> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 5:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] GSC Files
>
>
>
> >Declude scnas GSC files. Is there an option to have them not be sca
I have randomly
picked address in this block and they all come up in spam databases.
69.60.0.0/20 is listed in SBL.
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(805) 520-5800 x7332
Changing the way industry works
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Geiser
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:35 PM
> To: Declude JunkMail
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Discrepancies in New GLOBAL.CFG
>
>
> Hello, All,
> I've been reviewing the current v1.75 GLOBAL.CFG
I did get tossed from the list and had to resign up.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
> (Lists)
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.
iginal Message -
> From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 12:24 PM
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter processing
>
>
> > I would realy like to have a filter that stops on first m
I would realy like to have a filter that stops on first match. This is the
line from my log analyzer
for the last 7 days
HELOFILTER : 1036 14.96 %9.91 %
If I could optimize this Im shure there would be much less processing by
declude.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Mess
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Landry
> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 1:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter processing
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: &q
.
Kevin Bilbee
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be fou
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 3:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] re: RBL's
>
>
>
> > > OSSOFT appears to be identical to SBL. EASYNET-DNSBL contains
> > > S
t; SBL as part
> of it. Therefore, by removing SBL and OSSOFT, you will get the
> benefit of
> the SBL test, while not having it count more than once towards the
> weighting system.
If this is your recommendation the should you change the default GLOBAL.c
Bill
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "JunkMail Declude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 9:29 AM
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] re: RBL's
>
>
> > What good is it t
Are prodigy and yahoo affiliated?
I have been getting valid mail from prodigy users delivered by yahoo
servers.
and need to know if I should add
@prodigy.net.yahoo.com
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(805) 520-5800 x7332
9495
X-RBL-Warning: EASYNET-DNSBL:
http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL9495
X-RBL-Warning: SBL: http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL9495
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(805) 520-5800 x7332
Changi
vered to.
A
small email may make it through wiht high latency where and email with an
attachment will probably time out.
Kevin
Bilbee
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
i360Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:59 PMTo:
[EMAIL P
at
the bottom for management to review.
I get a prety good response when emailing management that there are
configuration issues. Pisses off the admin but it gets fixed!!
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jaso
recover
their own email it make doing this easier.
Hi, I am Kevin Bilbee the Network Administrator at Standard Abrasives.
We are having some issues receiving email from your mail server. I would
appreciate it if you could help me out. Your mail server is missing a few
DNS
SMTP id M2003071620080913586
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 20:08:10 -0700
Received: from public.zz.ha.cn([192.0.0.120]) by public.zz.ha.cn(AIMC
2.9.5.2)
with SMTP id jm23f168443; Thr, 17 Jul 2003 11:05:37 +0800
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
I received an emial to day using the tag to Obfuscate the
mesage.
It looked like this
Message about
They will continue to come up with ways to block content filters.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tandem Gro
I am getting a page not found when going to DNASTUFF and DNSREPORT
Other surfing is OK.
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(805) 520-5800 x7332
Changing the way industry works.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for
?? They also would still call the help desk just for us to say did you
look
at your held email on the server.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Geiser
> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 11:34 AM
> To: D
, they feel in control.
I am going to be releasing the software to a few declude list members next
week.
Kevin Bilbee
Sample email:
-
Welcome to the Standard Abrasives SPAM filter hold queue report.
The following is the email(s) sent to you that may
I have been going through email caught by the BADHEADERS test and most all
of the m are due to the year. I am guessing because it sais 03 instead of
2003.
I would assume this problem is due to the mail client or SPAM software not
being Y2K compliant.
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard
34.044 % 21.078 %
SPAM-LOW : 17 1.451 % 0.898 %
SPAM-MED :152 12.969 % 8.030 %
WEIGHT5:717 61.177 % 37.876 %
Whitelisted:340 29.010 % 17.961 %
-
Kevin Bilbee
Network
Scott,
I found your email to me about this issue. Take a look what you wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 5:16 AM
> To: Kevin Bilbee
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Logging request
>
>
>
I find this hard to believe unless there has been some data loss or the
archives are corrupt somehow??
the thread I am looking for was titled Logging request.
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(805) 520-5800 x7332
_
.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Russ Uhte
> (Lists)
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 1:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] REDIRECT configuration
>
>
> At 02:39 P
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Kratka
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Attack
>
>
> Just to let everyone know so others don't get hit with it, I just
> had a Spam
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] REDIRECT configuration
>
>
>
> >>
g for his mail
server.
What is the RFC and section for reverse DNS??
Kevin Bilbee
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
failures. Out of
10 domains that have been false positives in the past few days 3 are US
based 2 are Asia based and 5 are europe based.
We receive much more email from the us than other countries. Should I
continue to expect such a high rate of DNS mis-configurations for non US
countries???
Kevin
Imail actuall refers to this issue in the release notes for 8.01 and claims
that it is fixed?? So if you are still having this issue call imail tech
support and report it.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
All's I have to say about that is "GO SCOTT"
Any Idea when????
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 5:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
I
would guess you are looking for info on what other users are doing. From my
monitoring of the list your hold and delete settings would be done using
decludes weighting system. I can tell you we do not delete or hold on any one
test.
