/interfaces I don't see the ip
address, subnetwork ...
--
*Ilyass kaouam*
*Systems administrator*
* Mastère européen Manager de Projets Informatiques*
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 12:48:35 PM Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 08:05:12AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 14, 2018 03:57:08 AM Reco wrote:
> > > Back in the day I used two Raspberry Pi for improving WiFi coverage.
> > > It was very
Hi.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 08:05:12AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, April 14, 2018 03:57:08 AM Reco wrote:
> > Back in the day I used two Raspberry Pi for improving WiFi coverage.
> > It was very straightforward, although somewhat unconventional
> > configuration - two
On Saturday, April 14, 2018 03:57:08 AM Reco wrote:
> Back in the day I used two Raspberry Pi for improving WiFi coverage.
> It was very straightforward, although somewhat unconventional
> configuration - two WiFi APs with the same SSID ('AP name' in layman
> terms), each brigded to the same wired
Reco wrote:
> Back in the day I used two Raspberry Pi for improving WiFi coverage.
> It was very straightforward, although somewhat unconventional
> configuration - two WiFi APs with the same SSID ('AP name' in layman
> terms), each brigded to the same wired VLAN. Worked better than I was
>
David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 09 Apr 2018 at 10:21:46 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Well, nice that they're starting to do that ... it's still a Linksys, so
>> (not having any experience with it either), I'd lean toward it not being
>> that great of a device.
>
> That's a shame. I was moving
Hi.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 09:17:06AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 09 Apr 2018 at 10:21:46 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> > Celejar wrote:
> > > On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 00:32:05 - (UTC)
> > > Dan Purgert wrote:
> > >> If you have a device repeating a WiFi signal, it
On Mon 09 Apr 2018 at 10:21:46 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 00:32:05 - (UTC)
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> If you have a device repeating a WiFi signal, it *will* use the same
> >> channel as the upstream AP. It *cannot* use a different
Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 00:32:05 - (UTC)
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>> If you have a device repeating a WiFi signal, it *will* use the same
>> channel as the upstream AP. It *cannot* use a different channel.
>>
>> In the event you have a dual-band AP, and the following
Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 10:00:31 - (UTC)
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>
>> Celejar wrote:
>> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
>> > Dan Purgert wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> Yep, you've got the terms right.
>> >>
>> >> Does the buffalo also
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 00:32:05 - (UTC)
Dan Purgert wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > On Sat 07 Apr 2018 at 20:17:56 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> David Wright wrote:
> >> > On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> It's a nuance in the
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 10:00:31 - (UTC)
Dan Purgert wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Yep, you've got the terms right.
> >>
> >> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access to other
David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 07 Apr 2018 at 20:17:56 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> David Wright wrote:
>> > On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It's a nuance in the semantics of what it means to "repeat" wifi.
>> >> Suffice to say, in order to "repeat" wifi,
On Sat 07 Apr 2018 at 20:17:56 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> >>
> >> It's a nuance in the semantics of what it means to "repeat" wifi.
> >> Suffice to say, in order to "repeat" wifi, you have one radio splitting
David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>>
>> It's a nuance in the semantics of what it means to "repeat" wifi.
>> Suffice to say, in order to "repeat" wifi, you have one radio splitting
>> its time between pretending to be an AP for a client device, and
On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 10:00:31 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> Celejar wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
> >> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> >> [...]
> >> >>
> >> >> Yep, you've
David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 10:00:31 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Celejar wrote:
>> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
>> > Dan Purgert wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> Yep, you've got the terms right.
>> >>
>> >> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access
On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 10:00:31 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Yep, you've got the terms right.
> >>
> >> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access to other clients close to it?
Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> Yep, you've got the terms right.
>>
>> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access to other clients close to it?
>> or is it JUST trying to pretend that it's a client device to the
>>
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
Dan Purgert wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:13:30 - (UTC)
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >
> >> Joe wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> > I'd have thought that hardwired hubs are long gone, that all devices
> >> > with
Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:13:30 - (UTC)
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>
>> Joe wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > I'd have thought that hardwired hubs are long gone, that all devices
>> > with multiple Ethernet ports are switches and therefore software-based.
>> > Indeed, many routers
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:13:30 - (UTC)
Dan Purgert wrote:
> Joe wrote:
> > [...]
> > I'd have thought that hardwired hubs are long gone, that all devices
> > with multiple Ethernet ports are switches and therefore software-based.
