On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 21:49:12 -0500,
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 18:33, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:13:20 +0800,
csj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At Fri, 26 Sep 2003 02:13:53 +0100,
At Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:47:46 +0200,
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
[...]
..WWII was won on 3 major factors: Russian (and Chechen!) blood,
FDR's New Deal policy reforming US capitalism by banning it ;-),
giving _all_ of American industry a fair deal on re-tool flexing, and,
everybody knew _deep_ in
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 04:29:15 +0800,
csj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:47:46 +0200,
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
[...]
..WWII was won on 3 major factors: Russian (and Chechen!) blood,
FDR's New Deal policy reforming US capitalism by banning it
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On hindsight a reformed Soviet Union probably wasn't a bad idea.
Now we have all these little despots waging their little wars and
sometimes getting smart-bombed for it.
..this notion or whatever, _might_ be worth a mention in
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/legends/godwin/
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:09:50 -0400,
Roberto Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On hindsight a reformed Soviet Union probably wasn't a bad idea.
Now we have all these little despots waging their little wars and
sometimes getting smart-bombed
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 03:59:53PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 04:22:47PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:39:51PM +0800, csj wrote:
Why not? Mailfilter has a log feature of varying degrees of
verbosity. So if I accidentally delete a notice saying
At Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:59:53 +0100,
Pigeon wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 04:22:47PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:39:51PM +0800, csj wrote:
Why not? Mailfilter has a log feature of varying degrees
of verbosity. So if I accidentally delete a notice saying
At Fri, 26 Sep 2003 02:13:53 +0100,
Karsten M. Self wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 05:44:57AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At Mon, 22 Sep 2003 06:26:05 +0100,
Karsten M. Self wrote:
If Swen is the shape of things to come, it's the
At Fri, 26 Sep 2003 02:49:00 +0300,
Shaul Karl wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:10:42PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
someone on this list mentioned some other program to check
popservers before fetchmail'ing?
mailfilter?
There are others:
popsneaker
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:13:20 +0800,
csj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At Fri, 26 Sep 2003 02:13:53 +0100,
Karsten M. Self wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 05:44:57AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At Mon, 22
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 18:33, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:13:20 +0800,
csj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At Fri, 26 Sep 2003 02:13:53 +0100,
Karsten M. Self wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:39:51PM +0800, csj wrote:
Why not? Mailfilter has a log feature of varying degrees of
verbosity. So if I accidentally delete a notice saying Subject:
Congratulations: You've just won a million $$, I could always ask the
sender to resend it. Any email which can't
on Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:20:34PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Karsten M. Self said:
on Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:03:47PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've received far more invalid, than valid, C-R challenges. This is
simply spam by another name.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 04:22:47PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:39:51PM +0800, csj wrote:
Why not? Mailfilter has a log feature of varying degrees of
verbosity. So if I accidentally delete a notice saying Subject:
Congratulations: You've just won a million $$, I
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:10:42PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..someone on this list mentioned some other program to check
popservers before fetchmail'ing?
mailfilter?
--
Shaul Karl,shaulk @ actcom . net . il
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Bob McElrath said:
Wayne Gemmell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walt L. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone else out there being mail bombed with emails
that look like there from M$? The rate at which their coming
is increasing exponentially.
I recieved 10Mb of mail over the
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess that's as effective for reducing the bulk of your inbox as sending
550 executables not accepted, especially if you don't have control over
the mail server and you match this virus with 100% accuracy.
Either way, /dev/null or 550 after DATA
Bob McElrath said:
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess that's as effective for reducing the bulk of your inbox as
sending
550 executables not accepted, especially if you don't have control
over
the mail server and you match this virus with 100% accuracy.
Either way, /dev/null
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob McElrath said:
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess that's as effective for reducing the bulk of your inbox as
sending
550 executables not accepted, especially if you don't have control
over
the mail server and you match this
Bob McElrath said:
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob McElrath said:
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess that's as effective for reducing the bulk of your inbox as
sending
550 executables not accepted, especially if you don't have control
over
the mail server and
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob McElrath said:
Darn, I was hoping (aren't we all) for a way to reject it before the
whole thing is sent. You know...it wouldn't be hard to scan the input
for the EXE header and close the connection as soon as it's seen. Then
you'd only
on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 05:44:57AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At Mon, 22 Sep 2003 06:26:05 +0100,
Karsten M. Self wrote:
If Swen is the shape of things to come, it's the end of dial-up
POP3 mail accounts.
