Re: Bug a la instal·lació de postgresql?

2021-09-25 Thread Alex Muntada
Hola, Eloi > Acabo de recordar que fa un temps (oldstable o fins i tot > oldoldstable) hi va haver un canvi important a la comanda su, > bàsicament hi havia dues implementacions i es va canviar d'una > a l'altra per defecte, que tenia algunes subtileses. Crec que > es va documentar a les release

Re: Bug a la instal·lació de postgresql?

2021-09-24 Thread Eloi
Escric ràpid i de memòria perquè tinc poc temps ara mateix, intentaré documentar la resposta millor quan pugui... El 24/9/21 a les 17:58, Alex Muntada ha escrit: [...] - millorar l'script de postinst de postgres perquè utilitzi algun altre mecanisme per canviar a l'usuari postgres Acabo

Re: Bug a la instal·lació de postgresql?

2021-09-24 Thread Alex Muntada
Hola, Julio > la directiva del fitxer > /etc/pam.d/su > és > # auth sufficient pam_rootok.so > Si la descomentem el postgresql funciona.bé, ja que lògicament > ja no demana el pass Confirmo que comentant la directiva em passa el mateix que a vosaltres. Instal·lant dialog em surten els

Re: Bug a la instal·lació de postgresql?

2021-09-23 Thread julio
Hola Àlex, la directiva del fitxer /etc/pam.d/su és # auth sufficient pam_rootok.so Si la descomentem el postgresql funciona.bé, ja que lògicament ja no demana el pass, però llavors tenim un "forat" pel ticket de kerberos :) ... Has de descomentar la 2a línia. S'entèn? Le 23 septembre

Re: Bug a la instal·lació de postgresql?

2021-09-23 Thread Alex Muntada
Hola, Julio > ... com que a la configuració del nostre pam teníem una > directiva que obligava a root a demanar password quan feia su > l'script d'instal·lació es parava demanant un password, però > tant era el que escriguessis, o que en una altra terminal > posessis el password a l'usuari

Re: Bug a la instal·lació de postgresql?

2021-09-21 Thread David Gasa i Castell
Hola Julio, El que em sorprén en aquella instrucció no es tant el que demani un password > Doncs és precisament això, el que em sorprèn... que demani un password. En principi, des de qualsevol shell de root hauríem de poder connectar-nos a qualsevol usuari amb shell, sense necessitat de

Re: Bug a la instal·lació de postgresql?

2021-09-21 Thread julio
Le 21 septembre 2021 08:01:43 GMT+02:00, jordi Perera a écrit : >On 20/9/21 23:56, Julio Amorós wrote: >> Hola, >> ../.. a la configuració del nostre pam teníem una >> directiva que obligava a root a demanar password quan feia su > ../.. >> >> I la instrucció: >> >> *    su -s /bin/sh

Re: Bug a la instal·lació de postgresql?

2021-09-21 Thread jordi Perera
On 20/9/21 23:56, Julio Amorós wrote: Hola, ../.. a la configuració del nostre pam teníem una directiva que obligava a root a demanar password quan feia su > ../.. I la instrucció: *    su -s /bin/sh postgres -c "test -O /var/lib/postgresql &&             test -G /var/lib/postgresql" || \  

Re: Bug : Evince - Impression PDF freezes

2021-09-13 Thread Bernard Schoenacker
- Mail original - > De: "patrick jollant" > À: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org > Envoyé: Lundi 13 Septembre 2021 11:56:02 > Objet: Bug : Evince - Impression PDF freezes > Bonjour, > ne sachant où exposer le problème, j'ai ouvert un sujet sur ce forum >

Re: Bug : Evince - Impression PDF freezes

2021-09-13 Thread didier gaumet
Bonjour, - supprimer le paquet ipp-usb me paraît une mauvaise idée car c'est une dépendance: didier@hp-notebook14:~$ apt rdepends ipp-usb ipp-usb Reverse Depends: Recommande: cups-daemon Recommande: libsane1 Recommande: sane-airscan Ton unique imprimante-scanner peut être détectée

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-28 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
Perhaps it should be said that personal use of gpg and the use that a system administrator makes of it and key-ing are different use-cases. So we might expect fewer assumptions to hold and greater mystery :-) On Sat, Jun 26, 2021, 1:53 PM wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 08:42:26AM -0400, Cindy

