://www.gnome.org/start/unstable
For a quick overview of the GNOME schedule, please see:
http://live.gnome.org/Schedule
Happy coding.
Luca Ferretti,
in the behalf of GNOME Release Team
[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointEleven/Features/
[2] http://library.gnome.org/devel/jhbuild/
[3] http
Hi everyone,
as scheduled, a preliminary moduleset of our next development (and
unstable) release is available here[1], ready for your kind smoketesting[2].
By now, it includes all packages uploaded before Mon 13 at 23:59 UTC.
Please remember the final 3.11.4 release is planned for Wed 15 at
Maybe we could add a check in ftpadmin script?
2013/11/21 Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com
On 11/21/2013 08:07 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Hey,
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 18:26 +0100, Piñeiro wrote:
Hello all,
Here comes GNOME 3.10.2, the second update to GNOME 3.10, it includes
many
2013/8/3 Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
The current build status is:
* baobab, glade, aisleriot, gnome-clocks fail to build
(need new tarballs against latest vala release)
You can probably get the vala
GNOMEtters GNOMErs,
the latest development update before our planned freezes and beta
release for GNOME 3.1o is finally available.
I know, better and bigger things are now happening in Brno, but allow
me to introduce you one or two changes.
This is the first release including GStreamer 1.1 with
2013/7/31 Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org
Unfortunately we have two relevant issues:
a) several modules lack a recent tarball release;
b) some modules fails to build.
Hi, a second update about release build status. I've just
uploaded fresh[1] and latest sources for smoketesting[2
/show_bug.cgi?id=705150
On ה', אוג 1, 2013 בשעה 12:16 AM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org
wrote:
Hi all,
I wasn't able to send it this morning (UTC time, of course), sorry, but
here is a little update about current status of incoming development
release.
Unfortunately we have two relevant
It's simple: I haven't yet decided the way to include it in release set :-)
Cheers,
Luca
Il giorno 01/ago/2013 16:56, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha...@gnome.org
ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org
wrote:
Hi everyone,
a preliminary version of 3.9.5
Hi all,
I wasn't able to send it this morning (UTC time, of course), sorry, but
here is a little update about current status of incoming development
release.
Unfortunately we have two relevant issues:
a) several modules lack a recent tarball release;
b) some modules fails to build.
Let's
Hi everyone,
a preliminary version of 3.9.5 modules files is available at
ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/teams/releng/3.9.5
There are several missing fresh modules, so I suppose I'll update in the
next hours.
However, if you like to perform a GNOME 3.9.5 smoketest, well, you are
welcome. For
Hi all,
a neighbourly reminder from release team: 3.9.5 release is scheduled for
next week, so please ensure to package new tarball with all new code and
features for your modules, and do it before packaging your packages for
GUADEC ;-)
The tarball due date is July 30, the release itself will be
Hi,
currently we are missing an update gnome-desktop release. Latest is
3.5.5 but gnome-control-center needs gnome-desktop = 3.5.6.
Could someone take care of it?
Thanks in advance,
Luca
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Hi,
it seems that currently there is no tarball release available for
clutter-gst-2.0, but (at least) development releases of totem and
sushi are using its API from git master.
Could be good to have it in 3.5.90, so if someone can dist and upload
it in the next 5 hours will be great. If not
2012/7/2 Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com
Jon has been doing some fantastic work on Nautilus recently. It was
getting very little - if any - developer attention and he has stepped
up to make dramatic improvements, including addressing long-standing
complaints. I'm really excited about the next
2012/7/2 Andreas Nilsson li...@andreasn.se
And here is the same feature, but at the window manager level (and for all
the other apps too):
http://andreasn.myownb3.com/**temp/nau-side-by-side.pnghttp://andreasn.myownb3.com/temp/nau-side-by-side.png
Unfortunately this is already old :)
2012/7/3 Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org
2012/7/2 Andreas Nilsson li...@andreasn.se
And here is the same feature, but at the window manager level (and for
all the other apps too):
http://andreasn.myownb3.com/**temp/nau-side-by-side.pnghttp://andreasn.myownb3.com/temp/nau-side-by-side.png
2012/7/3 Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net
You linked the same bug twice.
Doh, my bad. They was Don't show a titlebar when maximized and Migrate
menu bar to a view menu button, but it seems both (and more) was reported
on the same bug.
___
Hello everyone,
tarballs due for GNOME 3.5.3 release are due on 2012-06-25 before 23:59
UTC.
So please make sure to prepare and upload your tarballs before this
deadline. If you can't, please send an email to release team mailing list
and we'll take care of it.
For more information about 3.5,
Hi,
libpwquality[1] is now a blessed dependence for GNOME Desktop.
It's currently used (release 1.1.0) by gnome-control-center and
gnome-disk-utility to provide feedback about your password strength
and to suggest new strong passwords.
