What's the difference between spamcheck and declude?
- Original Message -
From: "Frederick P. Squib, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 7:47 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamcheck
> Tom,
> http://w
What's the difference between spamcheck and declude?
Spamcheck is an addon for Declude JunkMail ( http://www.declude.com/tools
lists a number of addons for Declude).
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
e ini-file I've
posted some days ago in this thread.
Markus
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 6:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamcheck
>
How about a test to check if the e-mail address in the
subject is the same as the person it was sent to?
Or how about a test that checks for the following dupe names:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We're looking into tests that would detect these tricks.
I know that this may have been covered in previous posts, but I wanted
to cover this topic again. (I may even have discussed this myself). I have
some users that have requested that they receive everything so I have had
their accounts whitelisted (WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]). I also have b
> Why didn't negative weight get added for this piece of mail I
> received from the IPNOTINMX Test.
>
> Global.cfg
> IPNOTINMX ipnotinmx x x 0 -3
>
> Default.junkmail file
> IPNOTINMX IGNORE
Because you set the action to "IGNORE". Change it to "WARN" and it sh
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick
Childers
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] IPNOTINMX
> Why didn't negative weight get added for this piece of mail I
> received from the IPNOTINMX Test.
>
> Global.cfg
> IPNOTINMX ipnot
Why didn't negative weight get added for this piece of mail I received
from the IPNOTINMX Test.
The E-mail definitely should not fail the IPNOTINMX test, as the IP it came
from is in the MX record for the domain in the return address. The log
file snippet confirms that the E-mail did not fail t
ROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IPNOTINMX
>Why didn't negative weight get added for this piece of mail I received
>from the IPNOTINMX Test.
The E-mail definitely should not fail the IPNOTINMX test, as the IP it
came
from is in the MX record for the domain in the return add
My expected behavior would be that this piece of mail *SHOULD* have had
-3 subtracted from it. This is the behavior that I am shooting for.
Correct.
The log files for Declude show that it wasn't subtracted
03/31/2003 18:24:33 Qce102a4f0086c057 BASE64:5 SNIFFER:8 . Total weight = 13
Something i
Hi;
We have received much SPAM from that address and they are in our blacklist -
which simply means automatic deletion.
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROT
pause and reflect." Mark Twain
- Original Message -
From: "Kami Razvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:15 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] bigfoot.com?
Hi;
We have received much SPAM from that address and they are
You need to add the "XSENDERON" setting in the GLOBAL.CFG so that you
can see what the actual sender e-mail address is.
Do you mean the auto-whitelisting feature for webmail?
John Tolmachoff
MCSE, CSSA
Owner, Network Engineer/Consultant
PO Box 91975
City of Industry, CA 91715-1975
626-737-60
At 07:56 AM 4/5/2003, John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) wrote:
You need to add the "XSENDERON" setting in the GLOBAL.CFG so that you
can see what the actual sender e-mail address is.
Done...
Do you mean the auto-whitelisting feature for webmail?
Yep. It was working before, just all of the sudden sto
> Yep. It was working before, just all of the sudden stopped. No changes
> here since the report from the customer.
What does the log show?
John Tolmachoff
MCSE, CSSA
Owner, Network Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
City of Industry, CA
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanne
At 08:20 AM 4/5/2003, John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) wrote:
> Yep. It was working before, just all of the sudden stopped. No changes
> here since the report from the customer.
What does the log show?
04/05/2003 03:15:26 Qbaca06c OSSOFT:5 BADHEADERS:8 SNIFFER:10 BADIPS:10
WIREHUB-DNSBL:5 . Total weig
What does the log show?
04/05/2003 03:15:26 Qbaca06c From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 64.14.48.145 ID:
The next release will fix this.
A change was made to the last beta to the whitelisting to prevent false
positives, but it ended up breaking the "all@" functionality.
> Yet some mail is whitelisted properly to other customers...
Look at these once you have the XSENDER setting ON.
I am thinking it will show that the actual sender is different than the from
address in the header.
