In 20090323010320.gb7...@gecko.davescrunch.org, Dave Patterson wrote:
* Christofer C. Bell christofer.c.b...@gmail.com [2009-03-22 16:24:52
-0500]:
I remember the days before 1994 and the Great AOL Floodgates opening...
A 286 accelerator card in an 8086 IBM with a 20 Mg hard drive and 5 1/4
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:51:31PM EDT, Florian Kulzer wrote:
[..]
I need to see the relevant context quoted (properly trimmed as the
discussion progresses, of course), especially if a thread has run for
a while.
Most business mail runs something like this:
- hey, Dee.. got my fax?
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:56:35AM +1000, Adrian Levi wrote:
2009/3/23 Christofer C. Bell christofer.c.b...@gmail.com:
[snip]
I bottom-post out of force of habit, however, it's archaic and generally
unnecessary.
--
Chris
Now imagine you are CC'd in on the conversation with no
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:27:13PM -0400, Jesus Arocho wrote:
Hee, Hee; are you trying to humiliate people into using bottom posting by
associating them with use of Windows?
The debate of top/bottom posting is much alike elbows on/off the table,
burp/not burp after a meal, etc,
true
On 2009-03-22 19:52, Dave Patterson wrote:
* Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net [2009-03-22 16:06:06 -0500]:
Except that Our arguments are Right, and Theirs are Eeeevil.
Here we go. I can imagine the hearings now:
Are you now, or have you ever been, a top poster?
You must have missed
* Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net [2009-03-22 21:20:30 -0500]:
You must have missed the Editor Wars...
Why do we have to hide from the police, Daddy?
Because we use vi, son. They use emacs.
Escape Meta Alt Control Shift
Eight Megabytes And Constantly Swapping
EMACS Makes Any
On Mar 22, 2009, at 10:20 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-03-22 19:52, Dave Patterson wrote:
* Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net [2009-03-22 16:06:06 -0500]:
Except that Our arguments are Right, and Theirs are Eeeevil.
Here we go. I can imagine the hearings now:
Are you now, or have you
* Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net [2009-03-22 20:34:50 -0500]:
That's hyperbole, at the very least. The original Pentium was released on
March 22, 1993. 3 1/2 disks had been available for a while. While the
first GB disk wouldn't be seen until 1995, 100MB drives were
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:32:20 +0100
mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
...
now, when I respond to specific points in the quoted message, I bottom
post. unfortunately, many people are not used to this, and find it hard
to continue the discussion consistently: they often don't understand
levels
Sander Marechal a écrit :
[snip]
Actually, top posting makes some sense in a corporate environment. There
is no mailinglist or archive to see the entire discussion there. Suppose
you are discussing something with a coworker over e-mail. With top
posting every reply carries the entire thread
Comments inline ;-p
Daniel Burrows a écrit :
My experience has also been that attempting to bottom-post in a
corporate environment confuses people because they can't find your
reply. When people know the conventions, bottom-posting is a lot
clearer, but if it just confuses them, there's
--- On Thu, 3/12/09, Bob Cox debian-u...@lists.bobcox.com wrote:
From: Bob Cox debian-u...@lists.bobcox.com
Subject: Re: Top posting vs Bottom posting
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Thursday, March 12, 2009, 12:55 PM
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 00:12:15 -0500, Kumar Appaiah
(a.ku
--- On Fri, 3/13/09, Angus Auld aonghas_a...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Angus Auld aonghas_a...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Top posting vs Bottom posting
To: debian-user debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Friday, March 13, 2009, 10:55 AM
--- On Thu, 3/12/09, Bob Cox
debian-u...@lists.bobcox.com
Alex Samad wrote:
isn't that a reason for top posting?
No, because with bottom posting you can quote just a little bit of an
e-mail and put your response directly below it. This is a big boon with
larger e-mails because you can respond to multiple statements or
questions in turn.
Of course
has had its readability irrevocably destroyed by a
top-poster. On top of this, our top-posting friend wrote in HTML,
tripling the size of his worthless contribution and to cap it all, cc'd
the list and replied directly to the previous contributor in the thread
(not the OP, who just might have
Daniel Burrows wrote:
My experience has also been that attempting to bottom-post in a
corporate environment confuses people because they can't find your
reply.