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-26 Thread tomas
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 08:42:26AM -0400, Cindy Sue Causey wrote: > On 6/26/21, Andrei POPESCU wrote: [...] > > Well, it makes perfect sense if you remember that "everything is a > > file", even if there are exceptions (e.g. network devices). > > > Hopefully I'm reading this right. While on

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-26 Thread Cindy Sue Causey
On 6/26/21, Andrei POPESCU wrote: >> Andrei, thanks for having picked up my problem and having cared for the >> release notes to comment on it, and also for supposedly having motivated >> Julian Andres Klose to publish a very helpful blog post on the related >> subject. Brad Rogers here in the

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-26 Thread Marco Möller
On 26.06.21 11:54, Andrei POPESCU wrote: (...) Very good points, all appreciated. Feel free to suggest patches for it through bugs against the harden-doc package, or merge requests in Salsa if the Maintainer is accepting them. I'll do so. I decided, motivated also by observing how you are

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-26 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 24 iun 21, 16:42:34, Marco Möller wrote: > On 21.06.21 07:58, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Du, 20 iun 21, 10:20:42, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > Package: release-notes > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org, a...@packages.debian.org > > > > > > On Sb, 19 iun 21, 22:07:35, Marco

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-24 Thread Marco Möller
On 21.06.21 07:58, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Du, 20 iun 21, 10:20:42, Andrei POPESCU wrote: Package: release-notes X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org, a...@packages.debian.org On Sb, 19 iun 21, 22:07:35, Marco Möller wrote: Command apt-key and its man page say that apt-key is

Re: Bug#990086: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead

2021-06-20 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Du, 20 iun 21, 10:20:42, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > Package: release-notes > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org, a...@packages.debian.org > > On Sb, 19 iun 21, 22:07:35, Marco Möller wrote: > > > > Command apt-key and its man page say that apt-key is deprecated, but do not > > suggest an

Fix Kali Linux command not found error [WAS Re: Bug reportin ]

2021-05-22 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 06:47:17PM -0400, Mohamud Ali wrote: > dictionory > Sorry, command-not-found has crashed! Please file a bug report at: > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting > Please include the following information with the report: > > command-not-found version: 0.3 > Python version:

RE: Bug reportin

2021-05-21 Thread Larry Owens
command spelling?? L -Original Message- From: Mohamud Ali [mailto:khtos...@icloud.com] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2021 3:47 PM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Bug reportin dictionory Sorry, command-not-found has crashed! Please file a bug report at:

Re: Bug reportin

2021-05-21 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 06:47:17PM -0400, Mohamud Ali wrote: > Python version: 3.9.1 final 0 > Distributor ID: Kali > Description: Kali GNU/Linux Rolling Please report this to your operating system's support team, not to Debian's user mailing list, or any other place.

Re: bug considering accent marks

2021-04-11 Thread deloptes
David Wright wrote: > AIUI you really want to avoid using accented characters or any sort > of composition in your username and password. The reason is that if > your computer gets set in any unexpected language setting (or unset), > you might not be able to login at all, and unable to correct

Re: bug considering accent marks

2021-04-10 Thread David Wright
On Sat 10 Apr 2021 at 19:11:15 (-0400), mcgarrett wrote: > > On April 10, 2021 at 5:53 PM laurent aerens > > wrote: > > > > Package: unknown > > > > Version: debian 9 - 10 > > > > Severity: minor > > > > When I type accent marks (¨^´`) in the terminal followed by a letter >

Re: bug considering accent marks

2021-04-10 Thread David Wright
On Sat 10 Apr 2021 at 23:53:27 (+0200), laurent aerens wrote: > Package: unknown > > Version: debian 9 - 10 > > Severity: minor > > When I type accent marks (¨^´`) in the terminal followed by a letter > (that does not match with the accent) (for example ^ and the letter n) > nothing happens and

Re: bug considering accent marks

2021-04-10 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:53:27PM +0200, laurent aerens wrote: > Package: unknown > > Version: debian 9 - 10 > > Severity: minor This looks like you're attempting to generate headers for a bug report, except that you're writing to debian-user rather than to the bug tracking system, and you've