John Tolmachoff
MCSE, CSSA
Owner, Network Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
Ci
Just upgraded and all my emails are getting stuck in the Spool directory and
not getting delivered.
Any thoughts??? Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What do the logs shows?
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
I have noticed something. It seems that %REMOTEIP% always shows the IP the
Imail received from, even if that IP is listed in the Global.cfg as
IPBYPASS.
>From my Global.cfg:
LOGLEVELHIGH
HOP 0
HOPHIGH 2
CONSOLE ON
IPBYPASS67.94.227.36
>From my vulnerabi
> That's because Declude JunkMail and Declude Virus are separate. Although
> they share a lot of functionality, this is a place where they
> differ: Declude JunkMail has the ability to use the HOP/HOPHIGH/IPBYPASS
> options, but Declude Virus does not.
DUH. I guess that is what I get for working
For a given to address (i.e. WhiteListFile @TheCustomer.com
D:\IMail\Declude\WL_TheCustomercom.txt) what is the syntax for the
lines in WL_TheCustomercom.txt?
Can it be something like @notspam.com? Can it be an IP
address?
Each line in the file can be either an E-mail address ("[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Somebody mentioned aol.com and netscape.com a while ago, but I cant recall which
format it was. Perhaps somebody else remembers...
aol.com netscape.com
AND/OR
netscape.comaol.com
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Dan Patnode
Sent: 29 May 2003 16:12:11 -0700
Subject: [Declude.JunkMai
Before SPAMDOMAINS we've used a blacklist to give all from the following
sender-domains a little weight:
@yahoo.com
@yahoo.co.uk
@yahoo.de
hotmail.com
msn.com
email.com
email.it
@aol.com
@mail.com
lycos.com
lycos.co.uk
lycos.it
@info.it
@usa.net
earthling.net
earthling.com
earthlink.net
earthlink.
Just to confirm:
If I want to find out which of this domains can be used with the
spamdomains-test, I have to find a legit/real mail from each one, so
that I can check if the IP of those outgoing smtp-gateway has a REVDNS
containing the domain name. Right?
Correct. Technically, you might need to
On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 07:23 PM, Bill B. wrote:
Somebody mentioned aol.com and netscape.com a while ago, but I cant
recall which format it was. Perhaps somebody else remembers...
aol.com netscape.com
AND/OR
netscape.comaol.com
Bill
I think you mean netscape.net no? I might be over-
Thats correct, my mistake. It should be netscape.net
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Levitsky
Sent: Thu, 29 May 2003 22:33:21 -0400
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains
On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 07:23 PM, Bill B. wrote:
> Somebody mentioned aol.com and netscape.
I want to whitelist from a file in both the config.cfg and
$default$.junkmail
I know this is the command for $default$.junkmail
WHITELISTFILE C:\IMail\Declude\WhiteList.txt
What is the command for the config.cfg.
The WHITELISTFILE command does not work in the global.cfg file. It only
applies t
What command can I use to White list from a file in the config.cfg
Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist
>
> >I want to wh
What command can I use to White list from a file in the config.cfg
To whitelist in the global.cfg file (FYI, there is no "config.cfg" file),
you need to use the WHITELIST command (such as "WHITELIST FROM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]").
Rather than trying to figure out a way to whitelist from a file in th
X-RBL-Warning: HELOBOGUS: Domain fr_ru1_exch_01.azlan.fr has no MX or A
records.
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 81.80.195.20 with
no reverse DNS entry.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 12 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: HELOBOGUS, REVDNS, WEI
X-RBL-Warning: HELOBOGUS: Domain fr_ru1_exch_01.azlan.fr has no MX or A
records.
Did this fail the hellobogus because they used host name instead of domain
name (azlan.fr does have mx) ?
No.
It failed the HELOBOGUS test because their mailserver claimed to be a host
named fr_ru1_exch_01.azlan.f
When I see the following in a message header:
X-RBL-Warning: WORDFILTER: Message failed WORDFILTER test (294)
Do I assume that this means the message failed the filter on line 294 of
my wordfilter file?
