Re: EU security bug bounty, anyone has more info or contact?

Hi Carlos, you can try to contact Julia Reda, @Senficon on Twitter. Cheers, Luca Il giorno mer 2 gen 2019, 21:46 Carlos Soriano ha scritto: > Hello all, > > I just read this post > <https://juliareda.eu/2018/12/eu-fossa-bug-bounties/#bugbounty>, seems > the EU is putti

GNOME 3.11.4 Development Release

http://www.gnome.org/start/unstable For a quick overview of the GNOME schedule, please see: http://live.gnome.org/Schedule Happy coding. Luca Ferretti, in the behalf of GNOME Release Team [1] https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointEleven/Features/ [2] http://library.gnome.org/devel/jhbuild/ [3]

Smoketesting Development Release 3.11.4

:59 UTC, i.e. about 48 hours from now. Please upload your updated tarball ASAP to keep hope alive ... or contact release team if you are not able to do it. Happy releasing, uploading and testing, Luca, in the behalf or release team. [1] https://download.gnome.org/teams/releng/3.11.4/ [2] https

Re: GNOME 3.10.2 Release

Maybe we could add a check in "ftpadmin" script? 2013/11/21 Piñeiro > > On 11/21/2013 08:07 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Hey, > > > > On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 18:26 +0100, Piñeiro wrote: > >> Hello all, > >> > >> Here comes GNOME 3.10.2, the second update to GNOME 3.10, it includes > >> many fixe

GNOME 3.9.5 Development Release

the GNOME schedule, please see http://wiki.gnome.org/Schedule ——– Happy coding and testing, Luca, in the behalf or release team. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: 3.9.5 release status update (a.k.a. fresh packages required)

2013/8/3 Matthias Clasen : > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Luca Ferretti wrote: > >> The current build status is: >> * baobab, glade, aisleriot, gnome-clocks fail to build >>(need new tarballs against latest vala release) > > You can probably get the

Re: 3.9.5 release status update (a.k.a. fresh packages required)

2013/7/31 Luca Ferretti > > > Unfortunately we have two relevant issues: > a) several modules lack a recent tarball release; > b) some modules fails to build. Hi, a second update about release build status. I've just uploaded fresh[1] and latest sources for smoketest

Re: Smoketesting 3.9.5 release

It's simple: I haven't yet decided the way to include it in release set :-) Cheers, Luca Il giorno 01/ago/2013 16:56, "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" ha scritto: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > a preliminary

Re: 3.9.5 release status update (a.k.a. fresh packages required)

gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705150> > > On ה', אוג 1, 2013 בשעה 12:16 AM, Luca Ferretti > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I wasn't able to send it this morning (UTC time, of course), sorry, but >> here is a little update about current status of incoming devel

3.9.5 release status update (a.k.a. fresh packages required)

Hi all, I wasn't able to send it this morning (UTC time, of course), sorry, but here is a little update about current status of incoming development release. Unfortunately we have two relevant issues: a) several modules lack a recent tarball release; b) some modules fails to build. Let's sta

Smoketesting 3.9.5 release

. For more info about GNOME releases smoketesting, please refer to https://wiki.gnome.org/Smoketesting Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

3.9.5 tarball due / release reminder

on August 1st. Thank you in advance and... enjoy your packages :-) Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

No tarball for clutter-gst-2.0

I'll revert totem and sushi to previous versions :( Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Missing gnome-deskop 3.5.90 release

Hi, currently we are missing an update gnome-desktop release. Latest is 3.5.5 but gnome-control-center needs gnome-desktop >= 3.5.6. Could someone take care of it? Thanks in advance, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-l

Re: Be respectful and considerate. A complaint.

2012/7/3 Jasper St. Pierre > > You linked the same bug twice. > > Doh, my bad. They was "Don't show a titlebar when maximized" and "Migrate menu bar to a view menu button", but it seems both (and more) was reported on the same bug. ___ desktop-devel-lis

Re: Be respectful and considerate. A complaint.

