Am 25.07.2024 um 06:52 schrieb Sam Lander:
> Rackspace Xen 4.7 linux-image-4.19.0-26-cloud-amd64 works,
> linux-image-4.19.0-27-cloud-amd64 does not work.
FWIW: I do not use the *clowd* kernels, but the regular ones in my VM's:
> uname -a
> Linux SuperServer 4.19.0-27-amd64 #
Summary
Rackspace Xen 4.7 linux-image-4.19.0-26-cloud-amd64 works,
linux-image-4.19.0-27-cloud-amd64 does not work.
I am running Buster on Rackspace inside a 1GB basic model VM
At the end of June, linux-image-4.19.0-27-cloud-amd64 was added as a
security update
My unattended-upgrades script
> > > Hello,
> > > I am using a Kali Linux
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?q=kali+linux+support
> >
> >
Aleix,
That's not a Debian kernel version, potentially.
Kali Linux? We've tried to tell you - most of us don't run / have
never run Kali for an
How do you install them and tell me the characteristics of your computer
El El mié, 17 jul 2024 a las 2:38, Greg Wooledge
escribió:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 19:30:20 -, Prajnanaswaroopa wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I am using a Kali Linux
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=kali+linux+support
>
>
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 07:55:29PM -0600, Shawn Jefferds wrote:
Your final statement makes me curious about learning Dvorak.
Shawn Jefferds
??n ??f?rdz
Noli fovere canem ardentum
Vote Vader 2024!
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 11:37 Russell L. Harris wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 04:48:19PM
; to write a virus for Linux than for Windows, but the R number for such
> a virus, as epidemiologists would put it, would be very much less than
> one, so there's no point. No propagation. I think this would change,
> but this is of course just an opinion.
>
Linux servers are running headles
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 04:48:19PM +0800, hlyg wrote:
On 7/21/24 02:33, Russell L. Harris wrote:
The same reasons the standard typewriter keyboard is QWERTY rather
than Dvorak:
= The precedent set by the first to market is powerful.
= The influence of advertising upon a populace lacking in
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 12:19 PM Hans wrote:
>
> I do not agree to this. Updates should be installed as soon as they are
> available. Especially security updates. It shows , that within 24 hours after
> the release of an update, an exploit is available for this security hole.
I think you may be
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > - software updates that run as root (including Debian updates)
> > can run anything else as root
>
> So, maybe a more relevant discussion is: what will happen when a Debian
> stable security update comes with a "big blunder" that crashes the most
> machines in
hlyg writes:
> why free OS hasn't gained more share even after 30 years of development?
But it has. The internet and what connects to it now mostly run Linux,
other than Microsoft's single niche. Mobile phones run a Linux
variant. The PC desktop is the only exception where they have
dominat
On 2024-07-20 at 22:07, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 9:46 PM The Wanderer
> wrote:
>
>> On 2024-07-20 at 09:19, jeremy ardley wrote:
>>> The problem is the Windows Systems Administrators who contracted
>>> for / allowed unattended remote updates of kernel drivers on
>>> live
I do not agree to this. Updates should be installed as soon as they are
available. Especially security updates. It shows , that within 24 hours after
the release of an update, an exploit is available for this security hole.
But you should do it corrdectly, like some hospitals did: First check
run things also value what their MBA
>> says. And since there is no one to sue to cover their personal butt
>> in case the system goes south like cloudflare has in the last 3
>> days, M$ & cloudflare are a brick and morter legal target they can
>> sic the legal team onto
Dan Ritter writes:
> Richmond wrote:
>> Jeffrey Walton writes:
>>
>> Yes the updates should be tested at every stage. Maybe people think that
>> they cannot stop updates, but they can use Group Policy to stop Windows
>> Update. Or maybe they are afraid if they don't allow virus updates then
Joe (12024-07-21):
> And the important phrase there is 'if you want to'. The point is that
> many people, especially those accustomed to running with admin
> privileges on their Windows computers, would continue to do that.
No, they will not. They will continue to follow the system
default,
Alain D D Williams (12024-07-21):
> I only needed root as it was for another user.
