0400]:
> CPAN is a repository for Perl modules [...] but in general
> using the Debian dh-make-perl package to pull a CPAN
> module and convert it into a .deb will make you happiest.
That fails because of the same Catch-22: dh-make-perl *depends*
on CPAN, and CPAN *itself* is broken. All dh-make-perl do
.org
> Cc: jasheb...@aol.com
> Sent: Fri, Nov 19, 2021 11:10 am
> Subject: Re: installation catch 22
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 9:36 AM wrote:
>
>
> The installation runs through to completion but the system does not boot
> up.
> I have tried several times
jasheb...@aol.com wrote:
> I have been trying to install Debian on an older computer using the CD1
> install.
> The installation runs through to completion but the system does not boot up.I
> have tried several times with the same result.
> I am able to log in and look at the log file where it
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 9:36 AM wrote:
>
> The installation runs through to completion but the system does not boot
> up.
> I have tried several times with the same result.
>
> I am able to log in and look at the log file where it informs me that some
> firmware
> needs to be updated. (red
I have been trying to install Debian on an older computer using the CD1 install.
The installation runs through to completion but the system does not boot up.I
have tried several times with the same result.
I am able to log in and look at the log file where it informs me that some
firmwareneeds
On 2019-04-03, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I was going to document here the work-a-round I successfully used
> yesterday to install desired additional packages.
There's a bug report concerning this from 2014.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745381
In that thread our very own
Richard Owlett writes:
> At this point, the same cognoscenti who bemoan Linux lacking market
> penetration tell him to go read some techie manuals and perform arcane
> incantations. As true ostriches they insist the problem is "operator
> error".
This is a good way to not get any help.
--
John
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019, 8:26 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> At this point, the same cognoscenti who bemoan Linux lacking market
> penetration tell him to go read some techie manuals and perform arcane
> incantations. As true ostriches they insist the problem is "operator
> error".
>
This is a
Rather than quote my original post, I'll restate the underlying problem.
In the beginning, Joe Average would obtain Debian on a set of physical
installation CDs. He boots from it. The installer does it's thing.
Later, desiring additional software, he inserts the same CD and allows
Synaptic to
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 05:33:05AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
> I was wondering about that. I've never had a clear understanding of
> when to use 1 slash and when to use 3. I assumed that in this case 1
> was acceptable because how Synaptic's error message was phrased when
> attempting
On 04/01/2019 06:11 PM, Jason wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 07:23:49AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/31/2019 08:55 AM, bw wrote:
In-Reply-To:
The installation, having put the DVD1 ISO on a flash drive, encountered
no problems
*HOWEVER* I need several packages [gparted, tcl, tk]
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 07:23:49AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/31/2019 08:55 AM, bw wrote:
> >In-Reply-To:
> >
> >
> >>The installation, having put the DVD1 ISO on a flash drive, encountered
> >>no problems
> >>
> >>
> >>*HOWEVER* I need several packages [gparted, tcl, tk] which are in
On 04/01/2019 02:51 AM, didier gaumet wrote:
Le 31/03/2019 à 15:28, Richard Owlett a écrit :
[...]
I added the line
deb "file:/media/richard/Debian testing amd64 1/debian" buster contrib
main
to the beginning of sources.list .
[...]
This is unacceptable when installation via an iso image
On 03/31/2019 08:55 AM, bw wrote:
In-Reply-To:
The installation, having put the DVD1 ISO on a flash drive, encountered
no problems
*HOWEVER* I need several packages [gparted, tcl, tk] which are in the DVD
image.
Synaptic is unable to install them:
1. sources.list refers to a
Le 31/03/2019 à 15:28, Richard Owlett a écrit :
[...]
> I added the line
>> deb "file:/media/richard/Debian testing amd64 1/debian" buster contrib
>> main
>
> to the beginning of sources.list .
[...]