There's a simple solution. Have the list munge the email
addresses
Bob McElrath said:
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob McElrath said:
Darn, I was hoping (aren't we all) for a way to reject it before the
whole thing is sent. You know...it wouldn't be hard to scan the input
for the EXE header and close the connection as soon as it's seen.
Then
on Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:42:37AM -0500, Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:26, Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:09:50PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 09:19:32AM -0700, Carla Schroder wrote:
[snip]
on Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 11:07:26AM +0200, Elie De Brauwer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I don't think that many isp's are concerned about the user-isp
connection, who needs to pay extra for that ? It's the internet-isp
connection that eats all the money.
The isp will simply apply a quota,
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 02:49:00 +0300,
Shaul Karl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:10:42PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..someone on this list mentioned some other program to check
popservers before fetchmail'ing?
mailfilter?
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:31:34 -0600 (MDT),
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If it's a real server, I thought that it would just try the connection
again because it didn't get a yes 250 or a no 5xx or even a maybe
later 3-4xx, and you might not want to
on Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:03:47PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There's a company that provides this service. First time emails to you get
an auto-response You aren't authorized to send me email, visit this web
page to get authorized or something like that. I Googled and
on Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:46:45PM -0500, Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 19:40, Joyce, Matthew wrote:
Maybe this would be the future for e-mail, deny all but specified...
It is probably (should be imo) the future of all computing.
Permit this
Permit
Karsten M. Self said:
on Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:03:47PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There's a company that provides this service. First time emails to you
get
an auto-response You aren't authorized to send me email, visit this web
page to get authorized or something
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:02:20 -0400,
Bijan Soleymani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:10:42PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..someone on this list mentioned some other program to check
popservers before fetchmail'ing?
mutt and telnet are my
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 04:22:33AM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
3) modify my attached ~/.mailfilterrc with your POP3 username and
password details. The DENY rules to filter out viral crap are
translated from posts by Greg Lehey and David Lloyd on the LinuxSA
list.
These rules are not
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 12:38, Vineet Kumar wrote:
* cr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030920 20:47]:
I love Kmail too, but I'm running 1.3.2 (the version that comes with
Woody) and I'm not sure it offers that facility.I believe the newest
version does, but when I installed it briefly
On (24/09/03 04:22), Pigeon wrote:
I've just found getting mailfilter up on woody to be a suitable
means of passing the time while microwaving pizzas. It's dead easy:
I think my pizza would be crisped by now ;) but thanks for this.
Coincidentally, I was trying to confilgure mailfilter last night
Pigeon writes:
apt-get install mailfilter - it only depends on libc, libstdc++ and
debconf, so no baddies there.
Mailfilter is not in Woody. I didn't try installing the deb from Unstable:
just the source package. It has some source dependencies I didn't feel
like bothering with.
--
John
On (24/09/03 07:43), John Hasler wrote:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MS mail bombs
From: John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:43:10 -0500
Pigeon writes:
apt-get install mailfilter - it only depends on libc, libstdc++ and
debconf, so no baddies
At Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:14:27 -0400,
Bijan Soleymani wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:52:20AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:02:20 -0400,
Bijan Soleymani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For telnet
Clive writes:
I am not sure I agree with you
You're right. Mailfilter is in Woody. I had forgotten that I had been
mucking about with sources.list.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Apologies to Pigeon - this does work ;)
On (24/09/03 11:48), Clive Menzies wrote:
On (24/09/03 04:22), Pigeon wrote:
I've just found getting mailfilter up on woody to be a suitable
means of passing the time while microwaving pizzas. It's dead easy:
I think my pizza would be crisped by now
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:43:10AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Pigeon writes:
apt-get install mailfilter - it only depends on libc, libstdc++ and
debconf, so no baddies there.