> > Indeed, many routers can be configured as
David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 13:09:00 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> David Wright wrote:
>> >
>> > --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>> > Content-Disposition: inline
>> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>> >
>> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700),
On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 12:49:16 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 10:24:36 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > The software might not support it, but if openwrt or ddwrt can run
> > > on the hardware, they should support bridging.
> >
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 10:24:36 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > The software might not support it, but if openwrt or ddwrt can run
> > on the hardware, they should support bridging.
>
> I can make sure the router I buy can run openwrt or ddwrt, but it
>
On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 10:24:36 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > 1: I suppose there might be some network hardware which doesn't
> > > support actual bridging of wired interfaces, but I've
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > 1: I suppose there might be some network hardware which doesn't
> > support actual bridging of wired interfaces, but I've yet to see
> > such an example.
>
> I think the router I've been
On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 08:48:50 (+), Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:26:38 -0400
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, March 15, 2018 09:42:25 PM David Wright wrote:
> > > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright
On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 13:09:00 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> >
> > --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> >
> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> >> On
On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 23:26:38 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, March 15, 2018 09:42:25 PM David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > > > When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that
Joe wrote:
> [...]
> I'd have thought that hardwired hubs are long gone, that all devices
> with multiple Ethernet ports are switches and therefore software-based.
> Indeed, many routers can be configured as VLANs.
Hubs pretty much are. Not entirely sure where you're thinking switches
are
David Wright wrote:
>
> --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
>> > When you reprogram routers with
On Friday, March 16, 2018 08:53:00 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> I haven't had the need to do that, and I'm not quite sure how I would go
> about it, but (thinking on the fly now), I might try putting a switch
> immediately after the modem, with two routers plugged into that, then a
> router and
On Friday, March 16, 2018 04:48:50 AM Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:26:38 -0400
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
...
> > I haven't paid attention to this thread from the beginning, but
> > looking at the sketch, I'm wondering what the purpose of the 2nd
> > router is? Why not instead of a
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:26:38 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, March 15, 2018 09:42:25 PM David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > > > When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that
On Thursday, March 15, 2018 09:42:25 PM David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > > When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that allow it to do, say,
> > > wired bridging even though the manufacturer's
On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that allow it to do, say,
> > wired bridging even though the manufacturer's formware doesn't allow
> > for that?
>
> openwrt and dd-wrt both
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that allow it to do, say,
> wired bridging even though the manufacturer's formware doesn't allow
> for that?
openwrt and dd-wrt both allow wired bridging[1] (or pseudo-bridging by
routing if your wireless
On Wednesday 14 March 2018 22:24:26 David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 09 Mar 2018 at 12:31:35 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 09 March 2018 10:18:23 Reco wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> > > > For many years I have used my desktp
On Fri 09 Mar 2018 at 12:31:35 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 09 March 2018 10:18:23 Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> > > For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server
> > > with two interfaces one
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 23:22:36 +0200
Johann Spies wrote:
> Thanks again for all the inputs.
>
> I have tried a third option: arno-iptables-firewall.
>
> Now I can reach the internet from the local network. I still don't
> understand why I could not
> get it working with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 11:06:12AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> I see I have broken the thread by adding [SOLVED] to the subject.
But only because gmail is a broken mail user agent: it seems to have
dropped the In-Reply-To header. The change of
I see I have broken the thread by adding [SOLVED] to the subject.
Just to keep it in this thread:
I have tried a third option: arno-iptables-firewall.
Now I can reach the internet from the local network. I still don't
understand why I could not
get it working with Shorewall which I have used
Thanks again for all the inputs.
I have tried a third option: arno-iptables-firewall.
Now I can reach the internet from the local network. I still don't
understand why I could not
get it working with Shorewall which I have used for many years.
Regards
Johann
--
Because experiencing your
On 3/9/2018 3:30 PM, Johann Spies wrote:
For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server with
two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the other the
local network.
Now I have a fibre connection and for a month both connections will be
available in parallel.
I
On Friday 09 March 2018 10:18:23 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> > For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server
> > with two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the
> > other the local network.
> >
Johann Spies wrote:
> For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server with
> two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the other the
> local network.
>
> Now I have a fibre connection and for a month both connections will be
> available in parallel.
>
> I have
Hi.
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server with
> two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the other the
> local network.
>
> Now I have a fibre connection and for a month both
For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server with
two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the other the
local network.