Exactly. On a computer with only one user account, once the pirate have
access to that account, they can do everything that matters. Including
spy the root password next time it is typed, but why waste the time
ff to Google
(but not keystrokes I think), MS Edge does likewise - which is why I stick to
Firefox.
But if you have root access it is easy, I did it on a Unix system V machine in
the late 1980s, a few minutes work. I only needed root as it was for another
user.
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail
Joe (12024-07-21):
> I accept what you say, the point I was making is that the more users,
> and they will be less IT-competent users, the more will login as root.
No, they will not.
And it does not matter, because on a personal computer the root account
is not what matters, what matters is the
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 22:13:00 +0200
Hans wrote:
> > You missed one: Linux is virtually a virus-free environment, and a
> > large user base would mean many more people running as root, and it
> > would become worth the time of malware writers to target Linux.
> > Linux woul
> - software updates that run as root (including Debian updates)
> can run anything else as root
So, maybe a more relevant discussion is: what will happen when a Debian
stable security update comes with a "big blunder" that crashes the most
machines in early boot?
Admittedly, the wider
Richmond wrote:
> Jeffrey Walton writes:
>
> Yes the updates should be tested at every stage. Maybe people think that
> they cannot stop updates, but they can use Group Policy to stop Windows
> Update. Or maybe they are afraid if they don't allow virus updates then
> they will allow a virus?
Jeffrey Walton writes:
> This is alarming (to me) from the YC post:
>
> "we push software to your machines any time we want,
> whether or not it's urgent, without testing it" seems to be
> core to the model...
>
> Updates need to be tested inside an organization's lab, and then
>
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 12:40 AM wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 03:27:17PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > And even you Hans, leave out the major, all encompassing, reason for the
> > lack of market share, which is that most business that have a
> computerized
> > system to run things
Contrary to popular belief, the QWERTY layout was not designed to slow the
typist down, but rather to speed up typing.
Indeed, there is evidence that, aside from the issue of jamming, placing
often-used keys farther apart increases typing speed, because it encourages
alternation between the
hlyg (12024-07-21):
> is it possible to remap keyboard to Dvorak in X Window?
Yes, of course.
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=Debian+dvorak
> does anyone use it
> to speed up typing?
No, only to feel smug.
# Later experiments have shown
On 7/21/24 02:33, Russell L. Harris wrote:
The same reasons the standard typewriter keyboard is QWERTY rather
than Dvorak:
= The precedent set by the first to market is powerful.
= The influence of advertising upon a populace lacking in discernment
and addicted to novelty is deadly.
Add to
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 2:15 AM Andy Smith wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 10:28:28AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> > Crowdstrike did not strike at Linux or BSD UNIX systems - only MS Windows
> > systems.
>
> Except that time just a few months ago when it *did* happe
lesson will not be learned and that most will
largely forget this before too long.
:-(
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT
Lecturer.
+44 (0) 787 668 0256 https://www.phcomp.co.uk/
Parliament Hill Computers. Registration Information:
ell you what to do but not why, I have sometimes found that the recommendation
is wrong and that enabling something else is a better solution.
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT
Lecturer.
+44 (0) 787 668 0256 https://www.phcomp.co.uk/
Parliam
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 03:27:17PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
[...]
> And even you Hans, leave out the major, all encompassing, reason for the
> lack of market share, which is that most business that have a computerized
> system to run things also value what their MBA says. And since there is
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 10:28:28AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> Crowdstrike did not strike at Linux or BSD UNIX systems - only MS Windows
> systems.
Except that time just a few months ago when it *did* happen to
Crowdstrike+Linux?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41005936
N
and the CEO's and the CIO's of the institutions -
government departments and businesses, who were not running Linux or BSD
UNIX instead of MS Windows.
Crowdstrike did not strike at Linux or BSD UNIX systems - only MS
Windows systems.
..
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
(UTC+0800)
..
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 9:46 PM The Wanderer wrote:
>
> On 2024-07-20 at 09:19, jeremy ardley wrote:
>
> > On 20/7/24 18:35, George at Clug wrote:
> > [...]
> > The problem was not CrowdStrike as such. It happens in the best of
> > operations.
> >
> > The problem is the Windows Systems
On 21/7/24 07:28, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
Again lacking data center experience? Every server in your data center
that is outward-facing will be contacted by intruders on its open ports.
