We negative weight and whitelist on rare occasions. The best thing is to
notify them that they have configuration errors and let them know the
consequences of the configuration errors.
My bet is they do not even know there is a problem. You will be doing them a
favor by notifying them. My guess
How does Declude handle MIME encoded text? Or more to the point, which of
the following would work properly for text that is only MIME encoded?
BODY 25 CONTAINS .unbreak.biz
BODY 25 CONTAINS =2eunbreak=2ebiz
TIA,
-Marc
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
Use this one declude does not decode the message before scanning the body
BODY 25 CONTAINS =2eunbreak=2ebiz
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marc Hilliker
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 12:34 AM
To: [EMAIL
Hi
We do business with BeFree. We've never actually seen any spam from them
(we've seen people spamming using BeFree links, but that's an entirely
different kettle of fish). Because of that, I want to get their e-mail when
it is truly sent from them to us.
So, if I've got this right, whitelist
Robert Grosshandler wrote:
Hi
We do business with BeFree. We've never actually seen any spam from them
(we've seen people spamming using BeFree links, but that's an entirely
different kettle of fish).
It's not a different kettle of fish, just a different kettle of domains
and IP's that they
My imail server is obviously hugely fragmented. If I spend the money on diskeeper will
it be able to keep up with the fragmentation on a very busy imail server? I know this
isn't a diskeeper mailing list but I always get the best/fastest answers on this list.
Thanks
Our experience with Diskeeper on a very busy machine is quite honestly,
no. Diskeeper needs disk I/O cycles to do its work and must steal them
from other processes. Unfortunately, IMail is also disk intensive,
creating massive contention for drive resources.
Suggestion: DO NOT use Smart
Is DNSstuff.com down???
I can not seem to get to it.
Kevin Bilbee
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
Is DNSstuff.com down???
I can not seem to get to it.
Yes, it is down. We are investigating to see what the problem is.
Until it is back online, you can use http://ca.dnsstuff.com , which has
most of the DNS tools available.
-Scott
---
I use diskeeper and use the set it and forget. I use the smart scheduling
and it works like a champ on my servers (gateway and pop3/webmail server).
Thanks,
Kris McElroy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief Technology Officer
Duracom, INC.
www.duracom.net
I am always doing that which I can not do, in
At 12:47 PM 1/14/2004, Timothy Bohen wrote:
My imail server is obviously hugely fragmented. If I spend the money on
diskeeper will it be able to keep up with the fragmentation on a very busy
imail server? I know this isn't a diskeeper mailing list but I always get
the best/fastest answers on
This is good stuff, other than the obvious scheduling capability, does
diskeeper do a better job than the built-in defrag in windows server?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russ Uhte (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 8:07 PM
To:
I'm wondering about similar things along these lines. I assume that
Diskeeper does a better job and is more efficient and has nice
reporting tools, but is this more of a convenience for those with lower
volume servers? I'm particularly interested in the effect on RAID 5.
Thanks,
Matt
Omar
Hmm, some answers possibly:
http://www.serverworldmagazine.com/monthly/2002/02/xpdefrag.shtml
Sounds better, definitely faster, more configurable, but it doesn't
sound like it's a huge leap ahead of built in functionality when it
comes to results. This could though make a big difference on
Scott:
the de facto standard is to have a space after the colon in all
Internet headers.
There IS space after the colon - do you mean a space after between the
quote and the less-than symbol?
From: GOERING iSeries Solutions[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems
the de facto standard is to have a space after the colon in all
Internet headers.
There IS space after the colon - do you mean a space after between the
quote and the less-than symbol?
Sorry, you are correct (I hate variable spaced fonts...). In this case,
the problem is that there is no
At 01:54 PM 1/14/2004, Omar K. wrote:
This is good stuff, other than the obvious scheduling capability, does
diskeeper do a better job than the built-in defrag in windows server?
I found that I had to run windows defrag a few times before it would
effectively defrag the drive. By the time it was
At 02:29 PM 1/14/2004, Matt wrote:
I'm wondering about similar things along these lines. I assume that
Diskeeper does a better job and is more efficient and has nice reporting
tools, but is this more of a convenience for those with lower volume
servers? I'm particularly interested in the
I am not entirely sure what the log entries mean for Habeas. I have changed
from the whitlisting to a standard test as follows:
HABEAS habeas x x 0 10
What I get is a log entry like this:
nHABEAS:10
It was intended to reduce the total if a Habeus warrant mark was
- Original Message -
From: Tandem Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am not entirely sure what the log entries mean for Habeas. I have
changed
from the whitlisting to a standard test as follows:
HABEAS habeas x x 0 10
What I get is a log entry like this:
nHABEAS:10
It was intended to
I thought Scott had it configured that if the Habeas headers were found, it
was considered a fail and therefore the negative weight should be the
first weight parameter, not the second.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I thought Scott had it configured that if the Habeas headers were found, it
was considered a fail ...
Correct.
... and therefore the negative weight should be the
first weight parameter, not the second.
Correct. So:
HABEAS habeas x x -10 0
would probably be the best way to set it up.
Always remember, You get what you pay for.
The windows defrager is free and is essentially Diskeeper Light. Our
testing has shown that the full version is faster and does a better job
during each pass (usually only a single pass is required). And I don't
remember if the windows defragger
Scott, have you determined yet what is causing these random Unknown Var
log entries? I am running 1.77i18 and still seeing about 250 of these log
entries per day.
Unknown Var: %: %WARNING% %: %WARNING%
Unknown Var: %rning: %TESTNAME%: X-RBL-Warning: %rning: %TESTNA
Unknown Var: %:
I decided to test the Habeas Infringers ip4r test to see if it was working,
and in 10 minutes the test has flagged 8 messages. Here is the entry I am
using:
HABEAS-INFRIGERip4rhil.habeas.com*50
It looks like a good way to offset the weight reduction Habeas test by
making the
Okay, so it was 16 minutes and I spelled INFRINGER wrong. So what... ;-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:18 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Infringers ip4r test
I decided to test the Habeas
:))
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas
Scott, have you determined yet what is causing these random Unknown Var
log entries? I am running 1.77i18 and still seeing about 250 of these log
entries per day.
Unknown Var: %: %WARNING% %: %WARNING%
Unknown Var: %rning: %TESTNAME%: X-RBL-Warning: %rning: %TESTNA
Unknown Var: %:
I know this has been answered before, but I can not find it in the archives.
I have one client that wants to turn off the spam filter.
I have individual directories for each domain that is running special
weights and they are one.
How can I disable declude for their specific domain without
Initially I was trying to whitelist an entire hosted domain but was not
able to do so. Declude still caught spam being sent to them. So upon
further checking I found that that individual domain was actually using my
top level config files when email was sent to that particular doamin,
instead
I believe you want to make a per-domain config and
inthe config file you put in there just make all the tests have WARN and nothing
else so if a user in that domain wanted to they could filter mail based on the
headers but you would not be blocking any mail at all.
31 matches
Mail list logo
