Thanks Darrell,
That was what I was afraid of. How are others dealing with per user
black lists? Are they using IMail rules to accomplish this? Right now
I manage all domain configurations for my clients and typically do not
allow per user options. However, I would like to build-out a web based
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per-User Blacklist
Thanks Darrell,
That was what I was afraid of. How are others dealing with per user
black lists? Are they using IMail rules to accomplish this? Right now
I manage all domain configurations for my clients
Personally, I do not do per user blacklists. However, as one off
requests we have done this. In general if we are blacklisting something
its typically a global blacklist. Which may not be ideal in all cases
in an ISP type environment.
Darrell
Dean Lawrence wrote:
Thanks Darrell,
That
Thanks Darrell and Darin,
This is pretty much my belief as well, but I was just trying to see if
it was a feasable option to offer it on a per user basis. I agree that
it would be a nightmare to try and manage all those tests.
Dean
On Jan 2, 2008 11:50 AM, Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL
Dean,
What you read in the manual is correct. The only way to do this would
be to setup junkmail via per user and have a test for each user as their
own blacklist. For a *small* group of users this could be done, but on
any level of scale it would be impractical not only from a management
Is it possible to create a per-user blacklist? From what I have seen
in the manual and in the knowledge base, I have to define a test in
the global config file. I could do this for a per domain basis, but to
do it for every single user would be excruciating.
Thanks
--
I'm asking for your experience, and any gotcha's I may be missing.
Our main domain accounts for 95% + of our email clients.
On this domain, I have been using Per-User configuration files for clients who
need something different from the $default$.config. I set up domain folders,
and have a
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:00 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User config redirecting
I'm asking for your experience, and any gotcha's I may be missing.
Our main domain accounts for 95% + of our email clients.
On this domain, I have been using Per-User configuration files for clients
Sorry for re-posting but
from Thursday to Monday, no messages of the list.
If any, please re-answer.
Thanks
Andres.-
/***/
Hi List
I wonder if some have experience by configuring the per user and per domain
settings.
I mean, having 5000 users per domain, each user by domain will
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Per user config and performance
Sorry for re-posting but
from Thursday to Monday, no messages of the list.
If any, please re-answer.
Thanks
Andres.-
/***/
Hi List
I wonder if some have experience by configuring the per user and per
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 9:27 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Per user config and performance
Sorry for re-posting but.from Thursday to Monday, no messages of the list.
If any, please re-answer.
Thanks
Andres.-
/***/
Hi List
I wonder
Hi List
I wonder if some have experience by configuring the per user and per domain
settings.
I mean, having 5000 users per domain, each user by domain will choose if
Declude Antispam or not.
So, should be a file ( for all users same configuration, _not_ customized
for each one ) like
Can someone tell me what to put in the per user 'user.junkmail' file that would
cause all messages to effectively be whitelisted for that user (user does not
want anything tested by JunkMail)? Currently, all tests are set to 'WARN', but
that's not producing the desired results.
Thanks!
Kim W.
Kim,
You could just set the action to IGNORE. You cannot fully turn of
scanning, but by setting the IGNORE action, all mail will pass through
the system.
Dean
On 12/15/06, Kim Premuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone tell me what to put in the per user 'user.junkmail' file that would
, December 15, 2006 2:21 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: SPAM-WARN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User Filtering
Kim,
You could just set the action to IGNORE. You cannot fully turn of
scanning, but by setting the IGNORE action, all mail will pass through
the system.
Dean
On 12/15
Hi there,
I wonder if someone faced with this situation, and the best way to solve it:
My manager wants to set up Junkmail by 'opt in'. I mean, If you want, you
pay for it, you got your own 'user.junkmail' config file added to the
apropiate domain subfolder under IMAIL\declude\ directory.
To
C:\imail\immsgexp.exe -td:\imail\domains\yadayada.com\users -d7 -mspam
Thanks Dave! This is what I was looking for. Will I get a help screen with
the /? flag or is there more information on the flags for this?
Sheldon
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per user configuration web interface?
C:\imail\immsgexp.exe -td:\imail\domains\yadayada.com\users -d7 -mspam
Thanks Dave! This is what I was looking for. Will I get a help screen with
the /? flag
Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 5:26 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Per user configuration web interface?
There was discussion about a year or so ago and I was part of it, but I
cannot find the threads or info.
I sold my company in April but I am
I've looked in the documentation and haven't found (can't find :-) if it
is possible to have a per user alert message. We need to build the
messages with custom values (fields) from a database.