That includes your Debian servers. If your apache server or application
server running on Debian is
On 21/7/24 06:38, The Wanderer wrote:
The first would be poor institutional practice; the others would be
potentially-questionable software design, although it's hard to know
without seeing the internal architecture of the software in question and
understanding*why* it's designed that way.
On 7/20/24 16:45, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 11:54:06AM +0800, hlyg wrote:
crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue screens
it is evident that many people around still use Windows
i wonder if linux is more reliable than
On Sunday, 21-07-2024 at 08:38 The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2024-07-20 at 09:19, jeremy ardley wrote:
>
> > On 20/7/24 18:35, George at Clug wrote:
> >
> >> On Saturday, 20-07-2024 at 13:54 hlyg wrote:
> >>
> >>> crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue
> >>> screens
> >>
> >>
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 2:09 PM Joe wrote:
>
> You missed one: Linux is virtually a virus-free environment, and a
> large user base would mean many more people running as root, and it
> would become worth the time of malware writers to target Linux. Linux
> would become as virus-ri
On 2024-07-20 at 09:19, jeremy ardley wrote:
> On 20/7/24 18:35, George at Clug wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, 20-07-2024 at 13:54 hlyg wrote:
>>
>>> crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue
>>> screens
>>
>> The CrowdStrike issue was not a Windows issue, it was a CrowdStrike
>>
Thank Clug and all that reply !
On 7/20/24 18:36, George at Clug wrote:
Do you think Windows is not reliable? Why is that?
Windows used to crash often, i rarely use it now, they say it's more
stable these day
Do you use Linux yourself?
surely i use as this is debian user list
Have you
Andy Smith (12024-07-20):
> And yes here in the UK where we allowed the Post Office to pay
> billions to Fujitsu to develop the Horizon IT system that
> incorrectly accused hundreds of postmasters of fraud, resulting in
> criminal prosecutions and at least one case of suicide.
That was not a bug,
no real consequences for those people to blame.
We will be lucky to see any criminal prosecution of Post Office
management, if there are any they will be a joke, and absolutely
nothing will happen to the vendor Fujitsu UK.
There is still nothing stopping a Horizon IT incident on Linux.
So yes, agreed,
Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 11:54:06AM +0800, hlyg wrote:
> > crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue screens
> >
> > it is evident that many people around still use Windows
> >
> > i wonder
I would think linux is better as server OS due to reasons of security,
performance and
Operability etc.
Once aol mail was running on windows. But now aol is merged into yahoo
mail which was originally run on freebsd but now linux mostly.
And the initial hotmail was running on freebsd too
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 11:54:06AM +0800, hlyg wrote:
> crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue screens
>
> it is evident that many people around still use Windows
>
> i wonder if linux is more reliable than Windows
For this specific issue, if Linux were u
> You missed one: Linux is virtually a virus-free environment, and a
> large user base would mean many more people running as root, and it
> would become worth the time of malware writers to target Linux. Linux
> would become as virus-ridden as Windows.
>
> It would also become
and when the market will rule things,
then many good developers will be pushed away or demoralied. Because it will
become common, that people will no more cherish theire work.
The development of a few people will be cherished, those, who create programs,
the market wants.
I am using linux since more than
be cherished, those, who create
> programs, the market wants.
>
> I am using linux since more than 30 years and it is impressive, what
> people can do, when they can do, what they want and what they like.
>
> And look at the quality, look, what has been created since the
> beg
The same reasons the standard typewriter keyboard is QWERTY rather
than Dvorak:
= The precedent set by the first to market is powerful.
= The influence of advertising upon a populace lacking in discernment
and addicted to novelty is deadly.
Add to that extortion and bribes and a compromised
> > Because people don't have it hammered into them via the educational
> > formats, it doesn't come preinstalled on almost every computer you buy:
> > offered as the only option, Linux isn't advertised, and probably never
> > will be.
>
Both writers are ignoring the places w
, you have in coding in linux. Also here are
some rules (GPL, ethicness, kindness whatever), but those do not techniocal
restrict you in any way.