Re: bug considering accent marks

2021-04-10 Thread mcgarrett
> On April 10, 2021 at 5:53 PM laurent aerens wrote: > > > Package: unknown > > Version: debian 9 - 10 > > Severity: minor > > When I type accent marks (¨^´`) in the terminal followed by a letter > (that does not match with the accent) (for example ^ and the letter n) >

Re: Bug#977358: release-notes: document how to make the rescue mode usable if no root password is set (buster)

2021-03-21 Thread Alexander V. Makartsev
On 21.03.2021 12:40, Andrei POPESCU wrote: [Bcc: debian-boot] Dear Debian-User subscribers, The Release Notes editor is asking whether this is still an issue for bullseye (i.e. if the patch to Debian Installer mentioned below was applied in the meantime). It will be a while until I get to

Re: Bug#977358: release-notes: document how to make the rescue mode usable if no root password is set (buster)

2021-03-21 Thread Andrei POPESCU
[Bcc: debian-boot] Dear Debian-User subscribers, The Release Notes editor is asking whether this is still an issue for bullseye (i.e. if the patch to Debian Installer mentioned below was applied in the meantime). It will be a while until I get to check that. If someone can confirm either way

Re: Bug: missing package

2021-03-15 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 21:20:39 -0400 Jude DaShiell wrote: > Why is frobtads missing from debian repositories? The frobtads package > makes it possible for those living outside of g.u.i. land to play tads > games on the console. frobtads is in Debian non-free, in Sid and Jessie:

Re: Bug: missing package

2021-03-14 Thread Nito
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 21:20:39 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > Why is frobtads missing from debian repositories? Looking at the tracker, the package is held back by "failure to build from source" bugs, which are considered RC critical: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836934

Re: [BUG REPORT] luajit-2.1.0-beta3/jit/bcsave.lua:240: cannot convert 'nil' to 'unsigned short'

2021-02-24 Thread YunQiang Su
Ohh, this packages hasn't been update for so long. If no objection, I will upload the current git snapshot. Tiezhu Yang 于2021年2月24日周三 上午11:15写道: > > (1) Background > Source: luajit > Version: luajit_2.1.0~beta3+dfsg-5.3_mips64el.deb > Severity: important > Link:

Re: Bug#977358: release-notes: document how to make the rescue mode usable if no root password is set (buster)

2020-12-14 Thread nickgeovanis
Thanks Andrei. On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 5:15 AM Andrei POPESCU wrote: > Package: release-notes > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Dear Release Notes Maintainers, > > Some text based on below would make sense for the Release Notes for > buster. If agreed I'll try to come up with a

Re: Bug Report? - T14 Microphone Issue - Possible Missing Kernel Config?

2020-10-28 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Ma, 27 oct 20, 20:15:13, Jonathan wrote: > Good Evening, > > I was attempting to get my microphone working on my T14 AMD as it is the > only non-functioning piece I was aware of. Browsing possible solutions I was > shown the following could fix the issue if added to the kernel config: > >

Re: Bug Report

2020-10-04 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Sb, 03 oct 20, 16:35:00, thinkingtw...@tutanota.com wrote: > Hello, > > Having gone through Debian's ReportBug system, I am unsure which > packages the issue is coming from hence the email contact. > > The problem is quite straightforward. After the last update from Linux > Kernel

Re: Bug report: prog run via keyboard shortcut gets a different SSH agent?

2020-09-22 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 09:10:15AM +1000, Michael Slade wrote: > I don't know what package to assign this to so I guess I can't use the usual > bug reporting mechanism. > > I have a debian bullseye mate desktop with a custom keyboard shortcut set up > to run xterm.  I noticed that an ssh agent is

Re: Bug in Clamav Package

2020-09-11 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 11 sep 20, 07:26:21, Volker Bäurer wrote: > Hello, > > I use the Clamav/Buster. When restarting the service I get: > > "... mkdir[17696]: /bin/mkdir: cannot create directory '/run/clamav': File > exists" > > This message is useless because the directory exists and I have seen it since

Re: bug: MT7601U Wireless Adapter not work in buster 4 amd

2020-08-27 Thread Matthew Graybosch
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 03:04:21 + (UTC) Long Wind wrote: > it crash, reboot can also fail > at first i thought it's hard disk faultlater i realize that it's more > likely caused by wireless bug i don't have time to file bug report It looks like this issue has come up before in Buster.

