Slightly off this topic but if I have the all_list.dat file in my
declude directory but I do not any COUNTRY/COUNTRIES filters then
X-Country-Chain: Somewhere-Otherwhere-destination
Will show up in the headers but no points will be added to the score of
the e-mail. Right?
That is correct.
The possibility to filter on SUBJECT where the mailbox/account
appears. We use accounts that are first initial/last name, and any
mail that has that combination in the subject is virtually always
SPAM. So, since I'm jcochran, subjects like these would get filtered
on:
This is something that we
This question has probably already been posted before. Is there a list
anywhere that lists all the new tests in the beta versions that aren't
listed in the manual of the release? For example DOW and SPF. Is there any
easier way to find the documentation for these test other than looking
through
Has the link to the manual changed?
http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm no longer works.
I just checked, and it worked for me (with a redirect to the articles
URL, but I still use the URL you listed).
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The
But I'm sure I've seen discussion someplace with reference to lines
containing more than just a domain name in the spamdomains.txt file ... or
is that all that's needed besides enabling the test?
That's a new feature, that allows you to have an alias (for lack of a
better word) that can be
I'm finding this difficult to test and thought that I would ask it
instead. I've found some heavy obfuscation in some Nigerian stuff that
has be scratching my head about how to filter it. One such messages
contains the following:
THE OWNER OF THIS ACCOUNT LATE MR.DENNIS BR=
OWN ,HE DIED
Is there *any* way to allow a different HIJACK setting based on IP
and or MAILFROM?
No. It's either unlimited E-mail, or the standard settings.
Any thoughts on how I can make this work without whitelisting? I also
have DJMPro.
The only other option I can think of would be to increase the
I'm running a per-domain whitelist of e-mail addresses, etc. I
can't seem to get a couple domains configured correctly for one particular
client.
They receive e-mails from lehman.com, but it's a weird sender
address - [EMAIL PROTECTED] I added lehman.com
to the whitelist file
Can you give any idea when the next full release will be out and the
doccumentation updated?
Unfortunately, I do not have an answer for that yet.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Can we make imail/junkmail reject any ougoing message where From or ReturnTo
are not valid local addresses ?
Not easily. You could probably do it with filters, if you listed all local
E-mail addresses, but it could not be done manually.
-Scott
I recall someone indicating that this was possible. By default, Declude
seems to use the per-domain config that is the final destination on the
server instead of the RCPT To address (if forwarded to a different
domain). I believe there is a switch to turn this resolution off, but
it's
Over the last week or so we have been getting terrible performance, mostly
noticed through SMTP (either not accepting connections on port 25 or
really slow response). I have not been able to find any errors reported
in Imail or Declude. Watching Task Manager shows the CPU maxed at 100%
I am using F-Prot for virus scanning. Everytime I've tried using the
fpcmd.exe scanner it fails to detect anything. I'll try this again. My
current scanfile line is as follows:
SCANFILED:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\F-Prot.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM
/ARCHIVE /NOFLOPPY /NOBOOT /DUMB
Glad to see you back. Got a question on domainblack list. What is the type
for it? IP4r? IPBLACK? DomBLACK? what?
There is no domain blacklist -- what Declude JunkMail has is a sender
blacklist, which can blacklist the sender based on their E-mail address or
domain. You can use a line such as:
Welcome back Scott - how was your trip? Any details?
It was a nice trip. :)
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in
I was wondering what exactly the NONENGLISH tests hits on. Is it actual
high bit characters (or what ever classification is most appropriate), or
does it look for character encoding headers such as 'characterset=', or both?
It looks at the subject for several signs of non-English characters
Is order in a filter important for these commands? Specifically can I have
the END in front of the SKIPIFWEIGHT and MAXWEIGHT?
Declude JunkMail processes each line one at a time, so:
ALLRECIPS END NOTCONTAINS @domain.com
SKIPIFWEIGHT 60
MAXWEIGHT60
ANYWHERE 14
a) I think the LASTACTION' log entry is rendering the Deleting Spam
from/to log entry obsolete. It contains the action, the from and to to -
all information that is redundant with other log lines (see red sample below)
This will be changed in the next release.
b) Once an email is bypassing
But is it gone and they just forgot to whack the backup?
dnsreport.com was (is?) the best dns report on the planet.