Best regards
Hans
> Which the current rules for such does not allow, by FCC edicts, only
> sealed FCC approved blobs are allowed to play in th
there are around 10 linux installs here, half running armbian, they
get better uptimes than x86-64's.
Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect f
gene heskett (12024-07-20):
> > If they were, you'd have support for software-defined radio signal
> > processing in FFmpeg, for example.
> Which the current rules for such does not allow, by FCC edicts, only sealed
> FCC approved blobs are allowed to play in the rf field.
> So don't blame the
ished, those, who create
> programs,
> the market wants.
>
> I am using linux since more than 30 years and it is impressive, what people
> can do, when they can do, what they want and what they like.
>
> And look at the quality, look, what has been created since the beginnin
On 7/20/24 04:28, Nicolas George wrote:
hlyg (12024-07-20):
Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable
recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who
develop more apps,
The programmers who are attracted by market share are not necessarily
the ones
,
then many good developers will be pushed away or demoralied. Because it will
become common, that people will no more cherish theire work.
The development of a few people will be cherished, those, who create programs,
the market wants.
I am using linux since more than 30 years
I’ve never owned a machine running windows in my life.
On 20/7/24 18:35, George at Clug wrote:
On Saturday, 20-07-2024 at 13:54 hlyg wrote:
> crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue screens
The CrowdStrike issue was not a Windows issue, it was a CrowdStrike issue.
The problem did not affect our Windows computers as we have
My reason to keep windows is that I can’t play Starcraft under Linux.
--
Jeff Pang
jeffp...@aol.com
On 2024-07-20, Michael Kjörling wrote:
> On 20 Jul 2024 16:57 +0800, from hlyg2...@outlook.com (hlyg):
>> statistics about market share might come from web servers and game servers,
>> they know how many users use linux and Windows.
>
> No. They at most can know what platfo
On 2024-07-20, Michael Grant wrote:
> OpenOffice is quite featureful, it is not 100% bug for bug compatible with
> real MS Office products.
I failed to read an old version word file on a newer word. And succeed
with libreoffice. So yes it's not 100% bug compatible :)
> choices. There is no
On 20 Jul 2024 16:57 +0800, from hlyg2...@outlook.com (hlyg):
> statistics about market share might come from web servers and game servers,
> they know how many users use linux and Windows.
No. They at most can know what platform user agents report.
Which isn't necessarily the same thing
e, then
>> there's usually little that a programmer, no matter how motivated, can
>> do to extend that support to include Linux; especially if the product
>> in question is heavily dependent on OS-specific APIs.
>
> There are plenty of applications that run O/S agnostic.
Ye
pic some more, let me add:
As a former developer, i came to linux quite late, and although my
willingness to learn was huge, i found it not exactly easy to switch. At
least, i can say: "I do not regret a single bit following my decision to
change, and i can do more things now, than what i
Well said, Michael.
On Saturday, 20-07-2024 at 20:19 Michael Grant wrote:
> My opinions only...
>
> 1) MS Office (Word/Excel/PPT/etc) has never been available for
> Unix/Gnu-Linux. Word and Excel have long been 2 apps users require.
> Not OpenOffice. While OpenOffice is q
ays with.
>
> it is evident that many people around still use Windows
I would agree that Windows is the most used OS for desktop PCs.
>
> i wonder if linux is more reliable than Windows
Do you think Windows is not reliable? Why is that?
>
> according to some statistics linu
On 7/20/24 15:02, Michel Verdier wrote:
Linux is not on the market. I buy M$ but download debian. How can you say
how many people is using debian? Once upon a time there was a
linuxcounter...
Thank tomas, Verdier and George!
statistics about market share might come from web servers and game
ort Mac OS and Windows, for example, then
there's usually little that a programmer, no matter how motivated, can
do to extend that support to include Linux; especially if the product
in question is heavily dependent on OS-specific APIs.
There are plenty of applications that run O/S agnostic.
Th
support Mac OS and Windows, for example, then
there's usually little that a programmer, no matter how motivated, can
do to extend that support to include Linux; especially if the product
in question is heavily dependent on OS-specific APIs.