2012/7/3 Luca Ferretti > 2012/7/2 Andreas Nilsson > >> >> And here is the same feature, but at the window manager level (and for >> all the other apps too): >> http://andreasn.myownb3.com/**temp/nau-side-by-side.png<http://andreasn.myownb3.com/temp/nau-side-by-

Re: Be respectful and considerate. A complaint.

2012/7/2 Andreas Nilsson > > And here is the same feature, but at the window manager level (and for all > the other apps too): > http://andreasn.myownb3.com/**temp/nau-side-by-side.png > > Unfortunately this is already old :) https://bugzill

Re: taking features away (compact view removed from Nautilus)

2012/7/2 Allan Day > > > Jon has been doing some fantastic work on Nautilus recently. It was > getting very little - if any - developer attention and he has stepped > up to make dramatic improvements, including addressing long-standing > complaints. I'm really excited about the next release of Nau

TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 3.5.3

about 3.5, the full schedule, the official module lists and the proposed module lists, please see our colorful 3.5 page: http://www.gnome.org/start/unstable For a quick overview of the GNOME schedule, please see: http://live.gnome.org/Schedule Th

libpwquality is a new GNOME Desktop dependence

Hi, libpwquality[1] is now a blessed dependence for GNOME Desktop. It's currently used (release 1.1.0) by gnome-control-center and gnome-disk-utility to provide feedback about your password strength and to suggest new strong passwords. Cheers [1] http://fedorahosted.org/libpwquality/ __

Re: Design in the open

Il giorno 30/apr/2012 17:36, "Bastien Nocera" ha scritto: > >    * will be developed inside totem source tree (replacing?) > Yes. I think both the feature page and the mail to this list made it > pretty clear, even if glibly. To be honest not so clear, at least to me. And to be honest it's your

Re: Design in the open

2012/4/27 Allan Day : > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Luca Ferretti wrote: >> 2012/4/25 Allan Day : > ... >> So, IMHO a design driven GNOME needs good desing documents. The >> "design document is a written contract"[4] between designers and other >> tea

Re: Design in the open

2012/4/25 Allan Day : > > > But there are challenges and things we can do better. Among those > obstacles, I see: > * giving people a stake in the project - the danger of design-led > development is that people feel that the project is no longer theirs. > They want to feel they can have an impact

Re: 3.6 Feature: Totem -> Videos

2012/4/23 Bastien Nocera : > Work is on-going to make Totem into that: > https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Videos#Tentative_Design > Looks cool, the only issue I can see is actual video files may have weird names (such as "VID_20120424_123212.mp4" or "[Freedom] Mobile Suit Gundam Unicorn - 03 (19

Re: Boxes and 3.4

2011/11/30 Andrew Cowie : > On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote: > >> And, in suborder, why can't Boxes be simply a non-core, featured >> application, just like GIMP or Simple Scan? > > Because there's a big difference between an integrated, de

Re: Boxes and 3.4

2011/11/30 Vincent Untz > > > > The only thing you mentioned in the other thread that I saw was a > > feeling that it wasn't right. > > I said that I didn't feel Boxes should be tracked as a feature, and that > I didn't believe it was useful to most users. I agree with Vincent: there is a differe

GNOME 3.2.1 released

The first update to GNOME 3.2 series is now available. As usual it provides bug fixes, translations updates and tiny improvements, in order to make our stable release even more stable and useful. Of course these improvements are kindly provided by our vibrant GNOME community members and contributor

Re: RFC: gtk-doc and gobject introspection

For example, I personally prefer the documentation to be using language-specific tools, because I'm using that programming language. I don't care about uniformity among all the languages, rather I care about bindings consistency (which is often per-language due to additional mapping/overrides/metad

Re: GNOME user survey 2011

On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 09:24:35AM -0400, Shaun McCance wrote: > That is still not useful information. Developers aren't going > to add options for the sake of adding options. "Users want > more options? I guess I better hunt through my program to see > what I can make configurable." That's absurd.

