I have found a couple of them and have forwarded them to
support.
Thanks
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:19 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude
Application Er
Check to see if there are any declude.gpx
where x is a number and if so send a message to support letting them know of
that.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Is anyone else
seeing an error like this in there system log?
Event
Type: InformationEvent Source: Application ErrorEvent
Category: (100)Event
ID: 1004Date: 2/2/2005Time: 7:50:32
AMUser: N/AComputer: NS2Description:Reporting
queued error: faulting application Declude.exe, version 0.0.
We realize that some of our customers are having issues with
the 2.0 version of Declude, we have worked with some of our customers to
identify and fix them. Expect a release tomorrow with the urgent fixes. We will
continue to work on other issues and have a further release soon after. We
ap
Title: Message
It's a
very good point Keith (and Dave). I only commented on the OS
licencing; as it is the only software I knew of that
enforces licencing which is CPU dependent.
I've
also run into the hyperthreading licencing problem with SQL server, and can
confirm that it is a paper l
Title: Message
From what I have been reading
lately, this policy will also apply to the new dual-processor chips that
are due out next year. One piece of silicon = one license. Not true of Oracle and some others, however, who
view two processors as two processors, even if they are on one chip
John,
I say give them time to do it right. Not giving things enough time
previously is what has caused the present issues anyway. No one works
well under an inordinate amount of pressure. Having had a major server
crash just two weeks ago that required a complete rebuild, I know how
hard th
Title: Message
Andrew,
Not sure if this applies here, but here
is Microsoft stance on Hyperthreading CPU's...
Microsoft says...Per Processor LicensingFor
currently available Microsoft servers products licensed on a per processor basis
(e.g., Microsoft SQL Server™, Microsoft BizTalk Se
Title: Message
Well, in my continuing research I came up with something from
Microsoft's site that claims that you can only use this to serve "Web"
stuff. Obviously a licensing restriction and not an issue with
capabilities.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/overview/w
I received a phone call from Ralph at about 8:30 AM. Basically I was the
engineer to fix the problem was having car problems and on his way in. They
would call me on my cell when he came in a fixed it.
I still have not received a call or e-mail that it has been fixed.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Con
Title: Message
I've
no comment to offer on the suitability of flavour of Windows 2003 for IMail, but
I can comment on how the Hyperthreading is treated.
On all
Windows 2003 servers with hyperthreading enabled, you will see double the number
of physical CPUs in the Task Manager, in the Devi
Hello Matt,
Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 2:16:46 PM, you wrote:
M> So does anyone here have any experience with Web Edition and the
M> limitations, and have an opinion about whether or not this would work
M> with an IMail/Declude setup (or for that matter another E-mail platform
M> since IMail wi
After watching things run for a couple of weeks on Windows 2003 Server,
I have concluded that my IMail/Declude setup is running +30% more
efficiently than it did on Windows 2000. Because of this, I am
thinking of getting rid of my Windows 2000 installations and replacing
them with Windows 2003
There was discussion of this on a non-technical list I subscribe to. It
appears to be a true report. Blocking all IPs in the name of stopping spam.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:13 AM
I'd say this is a well-known problem over here. A similar article was in my
local newspaper a week ago. We've had all kids of trouble with them on the
SMTP AUTH issue. Seems they block some customers from using our SMTP
service, but not others.
We had a very funny case a couple of weeks ago. A
Nothing new here. I've been having problems with customers sending mail
to Verizon addresses for months. I can't even report problems to
Verizon, because messages to their support addresses get rejected.
Shayne Embry
>
> http://www.f-prot.com/news/gen_news/050127_isp_email_blocking.html
>
> A
> >I emailed support but I imagine they are fixing it, I have not heard back
> >from them..
>
> The person in charge of the install program just got in, so I expect you
> should get a response shortly.
It is now 3 hours later. Any fix yet?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For
http://www.f-prot.com/news/gen_news/050127_isp_email_blocking.html
Anyone knows more about this?
Markus
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAI
Thanks. I've added $default$.junkmail to C:\IMAIL\Declude\
Mike
At 09:00 PM 2/1/2005, you wrote:
Yes, you must have the default files in there proper place.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
I had the same problem. The declude.exe is about 1/2 of the size as the
one it replaced.
That actually is normal -- the old declude.exe file had quite a bit of
extra (unnecessary) debugging code in it. This smaller version removes
that code, which makes Declude slightly more efficient.
I emai
I working a routing to process the log files for declude. The ultimate
goal is to produce statitics and graphs based on the information from the
log files. I checked the manual and the descripiton for the various log
formats is vague.
Correct. That's because there are somewhere around 1,000
21 matches
Mail list logo