That's when the sender needs to trim out what doesn't need to be there.
It's not necessary to quote the entire previous e-mail.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:00:28AM +0100, Sander Marechal wrote:
Alex Samad wrote:
isn't that a reason for top posting?
No, because with bottom posting you can quote just a little bit of an
e-mail and put your response directly below it. This is a big boon with
larger e-mails because you
For all you posters discussing Top posting vs Bottom posting and taking
other threads off topic here is a thread for you.
First my opinion, Since this mailing list historically has been Bottom
posting then we stick with it.
Using both top and bottom posting in the mailing list will lead
Steven Demetrius wrote:
For all you posters discussing Top posting vs Bottom posting and taking
other threads off topic here is a thread for you.
First my opinion, Since this mailing list historically has been Bottom
posting then we stick with it.
good point.
personally the most e-mails i
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 07:23, randall rand...@songshu.org wrote:
personally the most e-mails i receive and sent are in a corporate
environment and everybody uses top posting there, i clearly see it has
benefits since it is used more as a notification to have the latest one
(and probably most
Nuno Magalhães wrote:
I think most people top post in corporate enviroments 'cos they just
click and type and don't really care about proper use of email or
computers in general. It's just the thing to send messages.
Actually, top posting makes some sense in a corporate environment
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:18:52PM +0100, Sander Marechal wrote:
Actually, top posting makes some sense in a corporate environment. There
Not really.
is no mailinglist or archive to see the entire discussion there. Suppose
you are discussing something with a coworker over e-mail. With top
. When people know the conventions, bottom-posting is a lot
clearer, but if it just confuses them, there's not much point.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Sander Marechal wrote:
Nuno Magalhães wrote:
I think most people top post in corporate enviroments 'cos they just
click and type and don't really care about proper use of email or
computers in general. It's just the thing to send messages.
Actually, top posting makes some sense
posting makes some sense in a corporate environment. There
is no mailinglist or archive to see the entire discussion there. Suppose
you are discussing something with a coworker over e-mail. With top
posting every reply carries the entire thread. Want to involve someone
else (like your boss)? Just CC
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Steven Demetrius wrote:
For all you posters discussing Top posting vs Bottom posting and taking
other threads off topic here is a thread for you.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Stephen D. Barnes wrote:
Alan B. Pearce wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 5:56 AM
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:18:52PM +0100, Sander Marechal wrote:
Nuno Magalhães wrote:
[snip]
For a real mailinglist (such as this) there is no such benefit when top
posting. Everyone already has all the previous messages because they are
subscribed here, and in the rare case you want
isn't that a reason for top posting, if you have already read the
previous emails, don't you want to just get to the new information with
out having to read the stuff you just read in the previous email ?
Well if the bottom-poster just leaves the cited text without any sort
of cleaning, i.e
Sander Marechal wrote:
Actually, top posting makes some sense in a corporate environment. There
is no mailinglist or archive to see the entire discussion there. Suppose
you are discussing something with a coworker over e-mail. With top
posting every reply carries the entire thread. Want
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:04:29PM -0700, Ken Teague wrote:
There's nothing more painful when reading e-mail than to start from the
very bottom, read the message, then begin to read each reply upwards. It
becomes really bad when some replies are more than a page long because
you now have
Dotan Cohen wrote:
Why did you think that I killfiled you there? I remember getting in
the crossfire between you and someone else a few months ago, but I
don't remember there ever being a problem between us.
Well, shoot, I know someone did and thought it was you. Was for something
rather
Just like I had seen only your post, and not Steve's. Know that that
is likely to happen before you decide to be violent or troll.
The irony here is that the reason this is so is because Dotan's got me
killfilled for my messages over on KU-U, a forum on which I am far, far, more
postal. I feel powerful.
If being the sort of irritating sad little tit you apparently are
makes you feel powerful, go for it.
As Wendall said Top-posting inconveniences almost everyone but you
obviously have nothing else in your life to offer the same sort of
high
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:32 AM, karun ka...@mail.karund.de wrote:
Top Posting is an unfortunate side effect, of Microsoft Outlook becoming
the standard for non Opensource computer software users.