Re: Bug #961990

2020-07-20 Thread Michael Lange
Hi, On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 18:47:37 -0400 The Wanderer wrote: > Looking at it, I don't see anything which strikes me as qualifying as > buggy. Can you clarify what about it you see as being a misbehavior > problem? > (...) > It appears that the software previously provided in libgcc1 is now being

Re: Bug #961990

2020-07-19 Thread The Wanderer
On 2020-07-19 at 18:14, Default User wrote: > On 2020-07-19 at 16:27, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >>> This has been going on since the beginning of June, 2020, with >>> no end in sight. >>> Bug #961990 - IIUC, no activity since 2020-06-02. >>> >> You show a session where you reject all the proposed

Re: Bug #961990

2020-07-19 Thread Default User
On 2020-07-19 at 16:27, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> This has been going on since the beginning of June, 2020, with no end in >> sight. >> Bug #961990 - IIUC, no activity since 2020-06-02. >> > You show a session where you reject all the proposed solutions, but > I don't see any justification why

Re: Bug #961990

2020-07-19 Thread The Wanderer
On 2020-07-19 at 16:27, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> This has been going on since the beginning of June, 2020, with no end in >> sight. >> Bug #961990 - IIUC, no activity since 2020-06-02. > > You show a session where you reject all the proposed solutions, but > I don't see any justification why

Re: Bug #961990

2020-07-19 Thread Stefan Monnier
> This has been going on since the beginning of June, 2020, with no end in > sight. > Bug #961990 - IIUC, no activity since 2020-06-02. You show a session where you reject all the proposed solutions, but I don't see any justification why you reject those choices, so I don't know what you

Re: bug report

2020-06-20 Thread Andrei POPESCU
[it's likely you are not subscribed, sorry for the Cc: in case you are] On Sb, 20 iun 20, 07:58:33, gilleswicki wrote: > Hello, I found a bug on my system and tried to report it using the > reportbug software. But as I don't know which packet is the cause of > the bug, following the procedure

Re: bug report

2020-04-30 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:13:29 +0300 deuxb...@gmail.com wrote: > hello, > i would like to report a bug on Debian. > fresh install on my system (Chuwi minibook) - trying to shutdown causes > reboot (windows works without a problem). Thank you! Please use the reportbug' tool:

Re: Re: Bug#522358: AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.sofailed

2020-03-12 Thread 呆呆

Re: Bug - but where

2019-11-27 Thread Felix Miata
Kamil Jońca composed on 2019-11-27 22:31 (UTC+0100): >...X.org 1.20.4 driver: modesetting... To switch to nouveau from modesetting could be as simple as installing xserver-xorg-video-nouveau. If it's already installed, you may need to specify it in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-device.conf to

Re: Bug - but where

2019-11-27 Thread Kamil Jońca
Felix Miata writes: > Kamil Jońca composed on 2019-11-27 21:35 (UTC+0100): > >> Felix Miata writes: > >>> Kamil Jońca composed on 2019-11-27 19:23 (UTC+0100): >> There is debian box > >>> Which Debian version? > >> sid. > > I don't have Sid on my box with G84. > ... >>> # inxi -V |

Re: Bug - but where

2019-11-27 Thread Felix Miata
Kamil Jońca composed on 2019-11-27 21:35 (UTC+0100): > Felix Miata writes: >> Kamil Jońca composed on 2019-11-27 19:23 (UTC+0100): > >>> There is debian box >> Which Debian version? > sid. I don't have Sid on my box with G84. ... >> # inxi -V | head -n1 >> inxi 3.0.37-00 (2019-11-19) >> #

Re: Bug - but where

2019-11-27 Thread Kamil Jońca
Felix Miata writes: > Kamil Jońca composed on 2019-11-27 19:23 (UTC+0100): > >> There is debian box > > Which Debian version? sid. > >> with: >> --8<---cut here---start->8--- >> 08:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation G84 [GeForce 8600 GT]

Re: Bug - but where

2019-11-27 Thread Felix Miata
Kamil Jońca composed on 2019-11-27 19:23 (UTC+0100): > There is debian box Which Debian version? > with: > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > 08:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation G84 [GeForce 8600 GT] > (rev a1) > --8<---cut

Re: Bug?