Cheers
[1] http://fedorahosted.org/libpwquality/
Il giorno 30/apr/2012 17:36, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net ha scritto:
* will be developed inside totem source tree (replacing?)
Yes. I think both the feature page and the mail to this list made it
pretty clear, even if glibly.
To be honest not so clear, at least to me. And to be
2012/4/27 Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
2012/4/25 Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com:
...
So, IMHO a design driven GNOME needs good desing documents. The
design document is a written contract[4] between designers and other
2012/4/25 Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com:
But there are challenges and things we can do better. Among those
obstacles, I see:
snip
* giving people a stake in the project - the danger of design-led
development is that people feel that the project is no longer theirs.
They want to feel they
2012/4/23 Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net:
Work is on-going to make Totem into that:
https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Videos#Tentative_Design
Looks cool, the only issue I can see is actual video files may have
weird names (such as VID_20120424_123212.mp4 or [Freedom] Mobile
Suit Gundam
2011/11/30 Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org
The only thing you mentioned in the other thread that I saw was a
feeling that it wasn't right.
I said that I didn't feel Boxes should be tracked as a feature, and that
I didn't believe it was useful to most users.
I agree with Vincent: there is a
2011/11/30 Andrew Cowie and...@operationaldynamics.com:
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
And, in suborder, why can't Boxes be simply a non-core, featured
application, just like GIMP or Simple Scan?
Because there's a big difference between an integrated, designed
The first update to GNOME 3.2 series is now available. As usual it
provides bug fixes, translations updates and tiny improvements, in
order to make our stable release even more stable and useful. Of
course these improvements are kindly provided by our vibrant GNOME
community members and
2011/7/28 Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com:
Anybody jhbuilding GNOME will have run into problems with .po file
conflicts in gdk-pixbuf, where building it causes local changes that
I'm sure it occurs to gstreamer stuff too, and maybe gtk+
B) is probably cleanest; I don't know if it will cause
2011/7/23 Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com:
I'd like to suggest that the GNOME developers consider changing the
public name of their app to System Preferences. This matches the Mac
OS X design and arguably GNOME follows some parts of OS X design.
Furthermore, it is more in line with
Il giorno ven, 20/05/2011 alle 08.02 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
- An 'initial-setup' tool. The goal here is to allow setting up a few
essential things on a new system before you start to use it for the
first time.
I strongly suggest to postpone this, if planned to be performed after
Il giorno ven, 20/05/2011 alle 08.24 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
You can read the details here:
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointOne/Features/ColorManagement
In GNOME 3.2, colord is an approved external dependancy and many GNOME
applications should use this to make a 100% color managed
Il giorno ven, 20/05/2011 alle 14.29 +0100, Bastien Nocera ha scritto:
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:19 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
I strongly suggest to postpone this, if planned to be performed after
installation and before first login to setup the master user (as it
seems reading the wiki
Il giorno ven, 20/05/2011 alle 14.37 +0100, Richard Hughes ha scritto:
On 20 May 2011 14:31, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
In GNOME 3.2, colord is an approved external dependancy and many GNOME
applications should use this to make a 100% color managed desktop.
Ehmm.. is? really
Il giorno gio, 19/05/2011 alle 10.53 +0200, Olav Vitters ha scritto:
You need various things in your
distribution to help GNOME development. I would not advise anyone to use
Ubuntu anymore when they want to get involved with GNOME.
Maybe I misunderstood this phrase, could you please elaborate
Il giorno mer, 18/05/2011 alle 14.09 +0200, Lennart Poettering ha
scritto:
A really long list of questions, but I suppose I'll have to vote about
this proposal, so...
In the future I expect more interfacing with GNOME however, and I'd thus
like to see the discussion regarding acceptance as
Il giorno mer, 18/05/2011 alle 10.40 -0400, William Jon McCann ha
scritto:
Having optional Linux-only functionalities is OK;
requiring Linux is not.
For Debian perhaps. However, I don't think this is true for GNOME.
The future of GNOME is as a Linux based OS.
What's the official
Il giorno mer, 18/05/2011 alle 17.54 +0200, Olav Vitters ha scritto:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:15:43PM +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
What's the official position adopted by GNOME Foundation about this
statement?
It was on the agenda for last meeting and we put it on the agenda of the
next
Il giorno ven, 13/05/2011 alle 08.33 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
* system-config-printer: We decided to continue to use that instead
of the GNOME 3 c-c one. s-c-p is a lot more complete and proven.
Hmm; this is an example of the pick-and-match mindset that pits
downstreams
Il giorno Fri, 13/05/2011 alle 18.26 +0100, Bastien Nocera ha scritto:
The correct way to behave then is to work on the search backends, not to
complain here.