Well, Google with Gmail certainly aren't helping.
I also thoroughly loathe answers in the form my
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 08:32:27AM +0100, karun wrote:
Top Posting is an unfortunate side effect, of Microsoft Outlook becoming
the standard for non Opensource computer software users.
Actually, I'd say it was a side-effect of pine in the unix world and any
graphical client everywhere else
karun wrote:
Top Posting is an unfortunate side effect, of Microsoft Outlook becoming
the standard for non Opensource computer software users.
Outlook as an excuse for top-posting went out the window circa 2002.
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
Also the base Outlook
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:01:34PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
There is a big world out there beyond the confines of the Debian
lists. There is a lot of top posting out there. It must be easy for
twits to come to believe that top posting is always, and everywhere,
OK. And that people who
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:47AM -0500, Daryl Styrk wrote:
I myself don't care for top posting. It just tosses a wrench in a
nicely flowing thread. I have started playing around with mutt the last
week or so, and I now appreciate how netiquette has come to be.
Specifically to mailing
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Top-posting works great in places where you have a common archive and
thus don't have to carry the full context in your message.
Er, what? Top-posting requires you to carry the *full* context of the
entire thread in every message!
--
Steve C. Lamb
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:24:05AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Outlook as an excuse for top-posting went out the window circa 2002.
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
If I understand this well enough, quotefix won’t work if you are using
Word as an editor for mails
Stephan Seitz schreef:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:24:05AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Outlook as an excuse for top-posting went out the window circa 2002.
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
If I understand this well enough, quotefix won’t work if you are using
Word
2009/3/7 Wendell Cochran atr...@eskimo.com:
Date: Fri Mar 6 11:06:29 2009
From: Joe McDonagh
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Hey Steve, I love that just by typing up here above e-mails I can
make smug users like you go postal. I feel powerful.
Top-posting inconveniences almost everyone
are for.
http://what-is-what.com/what_is/top_posting.html
Top-posting doesn't bother me and I actually find it easier to follow,
possibly because I used to work in support. Top-posting to unix geeks is
the equivalent of killing a small child's puppy. I never understood the
rage that top-posting
Top-posting doesn't bother me and I actually find it easier to follow,
possibly because I used to work in support. Top-posting to unix geeks is the
equivalent of killing a small child's puppy. I never understood the rage
that top-posting produces, and seriously, top posters should be shot
Dotan Cohen wrote:
Yes, there are those who over react. And no, I didn't killfile you!
[ snippage ]
Just like I had seen only your post, and not Steve's. Know that that
is likely to happen before you decide to be violent or troll.
The irony here is that the reason this is so is because
Date: Fri Mar 6 11:06:29 2009
From: Joe McDonagh
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Hey Steve, I love that just by typing up here above e-mails I can
make smug users like you go postal. I feel powerful.
Top-posting inconveniences almost everyone -- not only Steve Lamb.
Wendell Cochran
powerful, go for it.
As Wendall said Top-posting inconveniences almost everyone but you
obviously have nothing else in your life to offer the same sort of
high.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
little tit you apparently are
makes you feel powerful, go for it.
As Wendall said Top-posting inconveniences almost everyone but you
obviously have nothing else in your life to offer the same sort of
high.
There is a big world out there beyond the confines of the Debian
lists. There is a lot
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Hey Steve, I love that just by typing up here above e-mails I can
make smug users like you go postal. I feel powerful.
If being the sort of irritating sad little tit you apparently are
makes you feel powerful, go for it.
As Wendall said Top-posting inconveniences
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:14:35PM -0700, Glenn English wrote:
And it's next to impossible not to with the lame email client on this
iTouch...
It even top posts your signature? Wow, that's pretty bad. No one's
bothered to port any good e-mail clients to the touch yet?
--
Top posting in response to a top post is etiquette. Gloating over the
fact that fellow human being is put-off by your behavior is not. Top
posting because your email software is incapable of doing otherwise is
somewhat like being a child with 'special needs'. The rest of us
should be grown up
I myself don't care for top posting. It just tosses a wrench in a
nicely flowing thread. I have started playing around with mutt the last
week or so, and I now appreciate how netiquette has come to be.