2019-09-18 Thread Thomas H. George
Yes, I was originally using another desktop, lxde, and switched to gnome. Now I can't switch back On 09/18/2019 08:01 AM, songbird wrote: Thomas H. George wrote: ... Two problems after a distribution upgrade to Buster 1. At login window after boot up the desktop selection is locked a Gnome.

Re: Bug?

2019-09-18 Thread songbird
Thomas H. George wrote: ... > Two problems after a distribution upgrade to Buster > > 1. At login window after boot up the desktop selection is locked a > Gnome. That is, if the symbol to change the desktop selection is > selected a list of available desktops is displayed with a dot indicating

Re: Bug? Can not set clock in plasma5

2019-06-22 Thread andreimpopescu
On Mi, 01 mai 19, 11:33:23, Hans wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am running into the little issue, that I can not set the clock in plasma5 > (KDE). Neither as a normal user nor as root. > > I want to set the clock using systemd to set the time automatically, but when > ever I want set the hook and

Re: Bug with Eclipse on debian stretch (with logs attached)

2019-04-25 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2019-04-25, morgan wrote: > Hi, > > I installed Eclipse on my debian stretch but it crashes when launching. > I attached the logs, I don't understand if I could do anything, nor in > which package(s) are the issues. Sorry for not using reportbug for this > report. > > Feel free to contact me

Re: bug-report help : whole user input events freeze: doubts about the right package to submit against

2019-04-22 Thread bw
In-Reply-To: <3685896c-ded1-395b-6312-cef63a9d2...@pouzenc.fr> >Ludovic Pouzenc >I have doubts about the right package to submit against (gnome-shell, >pulseaudio, wayland, udev, kernel) >Poor work-around : > >- enable accessibility feature "visual-bell". The problem vanishes, Since the

RE: Bug Instação PHP

2019-04-04 Thread Paulo Correia
Lucas, Já tentou dar um apt-get -f install ? De: Fred Maranhão Enviado: quinta-feira, 4 de abril de 2019 08:58 Para: Lista Debian Assunto: Re: Bug Instação PHP você pode atualizar o seu sistema antes? rodando apt update; apt upgrade pode mostrar o conteúdo do

Re: Bug Instação PHP

2019-04-04 Thread Fred Maranhão
você pode atualizar o seu sistema antes? rodando apt update; apt upgrade pode mostrar o conteúdo do sources.list? assim: # more /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list.d/* :: /etc/apt/sources.list :: deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates main

Re: Bug#922270: kmail - "Name" column in message window can not made smaller

2019-03-04 Thread Hans
Hi Sandro, great! This did the trick. I deleted the line beginning with "Headerstate" and everything is working fine again. However, I knew, that the entry must have been in kmail2rc, but I could not really understand the values in this line. I can only confirm what you said: not really

Re: Bug with soft raid?

2019-02-20 Thread steve
Hello Andy, Thank you very much for your lengthy and very informative answer. After some investigation, I discovered that it was /dev/sdc that had some problems. So I took it out of the Rais 1 array. But this didn't really help since I got other freeze. grep "120 seconds" kern.log Feb 18

Re: Bug with soft raid?

2019-02-15 Thread Andy Smith
Hi Steve, On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 09:35:27AM +0100, steve wrote: > >for i in /dev/sd{b..f}; do echo "DISK: ${i}"; smartctl -l scterc "${i}"; > >sleep 3; done > > I get this for sdb and sdc > > SCT Error Recovery Control: > Read: Disabled > Write: Disabled > > and this for

Re: Bug with soft raid?

2019-02-15 Thread steve
Hi all, Thank you for your answers. Was busy so couldn't answer before. My system disk (with /, /usr, /boot and /boot/efi) is on a separate (non-RAID) disk sda. Maybe this works for you, too? You can try: cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6]

Re: Bug with soft raid?

2019-02-13 Thread Claudio Kuenzler
Hello Steve, As some of the other responders already said, check your drives' SMART values. But a disk may fail without any indication in the SMART table. I've seen this a couple of years ago and documented it here:

Re: Bug with soft raid?