> This is unacceptable when installation via an iso image on a flash drive
> is becoming more and
I wish to install Buster on a machine with essentially *NO* internet
connectivity.
I downloaded the DVD1 ISO on my primary machine [creates secondary
problem of being up against data cap].
The installation, having put the DVD1 ISO on a flash drive, encountered
no problems
*HOWEVER* I need
Good to know.
I was going to suggest that maybe your Internet connection was failing,
but I did not do so because you checked it with another machine.
On 17/08/17 11:04, Kynn Jones wrote:
> It appears that the problem was a network misconfiguration (outside of my
> control), and it is now
hours before this sudden failure. The package is definitely
> installed, and the error above persists even after I run `dpkg-reconfigure
> -p low ntp` (which requires no input from me).
>
> The only fix I can think of at this point would be to reinstall ntp
> altogether, but I ca
settings for this are in /etc/systemd/timesyncd.conf.
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017,
Kynn Jones wrote:
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:51:15
From: Kynn Jones <kyn...@gmail.com>
To: Debian User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: How to get around ntpd catch-22?
Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2
n User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: How to get around ntpd catch-22?
Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:51:44 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
I installed Debian on a (legacy) Optiplex 9010 desktop, using a minimal USB
installation image, and netinst
It appears that the problem was a network misconfiguration (outside of my
control), and it is now resolved.
Sorry for the confusing query.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:00:48AM -0500, Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
> Dear sir, unfortunately I do not have a solution to your problem, but I
> want to note that in “Failed to start ntpd.service: Unit nptd.service
> not found.” the name of ntpd was spelled “nptd”; maybe that is the
> source of
so I have a
Catch-22 situation.
How can I fix this problem without having an internet connection?
---
Aug 17 10:00:42 myhost ntpd[757]: error resolving pool 3.debian.pool.ntp.org:
Temporary failure in name resolution (-3)
Aug 17 10:00:45 myhost systemd[1]: Stopping Raise network interfaces...
Mark Grieveson wrote:
Hello. Just some info for those considering upgrading from Sarge to
Etch (or Sid). I just upgraded my system from Debian Sarge, to Debian
Sid. I initially set out to upgrade to Etch, but circumstances drove me
to Sid. I changed the repositories in my sources.list
Mark Grieveson wrote:
Hello. Just some info for those considering upgrading from Sarge to
Etch (or Sid). I just upgraded my system from Debian Sarge, to Debian
Sid. I initially set out to upgrade to Etch, but circumstances drove me
to Sid. I changed the repositories in my sources.list from
Hello. Just some info for those considering upgrading from Sarge to
Etch (or Sid). I just upgraded my system from Debian Sarge, to Debian
Sid. I initially set out to upgrade to Etch, but circumstances drove me
to Sid.
I changed the repositories in my sources.list from sarge to etch, and
Mark Grieveson wrote:
I'm hoping one day that I'll be samrt and actually make a back-up of
my system before trying stuff like upgrading again.
You should always have backups. If you are running unstable, you should
make the backups NOW. You never know what is going to happen in the next
was how irritating the udev/kernel image catch-22
was. I know others have dealt with this quandary too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sunday, 12 February 2006 12:21, Mark Grieveson wrote:
Thanks for the tips. I did install OpenOffice.org 2.0, and it works
well. My main point was how irritating the udev/kernel image
catch-22 was. I know others have dealt with this quandary too.
In my experience, aptitude is quite, eh, apt
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 04:09:51PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:57:52AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Thomas H. George wrote:
My Belkin UPS probably saved my computer from the power surge but its
internal programming is probably fried. I reinstalled the software
If this is a re-posting, my apologies. The original was reported Mail
Delivery Failed and did not appear in the list I downloaded. In
another case I re-posted a message after receiving the Mail Delivery
Failed notice, the re-posting did appear when I downloaded the list and
there was a
Thomas H. George wrote:
My Belkin UPS probably saved my computer from the power surge but its
internal programming is probably fried. I reinstalled the software from
the Linux tarball changing all the ownerships to root:tom and all the
permissions to 770.