Mailfilter is not in Woody. I didn't try installing the deb from Unstable:
just the source package. It has some
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:48:43AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
On (24/09/03 04:22), Pigeon wrote:
I've just found getting mailfilter up on woody to be a suitable
means of passing the time while microwaving pizzas. It's dead easy:
I think my pizza would be crisped by now ;) but thanks for
In linux.debian.user, Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael C. wrote:
I asked this on alt.os.linux. I was told to search freshmeat.net for a
perl script called poppy. It will get headers only, and ask what you
want to do with the mail one by one, but it also includes a script
Wayne Gemmell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walt L. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone else out there being mail bombed with emails
that look like there from M$? The rate at which their coming
is increasing exponentially.
I recieved 10Mb of mail over the weekend, and I the
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:39:51PM +0800, csj wrote:
Why not? Mailfilter has a log feature of varying degrees of
verbosity. So if I accidentally delete a notice saying Subject:
Congratulations: You've just won a million $$, I could always
ask the sender to resend it.
On my system, that'd
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:05:35PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
Apologies to Pigeon - this does work ;)
Accepted :-)
I have the SHOW_HEADERS option and being either stupid or inexperienced
(you take your pick) didn't realise that it would show me all headers
rather than just the deleted
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 21:25, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:46:45 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't this kindred to C-R?
No. It is C-R. At least the message they were replying to was.
And wasn't there a big, long thread last month where most in the
thread
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 00:22, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:08:42 -0600
Walt L. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone else out there being mail bombed with emails
that look like there from M$? The rate at which their
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 02:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 00:22, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:08:42 -0600
Walt L. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone else out there being mail bombed with emails
Ron Johnson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 20:28, John Hasler wrote:
Wayne Gemmell writes:
I can't see any solution to this. Downloading this amount of mail during
the day would cost me a fortune *sniff*
Set up fetchmail or mailfilter to delete
Jacob Anawalt writes:
There's a company that provides this service. First time emails to you
get an auto-response You aren't authorized to send me email, visit this
web page to get authorized or something like that. I Googled and can't
find it again. Interesting idea.
I've received spam
Wayne writes:
With fetchmail and mailfilter, it is.
It is possible with fetchmail alone, though at a small risk of loss of
mail.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 02:26:42 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And wasn't there a big, long thread last month where most in the
thread excoriated C-R?
Yup. Which goes to show that these people clearly didn't read it, don't
care, or are just plain stupid. I vote for all three.
Ron Johnson said:
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 02:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 00:22, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:08:42 -0600
Walt L. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone else out there being mail
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:11:48 -0500,
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wayne writes:
With fetchmail and mailfilter, it is.
It is possible with fetchmail alone, though at a small risk of loss of
mail.
..case in point:
fetchmail: 5.9.11 querying pop.net
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:10:42PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..someone on this list mentioned some other program to check
popservers before fetchmail'ing?
mutt and telnet are my favourite programs.
For mutt simply run:
mutt -f pop://pop.server.com
then it will ask you for username and
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 12:31, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 02:26:42 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And wasn't there a big, long thread last month where most in the
thread excoriated C-R?
Yup. Which goes to show that these people clearly didn't read it, don't
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:10:42 +0200,
Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:11:48 -0500,
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wayne writes:
With fetchmail and mailfilter, it is.
It is possible with
* Steve Lamb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030920 20:41]:
My only wish is that I knew exiscan-acl well enough to figure out if I
could have a custom script run upon a positive hit. In doing so have the
infected IP automatically added to Shorewall's blacklist. It would also
Don't deny the initial
* cr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030920 20:47]:
I love Kmail too, but I'm running 1.3.2 (the version that comes with Woody)
and I'm not sure it offers that facility.I believe the newest version
does, but when I installed it briefly (with RedHat 9, before I switched to
Debian) it warned me
* csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030921 15:54]:
This delete-before-download feature can be done by other, stand
alone applications applications: popsneaker, popcheck, pop
surgeon, pop browser, Save My Modem. mail filter, and for those
with the fortitude, telnet.
mutt is good at this, too. You can
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:02:20 -0400,
Bijan Soleymani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:10:42PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..someone on this list mentioned some other program to check
popservers before fetchmail'ing?
mutt and telnet are my
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:49:33 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I stopped reading the thread soon after the acrimony started
flying. Calling people stupid without a valid reason is pretty much
*wrong*.