The DNSstuff.com/DNSreport.com sites are certainly not gone, nor can I
foresee them going away any time in the near future.
My best guess is - Chuck Berry - whoever now own
I'm not getting any matches on ALLRECIPS filters with the IS. Anyone have
any tips?
ALLRECIPS 20 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you change it to:
ALLRECIPS 20 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
then it should work.
-Scott
---
I see a fair amount of spam e-mails that fail badheaders of c8000246 or
c8000247 which means no From address.
As a result all of the headers and body are put in the body. I'm wondering
if the badheaders return code could be made into a variable?
I'd be thinking along the lines of:
BADHEADERS
I have a filter for the following that isn't getting hit:
BODY 4ISBLANK
SUBJECT2ISBLANK
That's because of the way that Declude JunkMail now handles encoded
subjects/bodies -- we will try to change that behavior.
Also note that I have no idea why SPAMCOP(ALL) failed
You could save me a bit of time though by answering this one question.
With custom filters, will they also be skipped if there is a DUL/DUHL/DYNA
in the name and the Mail From is local, i.e. DYNAMIC or DUL-COMBO? If so,
I'll just change those names as well though I would prefer not to.
No --
I have therefore added a ptr:directpceu.com record to the domain, and
tested it here:
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/spf.ch?server=bedstone.orgip=62.128.191.2
6
This page and the SPF test page both say the email should fail. Even
though 62.128.191.26 has a reverse ending in directpceu.com
The
I seem to have broken things worse :) Is there any reason why the
following wouldn't work?
XBL(LAST)dnsbl%REMOTEIP%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.4
60
I tested the DUL lists using this format and it seemed to be
working. Here's the headers from a single hop test
XBL(LAST)dnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.4
60
XBL(ALL)ip4rsbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
127.0.0.420
Scott/Matt, would a configuration like above require multiple DNS queries
since the hostnames defined in the tests are no longer identical? Or is
No matches with the [EMAIL PROTECTED] format either.
Actually, it needs to be [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where the
first [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the name entered by the user, and the second one
is the one that IMail uses).
-Scott
---
Can I point to two whitelistfile's in the per user config file
for junkmail (i.e. to WHITELISTFILE entries on separate lines). For
example, one to main corporate then a personal one. Thanks,
Yes, that will work fine.
-Scott
---
Declude
You are correct -- I'll see if I can get a new interim release online
which will take care of this.
There is a new interim release 1.79i7 at
http://www.declude.com/version/interim . It takes care of the issue of the
ALLRECIPS filter not working properly.
What happened to this valuable site? I get a server not found?
It crashed last night -- it's back up now, though.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable
I am unable to receive from @fiberlinkinc.com if the message is sent
from them and is new. However, if I send a message to @fiberlinkinc.com
and they Reply to the message I sent, then I am able to receive from
them. Therefore only on Replied messages am I able to receive mail from
this company.
Is there any shot of you enabling a different type of test built to do RHS
lookups from the reverse DNS value?
Actually, you can use something like:
BULK-REVDNS dnsbl %REVDNS%.bulk.rhs.mailpolice.com* x
0
-Scott
---
For the test type below you have dnsbl ;
I have only been using rhsbl and ip4r - are these just names to
flag the type of test in global.cfg or are different actions taken on
each? [Hope I am somewhat clear on this..]
That is correct.
ip4r will take the IP address that the E-mail came from,
That would be awesome if it really does work. I'll give it a try this
evening! Am I also to assume that this will work with the %HELO% as
well? That would rock :)
Yes, it will also work with %HELO%. :)
You can also use %MAILFROMBL%, which turns [EMAIL PROTECTED] into
user.example.com, for
My declude logs has the following error on most messages coming in
Invalid XINHEADER: X-Note - Total spam weight of this E-mail is %WEIGHT%.
XINHEADER X-Note - Total spam weight of this E-mail is %WEIGHT%.