Please be specific. What
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:57:52AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Thomas H. George wrote:
My Belkin UPS probably saved my computer from the power surge but its
internal programming is probably fried. I reinstalled the software from
the Linux tarball changing all the ownerships to root:tom and
My Belkin UPS probably saved my computer from the power surge but its
internal programming is probably fried. I reinstalled the software from
the Linux tarball changing all the ownerships to root:tom and all the
permissions to 770. This allows me to display the monitor but I cannot
change
Can someone please help me ~ I am getting error message that
my base-config is not OK because console-data is not configured
{ which I have tried to do in KDE control center}
1) when I try dpkg --configure console-data I get error that
base-config is not completed.
2) when I try dpkg
On Tuesday, 04. Dec. 2001 at 20:49:11, tabanna wrote:
Can someone please help me ~ I am getting error message that
my base-config is not OK because console-data is not configured
{ which I have tried to do in KDE control center}
1) when I try dpkg --configure console-data I get error
on Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 08:49:11PM +, tabanna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Can someone please help me ~ I am getting error message that
my base-config is not OK because console-data is not configured
{ which I have tried to do in KDE control center}
1) when I try dpkg --configure
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 08:49:11PM +, tabanna wrote:
1) when I try dpkg --configure console-data I get error that
base-config is not completed.
2) when I try dpkg --configure base-config I get error that
console-data is not completed
So 'dpkg --configure base-config
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, tabanna wrote:
How can I cut out from this circle, and Fix matters ?
Try:
dpkg -i console-data* base-config*
Oki
Argh.
I have a Woody machine that attempted
to go through an upgrade last night and
is now in dpkg jail.
ppp tries to upgrade but bails with:
Unpacking replacement ppp ...
depmod: Unexpected value (20) in '/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kern
el/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.o' for
thing.
Thanks again for your help. At least some
learning will come of this. :)
-=greg
- Original Message -
From: Timothy Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Greg Wiley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: Upgrade Catch-22
This is an easy one to fix
On Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds like you are going to have to use method 2.
edit /var/lib/dpkg/status to trick dpkg into thinking modutils are not
installed.
Get a hold of modutils 2.4.8.1 from somewhere.
Install this manually with dpkg -i
When you
I have been plagued by this for a long time, decided to do something about
it and messed up. Who has kind words of advice?
I'm running Potato 2.2r1 on a P200 desktop. For some reason (honestly, I
didn't do it consciously) irda-common-0.9.5-2 was installed, but never
wanted to get configured (and
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:18:40PM +0200, Hans wrote:
I'm running Potato 2.2r1 on a P200 desktop. For some reason (honestly, I
didn't do it consciously) irda-common-0.9.5-2 was installed, but never
wanted to get configured (and I don't even have ir hardware installed). It
also wouldn't let
dpkg --force-reinstreq --purge irda-common
See dpkg(8) and dpkg --force-help for details. Be warned that this has the
potentiol to break your system. Realistically, it's probably ok for this
package, especially since you've never actually installed it properly.
I think you meant dpkg
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Hans wrote:
dpkg --force-reinstreq --purge irda-common
See dpkg(8) and dpkg --force-help for details. Be warned that this has the
potentiol to break your system. Realistically, it's probably ok for this
package, especially since you've never actually installed it
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 02:55:56PM +0200, Hans wrote:
dpkg --force-reinstreq --purge irda-common
See dpkg(8) and dpkg --force-help for details. Be warned that this has the
potentiol to break your system. Realistically, it's probably ok for this
package, especially since you've never
When all else fails, do it manually.