Given the verbage written about C-R and the problems it causes one has to
Arnt Karlsen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:11:48 -0500,
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wayne writes:
With fetchmail and mailfilter, it is.
It is possible with fetchmail alone, though at a small risk of loss
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:52:20AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:02:20 -0400,
Bijan Soleymani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For telnet simply run:
telnet pop.server.com 110
USER username
PASS password
LIST
TOP number (to show only the
Wayne writes:
I guess you could use fetchmail to weed them out but I found that
spending time on the DENY rules in mailfilter was better spent.
Fetchmail can be used alone to delete oversize mails on the server. I do
so because I am too lazy to get mailfilter up on Woody.
--
John Hasler
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003:09:23:21:18:48-0500] scribed:
Wayne writes:
I guess you could use fetchmail to weed them out but I found that
spending time on the DENY rules in mailfilter was better spent.
Fetchmail can be used alone to delete oversize mails on the server. I do
so
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:14:27 -0400,
Bijan Soleymani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:52:20AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:02:20 -0400,
Bijan Soleymani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For
I wrote:
Fetchmail can be used alone to delete oversize mails on the server. I do
so because I am too lazy to get mailfilter up on Woody.
mds writes:
What do you do about legitimate attachments sent to you?
Legitimate attachments of over 140k in size are rarely sent to me. For the
time
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:18:48PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Wayne writes:
I guess you could use fetchmail to weed them out but I found that
spending time on the DENY rules in mailfilter was better spent.
Fetchmail can be used alone to delete oversize mails on the server. I do
so because
Steve Lamb wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 02:26:42 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And wasn't there a big, long thread last month where most in the
thread excoriated C-R?
Yup. Which goes to show that these people clearly didn't read it, don't
care, or are just plain stupid. I
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:59:00 -0600
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe they gave up early on it due to content. I just forced myself to
drudge through the whole of it. Lots of good ideas and reasons to not
use C-R* from the I'll take it all to not miss one email camp.
Easier to
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:12:40 -0500
Legitimate attachments of over 140k in size are rarely sent to me. For the
time being if any are I'll lose them. When the current worm storm abates I
will stop the deletion.
When? Ladies and gents, we have an optimist in the house. :)
--
Steve Lamb wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:59:00 -0600
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe they gave up early on it due to content. I just forced myself to
drudge through the whole of it. Lots of good ideas and reasons to not
use C-R* from the I'll take it all to not miss one email
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:29:50 -0600
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While reading that certainly clarified the woes of the
challenge-response system, I'm unsure if it would have cleared me of
your charges since they said to read the thread:
Touche'. I think that reading the essay
On Monday 22 September 2003 07:26, Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:09:50PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 09:19:32AM -0700, Carla Schroder wrote:
The other way is a neat little trick I use on my ISP account- limit
the size of
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:26, Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:09:50PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 09:19:32AM -0700, Carla Schroder wrote:
[snip]
If Swen is the shape of things to come, it's the end of dial-up POP3
mail accounts.
Op ma 22-09-2003, om 09:42 schreef Ron Johnson:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:26, Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:09:50PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 09:19:32AM -0700, Carla Schroder wrote:
[snip]
If Swen is the shape of
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:09:53 +0200
Olav Lavell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op ma 22-09-2003, om 09:42 schreef Ron Johnson:
What's going to happen (nay, *is* happening) is that ISPs are starting
to offer spam virus filtering.
Yeah, but for a fee...
...and even then it is very poor spam and
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 03:09, Olav Lavell wrote:
Op ma 22-09-2003, om 09:42 schreef Ron Johnson:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:26, Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:09:50PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 09:19:32AM -0700, Carla
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 03:19, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:09:53 +0200
Olav Lavell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op ma 22-09-2003, om 09:42 schreef Ron Johnson:
What's going to happen (nay, *is* happening) is that ISPs are starting
to offer spam virus filtering.