2019-02-13 Thread David Christensen
On 2/12/19 12:48 PM, David Christensen wrote: I had a Linux md RAID0 (mirror) ... Correction -- RAID1 is mirror. David

Re: Bug with soft raid?

2019-02-12 Thread Alexander V. Makartsev
On 12.02.2019 16:08, steve wrote: > Hi There, > > Here is what I get on my up to date stretch box: > > Feb 10 12:19:12 box kernel: [ 7734.562060] INFO: task md0_raid1:461 > blocked for more than 120 seconds. > Feb 10 12:19:12 box kernel: [ 7734.562068]   Tainted: P   > OE

Re: Bug with soft raid?

2019-02-12 Thread David Christensen
On 2/12/19 11:37 AM, Tom Bachreier wrote: Feb 12, 2019, 12:08 PM by dl...@bluewin.ch: The system blocks for about 3 minutes and then I get back a hand on it. I have a similar - maybe the same - problem in buster - see the thread "Software RAID blocks" on this list about a month ago.

Re: Bug with soft raid?

2019-02-12 Thread Tom Bachreier
Feb 12, 2019, 12:08 PM by dl...@bluewin.ch: > Hi There, > > Here is what I get on my up to date stretch box: > > Feb 10 12:19:12 box kernel: [ 7734.562060] INFO: task md0_raid1:461 blocked > for more than 120 seconds. > [...] > Feb 10 12:19:12 box kernel: [ 7734.562192] INFO: task

Re: Bug with soft raid?

2019-02-12 Thread David Christensen
On 2/12/19 3:08 AM, steve wrote: Hi There, Here is what I get on my up to date stretch box: Feb 10 12:19:12 box kernel: [ 7734.562060] INFO: task md0_raid1:461 blocked for more than 120 seconds. and so one. The system blocks for about 3 minutes and then I get back a hand on it. I'm no

Re: Bug#132542: sysvinit: please make /etc/init.d/rcS a conffile

2019-02-02 Thread rhkramer
I don't understand the point of this email -- are you advocating for some change, or to avoid some change? (I looked at the bug report and skimmed some of the messages -- it seems like by posting this to the debian-user list you are looking for comments or support here, but the issue is not

Re: Bug#132542: sysvinit: please make /etc/init.d/rcS a conffile

2019-02-02 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Thorsten Glaser: > Just accept that this idea, originating from the systemd people at Fedora/Freedesktop, is NOT welcome to classical Unix people. Ahem! We classical Unix people experienced this idea in the late 1980s, from where it *really* originated, Sun and AT *

Re: bug a l'X session?

2018-10-22 Thread Ernest Adrogué
Alex Muntada writes: > Anava a suggerir-te que per aquestes coses provis el shellcheck > però veig que la recomanació que dóna és diferent: > > In gpg-tty.sh line 2: > export GPG_TTY=$(tty) >^-- SC2155: Declare and assign separately to avoid masking return > values. > > No tinc clar si

Re: bug a l'X session?

2018-10-21 Thread Alex Muntada
Hola Ernest, > Sí, era aquesta línia: > > export GPG_TTY=$(tty) > > ... > > La solució és posar-ho entre cometes > > export GPG_TTY="$(tty)" Anava a suggerir-te que per aquestes coses provis el shellcheck però veig que la recomanació que dóna és diferent: In gpg-tty.sh line 2: export

Re: bug a l'X session?

2018-10-21 Thread Ernest Adrogué
Antoni Villalonga writes: > Em sembla que alguna comanda dona un error i aquest s'acaba parsejant > malament, resultant un error extrany. Sí, era aquesta línia: export GPG_TTY=$(tty) L'ordre tty tornava el text "no és un tty", de manera que després de la substitució quedava export GPG_TTY=no

Re: bug a l'X session?

2018-10-18 Thread Antoni Villalonga
Hola, Em sembla que alguna comanda dona un error i aquest s'acaba parsejant malament, resultant un error extrany. També podries provar un altre wm. Això pot servir com a wm dummy. Si aguanta 30 segons sense tornar al gestor de sessions #!/usr/bin/env bash sleep 30 Més facil és instalar un

Re: bug a l'X session?