You can edit the entry for the package out of /var/lib/dpkg/status,
then use the info in /var/lib/dpkg/info/package-name.list to rm the
files in the package. You'll also want to check for anything done by
the {pre,post}{inst,rm} scripts in the info dir. Best
At home I have a laptop where win98 and linux co-exist, with lilo offering
to boot either one at startup. But at office, after linux installs lilo to
MBR,
NT won't boot. So, I went to boot floppy, ran fdisk /mbr; but now
machine won't boot linux. Boot floppy won't work for linux either.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At home I have a laptop where win98 and linux co-exist, with lilo offering
to boot either one at startup. But at office, after linux installs lilo to
MBR,
NT won't boot. So, I went to boot floppy, ran fdisk /mbr; but now
machine won't boot linux. Boot floppy
Pending further investigation, we now allege that [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At home I have a laptop where win98 and linux co-exist, with lilo offering
to boot either one at startup. But at office, after linux installs lilo to
MBR,
NT won't boot. So, I went to boot floppy, ran fdisk /mbr; but
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 06:25:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At home I have a laptop where win98 and linux co-exist, with lilo offering
to boot either one at startup. But at office, after linux installs lilo to
MBR,
NT won't boot. So, I went to boot floppy, ran fdisk /mbr; but now
i did this recently, and as a solution i just created a 15MB C: drive
for
the boot loader(primary partition) then Linux got a /boot partition
and NT got it's own primary partition. then i load LILO to the MBR and
tell
it to boot to C: (which then loads NT's boot loader) to load NT
or load linux
I did not install SCSI support during my debian-2.2.17pre6
installation, since I have no SCSI devices.
I have one backup mechanism, a CD-Rewritable drive.
The CD-Rewritable howto says I need SCSI support.
(whoops!)
I am eager to try making a debian kernel,
to make sure only the drivers I need
Lo, on Saturday, December 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] did write:
I am eager to try making a debian kernel, to make sure only the drivers I
need are there, but first I need to make a backup !!!
While backups never hurt, a kernel rebuild shouldn't require backups. If
you leave out some necessary
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 15:32:34 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I did not install SCSI support during my debian-2.2.17pre6
installation, since I have no SCSI devices.
I have one backup mechanism, a CD-Rewritable drive.
The CD-Rewritable howto says I need SCSI support.
(whoops!)
I
On 23 Dec 2000 16:27:02 EST, mikpolniak said:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 15:32:34 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I did not install SCSI support during my debian-2.2.17pre6
installation, since I have no SCSI devices.
I have one backup mechanism, a CD-Rewritable drive.
The
Can anyone explain to me how you can install g++ ?
I checked debian.org to find that
g++ depends on
http://www.debian.org/Packages/stable/devel/g++.html
thats great, so one of the dependencies is
libstdc++2.10-dev
But libstdc++2.10-dev depends on g++
Richard Jenniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone explain to me how you can install g++ ?
I checked debian.org to find that g++ depends on
http://www.debian.org/Packages/stable/devel/g++.html
http://www.debian.org/Packages/stable/devel/g++.html
thats great, so one of the
On Mon, 1 Jan 1996, Ted Llewellyn wrote:
Well, this is very pretty.I'm running Debian 2.0 with the default
SANE--the doc says v0.71 but I think it's v0.74. I was going to upgrade
to version 1.0. To do that, I have to install the new libc6, and to do
that I have to upgrade libstdc++2.8,
Well, this is very pretty.I'm running Debian 2.0 with the default
SANE--the doc says v0.71 but I think it's v0.74. I was going to upgrade
to version 1.0. To do that, I have to install the new libc6, and to do
that I have to upgrade libstdc++2.8, and apparently to do THAT, dpkg has
to
On Mon, Jan 01, 1996 at 20:12:48 +, Ted Llewellyn wrote:
Well, this is very pretty.I'm running Debian 2.0 with the default
SANE--the doc says v0.71 but I think it's v0.74. I was going to upgrade
to version 1.0. To do that, I have to install the new libc6, and to do
that I have to
Hi
Ship's Log, Lt. Ted Llewellyn, Stardate 010196.2012:
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 1996 20:12:48 +
WOW .. a 2 Year old Email ... :-)
did this mail get lost or is your date set a bit wrong ?
greetings
--
Alexander N. Benner - The Seven Promises of a Promise Keeper: -7-
A Promise Keeper is
Is the list catching up on OLD mail or has someone forgotten to set
their clock up?
