Jim,
It's the fact that administrators bounce spam or unaddressable E-mail
accepted by gateways for large sites like AOL and Yahoo that have
completely ruined the use of the nobody alias for my domains because
this forged stuff is constantly hitting my server, bounced from someone
like you or
No don't forget, shifting from 9 to 10 is now done by the computer.
(Man, I hate that transmission. Just feels weird.)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ji
Heck, I thought they had 10 gears but the 10th and 9th were reversed to
give you a great overdrive. Shows what I know. I will check the
archives again and see if I can find something that tells me different
than don't use BOUNCE! That would be the simplest solution...
Jim Rooth
Clotron, Inc
[E
Not because I want to, that's for sure. But I have my largest customer
who wants all mail to be sent back so the sender can see their email
didn't go through. They average 900 emails a day just from bounces!
The overhead caused by it is extremely detrimental but they pay the bill
like clockwork.
Jim Jim Jim. What can I say. Sometimes, it is hard to use that new fangled
transmission that only has 9 gears instead of 13.
Check the current JunkMail manual and archives, and you will be surprised.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From
Not because I want to, that's for sure. But I have my largest customer
who wants all mail to be sent back so the sender can see their email
didn't go through. They average 900 emails a day just from bounces!
The overhead caused by it is extremely detrimental but they pay the bill
like clockwork.
Title: Bounce not an action??
Scott, I have been noticing this for a couple of days. I didn't say anything because of the tremendous load you have had for the last three days. Good job in getting under control!
I am running v1.78i9. But even before that (running with v1.65) I was getting
I have WEIGHT40 set to bounce in the global.cfg.
I know you're looking for an answer, but before I give it to you, can I ask
why you are using "WEIGHT40 BOUNCE"?
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
Does anyone have a current spamdomains file they would care to share?
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
303-421-5140
www.warp8.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send a
I will send you the debug output off-line.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Missing headers
>
> > > Yes. Because the config file that is being used has the
Just a note for helping trap some of the new viruses.
I do not know which virus is the problem because our gateway is successfull
in deleteing the attachment before doing the virus scan. But whichever one
it is uses the domain name of the recipient in the HELO string.
For example if the mail was
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Missing headers
> - Original Message -
> From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > >Scott, can you think of any reas
> Yes. Because the config file that is being used has the IGNORE action (or
> doesn't have the tests listed).
All tests are listed and, as I said, all tests are set to "warn".
The best way to determine what is happening here is to use the debug mode.
To use the debug mode, you can change the "LO
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Scott, can you think of any reason why the DNSBL & RHSBL and a few other
> >tests are being logged with "ignore"?
>
> Yes. Because the config file that is being used has the IGNORE action (or
> doesn't have the tests list
Scott, can you think of any reason why the DNSBL & RHSBL and a few other
tests are being logged with "ignore"?
Yes. Because the config file that is being used has the IGNORE action (or
doesn't have the tests listed).
They are being included in the
message weight, but it is preventing these fail
Scott, can you think of any reason why the DNSBL & RHSBL and a few other
tests are being logged with "ignore"? They are being included in the
message weight, but it is preventing these failed tests from showing up in
the message headers.
Tests failed [weight=34]: BLARS-SPAM=IGNORE CSMA-SBL=IGNORE
Looking foward to it. Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 5:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-beta release
>I'm wondering when the next full (non-beta) release
Does anyone have a batch file to automaticaly download files from Kami's site using
wget? I've looked on the archive for this but haven't found anything.
Thanks
Gene
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMai
No that is not black listed.
Is the ".@" against any standard.
No, that is a perfectly valid format. I can't explain why the Exchange
server would reject the E-mail, unless it was blacklisted for some reason.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The a
19 matches
Mail list logo