That is correct.
I am seeing multiple messages fail wordfilter, showing line 294, however
Actually, I didn't even notice... That was "quest" not "qwest". The previous entry
for "qwest." should be fine:
qwest.
But just to be safe, it could be changed to:
@qwest..qwest.
-Original Message-
From: "Bill B."
Sent: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 23:44:38 EST
Subject: Re: Spamdomains
Th
Thanks for pointing that out. Perhaps the following will work better:
@qwest. .quest.
I have also added these:
ameritech.netyahoo.com
@go.com .go.com
-Original Message-
From: Dan Patnode
Sent: 02 Jun 2003 21:32:03 -0700
Subject: Spamdomains
Interesting FP toda
Since you are having bandwidth issues hosting your DNSSTUFF.COM site is it
possible to let one of us host a copy.
If you can find someone willing to dedicate a server to the job for the
next week, that would work. :)
We have arranged to move the sites into a data center (with virtually
unlimit
Does anyone have any information about FIVETENIGNORE?
C:\data\ftp\ip4r.htm says "Lists IP ranges of companies that ignore spam
complaints. Warning: May block large ISPs. NOTE: If you are listed, you can
find the address to get removed on their page ('blackhole')."
I ran the spam database lookup
I have a few unused servers at my datacenter but they are all windows 2000.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNSSTUFF.COM
>
Perry
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNSSTUFF.COM
>Since you are having bandwidth issues hosting your DNSSTUFF.COM site is
>it possible to let one of us host a copy.
If you can find someone willing to dedicate a server to the job f
Since you are having bandwidth issues hosting your DNSSTUFF.COM site is it
possible to let one of us host a copy.
If you can find someone willing to dedicate a server to the job for the
next week, that would work. :)
We have arranged to move the sites into a data center (with virtually
unlimit
Is anyone doing anything about these messages. I am getting more and more
by the day!
Unfortunately:
Received: from mail.stevenstransport.com [10.100.1.17] by
mail.stevenstransport.com
(SMTPD32-6.00) id AD69710A015C; Sun, 08 Jun 2003 14:24:25 -0500
Received: FROM declude.com BY mail.stevenstr
Hi Adam,
Can you see these error messages also if you disable the spamchk-test in
decludes global.cfg-file?
Are there other external exe-files configured in the global.cfg?
It seems like all other exe-files called from declude (SMTP, and
SMTPD.EXE to deliver the message) cannot be started.
Mayby
Application popup: smtp32.exe - Application Error : The application failed
to initialize properly (0xc142). Click on OK to terminate the
application.
You can find out more about this at http://www.declude.com/dq.htm --
upgrading Declude to v1.65 should help (it's technically a Microsoft issue
How did this get to Weight of 24.
The easiest way to find out is to use LOGLEVEL MID, which will include a
line in the log file with the weights.
If it finds the item in the email more then once does it accumulate.
For a filter, it will only look at the first occurrence. But, if multiple
lines
> How did this get to Weight of 24.
> FILTER-BODY filter c:\IMail\Declude\IMail_Filter_TextinBody.txt x 0 0
> Item Listed had a weight of 4
I am guessing that it caught more than one line in your filter. From what I can see,
it only lists
the last item caught in your filter file, although i
I am guessing that it caught more than one line in your filter. From what
I can see, it only lists
the last item caught in your filter file, although it will give all of the
points for all of the
lines caught.
Scott, is there a way to have it list all of the lines caught in the
filter? I would
Scott. Do you have any thoughts on how to get a list of all items in a test
that fails.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Navarre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:02 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Counting
> > H
Scott. Do you have any thoughts on how to get a list of all items in a test
that fails.
Yes. This is something that we plan to add.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Counting
>
> >How did this get to Weight of 24.