Subject: SANE install catch-22
Date: Mon, Jan 01, 1996 at 08:12:48PM +
In reply to:Ted Llewellyn
Quoting Ted Llewellyn([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Well, this is very pretty.I'm running
Well, everyone has picked up on the date. Can anyone answer the question?
_ () _-- __() Ted Llewellyn
) _-- /
/_--/__---
(/ (/
On Fri, 11 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW: Your clock has the wrong date (1.1.1996)
Alex.
Sergey wrote:
The package route is still better, but you don't have to use dselect.
There's no problem about using dselect. Tell it you don't have a
Packages file, when it asks for the path to the main packages, give
it the path you have and tell it to 'scan' for packages. Make all
the other
First of all, thanks to everyone who responded. Using dpkg is just what
I needed to do.
However, I now have run into a new problem. I've installed the gcc,
binutils, make and patch packages and their dependancies. I patched
the 2.0.35 kernal. I followed the instructions at the kernal.org
On Sat, 31 Oct 1998, Jerry E. McGoveran wrote:
Then I ran make zImage (takes awhile!) and it aborted with the following
error:
as86 -0 -a -o bootsect.o bootsect.s
make[1]: as86: Command not found
***[bootsect.o] Error 127
***[zImage] Error 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED](pa):bhmit1$ dpkg -S as86
On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Jerry E. McGoveran wrote:
I have a Debian installation in which the ethernet card driver is
apparently not installed. There were some errors at this stage of
the installation process, but the screen drew and reset to the inst.
menu too fast to read anything. I finished
At 06:37 PM 10/28/98 -0600, Andy Kennedy wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Jerry E. McGoveran wrote:
I have a Debian installation in which the ethernet card driver is
apparently not installed. There were some errors at this stage of
the installation process, but the screen drew and reset to the
On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Jerry E. McGoveran wrote:
At 06:37 PM 10/28/98 -0600, Andy Kennedy wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Jerry E. McGoveran wrote:
I have a Debian installation in which the ethernet card driver is
apparently not installed. There were some errors at this stage of
the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10/28/98
at 12:53 PM, Jerry E. McGoveran [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have a Debian installation in which the ethernet card driver is
apparently not installed. There were some errors at this stage of the
installation process, but the screen drew and reset to the inst.
You can always (under win95) go to the debian ftp site and download
any .deb package, then boot linux and mount the windows partition.
Then cd to the directory with the .deb and do a dpkg -i filename.deb.
My system has a windows partition, and I have that listed in my
/etc/fstab so it is mounted
On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Jerry E. McGoveran wrote:
: At 06:37 PM 10/28/98 -0600, Andy Kennedy wrote:
: On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Jerry E. McGoveran wrote:
:
: I have a Debian installation in which the ethernet card driver is
: apparently not installed. There were some errors at this stage of
:
I have a Debian installation in which the ethernet card driver is
apparently not installed. There were some errors at this stage of
the installation process, but the screen drew and reset to the inst.
menu too fast to read anything. I finished the installation, and
now I need to update the
I hope you can help me find out the origin or how we got this catch 22
phrase?
I would appreciate a respomse from you. I got to you page when I did a
search on catch 22
Thank you in advance.
Ofori Boateng
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED
I hope you can help me find out the origin or how we got this catch 22
phrase?
I would appreciate a respomse from you. I got to you page when I did a
search on catch 22
Thank you in advance.
Ofori Boateng
Searching for catch 22 brought you to the Debian pages because of
this thread
At 09:01 22/08/96 -0400, you wrote:
Hi Fun --
hi Su:)
dpkg --info libgdbm1_1.7.3-11.deb
yields:
...