Re: Those darn gdk-pixbuf .po file conflicts

2011/7/28 Owen Taylor : > Anybody jhbuilding GNOME will have run into problems with .po file > conflicts in gdk-pixbuf, where building it causes local changes that I'm sure it occurs to gstreamer stuff too, and maybe gtk+ > B) is probably cleanest; I don't know if it will cause problems for > peo

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings" by GNOME

2011/7/23 Matthias Clasen : >> I'd like to suggest that the GNOME developers consider changing the >> public name of their app to "System Preferences." This matches the Mac >> OS X design and arguably GNOME follows some parts of OS X design. >> Furthermore, it is more in line with Gnome 2's System>

Re: 3.2 features: color management

Il giorno ven, 20/05/2011 alle 14.37 +0100, Richard Hughes ha scritto: > On 20 May 2011 14:31, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > "In GNOME 3.2, colord is an approved external dependancy and many GNOME > > applications should use this to make a 100% color managed desktop." &g

Re: 3.2 features: login screen

Il giorno ven, 20/05/2011 alle 14.29 +0100, Bastien Nocera ha scritto: > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:19 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > > > I strongly suggest to postpone this, if planned to be performed after > > installation and before first login to setup the "mas

Re: 3.2 features: color management

Il giorno ven, 20/05/2011 alle 08.24 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto: > You can read the details here: > https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointOne/Features/ColorManagement "In GNOME 3.2, colord is an approved external dependancy and many GNOME applications should use this to make a 100% color manage

Re: 3.2 features: login screen

assistant to each user _after_ his/her first successful login, it could be fine and interesting (but I suppose should be moved from gdm to a separate project). If so, do you plan to add hooks for third parties (for instance, an hook to allow gwibber t

Re: systemd as external dependency

Il giorno mer, 18/05/2011 alle 14.09 +0200, Lennart Poettering ha scritto: A really long list of questions, but I suppose I'll have to vote about this proposal, so... > In the future I expect more interfacing with GNOME however, and I'd thus > like to see the discussion regarding acceptance as b

Re: systemd as external dependency

Il giorno gio, 19/05/2011 alle 11.30 +0100, Luis Medinas ha scritto: > Indeed i noticed some problems using jhbuild on ubuntu 11.04 i guess > it's libtool broken, because > lot's of modules fails due *.la files. I'm not the only one seeing > this issue [1] > https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Rem

Re: systemd as external dependency

give the same advice about e.g. > Mandriva. Oh, and Ubuntu is based upon what I read (IRC and so on) + > feedback during the 3.0 party, not personal experience. So, do we need a list of good/bad distro? :) Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list maili

Re: systemd as external dependency

ou please elaborate it? Thanks. Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: systemd as external dependency

Il giorno mer, 18/05/2011 alle 17.54 +0200, Olav Vitters ha scritto: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:15:43PM +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > What's the official position adopted by GNOME Foundation about this > > statement? > > It was on the agenda for last meeting and we p

Re: systemd as external dependency

rently existing distro", and so on... Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Feature Proposal - Sushi

Il giorno dom, 15/05/2011 alle 21.50 +0200, Olav Vitters ha scritto: > 1. Evince is supposed to be a generic document viewer. Is there any > overlap with Sushi? Yes and no. Evince only works with PDF/PS/$TEXTUAL documents, while sushi should also manage images, audio, video and probably more. Mo

Re: Settings downstream would reasonably want to add [was: long thread with no resolution]

Il giorno ven, 13/05/2011 alle 08.33 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto: > > > * system-config-printer: We decided to continue to use that instead > > of the GNOME 3 c-c one. s-c-p is a lot more complete and proven. > > Hmm; this is an example of the pick-and-match mindset that pits > downstre