>
> The easiest way to find out is to use LOGLEVEL MID, which will include a
> line in the log file with t
> And I have nothing for the recip.eml file, so I would like
> suggestions on that one as well. (I screwed up earlier in the
> week and deleted them all... I should know better than to do
> work when I have the flu...).
At the moment I can't find any other virusname to skip.
For the recip.eml
> At the moment I can't find any other virusname to skip.
>
> For the recip.eml I've set
> SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS Vulnerability
>
> And I've creted a new vulnerability.eml with
> SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEDOESNOTHAVE Vulnerability
>
> So I can send out two different warnings for a real virus and a
> vulnerabil
>> At the moment I can't find any other virusname to skip.
>>
>> For the recip.eml I've set
>> SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS Vulnerability
>>
>> And I've creted a new vulnerability.eml with
>> SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEDOESNOTHAVE Vulnerability
>>
>> So I can send out two different warnings for a real virus and a
>
> I have seen it discussed as something some wanted, but I never saw
anything
> talking about being able to use a vulnerability.eml file in a release of
> Declude. I tried searching the archives but "vulnerability.eml" actually
> shows every email with "vulnerability" in it which is a lot of mail.
-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 03:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS
> I have seen it discussed as something some wanted, but I ne
> I decided against notifying the recipient for
> Vulnerabilities. Apparently, vulnerabilities are essentially
> spam - and notifying the recipient would mean that they end
> up getting an unwanted message after all.
Yes. We've had this also until setting the AVAFTERJM option in the
global.cfg
> I decided against notifying the recipient for Vulnerabilities.
Apparently,
> vulnerabilities are essentially spam - and notifying the recipient would
> mean that they end up getting an unwanted message after all.
In my experience, that is true 98% of the time. That 2% percent though can
cause pr
I can get there now with my reporting code.
Hirthe, Alexander wrote:
Hello,
what happened to Spamcop.net? I cannot http them?
Alex
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscrib
We are having problem with Yahoo emails. Are there others having the same
problem?
What is going on with Yahoo?
Actually, it doesn't look like much is going on that hasn't been for some time:
X-IMAIL-SPAM-DNSBL: (YBL,72549026,127.0.0.2)
X-IMAIL-SPAM-DNSBL: (BLARS,72549026,127.1.0.97)
X-IMAIL-SPA
At 05:11 PM 6/20/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Just saw this
on /. and thought that you all might be interested...
http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/
I've just published a
paper on a new and unique spam blocking method called
"Greylisting". The
We have comparable mechanisms designed into the
Anybody using it to send mail? Anybody seeing mail with Habeas headers?
I'm not using it, but have seen a handful of E-mails using it (typically
from the "computer geek" types, not the average end user).
I'm considering subscribing for our outgoing e-mail newsletter, but before
I do, want to k
June 24, 2003 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas
>Anybody using it to send mail? Anybody seeing mail with Habeas
>headers?
I'm not using it, but have seen a handful of E-mails using it (typically
from the "computer geek" types, not the
osshandler
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas
Sorry, didn't make myself clear.
Whitelisting Habeas works from a programmatic viewpoint - I use it here.
But I've never noticed any mail bearing Habeas Headers, so I'm wonderin
>What is the WHITELIST syntax?
It's the word "WHITELIST", followed by "IP", "FROM", or "ANYWHERE",
followed by the text to look for. For example, "WHITELIST IP 127.0.0.1"
would whitelist any E-mails coming from the IP address 127.0.0.1. You
could also use "WHITELIST IP 127.0.0." to whitelis
Isn't the BLACKLIST essentially, anything that fails a test?
my $0.02
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
| Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:55 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST S
>Isn't the BLACKLIST essentially, anything that fails a test?
WHITELIST will force an E-mail to pass all tests, based on the IP address
it came from, or text within the From: address or message
headers/body. So, even if one of those E-mails fails one of the spam
tests, it will go through as
>Actually what I wanted to know more was more about the syntax.
>For instance I know WHITELISTIP n.n.n.n - but is there a way to specify
>a range of ip's or use a wild card in the IP address?