Now I have a fibre connection and for a month both connections will be
available in parallel.
I have decided to use my Raspberry Pi3 as
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:13:20 -0600 Bob Proulx sent:
Sometimes people say I write too much. But the details are
important. :-)
No way Bob. Never too much.
Personally I read all your posts even if they don't apply to anything I
need or particularly interest me. Sometimes they generate
On Friday 26 June 2015 10:28:08 Proxy One wrote:
Sometimes people say I write too much.
There is writing too much and writing a lot. I talk too much. You write a
lot.
In Latin too much and very much are the same word. In case any modern
language does the same thing, Bob is saying that
On 06/26/2015 05:13 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
notoneofmyseeds wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
I must say you have written a book here on this topic, Rob. I've learned a
lot. I printed it out. To your questions now.
Sometimes people say I write too much. But the details are important.:-)
And this is a
On 2015-Jun-26 17:27, Charlie wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:13:20 -0600 Bob Proulx sent:
Sometimes people say I write too much. But the details are
important. :-)
No way Bob. Never too much.
Personally I read all your posts even if they don't apply to anything I
need or
On 06/23/2015 10:22 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Another question: When you are connected to both as you have done what
is the output of these commands so that we can see the (as you say
broken) state of things?
ip addr show
ip route show | tac
I had a very long and nice response that I lost,
On Thursday 25 June 2015 08:46:49 notoneofmyseeds wrote:
On 06/23/2015 10:22 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Another question: When you are connected to both as you have done
what is the output of these commands so that we can see the (as you
say broken) state of things?
ip addr show
ip
notoneofmyseeds wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
I must say you have written a book here on this topic, Rob. I've learned a
lot. I printed it out. To your questions now.
Sometimes people say I write too much. But the details are important. :-)
And this is a large book again with this message.
I
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 22:30:02 +0200
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Perhaps someone else on the mailing list will have additional
suggestions. Hopefully they will be better than my poor contributions
here.
I would suggest getting into the depths of
the
notoneofmyseeds wrote:
one ethernet interface that you sometimes connect to one wired network and
sometimes to a different wired network?
For now, this is a laptop that is located in one place.
All networks are DHCP.
Those are good clarifications. Let me mention a few problems to be
On 06/22/2015 10:39 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
You say networks. Is that the same as ethernet interfaces? You have
two ethernet interfaces? Or you have one ethernet interface that you
sometimes connect to one wired network and sometimes to a different
wired network?
Bob, your ever so detailed and
On 06/22/2015 10:39 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
If you have only one wired ethernet and are planning on connecting
back and forth between two wired networks then it is similar but I
would use guessnet to manage the interface so that it can
automatically switch you between the specified network
On 15-06-21 11:52 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
do I need to remove/purge NetworkManager Applet 0.9.10.0 to manually
configure my interfaces?
It is not necessary. However I recommend doing so anyway.
It is not necessary because NetworkManager and wicd ignore any
interface with a configuration in
notoneofmy wrote:
I have three separate networks, ip addresses, etc.
One wireless and two hard wired, ethernet.
The wireless must connect to the internet.
As is necessary, I will need to physically swap the ethernet cables
between networks.
You say networks. Is that the same as ethernet
Just a quick question:
do I need to remove/purge NetworkManager Applet 0.9.10.0 to manually
configure my interfaces?
I'm using a laptop and want the wifi to go online, but the ethernet to
stay on a different lan networks, actually two different networks. And I
worry how to proceed with such
notoneofmyseeds wrote:
do I need to remove/purge NetworkManager Applet 0.9.10.0 to manually
configure my interfaces?
It is not necessary. However I recommend doing so anyway.
It is not necessary because NetworkManager and wicd ignore any
interface with a configuration in
Sam Su wrote:
Yes, I am using Ubuntu, I asked a similar question at ubuntu community but
nobody response, it looks like few of active Ubuntu users are interesting
for this topic. I also noticed that most of great posts about how to
preseed an ubuntu system are based on Debian preseed
are trying to install Ubuntu I would send this to the
ubuntu-us...@lists.ubuntu.com mailing list.
After the client machine was powered on, it can communicate with the
Cobber
server and enter into Ubuntu installation, however the process will get
stuck at network configuration.
Here is the client
the process will get
stuck at network configuration.
Here is the client error info:
http://www.use.com/8bc67ee30430d8fbaa4b
Can someone please advise?