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

Il giorno Fri, 13/05/2011 alle 21.17 +0200, Alexander Larsson ha scritto: > On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 14:59 +0200, Robert Ancell wrote: > > I'm proposing LightDM [1] as a replacement for GDM. I started the > > proposal for this in GNOME 3.0 [2] but due to the young age of the > > project I thought it

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

" and we want to implement all the stuff you listed in GDM or we can settle those requirements end evaluate if it's more simple to manage them following GDM approach (GNOME only) or following LightDM approach (shared between free desktops)? Cheers, Luca __

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

Il giorno Fri, 13/05/2011 alle 18.26 +0100, Bastien Nocera ha scritto: > The correct way to behave then is to work on the search backends, not to > complain here. You have misinterpreted my words; It wasn't a complain for that specific events, it was an example (but I suppose we could cite/find o

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

Il giorno Sat, 14/05/2011 alle 01.11 +0200, Luca Ferretti ha scritto: > Il giorno Fri, 13/05/2011 alle 18.42 +0200, Dave Neary ha scritto: > > > Please stop polluting my in-box. As many others have said, this thread > > is going no-where, please just stop posting to it. >

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

a frank and "official" reply? Cheers, Luca. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

n allow to start environments other than GNOME or not? You said "there isn't a lot of value in having a core GNOME component be cross platform or cross desktop" and I've learned many new stuff about "GNOME OS" vision those days, so I'm doubtful... Cheers, Luca __

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

2011/5/13 Luca Ferretti : > Bonus question: are you sure this "all work happens upstream" can lead > to better and faster solutions? I forgot a little example for this: 3 years ago I wrote a trivial patch to add a "Search tool" selector in Preferred Application preferenc

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

Il giorno ven, 13/05/2011 alle 12.28 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto: > On 2011-05-13 at 11:56, Luca Ferretti wrote: > people just took and barely contributed back solutions to > the common problem space. "this is the opensource, baby" (cit.) Once you release your project

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

a final product or a resource for distro? a resource to customize, of course * are we so much afraid about customizations? are customization the Evil? -- ok, this was a bonus and sarcastic question :) Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

Il giorno ven, 13/05/2011 alle 00.51 -0400, William Jon McCann ha scritto: > > How about: raison d'être. What is our mission, what is our reason for > existing? Is it to provide a gummy base for others to adapt, modify, > and differentiate? > > No. Your own vision of open source is totally di

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 19.01 -0400, David Zeuthen ha scritto: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > > > Second: are we a censorship? are we fighting against the ugly? are all > > non-gnome developers odd and stupid? > > > >

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

Il giorno ven, 13/05/2011 alle 01.20 +0100, Bastien Nocera ha scritto: > On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 02:00 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > > > Then, as I said on another reply, why are gnome-shell extensions allowed > > to change gnome-shell so deeply[1]? More, why is gnome-shell

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 20.34 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Luca Ferretti wrote: > Some examples of this that we've already seen are: > - color management (do you know what a perceptual rendering intent is ?) > - kerberos ticket

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 19.12 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto: > This is really starting to drift into a highly emotional and > non-productive direction. I'm not emotional, just a little overemphatic :) > Not allowing random third parties to put their pet projects > preferences into the

Re: Feature Proposal - Sushi

2011/5/12 Cosimo Cecchi : > This case is probably a bit borderline, as it's technically a new module > (so it would map to the old "new module proposal" process we used to > have), but it's used only by one application (Nautilus) currently...the > end result is I'm a bit confused :) Other places

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 18.14 -0400, David Zeuthen ha scritto: > > So? Why this should be a failure? > > Because the premise of System Settings in GNOME 3 is, > surprisingly, to change your system settings or personalize the > experience. So, are there no system settings or personalizati

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 16.54 -0500, Jason D. Clinton ha scritto: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 16:51, Sergey Udaltsov > wrote: > > And anyway, even if we dictate policies - at least we should have > > courtesy to put them in words, I guess. > > We're not dictating anything; we're just making

