> That's called a "Sender Blacklist". More information about how to set it
> up is in the manual at http://www.declude.com/JunkMail/manual.htm in the
> "Your own sender blacklists" section.
Will the "Sender Blacklist" feature of Declude.JunkMail really let me define
domains which are NOT spam a
Hi, Scott,
> >Is there any way that I can isolate a sender's domain and tell Declude
> >that all mail from that domain IS spam or all mail from that domain is
NOT
> >spam? I think I've read discussion that has allusions to this ability
but
> >I'm not quite sure what the feature is called.
>
> Tha
Larry, this is why we really do not want to send out messages about
receiving spam. This is from the man who programs the Declude program.
While I understand you do not want spam bounced, the email that gets caught
is going to bounce, along with any spam email. As stated below, most spam
is sh
Wow.. It maybe time to upgrade the server to dual Xeon 3Ghz 533's..
Moving iMail from one machine to another really isn't that hard.. I had to
upgrade our server.. The directions Ipswitch provides on their knowledge
base is very helpful..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mail
It's not Declude and Imail that's the problem, it's the extreme number
of postmaster messages balling up in your spool that will never be
delivered. At least that has been my experience, I'm in the same boat
(small isp ~6,000 accounts but 60k - 80k messages per day). I wrote a
utility to help cont
I am looking for suggestions to reduce the amount of resources that
Imail/Declude use. We are a small ISP and now and then we get hit hard by
a spammer mass mailing our users ( which equal ~20,000 ) and we get hit
our mail server all but shuts down due to the mass amount of incoming mail
and
Just received a call from the client. He doesn't want to know about the
bounced emails now...he wants the sender to know they are sending spam.
(Like they don't already know that!) I have activated the
WEIGHT40bounce.eml as I have a weight of 40 that deletes. Do I need to
change the name to WE
Just received a call from the client. He doesn't want to know about the
bounced emails now...he wants the sender to know they are sending spam.
(Like they don't already know that!) I have activated the
WEIGHT40bounce.eml as I have a weight of 40 that deletes. Do I need to
change the name to WEIG
Oh believe me, I do right now.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Rooth
> Sent: Wednesday, Febr
I am looking for suggestions to reduce the amount of resources that
Imail/Declude use. We are a small ISP and now and then we get hit hard by a
spammer mass mailing our users ( which equal ~20,000 ) and we get hit our
mail server all but shuts down due to the mass amount of incoming mail and
De
You have no idea
Jim Rooth
Klotron, Inc.
214.244.0979
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sending out a bou
You should probably set the log to DEBUG and send a snippet to Scott. Do not
leave it on DEBUG for more than a minute or so. Just enough to have a couple
of e-mails go through.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
>
I'm using the standard w2k security settings on everything.
Can you run the program from a command prompt?
Could you send me your \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file -- that may provide
me with a clue as to why this is happening.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for
I'm using the standard w2k security settings on everything.
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] permission on external test.
>
> >The executable is in a subfold
> trying to just send it to the one domain. But as much flak as I have been
> getting lately about spam, I think I will let everyone see they are
getting
> spam blocked!
I don't know Jim.
The smell of diesel is calling stronger and stronger.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engine
The executable is in a subfolder of imail. What permissions could it
possible be missing?
I don't know.
But, the "Error 5 starting external program" error message should only
occur if Windows denies Declude access to start the program. Are you using
the default Windows security settings an
The executable is in a subfolder of imail. What permissions could it
possible be missing?
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot
>
> >I' m getting - Error 5
Here's an example of one a message that failed both:
X-RBL-Warning: BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail client
[c040400f].
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam
[c040400f]
In this case, the E-mail failed the BADHEADERS test because of the bog
That was the first place I went to, the security settings. I had Imail send
one to the client that was complaining and of course, it went through
without a hiccup...thanks anyway.
Thanks Scott for your help. Yes that is what I wanted but I had in mind
trying to just send it to the one domain. B
Here's an example of one a message that failed both:
X-RBL-Warning: BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail client
[c040400f].
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam
[c040400f]
> An E-mail should never fail both tests for the same reason, since the
>
on 2/19/03 2:54 PM, R. Scott Perry wrote:
>> After checking the logs I do see the SMTPD and SMTP entries as stated. So
>> that portion is working
now to find out why I am losing attachments.
>
> Is it the whole E-mail being lost, or just the attachment? Neither Declude
> nor IMail will remove a
>Does Declude JunkMail have an email file similar to the virus file
>recip.eml? I have a client that wants to be notified when they have an
>email they don't receive.
In that case, you could use the ATTACH action, and modify the
\IMail\Declude\spamattach.eml file to not include the original sp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sending out a bounced message
>Does Declude JunkMail have an email fil
Does Declude JunkMail have an email file similar to the virus file
recip.eml? I have a client that wants to be notified when they have an
email they don't receive.
In that case, you could use the ATTACH action, and modify the
\IMail\Declude\spamattach.eml file to not include the original sp
Does Declude JunkMail have an email file similar to
the virus file recip.eml? I have a client that wants to be notified when
they have an email they dont receive. We are having an unusual
amount of lost emails and they are (and I am) trying to finds out why.
Almost all attachments with
I've noticed that many times a message will fail SPAMHEADERS and BADHEADERS
for the same problem.
Actually, what you are probably seeing is the results of the "BADHEADERS
Lookup" tool at http://www.declude.com/tools , as that will only show one
of the reasons that an E-mail failed the SPAMHEA
I've noticed that many times a message will fail SPAMHEADERS and BADHEADERS
for the same problem. This is throwing off our weighting system since one
'fault' causes multiple failures. I'm thinking of upping the weight on one
of these tests and disproportionately lowering the weight on the other.
27 matches
Mail list logo