Yeah, but for
On Monday 22 September 2003 10:09, Olav Lavell wrote:
Op ma 22-09-2003, om 09:42 schreef Ron Johnson:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:26, Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:09:50PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 09:19:32AM -0700, Carla
On Monday 22 September 2003 10:54, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 03:09, Olav Lavell wrote:
Op ma 22-09-2003, om 09:42 schreef Ron Johnson:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:26, Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:09:50PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 04:07, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
On Monday 22 September 2003 10:54, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 03:09, Olav Lavell wrote:
Op ma 22-09-2003, om 09:42 schreef Ron Johnson:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:26, Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at
Walt L. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone else out there being mail bombed with emails
that look like there from M$? The rate at which their coming
is increasing exponentially.
I recieved 10Mb of mail over the weekend, and I the last 12 hours I recieved
another 10Mb. I have a
At Mon, 22 Sep 2003 06:26:05 +0100,
Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:09:50PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 09:19:32AM -0700, Carla Schroder wrote:
The other way is a neat little trick I use on my ISP
account- limit the size of
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 16:07, Wayne Gemmell wrote:
Walt L. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone else out there being mail bombed with emails
that look like there from M$? The rate at which their coming
is increasing exponentially.
I recieved 10Mb of mail over the weekend,
Wayne Gemmell wrote:
Walt L. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone else out there being mail bombed with emails
that look like there from M$? The rate at which their coming
is increasing exponentially.
I recieved 10Mb of mail over the weekend, and I the last 12 hours I recieved
Maybe this would be the future for e-mail, deny all but specified...
--
-daniel
It is probably (should be imo) the future of all computing.
Permit this
Permit that
Deny everything else
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Wayne Gemmell([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Walt L. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone else out there being mail bombed with emails
that look like there from M$? The rate at which their coming
is increasing exponentially.
I recieved 10Mb of mail over the
daniel said:
Wayne Gemmell wrote:
[snip]
I can't see any solution to this. Downloading this amount of mail during
the
day would cost me a fortune *sniff*
Maybe it sounds drastic but I even thought of making some type of acl of
who can send me e-mail and deny the rest with a msg of If you
Wayne Gemmell writes:
I can't see any solution to this. Downloading this amount of mail during
the day would cost me a fortune *sniff*
Set up fetchmail or mailfilter to delete messages over 140k on the server.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
--
To
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 19:40, Joyce, Matthew wrote:
Maybe this would be the future for e-mail, deny all but specified...
--
-daniel
It is probably (should be imo) the future of all computing.
Permit this
Permit that
Deny everything else
Isn't this kindred to C-R?
--
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 20:28, John Hasler wrote:
Wayne Gemmell writes:
I can't see any solution to this. Downloading this amount of mail during
the day would cost me a fortune *sniff*
Set up fetchmail or mailfilter to delete messages over 140k on the server.
Is that possible with
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:46:45 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't this kindred to C-R?
No. It is C-R. At least the message they were replying to was.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main
El sábado, 20 de septiembre de 2003, a las 21:03, Ron Johnson escribe:
There goes Britany kissing Madonna...
Did she? I should watch more TV... What about Justin?
Regards, Ismael
--
Tout fourmille de commentaries; d'auteurs il en est grande cherté
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 21:18, Carla Schroder wrote:
On Saturday 20 September 2003 2:27 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
The other way is a neat little trick I use on my ISP account- limit the
size of messages to download, I limit them to 2000 bytes. You
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 04:39, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
El sábado, 20 de septiembre de 2003, a las 21:03, Ron Johnson escribe:
There goes Britany kissing Madonna...
Did she? I should watch more TV... What about Justin?
It was all over the talk shows that B kissed M at some award
show.
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 08:05, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 04:39, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
El sbado, 20 de septiembre de 2003, a las 21:03, Ron Johnson escribe:
There goes Britany kissing Madonna...
Did she? I should watch more TV... What about Justin?
It was all
El domingo, 21 de septiembre de 2003, a las 08:28, Alexander Winston escribe:
The 20th MTV Video Music Awards, but isn't this getting off-topic? :)
Yes, but, we were talking about spam, thus, all this horny teens
lesbian action is on-topic. xD
Regards, Ismael
--
Tout fourmille de commentaries;
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 09:26, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
El domingo, 21 de septiembre de 2003, a las 08:28, Alexander Winston escribe:
The 20th MTV Video Music Awards, but isn't this getting off-topic? :)
Yes, but, we were talking about spam, thus, all this horny teens
lesbian action is
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