Gotcha. It's all text based, and Declude searches for whatever is after
the "IP", "FROM", or "ANY
How'd you do that ?
Jim
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 10:22 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus Stats
> Viri caught by Declude and McAfee in July.
>
> W32/SirCam@MM (ED) 761
> W32/Hybris.gen@MM 48
>
I run a little MS Access project that scans the Declude Vir*.log files
and then tallies them up by virus type, mail-from and mail-to.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Argos Networks
600 East Crescent Avenue
Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-9411 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 2
On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 16:10
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus Stats
>
>
> I run a little MS Access project that scans the Declude Vir*.log files
> and then tallies them up by virus type, mail-from and mail-to.
&g
>Is there an option to stop testing for other types of filtering methods if a
>previous one is marked to DELETE... maybe even to HOLD. This would save on
>CPU and processing time.
No, this is not possible (although it is already on the suggestion
list). However, Declude JunkMail doesn't usuall
>Is there anything we can do to customize the way BADHEADERS tests? If there
>are several tests that it does, I would like to be able to turn on or off
>those components that give us false positives but be able to use this test
>for components that always find spam. SPAMHEADERS also?
Well, reme
>Can anyone shine some light on this test?
It's a seemingly "forever in beta" test. In our tests, it detected about
85% of all spam, with virtually no false positives. But, outside of the
confines of a test lab, it seems to have too high of a false positive rate
to be very useful. The prob
I want to thank Scott for helping me fix this problem.
It actually turned out to be my DNS server was set to disallow recursion
except from my ip ranges. The only thing was that when I set up the ip
range my IMAIL server was on I mistyped that range.
So the only MX records that it was finding w
>I just upgrade to 1.25a, and I received this a broken e-mail:
There was a problem with v1.25 (and, if you received an interim version,
that would be affected as well) that could cause this. You can upgrade to
v1.25a to fix the problem.
-Scott
> This may be a stupid question but I can't figure it out. I would like
>Declude to bypass a certain amount of IP addresses. These are mostly
>feedbacks and e-mail forms coming from some web pages I host. When people
>receive the forms it fails the SPAMHEADERS test and gets a note. I attempted
>
> Our internal web forms cause every emails produced to trigger SPAMHEADERS.
> To avoid that I would like to put our IP addresses in white list what is
the
> exact syntax to list all the address on 192.168.1.0 ? is it 192.168.1.* ?
> like:
>
> WHITELIST IP 192.168.1.*
Just leave off the * and y
>Can anyone recommend some good (free) test/filters s that I can run to
>catch SPAM? I am using only the OSSRC filter, but a lot of SPAM is still
>getting through.
Hopefully, some other people will answer too, but there is a new test that
I recently found out about that *will* be a pay service
Well, first of all, you are doing anything to "catch" spam. You either need
to "hold" or "delete" spam. I only recomend these two actions on a few of
the tests. This depends on how much spam you get and how many users are on
your domain. If you are like me, email is important but not that impo
> We have had junkmail running for a few months now, but am just really
>beginning to start using it to its full potential. I have created a
>per-user check for my email to check everything and it is set to SUBJECT.
>When something is caught it appears it is just putting SPAM in the head
>Are there any email notifications for Declude Hijack similiar to Declude
>virus? Is there a way to notify customers that they are trying to send too
>much mail or at least let them know that their email did not go because
>they went over the Hijack threshhold?
No, it is not currently possible
>a) are HEUR tests cumulative, e.g.:
>
>HEUR10 heuristics 10 x 4 0
>HEUR9 heuristics 9 x 4 0
>HEUR8 heuristics 8 x 3 0
>HEURheuristics
>
>If the HEUR value is 0., will the weight be:
>
>3 for
Scott,
>> if the value is 0., only the HEUR10 test would be triggered <<
Not to be argumentative, but your sample doesn't quite fit my experiences.
a) a value of 0. doesn't seem to trigger HEUR10 - but triggers HEUR9?