If need more info, please let me know.
Thanks,
Sam
mailing list.
After the client machine was powered on, it can communicate with the Cobber
server and enter into Ubuntu installation, however the process will get
stuck at network configuration.
Here is the client error info:
http://www.use.com/8bc67ee30430d8fbaa4b
Can someone please advise
G'day,
I have installed Debian Lenny on a HP Comaq Presario CQ61 laptop.
However, the automatic network configuration failed during installation.
I'm fairly new to Linux. I'd appreciate somebody referring me to a HOWTO
or some other resource containing instructions on how to rectify
Alexander,
You probaly should look at:
www.about*debian*.com/*network*.htm
To the automatic network configuration works during installation you must
have cable on (link on network-card) and your network card must be know to
Linux (a.k.a properly modules loaded), may cards have support built
Thanks a lot for a prompt reply to my email, Tiago!
I'll follow up on the suggestions you've made and let you know how I go.
Cheers.
Alexander Kapshuk.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
I Hope you get you network up and working,
We're here to help.
--
Tiago Almeida
tiagov...@gmail.com
On Sat May 2 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote:
need to run:
iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW --dport 80 -i eth0 -j
ACCEPT iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW --dport 22 -i eth0
-j ACCEPT /sbin/iptables -N ssh-connection
/sbin/iptables -A ssh-connection -i eth0 -p tcp
On Sun May 3 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Firestarter might work, but i really wanted to be able to add my own
entry to some file somewhere:) command-line junky :)
Sounds like shorewall to me ;)
ahhh, I might have to look at it. thanks!
per the INTRO page:
http://www.shorewall.net/
On Fri,01.May.09, 05:36:06, Paul Cartwright wrote:
I seemed to have a problem with my static setup of eth0 that stopped my
debian
lenny setup from coming up correctly. I kept getting errors in logs.
To redo my network config, just eth0, what is the best way to do it. I tried
On Sat May 2 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote:
#static setup
#auto eth0
#iface eth0 inet static
#address 192.168.10.103
#netmask 255.255.255.0
#broadcast 192.168.10.255
here is what I have now:
Please re-enable this part (and comment out the dhcp parts) and post the
output of 'ifup -v
On Sat,02.May.09, 05:38:38, Paul Cartwright wrote:
well, that seems to work.
...
part of the problem was 2 files I had worked on that did give me
errors, and I removed them. 1 was ipv6,
Do yo mean the module? If you don't want it loaded (though I have it and
there are no problems) just
On Sat May 2 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote:
part of the problem was 2 files I had worked on that did give me
errors, and I removed them. 1 was ipv6,
Do yo mean the module? If you don't want it loaded (though I have it and
there are no problems) just blacklist it in a file (ex. 00local.conf)
On Sat,02.May.09, 06:15:04, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Sat May 2 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote:
part of the problem was 2 files I had worked on that did give me
errors, and I removed them. 1 was ipv6,
Do yo mean the module? If you don't want it loaded (though I have it and
there are no
On Sat, 02 May 2009 06:15:04 -0400, Paul Cartwright posted:
[...]
what I want is a rule tht allows http for my web page to port forward from
my router to my desktop, and also allow me to ssh into my desktop from my
laptops.
If I understand correctly what you asking:
You will need to option
On Sat May 2 2009, Thorny wrote:
If I understand correctly what you asking:
You will need to option your router to port forward port 80 requests
from the WAN interface to the static IP Address of the computer on your
LAN you want them to go to.
I have done that and it works.
If those
On Sat,02.May.09, 16:32:44, Paul Cartwright wrote:
Firestarter might work, but i really wanted to be able to add my own
entry to some file somewhere:) command-line junky :)
Sounds like shorewall to me ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
I seemed to have a problem with my static setup of eth0 that stopped my debian
lenny setup from coming up correctly. I kept getting errors in logs.
To redo my network config, just eth0, what is the best way to do it. I tried
dpkg-reconfigure ifupdown, but that didn't change the interfaces file.
On Fri, 1 May 2009 05:36:06 -0400
Paul Cartwright a...@pcartwright.com wrote:
I seemed to have a problem with my static setup of eth0 that stopped my
debian
lenny setup from coming up correctly. I kept getting errors in logs.
To redo my network config, just eth0, what is the best way to do
101 - 200 of 357 matches
Mail list logo