Specifically to mailing lists. Top posting, HTML, 2-3 pages of quoted
text to see Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul E Condon wrote:
Top posting in response to a top post is etiquette. Gloating over the
fact that fellow human being is put-off by your behavior is not. Top
posting because your email software is incapable of doing otherwise is
somewhat like
On Mar 6, 2009, at 8:48 PM, Paul E Condon wrote:
Top posting in response to a top post is etiquette. Gloating over the
fact that fellow human being is put-off by your behavior is not. Top
posting because your email software is incapable of doing otherwise is
somewhat like being a child
-posting inconveniences almost everyone -- not only Steve Lamb.
Wendell Cochran
West Seattle
Top Posting is an unfortunate side effect, of Microsoft Outlook becoming
the standard for non Opensource computer software users.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
i just received s spam warning from my isp for a message posted to this
list and I wonder whats going on.
Regards,
Aniruddha
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:40:47 +0200
Aniruddha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Aniruddha,
i just received s spam warning from my isp for a message posted to this
list and I wonder whats going on.
It's difficult to be certain, but it's possibly because there's more
quoted text than new material
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 14:55 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:40:47 +0200
Aniruddha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Aniruddha,
i just received s spam warning from my isp for a message posted to this
list and I wonder whats going on.
It's difficult to be certain, but
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:39:08 +0200
Aniruddha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Aniruddha,
Hi thanks for the answer :) I'm really puzzled about this. The message
You're welcome.
concerning was an original unquoted message. Anyhow I really hope it's
You've sent several in the past couple of
Is it too off topic to post about a project completed with Debian
software? I don't have any specific problems with the solution I have
put together, but thought I would share and would like some constructive
criticism in regards to the way I integrated the software together.
Figure I would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/17/08 16:47, Nick Lidakis wrote:
Is it too off topic to post about a project completed with Debian
software? I don't have any specific problems with the solution I have
put together, but thought I would share and would like some constructive
Hey!
I have just srated using mutt. :-) I am really loving it!
Only thing that I would like to know how to change is, by default mutt top
posts. I would like to configure mutt to bottom post by default when I
reply to an email.
I have googled for the naswer and only found instructions on how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/08 20:46, Julian De Marchi wrote:
Hey!
I have just srated using mutt. :-) I am really loving it!
Only thing that I would like to know how to change is, by default mutt top
posts. I would like to configure mutt to bottom post by
command in nano?
With Vim, its G
But that's the answer of last resort...
Why?
You should be editing on the way to the bottom. Pure bottom-posting is
as bad as pure-top-posting. If I had just bottom-posed, you would see
Ron's signature lines, the debian-list signature line, and Ron telling
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 06:46:58 pm Julian De Marchi wrote:
Only thing that I would like to know how to change is, by default mutt top
posts. I would like to configure mutt to bottom post by default when I
reply to an email.
Mutt doesn't default to top posting, it defaults to putting
Julian De Marchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have just srated using mutt. :-) I am really loving it!
Only thing that I would like to know how to change is, by default mutt top =
posts. I would like to configure mutt to bottom post by default when I=20
reply to an email.
I have googled for
You should be editing on the way to the bottom. Pure bottom-posting is
as bad as pure-top-posting. If I had just bottom-posed, you would see
Ron's signature lines, the debian-list signature line, and Ron telling
you to turn on line wrapping. As it is, I left more than I probably
should
Mutt doesn't default to top posting, it defaults to putting the cursor at the
start of the message so you can read along as you go down, interspersing your
reply and removing unnecessary text. This is not a bug: It is by design and
is a feature.
I am fully aware this is not a bug(flea
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 09:28:42 pm Julian De Marchi wrote:
Mutt doesn't default to top posting, it defaults to putting the cursor at
the start of the message so you can read along as you go down,
interspersing your reply and removing unnecessary text. This is not a
bug: It is by design
it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:58:09AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Exotic mathematics without a grounding in reality is medieval philosophy
trying to determine how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Two. No, seven!
Arg. You made me lose count!