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 16.51 -0400, David Zeuthen ha scritto: > Yes. I also think we tried that with GNOME 2 and failed. I mean, look > at GNOME 2's control center - on all distros, it's a royal mess of > random crap from either GNOME, the distro or 3rd party app written by > a kid in a ba

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

did not see g-c-c 3 UI guidelines) for some > transitional period or is it a policy that is planned to last in > foreseeble future of gnome3? May I add: who is in charge to settle those _technical_ and _political_ sides of GNOME Desktop development? ;-) Cheers, Luca

Re: GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup

2011/5/12 Allan Day : >> >> I'm coming into this interested less in questions framed as "how can >> Deja Dup make GNOME better" than as "how can Deja Dup being part of >> GNOME make users' backup experience better". > > I presume you'd be happy for Deja Dup to become a GNOME Control Center > panel?

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was Re: GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

Il giorno mer, 11/05/2011 alle 01.27 +0100, Bastien Nocera ha scritto: > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 02:15 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > #2 -- will gnome-c-c module englobe _all_ chosen panels? who will > > approve them? g-cc maintainers? release team? design team? a pool on &g

Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was Re: GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

Il giorno mar, 10/05/2011 alle 21.51 -0500, Jason D. Clinton ha scritto: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 19:15, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > #3 -- I feel this "no-API for gnome-cc" approach crashes with planned > > and upcoming changes in GNOME Desktop modules definition >

no external panels for gnome-control-center [was Re: GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]

dware; same for Prey (http://preyproject.com/) and it's configuration panel. Are we going to make GNOME a closed desktop? Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Final GNOME 3.1/3.2 schedule

Il giorno ven, 22/04/2011 alle 19.51 +0200, Andre Klapper ha scritto: > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 22:42 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > A draft for the GNOME 3.1 schedule is available at > > https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointOne#Schedule > > Comments are welcome; Silence means compliance. > > N

Re: Fix gsettings path to use /org/gnome instead /apps

Il giorno ven, 25/03/2011 alle 11.04 +0100, Chris Kühl ha scritto: > I'm definitely for having these all be consistent but I find it more > consistent that all paths be of the format org.gnome.[application > name] and /org/gnome/[application name]. This would mean leaving the > "gnome-" prefix eve

Re: Fix gsettings path to use /org/gnome instead /apps

Il giorno ven, 25/03/2011 alle 08.55 +, Richard Hughes ha scritto: > On 24 March 2011 22:41, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > [3] actually it misses a patch for org.gnome.packagekit.gschema.xml > > I've made this change in gnome-packagekit in git master, let me know > if we

Re: Fix gsettings path to use /org/gnome instead /apps

Il giorno ven, 25/03/2011 alle 00.10 +0100, Xan Lopez ha scritto: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > If you have no time to commit, I'll be glad to help you, just ask on irc > > (elle.uca) or reply here. > > Looks good for epiphany too,

Re: Fix gsettings path to use /org/gnome instead /apps

Il giorno ven, 25/03/2011 alle 09.48 +1100, Robert Ancell ha scritto: > Two questions: > > 1) Where is it defined what format the path is supposed to be in? Currently here is not yet a formal page about it, I suppose we should add the recommendation to use org.$PROJECT or com.$VENDOR in gsettings

Re: Fix gsettings path to use /org/gnome instead /apps

Il giorno gio, 24/03/2011 alle 18.44 -0400, Cosimo Cecchi ha scritto: > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 23:41 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > > If you have no time to commit, I'll be glad to help you, just ask on irc > > (elle.uca) or reply here. > > Feel free to push the gno

Fix gsettings path to use /org/gnome instead /apps

Flash news from release team to our all brave developers. A member of release team known as *cough*Luca Ferretti*cough* was sure gsettings PATHs and gsettings IDs were the same, so he was also sure all GNOME 3 core apps were using the proper path. So he never sent any notice or filed bug report

Re: dconf path name standard

n different stuff. My own current plan is open a page for a GNOME Goal on wiki this week, stay tuned. Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Re: gnome-panel & gnome-applets?