2018-10-17 Thread Ernest Adrogué
Hola, tictacbum writes: > que hi tens a la línia 43 del /etc/X11/Xsession? al meu hi tinc un > comentari, per això m'estranya que et salti a aquesta línia Sí, hi ha un comentari. És l'Xsession de Debian, no l'he tocat. Diria que el número de línia no és fiable, perquè l'Xsession afegeix

Re: bug a l'X session?

2018-10-17 Thread tictacbum
Hola Ernest, que hi tens a la línia 43 del /etc/X11/Xsession? al meu hi tinc un comentari, per això m'estranya que et salti a aquesta línia has provat de comentar tot el de .environment excepte l'export LANG="ca_ES.UTF-8" i provar d'entrar a veure si peta? salut! Lluís Missatge de Ernest Adrogué

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-12 Thread Brad Rogers
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 21:24:42 -0400 Ric Moore wrote: Hello Ric, >Works a charm for me, and has for years, BUT every once in awhile As it does for many, I'm sure. >the volume levels back up to 100%. Pulse rides on top of alsa, so alsa And that's a problem. Now, if sound goes wrong there are

Re: bug

2018-09-12 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 08:28:02PM -0500, james wrote: > E: The value 'stable-updates' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as > such a release is not available in the sources > E: _cache->open() failed, please report. Please post here the contents of

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-11 Thread Ric Moore
On 09/10/2018 08:27 AM, Brad Rogers wrote: On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:53:01 + (UTC) Curt wrote: Hello Curt, So uninstall it then in that unfortunate case--with extreme prejudice Time. Oh, and I can't be arsed to try PA in the first place. :-) Or are we dealing with the supernatural

Re: [beginning OT] Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread rhkramer
On Monday, September 10, 2018 09:37:28 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote: > I could offer my program cdrskin as real example. > It is a cdrecord/wodim compatibility wrapper but exceeds both when it > comes to DVD and BD media. Thanks, for: * the useful example, and * changing the Subject: line

Re: [beginning OT] Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 03:37:28PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Reco wrote: > > > It's the usual. A compatibility wrapper can never exceed the original. > > rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hmm, I don't see why it couldn't in some sense -- I'm trying to think of how > > to

[beginning OT] Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Reco wrote: > > It's the usual. A compatibility wrapper can never exceed the original. rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > Hmm, I don't see why it couldn't in some sense -- I'm trying to think of how > to say what I want to say, let me try a made-up example. I could offer my program cdrskin as real

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Brad Rogers
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:53:01 + (UTC) Curt wrote: Hello Curt, >So uninstall it then in that unfortunate case--with extreme prejudice Time. Oh, and I can't be arsed to try PA in the first place. :-) >Or are we dealing with the supernatural here (software from Hell)? I'm wary because of

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Curt
On 2018-09-10, Brad Rogers wrote: > > The machine it does affect is the one that I routinely use, which has > been in use for longer than PA has been around. I /could/ install PA, > but am reluctant to do so, since sound works here ATM and I'm concerned > that installing PA may cause issues for

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread rhkramer
On Monday, September 10, 2018 05:49:01 AM Reco wrote: > It's the usual. A compatibility wrapper can never exceed the original. Hmm, I don't see why it couldn't in some sense -- I'm trying to think of how to say what I want to say, let me try a made-up example. Suppose some piece of software is

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Brad Rogers
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:49:01 +0300 Reco wrote: Hello Reco, >On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:59:03AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: >> I've not been running apulse long, but so far, no crashes in Ff 62. >So upstream lies then. To quote apulse's README.md: Maybe, maybe not. It's only been a couple of

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:59:03AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 11:43:39 +0300 > Reco wrote: > > Hello Reco, > > >Moreover, apulse causes Firefox to crash since Firefox version 58, as > > I've not been running apulse long, but so far, no crashes in Ff 62. So

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Brad Rogers
On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 11:43:39 +0300 Reco wrote: Hello Reco, >Moreover, apulse causes Firefox to crash since Firefox version 58, as I've not been running apulse long, but so far, no crashes in Ff 62. >apulse is a kludge, not a solution. That's as may be (I don't have an opinion either way).