Kevin
Bilbee
-Original Message-From
I second that. That is one of my biggest issues when people travel and
connect with dialup or dsl or the likes.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill B.
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
the log at the same time.
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(805) 520-5800 x7332
Changing the way industry works.
07/02/2003 09:24:31 Q072801b4d40e REVDNS:8 ROUTING:4 . Total weight = 12
07/02/2003 09:24:31
following
line
gmx.at verizon.net
it would have passed spam domains and also no entry would pass all mail from
sender gmx.at.
So spam domains matches sender domains with the reverse DNS entries of the
servers they were sent from. In the above format.
Thank you.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Mess
Why did this one not get caught by the spam domains test. What would I need
in my sd.txt file to catch items like these.
These are the lines in my sd.txt that contain verizon.net
bellatlantic.netverizon.net
gte.net verizon.net
verizon.net .bellatlantic.
Kevin Bilbee
o clean our entire imail-spool folder from old
> logfiles, queue files, virus messages and hold spam.
>
> Markus
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
Kevin Bilbee
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (htt
I am running the VB script from this list tu purge all held messages after
14days. I guess I could make it part of the app instead of using the vb
script.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Webmaster
> Sent: Tues
the stats. You could create another config
file and have it summarize the prior day and have that emailed to you.
If any one is interested in testing the app please let me know off list and
I will notify you when it is ready. It is written in C#.
Kevin Bilbee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Origi
Good Idea Bill.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Landry
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 4:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
>
>
> Would it make sense to start
I have to agree with David
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Stavert
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 3:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
>
>
> I understand
yet.
Kevin
Bilbee
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kami
RazvanSent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:49 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] If CISCO
does not comply.. ?
Hi;
I just received
an email from Li
Title: Message
What
does your subject line have to do with the body of the
message
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kami
RazvanSent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:49 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] If CISCO
no fixup protocol smtp 25
I just looked in our PIX and this is the exact line.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terry Parks
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE:
We run a PIX with no Issues. Like any thing else if it is configured
properly it will run great.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rifat Levis
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
If it is a CISCO pix you need to add the line
no fixup protocol smtp 25
I just looked in our PIX and this is the exact line.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jason Newland
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1
I any one else having delivery probems to the Imail forum
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
Changing the way industry works.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail
We just cam out with a policy to add our helpdesk phone number to the
headers telling them to ask for the mail administrator if they do not get an
email response.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Susan Dunc
finally did. The router
in question is 199.171.61.195. The owner of our company has been having
problems getting to ATT Worldnet email from his cable modem providor.
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(805) 520-5800 x7332
We have bee receiving apam with a sernder addres like the following
X-Declude-Sender:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would I be safe on filtering mail that has "*" in X-Declude-Sender or not. I
have not seen a non-spam have a sender address like this.
Kevin Bilbee
---
[This E-mail was scanned f
It has been my experienct that the rules.ima is only effictive on mail
placed into the main folder.
I am 7.15
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Earl Baumgardner
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 6:13 PM
log fragment the whitelist is working but the pass checking
actions does not like the WHITELISTFILE line in the .junkmail file.
Kevin Bilbee
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
5 [5]X-Spam-Prob:
0.383084X-UIDL: 354249338
Kevin
Bilbee
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Bill
LandrySent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:08 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] bizarre
Message
Hmmm, I hav
That answers my question?
Thank you.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] language limitation?
>This leads me to ask a question?
This leads me to ask a question? What char set(s)\Codepage(s) does junkmail
support???
Example answer I am looking for would be UTF-8.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jose Gosende
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04,
I think you need to skip attachments or at least make it an option in the
CFG file. I have already discounted the use of BASE64 test because if there
is a text attachment the test will be triggered.
Why do you need full-mime support to skip attachments??
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message
The message was delivered to 18 remote addresses.
I asked the question a couple of weeks earlier.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of andyb
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTE
OK I am having trouble with the spam domains test. I just can not get my
brain to wrap it. Could someone try to give a concise detailed
explanation???
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill B.
> Sent: Friday, Ma
you
want to be configurable?
At this point I can process about 1000 held messages in about 10 seconds. I
have not written the recover portion yet?
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
Changing the way industry works.
---
[This E-mail
I second that. I have messages with a bosy and a base 64 attachment that
reguraly fail the base64 test. I also have found that email from our china
customers are base64 encoded and they regurarly fail the base64 test. I have
it at a low weight.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
>
But if the email is set to bounce and it is sent to multiple receipients
along with postmaster and one of the other reciepients is set to delete then
wont the email just be deleted and never bounced?
Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf O
to send
back.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist and mult rcpt
>
>
>
>
accounts are no different.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 9:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist and mult rcpt
>
>
&g
Why would you white list the postmaster anyway, only 1 of about 1000 emails
to my postmaster account is legitimate. Same for abuse.
Madscientist wrote:
>Most valid messages to postmaster, for example, only have
>postmaster as the recipient.
When ever I notify a domain of a poorly configured
501 - 565 of 565 matches
Mail list logo