So it doesn't seem as if you are using a "CEILING" test (or rounding)
> >> if the value is 0., only the HEUR10 test would be triggered <<
>
>Not to be argumentative, but your sample doesn't quite fit my experiences.
>
>a) a value of 0. doesn't seem to trigger HEUR10 - but triggers HEUR9?
>So it doesn't seem as if you are using a "CEILING" test (or rounding)
>If I joing postfixgate do I get a kill file with addresses/domains that
>becomes my kill.lst file? Or does it become another test for Junkmail to
>attach to? If its the latter, how do I set it up?
You get the files from postfixgate, and it becomes another test in Declude.
All you need to do
Is this worth the money ($125/yr.)? Is it a good test? Does it have a lot
of false positives?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
The DECLUDE.GP* files only contain a few garbled characters - but may be the
debug log helps zooming in? (PS: Never let me test )
11/06/2001 19:07:16 CFG: Setting LOG_OK level to NONE
11/06/2001 19:07:16 CFG: Set hop to 0 and hophigh to 0.
11/06/2001 19:07:16 Console turned OFF
11/06/2001 19:
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 09:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.28 - SwitchRecip not effective?
Andy, please do not use digital signatures when posting. This causes
system delays wh
>Is there any plan or possibility to allow for multiple actions for one test?
There are no immediate plans to directly support multiple actions per test
(IE having the MAILFROM test add a warning to the headers and have the
subject altered), although it can be done (by defining two identical t
Aha!! That's exactly what I was missing. Thanks!
>If you want, you can have two different tests defined in the global.cfg file:
>
> WEIGHT10weight x x 10 0
> WEIGHT30weight x x 30 0
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkM
Scott,
I would really like the whitelist entries to be in the domain junkmail
cfg file.
Is that something that could be done eventually?
Terry
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.J
>Does it matter where the Whitelist entry is located in the Global.cfg file?
>I made a couple of entries as below and they are still being caught.
>
>WHITELIST FROM @domain.com
They can go anywhere in the global.cfg file. One thing to look out for is
to make sure that there are no spaces at th
>I would really like the whitelist entries to be in the domain junkmail
>cfg file.
>Is that something that could be done eventually?
It's something that we are considering, but haven't made any plans to start
yet.
-Scott
---
This E-mail came from the Declude
T LEGS Web Management Co., Inc.
http://www.getafreewebsite.com
877-483-3393
||-Original Message-
||From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
||Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:26 AM
||To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] White
>OK, Maybe I am trying to use this wrong. I am wanting to allow emails
>coming FROM these accounts to get to my users. For example the domain
>@freemerchant.com is being caught by Declude Junkmail and I don't want it to
>be caught. It is an message showing an order for a customer. With the
>f
Adolfo:
Here an excerpt of my GLOBAL.CFG file
RBL ip4rblackholes.mail-abuse.org 127.0.0.2
DUL ip4rdialups.mail-abuse.org 127.0.0.3
RSS ip4rrelays.mail-abuse.org 127.0.0.2
OSRELAY ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0
urday, December 01, 2001 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help please
> Adolfo:
>
> Here an excerpt of my GLOBAL.CFG file
>
> RBL ip4rblackholes.mail-abuse.org 127.0.0.2
> DUL ip4rdialups.mail-abuse.org 127.0.0.3
> RSS ip4rrelays.mail-abuse.org 1
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webmaster
Oilfield Directory
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 09:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help please
How did you feel this configuration worked, did you have any complaints
>My question is, can you pick and choose which tests you want Declude to
>perform, or are they all done by default?
Yes, you can pick and choose. By default, all the tests that Declude has
defined are run, except for the ones that require a subscription or
normally would not be used for some
>Is there a variable such as %HeaderCode% so that my email notifications or
>WARNING headers can include a string such as:
>
>XRBL-Warning: %WARNING%
>http://www.declude.com/tools/header.php?code=%HeaderCode%
No, but that will be available in the next release.
U
X-UIDL: 601
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declu
501 - 600 of 6317 matches
Mail list logo