If you change that line to:
XINHEADER X-Note: Total spam weight of this
You can also use %MAILFROMBL%, which turns [EMAIL PROTECTED] into
user.example.com, for spam databases that work on the full E-mail address
rather than just the domain.
Scott, are there any such lists that use the full e-mail address that you
know of? These are some nice additional features.
I am trying to understand how this works.. We have the following in the
Global:
EMERGENCYBYPASS bypasswhitelisting 40 2 0 0
This should be bypasswhitelist not bypasswhitelisting.
in the following action in the default file.
EMERGENCYBYPASS DELETE
With bypasswhitelist, an E-mail with a
Received: from ns1.ssc-isp.net [12.9.25.242] by standardabrasives.com
(SMTPD32-8.05) id AA05D10128; Tue, 11 May 2004 23:53:57 -0700
Received: from [80.199.82.218] ([80.199.82.218])
by ns1.ssc-isp.net (SAVSMTP 3.1.6.45) with SMTP id M2004051123492224557
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 11 May
I have a filter called FOREIGN that I have been defeating with END
statements for certain domains with international traffic like so
- Foreign.txt -
ALLRECIPSENDCONTAINS@clientdomain.com
I just noticed an E-mail that was held which failed this filter for this
client. Note
Are you using an interim version of Declude? I just recently had this
problem, and contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] They told me there was a bug with the
ALLRECIPS in the current interim, and that it would be resolved in a
future interim. For now, I've had to return back to the latest beta.
If
Not to start a huge long thread about interims and such, but if you can
get this interim released, do you know if that little problem with the zip
files (zipped but didn't abide by the zipped rules) getting caught by
banext ezip will be fixed as well...
Yes (whenever we say that something has
Is there anyway we can whitelist a test?
With Declude we can have combination tests and tests that give weight
based on a combination of test names.. now I wonder if we can whitelist a
test name:
Whitelist Testsfailedspamcop :)
If we can do this it can help us with whitelisting based on
I just had an email fail spamdomains for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'swbell.net' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid mta7.pltn13.pbi.net.
pbi.net is registered to SBC and is valid (pacific bell internet)
In my spam domains file I have this:
Now Scott needs to notify us for future IP change of his mail server
No, it is your responsibility to check to see if it changes.
Declude JunkMail is designed to prevent legitimate E-mail from getting
caught. If you are blocking the E-mail, there is probably a problem with
your configuration.
No need for a response from NJABL -- they are refusing to accept our mail
to their removal address (a temporary failure for 10 hours from their
primary mailserver; their backup would have outright refused the E-mail if
our mailserver hit it). So it is safe to say that NJABL is willing to
I was wondering if there was a way to decode the Mime encoding of
a message so that I could build filters to catch the Vi*agra portion of
the subject line. I'm included both what the subject line looks like in an
e-mail client and what the internet headers of the message looks like.
The
It would be a great help if you can indicate what is the latest interim
number- for one big reason...
It will reduce the load on your server since we really have no way to know
other than downloading it and seeing if a new version shows up. If we know
the latest interim is the one we have then
The file date does display on the webpage. But I agree the version number
displayed in some manner would be very useful.
We can do that, but then it is back to just releases/betas.
I think the final answer really should be If you don't like the way that
interim releases work, pretend that
The management of interim releases comes up in regular intervals. I agree,
it is a waste of resources of time that email messages refer to a mysterious
latest interim - instead of simply qualifying, interim 1.76i6. I just
can't see how that can possible take more time to the author - but it will
Please understand that I hold you in the highest regard..grin
Surely you know which interim you have available when you post to the list
that something is added or fixed in the latest interim?
I can say that the latest interim is 1.79i7. But that won't help someone
who is running 1.79i3 in
BTW, what is the new link for interims ?
The URL for interim releases is http://www.declude.com/version/interim .
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus
That one is 1.79i6. Scott just said that the latest interim was v1.79i7?
The latest interim available at the web site is 1.79i6.
Just out of curiosity, how did you come by this valuable piece of
information. As I said, I found no mention of it in the archives.
http://www.mail-archive.com is
Is this something new(er)?
I don't believe so.
I'm now also seeing errors related to a bad Subject: header??? In this
case it is seemingly related to multiple spaces that appear at the end or
near the end of the subject. This is essentially causing a double hit for
this as I am already
Does anyone know what the Country Code for Palestine is? I just received
an e-mail which Declude's X-COUNTRY-CHAIN identified as Palestine yet the
official country code list,
http://www.iana.org/cctld/cctld-whois.htmhttp://www.iana.org/cctld/cctld-whois.htm,
makes no mention of Palestine.
My messages from Declude are being caught as spam.
Failing NJABL-DYNA, and DUL
Robert:
MAPS says that our new IP is not listed in DUL. Are you paying for their
service? If not, you should remove the test (otherwise, they might list
all IPs or randomly list IPs or whatever).
MAPS says that our new IP is not listed in DUL. Are you paying for
their service?
If not, you should remove the test (otherwise, they might list all IPs
or randomly list IPs or whatever).
This is the old EASYNET-DYNA zone that they picked up after EASYNET was no
more.
Actually, DUL is the
This sounds like NJABL-DYNA. According to their information, they will
not remove us, and I'm guessing they will not. Interestingly, though,
Easynet was willing to remove our IP, back when they ran it. We'll see
what they say, though.
No need for a response from NJABL -- they are refusing
My messages from Declude are being caught as spam.
Failing NJABL-DYNA, and DUL
Anybody else having this problem? Started a couple of days ago.
That's because we were assigned a new IP. Note that NJABL-DYNA lists
static IPs (such as ours), and does not allow legitimate mailservers to be
Something odd is happening here. I've now seen two recent false positives
where the BADHEADER error code, 8004000e, relates to a Bogus Message-ID
header when looked up with your tool. From what I can see, the
Message-ID headers were both fine (one example is included below). Also
note that
Was just wondering why these messages, that should be delivered to our
maillist account, is being delivered to our spam account.
It's hard to say without more information, but what I can say is that:
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: ROUTING [-6]
The E-mail only failed the ROUTING test, and scored less than
Setting up iMail to store-and-forward the mail for the new server is easy
enough. I just want to make sure I have my ducks in a row on the Declude
side. The on-line manual sez that Declude will treat the mail for the
forwarded domain as outgoing, and claims that the standard and pro
Maybe this was discussed before, but i have spf.log and spf.none growing in
c:\
what to do about these ? why aren't they included in the regular declude
logs ?
Because they are not appropriate for the regular Declude logs. The SPF
logging was added when the SPF support was first added, and
I know this has been requested before, but if more people request it,
won't it get higher on the list...
The TESTSFAILED filter type just begs for the NOTCONTAINS parameter.
The next release will include NOTCONTAINS. :)
-Scott
---
Declude
No backup software, no on access scanning. I am having some other problems
with the machine - I'm about to nuke it regardless - I just wanted to make
sure that declude was still being called to scan for viruses until I get
this box formatted... ugh
Unfortunately, if the files can't be locked by
I am using the ATTACH command with the default spamattach.eml file. Is
there a method to specify a different .eml file? I would like to have
one per domain or for testing etc.
No, only the \IMail\Declude\spamattach.eml file can be used with the ATTACH
action.
Not on version 7. decluse does not know if it is a local or
remote user until Imail 8 and SMTP auth. Imail 8 indicates in
the Q file it the user authed or not not if the user is local
or remote.
And why we can specify separate XINHEADER and XOUTHEADER lines?
That's different.
This may be very minor and possibly just cosmetic, I have found that some
messages will have a %WEIGHT% variable returned for a WARN action that is
-100 when such a score is impossible on our system. The example below is
from a message that scored 0 in the logs (seemingly correct), but shows
1.79i6 is the version that I am running presently. Following are some
other examples, with the first appearance in my inbox being April 12th
which happens to be less than a week after you added the weight variable
to the external tests, and just after you resolved the issue where the
weights
This email failed some tests that it shouldn't--at least the COMMENTS
test--from what I can tell. Help please.
Unfortunately, there isn't much that can be done about this -- it seems
that some .PDF files are sent in a strange way that causes them to appear
to have anti-filter HTML comments in
Logentry for that time period - there is a gap?
05/05/2004 05:15:07 Qae350111006606b6 Could not lock
D:\IMail\spool\Qae350111006606b6.SMD; timed out (j=2).
05/05/2004 05:33:09 Qae85002a00623cd4 Tests failed [weight=44]: SBL=WARN
HELOBOGUS=WARN IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE MOREIPS=WARN
I just came across an issue where DNS Report was giving me a failure for
the following:
FAIL
Connect to mail servers
ERROR: I could not connect to one or more of your mailservers:
mx2.mailpure.com: Connection closed before I received all my data (state
8). Your mailserver disconnected before
There were e-mails delivered between 5:15 and 5:33 - This could not lock
message should've just effected just that one e-mail. It shouldn't have
stopped Declude from being called for 15 minutes. Correct?
After a closer look at the logs, this was what I found - what could cause so
many errors?
I am not running my own DNS Servers. My ISP will have to add an A record for
me, correct?
Whoever handles your DNS would need to add the TXT record. Depending on
that situation, that could be you, your Internet provider, or a company
that the DNS has been outsourced to.
Scott, what's the limit on weight? 2-byte signed int? 4-byte signed int?
4-byte signed int, so it can go from about -2147483647 to 2147483647
(giving you 31 flags to play with).
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for
I know when Imail 8.1 was initially release there were some issues with
Imail and Declude?
I just noticed 8.11 is out and figured I'd upgrade but want to make sure
my Junkmail doesn't break! :)
There was a very minor issue with IMail v8.1 (where E-mail forwarded E-mail
would get scanned multiple
There are no known issues with IMail v8.11 and Declude.
So can I continue to use the latest non-beta or do I need to beta? How
stable is the beta?
It would probably be better to run the Declude beta. It is very stable,
and will help ensure that nothing weird happens when using IMail v8.11
To confirm, you're talking about Declude 1.79?
Correct. I don't recall off-hand which version added the support for
ignoring forwarded E-mails to work around the problem with IMail v8.1, but
it was after the latest released version, so running 1.79 will work
fine. If anyone is running a beta
Is there a manual suitable for printing (not the html page) available on
the website?
The manual at http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm is the only
version of the manual. It is designed to be printable.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The
Does anybody know why my root account gets cought up in the hold1 folder
when using Declude HiJack?
Log entry:
---
05/03/2004 15:39:56 Q4bac085007e9 root is not local.
That's probably because root isn't a valid E-mail address, and therefore
is assumed to be highly suspicious. The E-mail
This started happening just a few days ago.
I have been running HiJack for 6 months now, without this being an issue.
It seems to happen when Declude is sending Virus Alerts to me as the Admin.
admin = root account.
Where can I add the domain name to the root account?
That would be in the To:
This is my postmasert.eml:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is strange -- that should show up as [EMAIL PROTECTED]. IMail
v8 and IMail v8.10 made a number of small changes in the way that it
handles E-mail sent from Declude, so it may be related to that (it sounds
like it may be processing
Is there a tutorial available to set up SPF with Declude?
Do I also have to set up records at spf.pobox.com for this to work?
I have look at the wizard, but I am not quite certain as of how to set up my
domain correctly.
There are two separate pieces:
[1] Setting up your domain with an SPF
If in the Global.cfg, If I have IPBYPASS and the IP of my backup MX, does
that affect HELO in a filter test?
Yes. Declude JunkMail will then see the HELO of the server that connected
to your backup MX record.
Example, I have IPBYPASS and my backup MX. In a filter file for headers and
such, I
Does Declude offer some kind of training for their products? With
things in the virus/spam world getting out of control, it would be great
to get into some kind of training to be sure I am doing all that I can.
No, we do not currently offer any training courses.