Il giorno mar, 28/12/2010 alle 16.50 +, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto: > On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 13:42 +, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > > Sergey, who sometimes prefers to look backwards rather than forward > > no problem with that. you can maintain the old user experience for > yourself and never u

Re: Another build status update

Il giorno gio, 16/12/2010 alle 11.29 +0100, Cosimo Cecchi ha scritto: > AFAICS Epiphany is failing because of this commit, which uses WebKit API > that's not in a tarball yet (or at least, not in the one jhbuild is > using). > > http://git.gnome.org/browse/epiphany/commit/?id=67d0bb92493b5c0300d

Re: build status

Il giorno mer, 08/12/2010 alle 07.23 -0500, Matthias Clasen ha scritto: > Other problems: In my jhbuild sandbox I've issue with gnome-disk-utility too, configure phase. It mourn for missing avahi-ui.pc file and, in fact, only avahi-ui-gtk3.pc is installed by jhbuild avahi module. __

Re: Release team membership change (was Re: GNOME 2.32.1 released)

Il giorno gio, 18/11/2010 alle 08.58 +0100, Fabio Marzocca ha scritto: > My personal welcome to Luca! > > Fabio Hi hi hi... So may I start to poke maintainers? Fabio we want a refresh of Baobab UI, something beautiful and cool like a Mac application (daisydiskapp.com for instance) :)

Re: Release team membership change (was Re: GNOME 2.32.1 released)

Il giorno gio, 18/11/2010 alle 02.14 +0100, Vincent Untz ha scritto: > Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010, à 02:02 +0100, Luca Ferretti a écrit : > > Pleased to meet you! > We've prepared a long & hard training for Luca (you know, the usual > stuff, "delegating" all t

GNOME 2.32.1 released

Pleased to meet you! The first update to GNOME 2.32 (and my own first release) is now available. It provides bug fixes, translation updates and the usual care and kindness that our brave GNOME developers and contributors deserves to details. More information about the GNOME schedule is available

[ext deps] Update xulrunner to 1.9.2 for GNOME 3.0

dy to update jhbuild :) Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

[ext deps] Update xulrunner to 1.9.2 for GNOME 3.0

dy to update jhbuild :) Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: cheese module split-up

age? It could be helpful to choose the most appropriate translation. Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

GNOME Goal: XDG config folder implementation

http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/XDGConfigFolders [1] The migration from 2.x to 3.x is a good time to perform this, isn't it? :) [1] note: by now it's only a proposal ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.o

Re: Modulesets Reorganization

Il giorno mer, 02/06/2010 alle 07.52 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto: > There have been no organized UI reviews of new modules in a long time, > the HIG has not been updated to match the UIs we see in current applications. I'm not against evolution of HIG in time, but shouldn't be applications t

Re: Modulesets Reorganization

Il giorno mer, 02/06/2010 alle 12.08 +0200, Paolo Borelli ha scritto: > - QA effort will be impacted: I used to run a full jhbuild version of > gnome all the time and I don't anymore and I think I am not the only > one... This is a problem on its own (and something the RT should work > on!), but

Re: Modulesets Reorganization

Il giorno mer, 02/06/2010 alle 08.50 +0200, Xavier Claessens ha scritto: > > The long term plan for the GNOME applications that were removed from the > > Desktop, Admin and Dev Tools modulesets is to simply highlight the > > high-quality > > applications using the GNOME platform through our commu

Re: Modulesets Reorganization

Il giorno mer, 02/06/2010 alle 18.14 +0800, Paul Cutler ha scritto: > To market these apps effectively, they will need to adhere to GNOME > guidelines and processes. They'll need to be free software, they'll > need to be localized, they'll need documentation, they'll need to be > accessible. The

