On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 03:40:22PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
I would try talking to them, inviting them to participate in whatever the
channels mission is, what else could I do?
Then you don't understand the nature of these people. It is like going
into alt.nuke-the-usa (I think that is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 01:16:08 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Then you don't understand the nature of these people. It is like going
into alt.nuke-the-usa (I think that is it) and trying to rationally discuss
topics with anyone there.
No, it
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
[snip]
I agree Steve, there are plenty of Manual(s) to read. But for a new
IRC user they sure confusing. I have been trying to Window it but, as
of yet, no luck.
Sure, there's plenty of documentation, unfortunately that's like
saying MS Office
Subject: Re: bitchx (sucks!)
Date: Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 01:45:18PM -0600
In reply to:steven walsh
Quoting steven walsh([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BitchX suffers from it's own unique form of feature creep. Use
IRCII with a nice
steven walsh dixit:
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
[snip]
I agree Steve, there are plenty of Manual(s) to read. But for a new
IRC user they sure confusing. I have been trying to Window it but, as
of yet, no luck.
Sure, there's plenty of documentation, unfortunately
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
steven walsh dixit:
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
[snip]
I agree Steve, there are plenty of Manual(s) to read. But for a new
IRC user they sure confusing. I have been trying to Window it but, as
of yet, no luck.
Check out http://www.innerx.net/~nuke I need not say more. The package for
epic in debian is called epic4.
--
Rafael Kitover
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpyyBFY6cHF4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 17:17:40 -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
I agree Steve, there are plenty of Manual(s) to read. But for a new
IRC user they sure confusing. I have been trying to Window it but, as
of yet, no luck.
As for anything new, it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 10:44:12 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve, most of the docs you pointed out say next to nothing. One may try to
guess (as surely most bitchx users do) how to work things out, and that
works some times, but not always.
I
- Begin Forwarded Message -
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 15:24:00 -0600 (CST)
From: steven walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bitchx (sucks!)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-MD5: tm9kkgAIpk3NEqxSyKGLDg==
I didn't guess, I RTFM'd. I read in the docs
[l] Help on Topic: index
4OP ABORT ADDIDLE ADDSHIT ADDUSER ADDLAME ADDFORWARD
ADDWORD ADMIN AJOIN AJOINLIST AWAY BACK BAN
BANS BANSTABANTYPE BANWORD BEEP BKBOTLIST
BYE C CDCDCC
: Normal
X-Mailer: PMMail 99 Professional (2.10.0382) For Windows NT (4.0.1381;3)
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: bitchx (sucks!)
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 15:24:01 -0600 (CST), steven walsh wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 15:51:00 -0600 (CST), steven walsh wrote:
Funny, looks alphabetized to me.
Man, cwhom. Chgaop cghchanch... VERY INFORMATIVE. Alphabetical
sorting isn't enough, help should be helpful.
You said it wasn't
On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 02:06:18PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
The ability of some IRCers to blatantly ban entire countries because of the
acts of a few is why EfNet is in a decline. Too many little kids fighting
for power in a virtual medium. It's funny in a sad sort of way.
It was on
Could that be because your domain is banned? I bet it is. And why?
Because they had problems with people from your domain flooding, spamming
and clonning on their channel. Some of the channels I ran banned entire
COUNTRIES because of people like that.
Now I can freely assume that
In a message dated 3/9/99 4:33:12 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
See what you want, just know that you're more than likely 100% wrong.
I can only see what you project with your attitudes and behaviors.
Which are only a reflection of your own.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:24:21 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Yeah, why should we try to improve our social life when a simple ban command
makes us feel powerful.
Banning and ignoring is the simplest way to deal with social problems.
No, banning
Steve Lamb dixit:
[ ... ] btw, so please, stop preaching to the choir.
and just what's calling someone publicly a clueless newbie... whining... ?
Horacio
On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 02:55:43PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
No, banning is the way to get control of an otherwise unwieldy
situation. Have you been on a channel that gets 10-20 clone/flood attacks
per week? You can that a social problem but tell me, exactly how would
*YOU* solve it,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 00:32:39 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
There is no general solution to such a problem, but I have seen worse in
Real Life. Sure, you can lock the door, but then?
See who is knocking.
I would try talking to
Sorry about that (), but even if the program itself is damn good, the docs
and /help really suck... further more, #bitchx SUCKS.
I've been desperately trying to get help around, and even went to #bitchx at
irc.chat.org, just to be kicked out every time I try to join it, the reason
being spammers
:
Sorry about that (), but even if the program itself is damn good, the docs
and /help really suck... further more, #bitchx SUCKS.
I've been desperately trying to get help around, and even went to #bitchx at
irc.chat.org, just to be kicked out every time I try to join it, the reason
being spammers
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BitchX suffers from it's own unique form of feature creep. Use
IRCII with a nice script (one you are comfortable with and hopefully has
no nasty backdoors like the ircN script that mIRC had *snicker*).
I hear EPIC is a nice client as
Thanks Lawrence and Stephen,
I downloaded ircii and it looks better documented than bitchx. I still
don't know how to deal with the scripts, but they look promising and fun,
and I even found a mailing list for ircii.
Horacio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 19:53:26 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about that (), but even if the program itself is damn good, the docs
and /help really suck... further more, #bitchx SUCKS.
/bhelp, not /help. /help is the ircII help files
Subject: Re: bitchx (sucks!)
Date: Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 01:30:33PM -0800
In reply to:Steve Lamb
Quoting Steve Lamb([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 19:53:26 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about that (), but even
26 matches
Mail list logo