I want to block anything sent from onlinelifetime.com. I could use
BLACKLIST fromfile C:\iMail\Declude\blacklist.txt x 50 0
Or
BLOCKSENDER filter C:\IMail\Declude\BlockSender.txt x 0 0
(
BlockSender.txt:
HEADERS 50 CONTAINS @onlinelifetime.com
HEADERS 50 CONTAINS
The header contains:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [62.4.71.170]
is think %MAILFROM% will be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a %Variable% that will give [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
No -- Declude JunkMail only uses the return address, as it is the one that
Shouldnt this fail the helobogus test ? (No mx and no A records)
Received: from finance [217.64.97.78] by mail.cefib.com
No, because the sender was one in your domain. Since most mail clients
unfortunately are not RFC-compliant with the HELO/EHLO, Declude JunkMail
automatically skips this test
For log level high,
I'd like to see the failure line for fromfile test logged.
Current log line:
04/28/2004 00:14:52 Q3dca01de026a2147 Msg failed BLACKLIST-DOMAIN ().
Action=WARN.
Desired log line;
04/28/2004 00:14:52 Q3dca01de026a2147 Msg failed BLACKLIST-DOMAIN
(@bestdeals.com). Action=WARN.
Wouldn't a difference in the number of recipients in the ALLRECIPS and
REALRECIPS variables be a rather good spam indicator, as this means that
the recipient list is a mixture of both valid and invalid addresses? I
guess that such a test could be implemented directly in Declude, but it
has to
What I really want to do is WHITELIST these IP addresses for my domain
only.
That isn't currently possible.
Per-user/per-domain whitelisting is available for the return address, but
there isn't yet a way to have IP whitelisting on a per-user/per-domain basis.
Can you whitelist IP addresses via a file in global.cfg or only inline?
You can currently only whitelist IPs in the global.cfg file (WHITELIST IP
192.0.2.25).
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
M Received: from À [66.63.168.171] by rleeheath.com
M (SMTPD32-8.10) id AE395E1A020E; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:28:57 -0500
M X-RBL-Warning: RDNS-ROUTE: 0.0.0.0 - (Private IP) -
Reverse DNS 0.0.0.0 ??? automatic whitelisted? Wondering how this
spam was autowhitelisted and went right through? Using
Was wondering if there was a way to have a per-domain virus.cfg.
No -- the virus.cfg (like the global.cfg file for Declude JunkMail) only
contains global settings.
Is it possible to have only his domain allow this extension so he
can distribute the file or the only way to change
Are wildcards supported in the sender blacklists?
For example:
@mail*.rapiddealsbyemail.com
@mail*.emailcourrier.com
@relay*.reunion.com
@*xxx*
No, that is not possible.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
We turned on the ipblacklist and domainblacklist and populated them from a
couple of pretty good sources last Thursday and all of a sudden we were
not getting anywhere close to the amount of spam, however some customers
who use ColdFusion started not getting much of their email. Also our dual
Can IP addresses in conjunction with e-mail addresses (or domain
names) be added to a Whitelists.txt file within a per-domain configuration?
No, currently the whitelistfiles can only use domains or E-mail addresses.
-Scott
---
Declude
And to just re-verify something, if the whitelist.txt file is in the domain
folder (per-domain config), the GLOBAL.CFG is skipped and the whitelist.txt
file is used instead for whitelisting e-mail addresses. Or are they used in
conjunction with each other?
That's handled the same regardless of
Something just struck me. Wouldn't it be a good idea to have the
individual addresses in the ALLRECIPS variable surrounded by angled
brackets, if it is possible to do that? It only makes sense to use this
variable with the CONTAINS filtertype, and by having such brackets we
could easily
Just trying to get a domain configured correct in a per-domain config with
the whitelist.txt file (having problems and hearing about it from the
client).
Just so long as you have the WHITELISTFILE option in the correct config
file, and the file exists and has the appropriate domain(s) and/or
I have this weird problem. I've been trying to get WHITELISTFILE to work
for days with no avail. I was pretty sure I had followed all the
instructions, and still no results. So I left the settings in there, and
gave up. Well, sparked by the Perl Script Spamheaders email and my
finding of the
501 - 600 of 3770 matches
Mail list logo