Re: Modulesets Reorganization

Il giorno mer, 02/06/2010 alle 00.37 +0100, Lucas Rocha ha scritto: > 1. The Desktop moduleset will only contain the components needed to get a > desktop session running and provide core functionalities (e.g. gdm, > gnome-session, gnome-settings-daemon, nautilus, etc). All applications > providing

Re: [Fwd: Proposing new external dependency for Empathy: libfolks]

Il giorno mar, 25/05/2010 alle 11.07 +0200, Frederic Peters ha scritto: > New Dependencies > = > > empathy depends on: > libfolks > > libfolks depends on: > telepathy-glib Vala bindings [3] (should be in telepathy-glib 0.11.6) > for building > > telepathy-glib Vala bindin

Re: Module Proposal for 3.0: Déjà Dup Backup Tool

Il giorno gio, 06/05/2010 alle 13.24 -0400, Michael Terry ha scritto: > Hi, it's the maintainer of Deja Dup again. A couple things: > > 1) I've been talking to the usability guys a bit about the UI in > general and thoughts on a possible Profiles interface. There's an > ongoing discussion on the

Re: GSettings and you

Il giorno mar, 20/04/2010 alle 15.45 +0100, Bastien Nocera ha scritto: > - Should the summary and descriptions in the schemas follow the same > rules as GConf wrt periods at the end of sentences? About this topic, * while converting from GConf to GSettings, could be good check label

Re: new module proposal -- gnome-icon-theme-symbolic

Il giorno sab, 17/04/2010 alle 00.17 +0200, Jakub Steiner ha scritto: > Icons follow the naming specification[1], but have a -symbolic suffix, > so only applications specifically looking up these symbolic icons will > render them. If a -symbolic icon is missing, the app will fall back to > the reg

Re: Updated WebKit external dep

Il giorno mer, 07/04/2010 alle 12.11 +0200, Vincent Untz ha scritto: > Le mercredi 07 avril 2010, à 11:57 +0200, Luca Ferretti a écrit : > > I've just updated WebKit dep to 1.2.0 stable release in the following > > places: > > * jhbuild 2.30 moduleset > &g

Updated WebKit external dep

I've just updated WebKit dep to 1.2.0 stable release in the following places: * jhbuild 2.30 moduleset * jhbuild 3.0 moduleset * 2.30 external deps page on live.gnome.org Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-

Re: Module Proposal: GNOME Shell

#x27;ve misses it, but are you planning to depend on Clutter 1.2 or 1.4? If the latter, when we'll have a release tarball for jhbuild? :) Cheers, Luca ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/

Re: Label in tray = P in the A

Il giorno mer, 24/03/2010 alle 14.17 +, Sergey Udaltsov ha scritto: > Translated. Typically, 3 letters (well, at least that's my > recommendation as maintainer of xkeyboard-config). About this, a quick note about xkeyboard-config I always forgot to report. Why don't use directly ISO 3166-1 alp

Re: Udisks, Upower, external deps and jhbuild

Il giorno mer, 17/03/2010 alle 21.12 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Luca Ferretti wrote: I've just updated JHBuild, adding udisk and UPower modules and update deps for gnome-powe-manager, gnome-sessione and gnome-disk-utility. See http://git.g

Udisks, Upower, external deps and jhbuild

stuff needed to build (udev, mostly)... Cheers, Luca [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/2010-March/000758.html [2] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/2010-March/000747.html [3] http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentynine/ExternalDependencies

Re: Reminder : do NOT hardcode deprecation flags in tarball / new tarballs NEEDED

19.3 release and some modules > > were not fixed for this. > > A secondary reminder: please also note that due to recent deprecation of some GTK_WIDGET_* macros in GTK+, you'll have to use *new* functions (such as gtk_widget_get_realized or get_mapped) and then increase GTK_REQUIRE

  1   2   3   4   >