RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

2003-09-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
Since we house mulitple domains (using spam filtering) and this filter test is used in the Global file it seems it would fail every other domain email (i.e. 1000 weight) that we house on the same box?! Is there a way to only define it for use in the default config file for that

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

2003-09-03 Thread George Kulman
03, 2003 7:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule Since we house mulitple domains (using spam filtering) and this filter test is used in the Global file it seems it would fail every other domain email (i.e. 1000 weight

[Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

2003-09-02 Thread Keith Johnson
I have a customer who only wants to get email to a list of valid employees, no one else (i.e. ex-employees). However, the list of ex-employees is too long for him to come up with, thus he gave me the list of valids. I looked, but I don't think Declude has a HEADER tag called DOESNOT CONTAIN,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

2003-09-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a customer who only wants to get email to a list of valid employees, no one else (i.e. ex-employees). However, the list of ex-employees is too long for him to come up with, thus he gave me the list of valids. I looked, but I don't think Declude has a HEADER tag called DOESNOT CONTAIN,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

2003-09-02 Thread Keith Johnson
Scott, The problem with using the CONTAINS is that I would have to have a list of the ex-employees and the only list he can put together is the good employees. Thus if I used the CONTAINS I would be hitting good employee email. Any other suggestions, thanks for your time. Keith What

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

2003-09-02 Thread Keith Johnson
Karen, My bad, I failed to mention this is a Store and Forward domain... Keith -Original Message- From: Karen D. Oland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

2003-09-02 Thread Karen D. Oland
Delete the nobody alias. Then, only valid email in his domain will be accepted. Delete all old employees not on the list of valid names you just received from the domain. -Original Message- From: Keith Johnson The problem with using the CONTAINS is that I would have to have a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

2003-09-02 Thread Karen D. Oland
Keith, What about at the client end? Could he not filter at his mail server to refuse mail for non-local users? It sounds like you need a to version of MAILFROM -- then you could delete all those that failed the test. Perhaps a domain rule that tests for each of his vlalid user names and adds

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

2003-09-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
CONTAINS *would* work in this way. For example: HEADERS -1000 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED] HEADERS -1000 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... In this case, an E-mail with [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the headers would always receive a weight less than 0. You can then create a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

2003-09-02 Thread Keith Johnson
Scott, SWEET, that is a great idea, I'll give it a go, you are the man. Keith Johnson CONTAINS *would* work in this way. For example: HEADERS -1000 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED] HEADERS -1000 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... In this case, an E-mail with

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

2003-09-02 Thread Keith Johnson
] Cc: Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule Scott, SWEET, that is a great idea, I'll give it a go, you are the man. Keith Johnson CONTAINS *would* work in this way

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

2003-09-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
I spoke to soon. If I use the weighting method, it hurts my ability to use the Weight system to guard them against Spam. Your thoughts... Ah, I see. In that case, you can have the same filter, but instead of having it defined as MYFILTER filter C:\IMail\Declude\myfilter.txt x -1000

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule

2003-09-02 Thread Keith Johnson
: [Declude.JunkMail] Need aid on Declude Header rule I spoke to soon. If I use the weighting method, it hurts my ability to use the Weight system to guard them against Spam. Your thoughts... Ah, I see. In that case