-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 05:59 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:58:09AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Exotic mathematics without a grounding in reality is medieval philosophy
trying to determine how many angels can dance on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/17/08 12:46, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On 17/01/2008, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 8:08 AM, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/01/2008, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ducks float, they must be made of wood
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/08 23:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
If ducks float, they must be made of wood (or small rocks), so if
the witch weighs the same as a duck, then she must be made of
wood and therefore, she'll float, so she's a witch.
The sad
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:55:15AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:23:37AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
It's been quite a while, and we can't quote the
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 17:37:16 +1100, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:23:37AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
It's been quite a while, and we can't quote the whole movie.
and apparently, one can recover from
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:02:07 +0100 (CET)
s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, why don't your lines wrap at ca. 80 chars? Missed that lesson?
Huh? I set Claws to wrap at 70. I thought it would do that
automatically before sending the message...
Fixed.
--D.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 05:34:28 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
I always hated that STOP AHEAD thing. I always figured if you are
close enough to the words that it mattered which one you drove over
first, you aren't looking far enough up the road. And if you are
following too closely to read
it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
that...
The sad thing is that I work for them.
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
On Jan 16, 2008 12:42 AM, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/15/08 23:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
If ducks float, they must be made of wood (or small rocks), so if
the witch weighs the same as a duck, then she must be made of
wood and therefore, she'll float, so she's
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:55:15AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:23:37AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 12:42 AM, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/15/08 23:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
If ducks float, they must be made of wood (or small rocks), so if
the witch weighs the same as a duck, then she must
read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
On 15 Jan, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:23:39PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/15/08 19:24, s. keeling wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 01/15/08 17:05, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
The problem, the oft-overlooked side comment made by one of the
Given that you're in the country that invented the witch-hunt, that's
not much surprise.
I wasn't aware that he was from Babylonia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch-hunt#Antiquity
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:57:51AM +0100, Ulrich Schweitzer wrote:
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 05:34:28 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
I always hated that STOP AHEAD thing. I always figured if you are
close enough to the words that it mattered which one you drove over
first, you aren't
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:56:28AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:55:15AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:23:37AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:56:28AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:55:15AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:53:34PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
[snip]
Well, now you're just contradicting.
I'd tell you why that's not true but there's a bunch of mean looking
guys at my door. I figure it's either the Spanish Inquisition or the
Business Software Alliance. (Is there much
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:07:41AM +0100, Dan H wrote:
Again: There is NO NEED to scroll through redundant stuff! You need to EDIT
the irrelevant stuff away! What's so hard to understand about this?
Do you notice that this posting, although it is deep in an ongoing thread,
covers barely
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:29:49PM +1100, Alex Samad wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:17:42PM -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:00:28PM +1100, Alex Samad wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 03:49:52PM -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
In fact, it's a social convention, a matter of
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:23:39PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/08 19:24, s. keeling wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 01/15/08 17:05, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
The problem, the oft-overlooked side comment made by one of the
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:53:34PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
[snip]
Well, now you're just contradicting.
I'd tell you why that's not true but there's a bunch of mean
looking guys at my door. I figure it's either the Spanish
Inquisition
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:12:07PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:53:34PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
[snip]
Well, now you're just contradicting.
I'd tell you why that's not true but there's a bunch of mean
further down, re reading the same
information I have read in the previous email.
Then the people posting are not trimming their posts as they should.
or taken to the extreme, why not remove all the original post!
Extremism is the hallmark of the non-thinker.
Extremes are alone logical
On Jan 16, 2008 8:08 AM, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/01/2008, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ducks float, they must be made of wood (or small rocks), so if
the witch weighs the same as a duck, then she must be made of
wood and therefore, she'll float, so she's
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 8:08 AM, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/01/2008, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ducks float, they must be made of wood (or small rocks), so if
the witch weighs the same as a duck, then she must be made of
wood and therefore, she'll
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:46:38 +1300
Chris Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Its also to recommended to set the line wrap variable in your editor to
about 72 or so. I don't know how to set that in Slypheed Claws.
Configuration / Preferences / Compose / Wrapping
Chris.
Celejar
--
501 - 600 of 1302 matches
Mail list logo