Depends: libc5 (=5.2.16-1)
...
You quite right, but i have libgdbm1_1.7.3.8 ... thats my other problem, i
cant find lib3-11 ...
I even had a look at ftp.debian.org, i can find this version ...
Hi i just grabbed the unstable apache package. I tried to install it
and it wouldnt because it need libc5 and libdbgm1 (?). I grabbed these
packages installed libc5 and then tried installing libdbgm1, guess what,
libdbgm1 wont intsall because it wants version libc5-16 while i have
libc5-18.
Hi Fun --
You said:
Hi i just grabbed the unstable apache package. I tried to install it
and it wouldnt because it need libc5 and libdbgm1 (?). I grabbed these
packages installed libc5 and then tried installing libdbgm1, guess what,
libdbgm1 wont intsall because it wants version libc5-16
Thanks to all the Debian L'ers for the suggestions on how to
deal with this problem, especially Dwarf, Guy, Jim and Heiko.
I did manage to correctly get a fresh source and image installed
by using Heiko's suggestion (or a very close version of it)! I
changed the status file to read purge ok
Hi Paul --
You said:
My CD is on a SB16 card. I've told the new kernel
NOT to load modules (N to kerneld) and somehow, what is now
happening is SB driver loads during boot, and then later in the
boot process I see loading modules, and you guessed it, it loads
sbpcd as a module also!
The
manually created the symlink
Jim,
THANKS! I'll give that a try.best suggestion I've heard today
:-)
Paul
- Jim
I've managed to get myself in a catch-22 kind of dilemma. In an effort
to get a working 2.0.0 kernel with the proper options to support IP
masquerading, somehow or other both my kernel-image and kernel-source
packages have gotten to a state where I'm stuck fast!
Before you try anything
On 23:36:54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
masquerading, somehow or other both my kernel-image and kernel-source
packages have gotten to a state where I'm stuck fast!
Before you try anything drastic, check the #!/... line of the
post-install scripts for the kernel. Mine pointed to a non-
existent
On 7 Aug 1996, Jim Pick wrote:
I had the same problem with a virgin Debian 1.1 installation. I
investigated and found that the kernel-image/kernel-source postinst
and prerm scripts reference #! /bin/perl.
However, on my virgin Debian 1.1 installation, there was no
symlink from /bin/perl
Jim Pick wrote on 08 Aug 1996 04:44:21 +1000:
wb2oyc ... In an effort to get a working 2.0.0 kernel with the
wb2oyc proper options ... results in errors during the prerem
wb2oyc or postrem scripts for both the source and image package.
Jim I had the same problem with a virgin
On 14:19:59 Guy Maor wrote:
On Tue, 6 Aug 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some way to force dpkg to reinstall (or remove) in spite of the
error it encounters attempting to remove the older package first?
Type `dpkg --force-help' for instructions on forcing options. I think
you want
On Tue, 6 Aug 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some way to force dpkg to reinstall (or remove) in spite of the
error it encounters attempting to remove the older package first?
Type `dpkg --force-help' for instructions on forcing options. I think
you want --force-remove-reinstreq. Be
On Wed, 7 Aug 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the try Guy, but no help there. Been there, done that. The
remove (or forced install) doesn't work either, for the same reason.
The prerem and/or the postrem script fails. Actually, I thought the force
option would be the answer, but I
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've managed to get myself in a catch-22 kind of dilemma. In an effort
to get a working 2.0.0 kernel with the proper options to support IP
masquerading, somehow or other both my kernel-image and kernel-source
packages have gotten
Oh Debian L'ers,
I've managed to get myself in a catch-22 kind of dilemma. In an effort
to get a working 2.0.0 kernel with the proper options to support IP
masquerading, somehow or other both my kernel-image and kernel-source
packages have gotten to a state where I'm stuck fast! I cannot
92 matches
Mail list logo