And let's not forget how many regularly conflate "commo
hlyg (12024-07-20):
> Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable
> recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who
> develop more apps,
The programmers who are attracted by market share are not necessarily
the ones who are interested in developing
Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable
recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who
develop more apps, which attract more users. e.g. many vpn providers
support Windows and android, not linux.
linux can get distributed by wor
On 2024-07-20, hlyg wrote:
> i wonder if linux is more reliable than Windows
no doubt :)
> according to some statistics linux has only 4% desktop market, 73% for MS, 15%
> for MacOS
Linux is not on the market. I buy M$ but download debian. How can you say
how many people is using deb
formats, it doesn't come preinstalled on almost every computer you buy:
> offered as the only option, Linux isn't advertised, and probably never
> will be.
All of them good factors. I may add yet another: because in the current
economic ideology, investing in things seems preferrable than inve
On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 11:54 +0800, hlyg wrote:
> crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue screens
>
> it is evident that many people around still use Windows
>
> i wonder if linux is more reliable than Windows
>
> according to some statistics linux has o
crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue screens
it is evident that many people around still use Windows
i wonder if linux is more reliable than Windows
according to some statistics linux has only 4% desktop market, 73% for
MS, 15% for MacOS
why free OS hasn't gained more
Hi,
Vijay Kirpalani wrote:
> I am using xorriso to create a bootable Linux ISO and facing some issues.
> Please suggest what i might be doing wrong or missing.
I answered to your identical mail on bug-xorr...@gnu.org . See:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-xorriso/2024-07/msg
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024, 3:10 PM Bret Busby wrote:
> On 18/7/24 01:43, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 05:52:47PM +0200, Aleix Piulachs wrote:
> >> installing w4sp-lab in Kali-linux-2024.2-installer-everything-amd64.iso
> >> gives me an error
On 18/7/24 05:22, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:37:38PM +0200, Aleix Piulachs wrote:
I am installing with virtualbox w4sp-lab to
kali-linux-2024.2-installer-everything-amd64.iso and the module (import
w4sp from w4sp_webapp.py ) gives an error: import os import re import
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:37:38PM +0200, Aleix Piulachs wrote:
> I am installing with virtualbox w4sp-lab to
> kali-linux-2024.2-installer-everything-amd64.iso and the module (import
> w4sp from w4sp_webapp.py ) gives an error: import os import re import sys
> import pwd import
On 18/7/24 01:43, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 05:52:47PM +0200, Aleix Piulachs wrote:
installing w4sp-lab in Kali-linux-2024.2-installer-everything-amd64.iso
gives me an error when I press w4sp_webapp.py in python module error:
import w4sp and error in module: from w4sp_app
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 05:52:47PM +0200, Aleix Piulachs wrote:
> installing w4sp-lab in Kali-linux-2024.2-installer-everything-amd64.iso
> gives me an error when I press w4sp_webapp.py in python module error:
> import w4sp and error in module: from w4sp_app import * and I cannot change
&
Prajnanaswaroopa,
What sources are you using to upgrade from?
e.g. what do you see for:
# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
I do not know what Kali Linux might use for non-free firmware.
Debian Bookworm can use something like:
deb https://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main non-free
non-free
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 19:30:20 -, Prajnanaswaroopa wrote:
> Hello,
> I am using a Kali Linux
https://www.google.com/search?q=kali+linux+support
Hello,
I am using a Kali Linux 6.6.9 version. When I tried to update and upgrade, the
terminal shows that the header linux-header-6.8.11-amd64 cannot be installed. I
tried several commands, but all seen to return the same comment. In addition,
the error the terminal shows is as follows:
dpkg
El 23/6/24 a las 10:05, JavierDebian escribió:
El 23/6/24 a las 03:54, Camaleón escribió:
El 2024-06-22 a las 12:54 -0300, JavierDebian escribió:
(...)
Si veo Netflix en Firefox 127.0.1 o en 115.12.0esr, a pantalla del
navegador, no hay problemas.
Si lo pongo en pantalla completa, se
El 23/6/24 a las 03:54, Camaleón escribió:
El 2024-06-22 a las 12:54 -0300, JavierDebian escribió:
(...)
Si veo Netflix en Firefox 127.0.1 o en 115.12.0esr, a pantalla del
navegador, no hay problemas.
Si lo pongo en pantalla completa, se "apaga" la imagen, es decir, muestra el
video unos
El 2024-06-22 a las 12:54 -0300, JavierDebian escribió:
(...)
> Si veo Netflix en Firefox 127.0.1 o en 115.12.0esr, a pantalla del
> navegador, no hay problemas.
> Si lo pongo en pantalla completa, se "apaga" la imagen, es decir, muestra el
> video unos 10 segundos, y se pone negra un par de
ue que hay en Netflix mejor es chupar un
clavo.
En Windows en OTRA maquina NO me pasa, en Windows en Máquina virtual sobre
Linux tengo el mismo problema.
Para mi que es algún problemilla de los navegadores que se dan de cabeza con
los drivers de Linux.
A mi hermana que tiene Fedora (que tiene otr
Buen día.
Tema totalmente OT.
Tengo un sistema Debian 6.7.12 bookworm.
Por primera vez en mi vida, ante un cambio de i7 2014 a un Ryzen 9 2024,
he comprado una placa de video; siempre usé las "on-board".
Es una Radeon RX 6400.
Hasta ahora, anda 99% bien; el 1% mal, es lo que voy a comentar:
e...@gmx.us wrote:
> On 6/4/24 10:59, songbird wrote:
>> t...@tommiller.us wrote:
>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid.
>> ...
>>
>>i've been using the "more" command
Ash Joubert wrote:
> On 2024-06-05 02:59, songbird wrote:
>> t...@tommiller.us wrote:
>>> last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid.
>>i've been using the "more" command provided by the util-linux
>> package.
>
> You m
On 2024-06-05 02:59, songbird wrote:
t...@tommiller.us wrote:
last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid.
i've been using the "more" command provided by the util-linux
package.
You might be thinking of less(1), a program similar to more(1). The
ori
On 6/4/24 10:59, songbird wrote:
t...@tommiller.us wrote:
Hello!
last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid.
...
i've been using the "more" command provided by the util-linux
package.
How do you use "more" to do what "last" do
t...@tommiller.us wrote:
> Hello!
>
> last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid.
...
i've been using the "more" command provided by the util-linux
package.
songbird
subscribed to this list.
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Best!
>
> Tom
>
> <8>
>
> # Prior to upgrade, last(1) is present in 12.5
>
> root@lol ~ # cat /etc/debian_version
>
> 12.5
>
> root@lol ~ # which last
>
> /usr/
On 2024-06-04 16:09, t...@tommiller.us wrote:
last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid.
I remember seeing in the NEWS for util-linux that last(1) was moved to
the wtmpdb package:
$ zcat /usr/share/doc/util-linux/NEWS.Debian.gz
util-linux (2.40.1-2) unstable
Prior to upgrade, last(1) is present in 12.5
root@lol ~ # cat /etc/debian_version
12.5
root@lol ~ # which last
/usr/bin/last
root@lol ~ # last --version
last from util-linux 2.38.1
root@lol ~ #
# Update, upgrade, and reboot 12.5 to prepare for sid
root@lol ~ # apt-get update && apt-get f
On 5/7/24 14:17, David Martin wrote:
Bonjour,
Savez vous quelle est la meilleure solution aujourd'hui pour un
serveur dédié sous Debian Linux ?
Un serveur dédié pour quoi faire? C'est différent s'il gère une
association locale de libristes ou de joueurs de bridge (dans ce cas,
une
Sharepoint. Et je trouve curieux ces entreprises qui confient toutes
leurs données à des américains parfois concurrents sur le segment. En
tant qu'utilisateur imposé de ces solutions je n'ai pas accès à ces
informations de sécurité.
C'est du coté serveurs que Linux s'impose (chez nous Redhat)... tant
Gabriel Moreau a écrit :
> Vrai pour Apple dont le noyau Darwin est un dérivé des BSD.
Non, le noyau est un micronoyau avec des serveurs de type Unix par
dessus (du code pompé à Free et NetBSD). C'est le pire truc qui puisse
exister.
> Faux pour
> Windows qui n'a rien d'UNIX. Windows NT
1 - 100 of 45055 matches
Mail list logo
