We have been periodically experiencing problems with
Smartermail not sending any mail or sending mail to different people than you
may have intended. Smartermail has looked at our configuration numerous
times and never found anything. Yesterday afternoon after a particularly
bad day we
: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/smartermail problems
We have been periodically experiencing problems with Smartermail not
sending any mail or sending mail to different people than you may have
intended. Smartermail has looked at our configuration numerous times
and never found anything. Yesterday
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Sudowski -
Handy Networks LLC
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:46 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/smartermail problems
SmarterMail3 / Declude integration is very
PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:46 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/smartermail problems
SmarterMail3 / Declude integration is very different than
task manager? Any declude.exe's ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of scott_powner
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:42 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/smartermail problems
That's what we tried
x882 | Fax: 888-300-2FAX
www.handynetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 12:17 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/smartermail problems
Jay,
We
: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject:
[Declude.JunkMail] Declude / Smartermail questions
I have some questions
about declude with smartermail.
1) With the imail
implementation, if Declude trapped a valid email you could move the email back
into the imail spool and it would be delivered
I have some questions about declude with
smartermail.
1) With the imail implementation, if Declude
trapped a valid email you could move the email back into the imail spool and it
would be delivered to the user. Can you do the same with
smartermail? If not, how do you get the
Anyone have an automated system to interface between SmartMail and Postfix
using Postfix only as a gateway to SmarterMail/Declude/Sniffer???
Thanks,
Michael Jaworski
Puget Sound Network, Inc.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail
: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude SmarterMail - Postfix
Anyone have an automated system to interface between SmartMail and Postfix
using Postfix only as a gateway to SmarterMail/Declude/Sniffer???
Thanks,
Michael Jaworski
Puget Sound Network, Inc.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http
Thanks Len. Looking at IMGate I suddenly realized it sits on top of Postix
and is not stand alone. Duh! Windows shop here with one Postfix machine to
handle the dictionary and harvest attacks for our backup mail server.
Mike
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
, January 05, 2005 9:50 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Declude SmarterMail
What sort of message volume are you
testing? The SmarterTools folks say the CPU loads should be lighter with SM
than IMal. Can you verify that from your experience
is the interface
between Smarter Mail and IMGate? =Di you write a custom XML export
routine?
- Original Message -
From:
Harry Palmer
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:51
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude
SmarterMail
Thanks, Harry!
- Original Message -
From:
Harry Palmer
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 9:42
AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude
SmarterMail
The
IMGate configuration is by Len Conrad http://imgate.meiway.com
Has anywone been beta testing SmarterMail and
Declude?
If so how is it working for you?
We never got the beta working, so curious to know
if this is working for anyone.
Peter
We are
testing SmarterMail and Declude now. It is workingquite well with a few
outstandingissues. It's still in beta.
he.
-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.
- Original Message -
From:
Harry Palmer
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 7:24
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude
SmarterMail
We
are testing SmarterMail and Declude now. It is working
: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude
SmarterMail
What sort of message volume are you
testing? The SmarterTools folks say the CPU loads should be lighter with SM
than IMal. Can you verify that from your experience?
I'm testing it as a "SmartHost" mail
cache right now, with volum
Hello Sanford,
Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 2:05:17 AM, you wrote:
I think you're missing the whole point here. I never claimed (at least
I don't think I did) that XML was a better/faster way of storing large
amounts of relational data with high I/O demands.
Of course there are better methods of
Any word on whether Declude has decided to support Smartermail? I'm
running Imail 7.13 and 8.10. No rush to switch except for reliability.
I'm tired of Imail NIC problems and the POP service always locking up.
So far I've been extremely happy with Smartertools products.
--
Best regards,
David
What about SQL support in another product? I'd look at switching but the db
storage is key to me. I rebuilt a machine after a crash and had imail back
running with 100+ domains and 2000 users quickly with all the account info
coming from their.
E
-- Original Message
Hello Eric,
Monday, November 8, 2004, 9:30:42 AM, you wrote:
EK What about SQL support in another product? I'd look at
EK switching but the db storage is key to me. I rebuilt a machine
EK after a crash and had imail back running with 100+ domains and
EK 2000 users quickly with all the account
Mailing Lists wrote:
We're moving our installs to SM as well, hoping to see Declude support
for it ):
Ditto! One more vote for SM.
Jim
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
We're moving our installs to SM as well, hoping to see Declude support for
it ):
PV
- Original Message -
From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 9:26 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail
Any word on whether Declude has
We're moving our installs to SM as well, hoping to see Declude support
for it ):
J Ditto! One more vote for SM.
Looks like we're going that route as well with our 2 (soon to be 3)
installations.
Really hope to be able to take Declude with us. If not, will probably migrate
to MXGuard.
]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail
We're moving our installs to SM as well, hoping to see Declude support
for it ):
J Ditto! One more vote for SM.
Looks like we're going that route as well with our 2 (soon to be 3)
installations.
Really hope to be able to take Declude with us
DS We are probably leaning this way too but still unsure because of sign-up
DS applications we run require we store email account user info into SQL.
Yep, email address and associated date link to other customer data for
us too. The way to handle it is through syncing dbase data with data in
the
we will move to smartermail as soon as declude release a version for it
- Original Message -
From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail
DS We are probably leaning
They are so far ahead of Imail by using. . . XML instead of. . .
registry it's not funny.
Hrm. An XML file vs. a memory-mapped, intelligently cached, indexed
b-tree.
Or an XML file vs. a central RDBMS already holding subscriber data and
used by multiple third-party applications.
Or an
Hello Sanford,
Monday, November 8, 2004, 4:36:07 PM, you wrote:
They are so far ahead of Imail by using. . . XML instead of. . .
registry it's not funny.
SW Hrm. An XML file vs. a memory-mapped, intelligently cached, indexed
SW b-tree.
The biggest problem with the registry is that it
, November 08, 2004 8:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail
Holding off on SmarterMail here too and again need SQL DB with email account
info for our integrated member applications. Do you have a link to MailMax?
I am just as upset as others about IMail
been
looking at MailMax as a potential iMail replacement).
- Wolf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sullivan
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail
Hello Eric
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 7:32 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail
Has anyone load tested Smartermail? It looks pretty good, but being
rather
new on the market and only showing smaller clients as their customers I'm
wondering how
The biggest problem with the registry is that it is basically an
opaque binary file structure that if (when) it gets corrupted is
almost irretrievable.
It's irretrievable if people don't have a backup. If people don't run
backups, they shouldn't run mailservers.
The claim that
34 matches
Mail list logo