TIA,
Rod
--
Roderick A. Anderson
Project Manager
Technology Services Management Group
We have JM Pro, and have a few per-user settings. Now we have a client with
a nobody alias setup to catch all emails that aren't specifically
addressed to one of their mailboxes. They want custom JM settings for this
nobody alias. Can we just setup a nobody.jumkmail file like we would for
any
We have JM Pro, and have a few per-user settings. Now we have a client with
a nobody alias setup to catch all emails that aren't specifically
addressed to one of their mailboxes. They want custom JM settings for this
nobody alias. Can we just setup a nobody.jumkmail file like we would for
any
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] per user settings question
We have JM Pro, and have a few per-user settings. Now we have a client
with
a nobody alias setup to catch all emails that aren't specifically
addressed to one
Hmmm..., that doesn't quite do what they want. They have an mailbox
julie, and nobody is an alias that resolves to julie. They want different
JM settings for mail specifically addressed to julie versus mail addressed
to no legitimate mailbox (which would get handled through the nobody alias).
Thanks, Scott. Actually, we're back at IMail 7.15. I have yet to see any
real benefit in the 8.x series.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] per user settings
I'm working on a white list solution to allow per user white listing
based on the sender/sending domain. My setup is primarily as Store
and Forward for another server. I have about 500 domains with about
20,000 users doing 300k msgs per day.
Redirecting looks like a nice option but I'm a bit
Of David Sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 11:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User Whitelisting Options
I'm working on a white list solution to allow per user white listing
based on the sender/sending domain. My setup is primarily as Store
and Forward for another
Hello David,
Tuesday, March 9, 2004, 1:06:42 PM, you wrote:
KDa. Using %ALLRECIPS% can cause problems when there is a larger
KD number of recipients. Some of the parameters may not be passed
KD or may be are stripped off due to limitations of the length of a
KD command
KD I have written an external test that at the domain level allows
KD the administrator decide whether the domain or user level
KD has priority when whitelisting or blacklisting.
What's your logic in that?
The idea is the following:
A specific company has certain organization that
I am currently using the per user setting on some of my users. I have a
question before I go any further with creating the personal .junkmail files.
If I have tests 1,2,3,4 defined in my Global.Cfg file and I have only test
1,2 defined in my user.junkmail file am I correct to say that it will
I am currently using the per user setting on some of my users. I have a
question before I go any further with creating the personal .junkmail files.
If I have tests 1,2,3,4 defined in my Global.Cfg file and I have only test
1,2 defined in my user.junkmail file am I correct to say that it will
I am still having issues with this. I have the REDIRECT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] c:\dir\dir\filename in both the global.cfg and the
$junkmail file. I also have the renamed copy of the $junkmail file with
the custom actions in the Imail directory. It is not processing the
users settings...
Can you look
Argh. I know this has been covered buy I can't find it in my own
archives from the group..
Where do I define per user tests ? I am trying to use the REDIRECT (
REDIRECT [EMAIL PROTECTED] c:\dir\dir\username.txt ) statement to point at
a username.txt with their own configs in it. Particularly
Where do I define per user tests ?
Tests in Declude JunkMail are global. The best you can do for a per-user
test is one that runs for everyone, but actions are only taken on the test
for specific user(s).
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per user tests
Where do I define per user tests ?
Tests in Declude JunkMail are global. The best you can do for a
per-user
test is one that runs for everyone, but actions are only taken
Tests in Declude JunkMail are global. The best you can do for a per-user
test is one that runs for everyone, but actions are only taken on the test
for specific user(s).
If I define the tests ( ie: a fromfile ) in the global.cfg, how do I
make it apply for only one person in the $junkmail
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Per user tests
Tests in Declude JunkMail are global. The best you can do for a
per-user
test is one that runs
Ahh. OK. I am getting it now. So, to whitelist for that particular users
fromfile, I would set the test to assign weight 0 in my global.cfg, and
then in the users config file ( a renamed copy of the $junkmail file ),
I would use a ROUTETO statement ?
Is this correct ?
That should work fine. That
On the per user configurations, any problems if the user has a period in the
name?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
I'm about to add Declude Junkmail to our existing mail server, and had
some questions. Due to mixed desire for server-side spam filtering, we
are making it an opt-in setup for spam filtering. I'm currently only
adding headers to positive results and will redirect these to a
subfolder later.
However, is there any way to limit testing to a specific list of users,
and also to only alter the headers of these messages, without touching the
others?
Unfortunately, there is no way to ensure that E-mail to a specific user
will not be scanned, or to prevent the global headers (such as
Is it possible to create/setup a per-user blacklist that each user can
maintain?