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-09 Thread deloptes
Rob van der Putten wrote: > Does anyone know why ALSA is no longer supported? You mean supported by Firefox? I guess they decided PA is more easy to implement as default interface ... whatever underlaying audio system you use. I still could not understand why, but this seems irreversible.

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-09 Thread Nicolas George
to...@tuxteam.de (2018-09-09): > Personally, I couldn't care less: I consider my browser's inability > to make sounds a welcome *feature*, so not having Pulse (which is my > default) just naturally takes care of that. Same for me. And apulse seems to work for me anyway. > Given the amount of

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-09 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:24:30AM +0200, Rob van der Putten wrote: > Hi there > > > Note: A reply in bugs failed. > > On 09/09/18 10:08, Marco Lucidi wrote: > > > On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 21:41:11 +0200 Samuel Thibault > > wrote: > > > Unfortunately

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-09 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:24:30AM +0200, Rob van der Putten wrote: > Hi there > > > Note: A reply in bugs failed. > > On 09/09/18 10:08, Marco Lucidi wrote: > > > On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 21:41:11 +0200 Samuel Thibault > > wrote: > > > Unfortunately AIUI upstream has stopped

Re: Bug#900533: The most annoying bug ever: https://bugs.debian.org/900533 , fix it!

2018-07-24 Thread Andreas Ronnquist
On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 17:19:42 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Sun, 2018-07-22 at 18:55 +0300, Askar Safin wrote: - 8< - >> >> I am unable listen music using https://vk.com/audio anymore.

Re: Bug#900533: The most annoying bug ever: https://bugs.debian.org/900533 , fix it!

2018-07-22 Thread Phil Wyett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 2018-07-22 at 18:55 +0300, Askar Safin wrote: > Recently Debian Stretch introduced the most annoying bug ever: https://bugs.de > bian.org/900533 ("chromium 67.0.3396.62-1: youtube video, gif's, html5, and > movies no longer work"). It affects

Re: Bug related to "USB"/unknown package

2018-07-03 Thread Benjamin Herwig
Hi Mike, Thank you a lot. Problem is solved. :-) Best greetings, thanks again Benjamin On 03/07/18 13:53, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 01:18:57PM +0200, Benjamin Herwig wrote: >> I encountered some strange USB behaviour (also others on the internet, >> for example >>

Re: Bug related to "USB"/unknown package

2018-07-03 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 01:18:57PM +0200, Benjamin Herwig wrote: I encountered some strange USB behaviour (also others on the internet, for example https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-hardware-18/what-does-cdc_acm-unknown-symbol-refcount_inc_not_zero-err-0-in-dmesg-mean-4175633136/)

Re: Bug#896806: systemd-resolved violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines

2018-04-30 Thread Charlie S
On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:09:44 -0400 Roberto C. Sánchez sent: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:18:01PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote: > > > > AFAIK it is still there untouched in git sources, as originally > > mentioned in the bug report > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896806

Re: Bug#896806: systemd-resolved violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines

2018-04-30 Thread Brian
On Mon 30 Apr 2018 at 16:18:01 +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:24:19 +0200 to...@tuxteam.de said: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 03:00:07PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 06:43:03 +0200 to...@tuxteam.de said: > > > > [...] > > > > > > It

Re: Bug#896806: systemd-resolved violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines

2018-04-30 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 30 April 2018 10:09:44 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:18:01PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote: > > AFAIK it is still there untouched in git sources, as originally > > mentioned in the bug report > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896806 > > >

Re: Bug#896806: systemd-resolved violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines

2018-04-30 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:18:01PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote: > > AFAIK it is still there untouched in git sources, as originally mentioned in > the bug report https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896806 > > That aside, the question of whether it will ever get fixed in

Re: Bug#896806: systemd-resolved violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines

2018-04-30 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 03:00:07PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 06:43:03 +0200 to...@tuxteam.de said: [...] > > It seems this issue is fixed upstream. Would you like to check that? > > > > Tone down. Apply Hanlon's razor

Re: Bug#896806: systemd-resolved violates The Debian Free Software Guidelines

2018-04-29 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 11:20:00PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote: > On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 12:52:54 -0700 Don Armstrong said: > > > If there is a concern here, it's a privacy concern. Google's public > > statements regarding maintaining privacy and

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >