well someday i may find this fascinating, but for the moment
i'd really like to just have it percolate in 'run silent, run
deep' mode.
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 01:26:50PM +, Tom Gilbert wrote:
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Sep 17 00:45:07 2000) --]
> gpg: S
http://id-pro.co.uk | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
^^-^^ '-----'
pgpuOqmNlhpuM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
well at least the message has changed a bit
(it's not looking for pgp any more, now it's
looking for a signature...)
i don't give a whit about signing my messages; unless we're passing
munitions details during a war, i don't see the importance (at least
none of my ra
:
> > Hi Will,
> >
> > A lot of people on this list are probably using GnuPG (gpg), which is a
> > GNU replacement for PGP. As long as you have a non-us line in your apt
> > cources.list do an apt-get install gnupg.
>
> so i did
> # apt-get --purge remove pgp
Hi Will, Chris,
I have the following in my ~/.muttrc
[rei:~]%grep pgp ~/.muttrc
set pgp_default_version=gpg
set pgp_autosign
set pgp_sign_as=
set pgp_timeout=7200
It works fine like that, you shouldn't need much more.
cheers,
damon
Quoth Chris Gray,
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:15:58PM -0500, Will Trillich wrote:
> mutt is now back to displaying
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Thu Sep 14 13:08:42 2000) --]
> sh: /usr/bin/pgp: No such file or directory
> [-- End of PGP output --]
> for any email from any
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Trillich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 8:16 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: pgp vs. mutt
>
>
> mutt is now back to displaying
> [-- PGP output follows (current tim
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 07:49:15PM +1100, Damon Muller wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> A lot of people on this list are probably using GnuPG (gpg), which is a
> GNU replacement for PGP. As long as you have a non-us line in your apt
> cources.list do an apt-get install gnupg.
so i did
#
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 07:49:15PM +1100, Damon Muller wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> A lot of people on this list are probably using GnuPG (gpg), which is a
> GNU replacement for PGP. As long as you have a non-us line in your apt
> cources.list do an apt-get install gnupg.
>
Hi Will,
A lot of people on this list are probably using GnuPG (gpg), which is a
GNU replacement for PGP. As long as you have a non-us line in your apt
cources.list do an apt-get install gnupg.
The pgp you have installed is quite old, and certainly doesn't support
gpg and the newer pgp&
after i got tired of seeing
/usr/bin/pgp: Command not found
in mutt for months on end, i did
apt-get install pgp-us
and went back into mutt to read my email.
now i see
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Sep 13 22:56:26 2000) --]
^GUnsupported packet format
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 03:23:20PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> This is why the gpg maintainers get so sniffy about mutt. The mime/pgp
> attachments are not widely supported *at all*. So there's been an
> option, since 1.2.3 I think, to do it the standard way.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > Say I'm using one of the many mailers that doesn't support gpg
> > integration, so I need to save the message and key to disk and use gpg
> > manually to check the signatures. W
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
pgpgrX4is1BOD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 12:57:44PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> > If it helps, my .muttrc is attached. Note that I've got gpg, not
> > pgp, installed. I'd recommend you use the same. The
a signed mail:
> >
> >[-- PGP output follows (current time: Sat Sep 9 03:17:03 2000) --]
> >Signature by unknown keyid: 0x55F2B9B0
>
> You need to get the key for that key id. GNUPG has an option to
> autofetch unknown keys.
>
> >This signature applies t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> If it helps, my .muttrc is attached. Note that I've got gpg, not pgp,
> installed. I'd recommend you use the same. There is only one tag in my
> muttrc which appears relevant, that's
it all and explains:)
>
> I've upgraded from hamm to potato, and decided to try pgp due to all
> the debian-user mails that are signed. I've told mutt to use pgp5 but
> now I get the following error message once I open a signed mail:
>
>[-- PGP output
)
>
> I've upgraded from hamm to potato, and decided to try pgp due to all
> the debian-user mails that are signed. I've told mutt to use pgp5 but
> now I get the following error message once I open a signed mail:
>
>[-- PGP output follows (current time: Sat Sep
Hai,
I admit upfront, I haven't read all the docs, but I would be chilled
if someone could point me to the relevant part of the docs, or maybe
even spoils the fun of having to read it all and explains:)
I've upgraded from hamm to potato, and decided to try pgp due to all
the debian-
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 09:54:21PM +0530, USM Bish wrote:
> All packages of debian are listed at this URL:
I beleive (from experience) that the problem he may be running into is
trying to download the pgp packages from the US server.
You need to set non-US.debian.org as a package source
All packages of debian are listed at this URL:
http://www.debian.org/Packages/stable/allpackages.html
USM Bish
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Chris Nestrud wrote:
> Greetings. I'm trying to find a Debian package for pgp. Other packages
> requiring pgp have referred to such a package, but
How do they compare to one another? That is, PGP and Gnupg?
Sven Burgener wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 04:30:22PM -0500, Chris Nestrud wrote:
> > Greetings. I'm trying to find a Debian package for pgp. Other packages
> > requiring pgp have referred to such a package, b
ris Nestrud wrote:
> > Greetings. I'm trying to find a Debian package for pgp. Other packages
> > requiring pgp have referred to such a package, but 'apt-cache search pgp'
> > doesn't return anything meaningful. I haven't been able to find a package
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 04:30:22PM -0500, Chris Nestrud wrote:
> Greetings. I'm trying to find a Debian package for pgp. Other packages
> requiring pgp have referred to such a package, but 'apt-cache search pgp'
> doesn't return anything meaningful. I haven't bee
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 16:30:22 -0500 (CDT), Chris Nestrud wrote:
>Still, if a package was
>referred to, shouldn't one exist?
Yup, you need to reference the "non-US" distribution.
I get mine here:
http://FTP.Uni-Erlangen.DE/pub/Linux/DEBIAN
HTH,
Ralf
--
Sign the EU petition against SPAM:
Greetings. I'm trying to find a Debian package for pgp. Other packages
requiring pgp have referred to such a package, but 'apt-cache search pgp'
doesn't return anything meaningful. I haven't been able to find a package
for pgp when searching through the various distrib
for windows i suggest freePGP
you can get it from http://www.pgpi.org/
umm have not tried setting pgp up in linux so i do not know : (
At 11:47 29/06/00 +0100, Wilson Yau wrote:
A quick question:
Could anyone please (from your experience) suggest to me the best PGP
plug-ins for mail clients
A quick question:
Could anyone please (from your experience) suggest to me the best PGP
plug-ins for mail clients like Netscape (both on Linux & Windows),
outlook & outlook express?
Many thanks.
Wilson
ault
set pgp_send_version=default
set pgp_key_version=default
There should be some links from http://www.mutt.org that might be of
help.
Cheers,
Tom.
--
"Everyone is entitled to an *informed* opinion."
-- Harlan Ellison
pgpaFKtkBuHQ9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Sven Burgener writes:
> Hello
>
> Anyone that's got gnupg / pgp5 installed, could they be so generous as
> to assist me in setting it up?
>
> When I have gnupg installed, mutt says /usr/bin/pgp doesn't exist. Do I
> need to create a link or so?
>
>
Hello
Anyone that's got gnupg / pgp5 installed, could they be so generous as
to assist me in setting it up?
When I have gnupg installed, mutt says /usr/bin/pgp doesn't exist. Do I
need to create a link or so?
Now when I have pgp5i installed, mutt tells me there is not /bin/pgp.
This
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 05:01:48PM -0500, Pat Mahoney wrote:
> > Now, when I try to send a signed mail, mutt tells me that there is
> > no /bin/pgp. Indeed there is no pgp link / binary installed. In the
> > other version of pgp this wasn't so.
> Try installing gnupg.
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 12:53:48PM +0200, Sven Burgener wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am new to pgp. So far, I did "apt-get install pgp". That
> installed some version of pgp for me.
>
> I then saw that I wasnt able to read some ppl's pgp keys in mutt
> with that vers
Hi all
I am new to pgp. So far, I did "apt-get install pgp". That installed some
version of pgp for me.
I then saw that I wasnt able to read some ppl's pgp keys in mutt with that
version of pgp: -> the output of pgp (in mutt) advised me to upgrade to a newer
version. So
On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 12:35:32PM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> Thanks for the quick replies. There is no "pgp" link to pgp5. I see a set
> of executable links from the manpage.
>
> Mutt expects "pgp." What is the best approach to integrate these together?
Thanks for the quick replies. There is no "pgp" link to pgp5. I see a set
of executable links from the manpage.
Mutt expects "pgp." What is the best approach to integrate these together?
Kenward
On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 11:49:48AM -0700, Eric Hanchrow wrote:
> >
On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 11:41:12 -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> I just installed pgp last night, read some mail this AM, and got a "need
> newer pgp version" message from a tagged post. I haven't used pgp before,
> so don't know if the "older" version is c
I just installed pgp last night, read some mail this AM, and got a "need
newer pgp version" message from a tagged post. I haven't used pgp before,
so don't know if the "older" version is considered really old now. Can
someone toss the answer to this my way, please?
TIA,
Kenward
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 12:13:55PM -0800, Percival wrote:
> I am curious to see which version of PGP people are using. Debian is known
> as an open-source 'only' distribution, and I'm curious to see what people
> think about this whole patent issue. There are curerently
I am curious to see which version of PGP people are using. Debian is known as
an open-source 'only' distribution, and I'm curious to see what people think
about this whole patent issue. There are curerently 3 versions of PGP in
potato - international, us, and internation versio
> there are some other gui mail readers that i hear are quite good but
> i've
> never used enough to have any real opinion on. check out tkrat,
> postillion,
> xfmail (now becomming archimedes) all of which support imap and
> pgp/gpg to
> varying degrees.
Has anyone a
> Hmm. I've never had any problems with it, but YMMV. (Not SMTP, by the
> way, but RFC 822.)
yeah you're right.
> See, that drives me up the wall. I don't like the fact that it all goes
> through another editor (and one so badly written that it needs to insert
> a spurious blank line at the end
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Shand) wrote:
> * because you can't (nicely) edit the headers while you are editing the
> message you are forced to do it at the "pre-send" screen. this is okay
> (though a little strange for a user used to pine/modern gui
> mailers) however if you have a long To: or
> Hmmm, I don't think that's true, AFAIK you can configure mutt to edit
> the header in the message body however you want. See its man files.
as it says just below where you cut off the quote:
editing that field and then scrolling through it. when you set 'set
edit_headers' on you can edi
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 01:09:23PM -0900, Adam Shand wrote:
> * because you can't (nicely) edit the headers while you are editing the
>message you are forced to do it at the "pre-send" screen. this is okay
>(though a little strange for a user used to pine/modern gui
>mailers) however
different tasks. if i want to type i want pico, if i want
to program or massage data, i want vim. i would love to change to mutt
(pine is slow and pigish when you have large folders, it's not threaded, not
very configurable and it's pgp/gpg support sucks in comparison).
adam.
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 10:12:13PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 03:36:37PM -0900, Adam Shand wrote:
> > mutt's pgp/gpg integration is second to none (it's *really* nice) but it
> > only uses pgp/mime which a lot of clients don't support ye
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 03:36:37PM -0900, Adam Shand wrote:
> mutt's pgp/gpg integration is second to none (it's *really* nice) but it
> only uses pgp/mime which a lot of clients don't support yet
> (pine/netscape). i also personally hate it's lack of editor
> int
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Shand) wrote:
>mutt's pgp/gpg integration is second to none (it's *really* nice) but it
>only uses pgp/mime which a lot of clients don't support yet
>(pine/netscape). i also personally hate it's lack of editor
>integration. if it wasn'
> does anyone know which mail programm can access imap postoffices and
> also encrypt mail with pgp?
pine has the best imap support, and can support pgp/gpg though filters
(check out pgp4pine on freshmeat), this is what i use.
mutt's pgp/gpg integration is second to none (it'
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 08:08:51PM +, Sven Gaerner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know which mail programm can access imap postoffices and also
> encrypt mail with pgp?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sven
>
> --
> +---
Sven Gaerner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know which mail programm can access imap postoffices and also
> encrypt mail with pgp?
I've been told that Mutt speaks some dialect of IMAP. Mutt is famous
for being able to sign & encrypt mails with gpg and pgp2/pgp5.
Regards,
Hi,
does anyone know which mail programm can access imap postoffices and also
encrypt mail with pgp?
Thanks.
Sven
--
++
| Please reply only to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Other email
> I notice that mutt gives the following for almost all signed messages:
>
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Mon Jan 31 16:24:38 2000) --]
>
> ^GUnsupported packet format - you need a newer version of PGP for this
> file.
That message is from PGP 2.x, not from Mutt
use gpg as your default pgp ie
set pgp_default_version=gpg
Chanop
Some what recently, Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about Updated pgp for mutt?
>:) I notice that mutt gives the following for almost all signed messages:
>:)
>:) [-- PGP output follows (current t
I notice that mutt gives the following for almost all signed messages:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Mon Jan 31 16:24:38 2000) --]
^GUnsupported packet format - you need a newer version of PGP for this
file.
For a usage summary, type: pgp -h
For more detailed help, consult the PGP
Urban Gabor wrote:
> Could somebody explain me what PGP is?
http://www.pgp.net/, /usr/doc/pgp, /usr/share/pgp/
It's used to encrypt and sign electronically.
Regards,
Joey
--
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
Please always Cc to me whe
Could somebody explain me what PGP is?
I'd prefer private mails, if possible.
Gabor Urban --- Lufthansa Systems Hungaria KfT
mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel : (36)-1-431-2949 Fax :(36)-1-431-2977
"Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk ?"
wrote:
> Actually, I found a great HOWTO on integrating GnuPGP with Mutt that
> helped me with everything. It's at:
>
> http://www.linux.com/howto/Mutt-GnuPG-PGP-HOWTO.html
>
> I'm curious though: did you set anything for the pubring or secring?
> THe howto says to:
Actually, I found a great HOWTO on integrating GnuPGP with Mutt that helped
me with everything. It's at:
http://www.linux.com/howto/Mutt-GnuPG-PGP-HOWTO.html
I'm curious though: did you set anything for the pubring or secring? THe
howto says to:
set pgp_gpg_pubring=~/.gnupg/pubri
not support GnuPGP (in the PGP notes in
> /usr/doc) and in another place, the on-line FAQ, that GnuPGP is
> recommended? What gives?
>
> I've got the latest Mutt from the unstable branch.
Mutt works great with GnuPG. I'm using it right now.
On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 05:48:18PM -0600, David J. Kanter wrote:
> Just a quick follow-up to my post: I use Mutt and have read in one place
> that Mutt does not support GnuPGP (in the PGP notes in /usr/doc) and in
> another plac
Just a quick follow-up to my post: I use Mutt and have read in one place
that Mutt does not support GnuPGP (in the PGP notes in /usr/doc) and in
another place, the on-line FAQ, that GnuPGP is recommended? What gives?
I've got the latest Mutt from the unstable branch.
Thanks.
--
David J. K
I've got a public and private keyring, created with PGP 6.5 for Windows NT,
that I'd like to use on my Linux box. Can I use the GnuPGP package as a
substitute? The keys are nothing fancy, like no encoded pictures or
anything, so I would think they are fairly backward-compatibl
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 01:00:11PM +0200, Martin Fluch wrote:
>
> can anyone give me a short hint, how do I move my secret key from pgp
> (2.6.3) to gpg (1.0) (if it is posible)?
The easiest way is to just tell gpg to use pgp's keyrings in addition to
its own. Add these lines t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
can anyone give me a short hint, how do I move my secret key from pgp
(2.6.3) to gpg (1.0) (if it is posible)?
Martin
- --
Where do you want to go today? - As far from Redmond as possible!
For public PGP-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP
Pablo De Napoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PDN> I'm running a debian system where I have an X server. I want to
PDN> conect to a unix SCO System V host , and conect some X clients
PDN> running on that host to the X server on my debian host.
Right. Various techniques for doing this are in the Rem
IE-1 protocol ?)
> >
> > Besides that , I want to make another question: is it legal to use pgp
> > (international version) and other secure cryptographic software , here
> > in Argentina ? Does anybody knows about this ?
> >
> > Th
e with the both? Which one should I use?
FWIW I'm running PGP 2.6.3i and GPG. GPG is compatible with PGP 5 and
can be hacked to support PGP 2 AFAIK, but there are patent issues with
that.
PGP 2 will not support PGP5 emails - PGP5 changes the encryption method
and v2 doesn't support this.
Hi,
Is pgp5 backward compatible with pgp2? I have an email which is
encrypted using pgp5 with my pubring generated by pgp2, but I
could not seem to open it using pgp2.
If I upgrade to pgp5, do I need to generate another keyring? If
I do, should I use RSA or
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Peter Palfrader aka Weasel wrote:
> I'm a bit puzzled about the validy of keys that pgp (6.5.1) tells me.
I don't trust pgp 6.5.1.
Martin
--
For public PGP-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 10:08:09PM -, Pollywog wrote:
> You exchanged passphrases?? I don't think you should do that.
> Your passphrase is for your own use when you encrypt or sign something.
oops, fingerprints :)
--
Weasel http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~pp
On 11-Sep-99 Peter Palfrader aka Weasel wrote:
> I'm a fairly new pgp user and hope that the gurus here can bring some
> light into my dark.
>
> I'm a bit puzzled about the validy of keys that pgp (6.5.1) tells me.
>
> Here's what I have:
> KeyID
I'm a fairly new pgp user and hope that the gurus here can bring some
light into my dark.
I'm a bit puzzled about the validy of keys that pgp (6.5.1) tells me.
Here's what I have:
KeyID Trust Validity User ID
0x... marginal complete Dillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
hi guys...
Is there any way to use the PGP authentication in Apache Web Server. I mean, is
not
for a commercial use, so I´d use the freeware version...
Looking forward to your answer
Thus wrote Steve Gore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [99.08.17 21:03]:
> > > I'm new to pgp. It seems that there are many pgp packages in potato,
> > > ie pgp-us, pgp-i, pgp5i. Which one I should use?
> >
> > Personally, I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GPG): http://www.g
Hello Chanop,
On 17-Aug-99, you wrote:
CS> hi,
CS>
CS> I'm new to pgp. It seems that there are many pgp packages in potato,
CS> ie pgp-us, pgp-i, pgp5i. Which one I should use?
CS>
CS> thanks
CS>
CS> Chanop
As I understand it, the are two versions of pgp due to
> > I'm new to pgp. It seems that there are many pgp packages in potato,
> > ie pgp-us, pgp-i, pgp5i. Which one I should use?
>
> Personally, I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GPG): http://www.gnupg.org
> It's currently in beta - what isn't in the Linux world :
Thus wrote Chanop Silpa-Anan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [99.08.17 06:46]:
> hi,
>
> I'm new to pgp. It seems that there are many pgp packages in potato,
> ie pgp-us, pgp-i, pgp5i. Which one I should use?
>
> thanks
>
> Chanop
Personally, I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GP
hi,
I'm new to pgp. It seems that there are many pgp packages in potato, ie pgp-us,
pgp-i, pgp5i. Which one I should use?
thanks
Chanop
--
Chanop Silpa-Anan
Australian National Unive
t you generate a revoke
certificate WITHOUT revoking the key as pgp does. The idea is that you
should do this and print it. Then you put the result in a fireproof
lockbox or in a safe-deposit box or something like that.
> Joseph> "well first you type pgp -fkxa 0x secring.pgp | &
t about 80% of the populace will NEVER get a
Joseph> signature from you. Still, if that's what you feel you need,
Joseph> that's what you should ask for.
That's OK. A signature from me is not exactly a _requirement_
for anything at all, you know ;-)
Joseph> &
don't have glibc. signing works fine - it is just
> > encryption that I have problems with.
>
> I have encryption working fine with gpg and pgp 2.x - the options you need
> to use are:
>
> --set-filename --rfc1991 --load-extension idea --cipher-algo idea --armor
> --en
t
> encryption that I have problems with.
I have encryption working fine with gpg and pgp 2.x - the options you need
to use are:
--set-filename --rfc1991 --load-extension idea --cipher-algo idea --armor
--encrypt
And you MUST NOT pipe the input to gpg - it must be given a filename on
the command line.
Jason
e can I get version 1 from?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpldTefgSZN1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> Why does the following not work? If I don't get any reply from
> debian-user, I will post to debian-devel, as I am reasonably certain I
> got these packages from potato.
I reported a bug a while ago about gpg-rsa2 and gpg-idea2, and the
answer was:
You need libc6 2.1.x - or you can grab the so
created 1999-06-01
File `abc.gpg' exists. Overwrite (y/N)? y
gpg: RSA keys are deprecated; please consider creating a new key and use this
key in the future
gpg: this cipher algorithm is depreciated; please use a more standard one!
[541] [snoopy:bam] >pgp -m abc.gpg
Pretty Good Privacy(tm)
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 11:03:53AM -0400, Aaron Faby wrote:
> This may not be the appropriate place to ask, but does
> anyone know where I can get PGP Key?
I'm not sure what you mean. Do you know how pgp works? (roughly)
If you wnat to send encrypted mail to people, you need their
This may not be the appropriate place to ask, but does
anyone know where I can get PGP Key?
--
Aaron Faby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Administrator/Technical Support
Yourlink, Inc.
ing with a line like
this:
mda "/usr/bin/procmail -d %T"
Rumor has it that Exim will also do some of the things procmail can
do. But I'm not using Exim.
> 2) I know nothing about PGP, but I want to try it and installed pgp5i from
>potato. As earlier mentioned on
sage. I can go in the
>attachment-list and save the mail I want to reply to, but that isn't
>very handy either ;)
No ideas there.
> 2) I know nothing about PGP, but I want to try it and installed pgp5i from
>potato. As earlier mentioned on the list, pgp5.0 is composed of
very handy either ;)
2) I know nothing about PGP, but I want to try it and installed pgp5i from
potato. As earlier mentioned on the list, pgp5.0 is composed of seperate
programs:
source(/2):~$ dpkg -L pgp5i
/usr/bin
/usr/bin/pgp5
/usr/bin/pgpe
/usr/bin/pgps
/usr/bin/pgpv
/usr/bin/pgpk
** I add
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Hi,
> Mutt uses PGP/MIME for pgp signing. How do I change this to plain text
> or app/pgp??
>
> The macro provided in the doc do not seem to work for me:
>
> macro compose S "Fpgp +verbose=0 -fast \
>
Have a try to the key ^P (+p)
Regards,
--
Horacio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Valencia - ESPAÑA
Hi,
Mutt uses PGP/MIME for pgp signing. How do I change this to plain text
or app/pgp??
The macro provided in the doc do not seem to work for me:
macro compose S "Fpgp +verbose=0 -fast \
+clearsig=on\ny^T^Uapplication/pgp; format
Hi,
I have tried gnupg/pgpgpg but I can not make it work with XFmail. If you,
or anyone, knows how this can be done, please let me know.
TIA
On 21-Jun-99 Dpk wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Christian Dysthe wrote:
> Installing PGP 5 should fix it. You might want to look into gnupg, a
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Christian Dysthe wrote:
Hi,
I installed the pgp 2.6.2-us on my potato box. I use it with XFmail and it
works fine.
The problem is that I actually have friends running Windows (!) and
I can not verify their signatures. They use PGP 6.0.2 and when I
Hi,
I installed the pgp 2.6.2-us on my potato box. I use it with XFmail and it
works fine.
The problem is that I actually have friends running Windows (!) and I can not
verify their signatures. They use PGP 6.0.2 and when I try to verify I an error
messaged telling me the ASCII armor has an
Hi!
Rene Mayrhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to upload my PGP public key on a
> public key server. The PGP 5 documentation found
> under /usr/doc/pgp5i/README claims that PGP5 can
> interact with key servers, but it does not say how
> to do this.
>
> Ha
501 - 600 of 881 matches
Mail list logo