Thanks,
Greg
attachment: winmail.dat
Hello List,
I tried to setup user/domain setting with multiple actions for Junkmail,
and it does not seem to be working.
I've setup two actions per test attach, and mailbox. The parameter for the
mailbox option is bsumariwalla-spam, where bsumariwalla indicates a
Imail user account. What I'd
Hello List,
Oopps forgot the log files
I tried to setup user/domain setting with multiple actions for Junkmail,
and it does not seem to be working.
I've setup two actions per test attach, and mailbox. The parameter for the
mailbox option is bsumariwalla-spam, where bsumariwalla indicates
I'm not asking for help, just offering an opinion...
Using Declude with one CFG file and multiple Domains one
could set up a default JNK/Action file with weight tests
as follows:
CFG:
WEIGHT1 weightrange x x 10 19
. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User - Alias Account
What if you created a mailbox instead of an alias on the first virtual
domain that only forwarded and did not store? Would JunkMail process
before
Imail forwarded
. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User - Alias Account
I have a client with an alias on 1 virtual domain that points to a
mailbox
on a second virtual domain.
I want to enable SPAM blocking
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Todd Ryan
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User - Alias Account
Scott,
I had a situation where there was an alias that pointed to another
I have a client with an alias on 1 virtual domain that points to a mailbox
on a second virtual domain.
I want to enable SPAM blocking on the alias, but not on the actual mailbox.
I tried creating the .junkmail file in the domain folder in which the alias
exists, but it is not actually dealing
I have a client with an alias on 1 virtual domain that points to a mailbox
on a second virtual domain.
I want to enable SPAM blocking on the alias, but not on the actual mailbox.
I tried creating the .junkmail file in the domain folder in which the alias
exists, but it is not actually dealing
] )
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: October 2, 2002 1:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User - Alias Account
I have a client with an alias on 1 virtual domain that points to a mailbox
, 2002 4:58 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User - Alias Account
Bummer.
Thanks anyway.
Trent
---
Trent M. Davenport - Systems Administrator
Northern Television Systems Ltd - WHTV
203-4103 4th Avenue, Whitehorse, YT Y1A 1H6
(867) 393-2225 X204, (867) 393-2224 FAX
What if you created a mailbox instead of an alias on the first virtual
domain that only forwarded and did not store? Would JunkMail process before
Imail forwarded?
Good idea -- Declude JunkMail would scan based on the name of the mailbox,
before the E-mail was forwarded.
] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] )
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: October 2, 2002 2:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User - Alias Account
What if you created a mailbox instead of an alias
We're doing that very thing...it works well.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Trent M. Davenport
Sent: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:32:55 -0700
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User - Alias Account
I'll try that and let you know how it goes.
Trent
---
Trent M. Davenport - Systems
: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User/Domain Global.cfg
Like the junkmail file, can you also use per user/domain global.cfg
files with Pro version?
No -- the global.cfg file is for global settings, and can't be used on a
per-domain/per-user basis.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail
Along a similar line, can outgoing rules be per domain? If so, how would we
do that?
In Declude JunkMail, the only per-user/per-domain settings are the actions.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail
JunkMail-Pro on IMail 6.04 on WinNT...
I have a user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], which has an alias, SomeAlias. I also
have my per-user config set up and verified to be working properly.
If I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the domain's
$default$.JunkMail is used instead of the SomeUser.JunkMail
I have a user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], which has an alias, SomeAlias. I
also have my per-user config set up and verified to be working properly.
If I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the domain's
$default$.JunkMail is used instead of the SomeUser.JunkMail
I also tried creating a
You can just create a \IMail\Declude\domain.com\SomeAlias.JunkMail file,
and Declude will use that.
-Scott
Hi, Scott. Sorry, but that's not what I'm seeing. Here's the details.
user = [EMAIL PROTECTED],
alias = SomeAlias, which resolves to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At the
Hi, Scott. Sorry, but that's not what I'm seeing. Here's the details.
user = [EMAIL PROTECTED],
alias = SomeAlias, which resolves to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is SomeAlias [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]? If
it's [EMAIL PROTECTED], then you would need to use
Hello Scott,
We have been using Declude Junk Mail for almost one
year and have about 5% of our users that have opted out of the program for one
reason or another.
I have a question about the per user default file.
I have set all the tests to IGNORE or WARN. But my question is, can I just
We have been using Declude Junk Mail for almost one year and have about 5%
of our users that have opted out of the program for one reason or another.
I have a question about the per user default file. I have set all the
tests to IGNORE or WARN. But my question is, can I just have an empty
63 matches
Mail list logo