You have misinterpreted my words; It wasn't a complain for that specific
events, it was an example (but I suppose we could cite/find
Il giorno Fri, 13/05/2011 alle 12.04 -0400, William Jon McCann ha
scritto:
- LightDM is a cross-platform solution. Ubuntu is planning to switch
to it this cycle, and other distributions have expressed interest in
the project. By sharing this piece of infrastructure GNOME can spend
more
Il giorno ven, 13/05/2011 alle 00.51 -0400, William Jon McCann ha
scritto:
How about: raison d'être. What is our mission, what is our reason for
existing? Is it to provide a gummy base for others to adapt, modify,
and differentiate?
No.
Your own vision of open source is totally
Il giorno ven, 13/05/2011 alle 12.16 +0200, Olav Vitters ha scritto:
The control-center maintainers made a quick API for GNOME 3.0 only.
Saying the removal is censorship?
Of course not a real world censorship, but something that resembles it.
System Settings is a place that can be useful to
2011/5/13 Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org:
Bonus question: are you sure this all work happens upstream can lead
to better and faster solutions?
I forgot a little example for this: 3 years ago I wrote
a trivial patch to add a Search tool selector in Preferred Application
preference tool. Start
Il giorno Fri, 13/05/2011 alle 18.42 +0200, Dave Neary ha scritto:
Please stop polluting my in-box. As many others have said, this thread
is going no-where, please just stop posting to it.
This could be true, we are discussing about ideas and visions and anyone
has his strong option. But
Il giorno Sat, 14/05/2011 alle 01.11 +0200, Luca Ferretti ha scritto:
Il giorno Fri, 13/05/2011 alle 18.42 +0200, Dave Neary ha scritto:
Please stop polluting my in-box. As many others have said, this thread
is going no-where, please just stop posting to it.
This could be true, we
2011/5/12 Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com:
I'm coming into this interested less in questions framed as how can
Deja Dup make GNOME better than as how can Deja Dup being part of
GNOME make users' backup experience better.
I presume you'd be happy for Deja Dup to become a GNOME Control Center
Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 20.45 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov ha scritto:
GNOME is not an OS. GNOME is not a distribution. GNOME is a core
desktop (desktop building toolkit, if you like) that is used by
distributions - it is them who define the _final_ user experience. Do
we all agree that
Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 16.51 -0400, David Zeuthen ha scritto:
Yes. I also think we tried that with GNOME 2 and failed. I mean, look
at GNOME 2's control center - on all distros, it's a royal mess of
random crap from either GNOME, the distro or 3rd party app written by
a kid in a
Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 18.14 -0400, David Zeuthen ha scritto:
So? Why this should be a failure?
Because the premise of System Settings in GNOME 3 is,
surprisingly, to change your system settings or personalize the
experience.
So, are there no system settings or personalizations
2011/5/12 Cosimo Cecchi cosi...@gnome.org:
This case is probably a bit borderline, as it's technically a new module
(so it would map to the old new module proposal process we used to
have), but it's used only by one application (Nautilus) currently...the
end result is I'm a bit confused :)
Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 19.12 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
This is really starting to drift into a highly emotional and
non-productive direction.
I'm not emotional, just a little overemphatic :)
Not allowing random third parties to put their pet projects
preferences into the
Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 20.34 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
Some examples of this that we've already seen are:
- color management (do you know what a perceptual rendering intent is ?)
- kerberos tickets
Il giorno mar, 10/05/2011 alle 21.51 -0500, Jason D. Clinton ha
scritto:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 19:15, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
#3 -- I feel this no-API for gnome-cc approach crashes with planned
and upcoming changes in GNOME Desktop modules definition
There is no GNOME
Il giorno mer, 11/05/2011 alle 01.27 +0100, Bastien Nocera ha scritto:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 02:15 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
#2 -- will gnome-c-c module englobe _all_ chosen panels? who will
approve them? g-cc maintainers? release team? design team? a pool on
doodle.com :P
Il giorno mar, 10/05/2011 alle 20.51 +0100, Bastien Nocera ha scritto:
http://live.gnome.org/DejaDup/Screenshots/Future for screenshots.
Déjà Dup 19.1, which includes those changes, is already in Fedora
Rawhide and will be in Ubuntu Oneiric once we land the GNOME 3
control
center.
That won't
Il giorno ven, 25/03/2011 alle 11.04 +0100, Chris Kühl ha scritto:
I'm definitely for having these all be consistent but I find it more
consistent that all paths be of the format org.gnome.[application
name] and /org/gnome/[application name]. This would mean leaving the
gnome- prefix even
Flash news from release team to our all brave developers.
A member of release team known as *cough*Luca Ferretti*cough* was sure
gsettings PATHs and gsettings IDs were the same, so he was also sure all
GNOME 3 core apps were using the proper path. So he never sent any
notice or filed bug report
Il giorno gio, 24/03/2011 alle 18.44 -0400, Cosimo Cecchi ha scritto:
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 23:41 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
If you have no time to commit, I'll be glad to help you, just ask on irc
(elle.uca) or reply here.
Feel free to push the gnome-utils bits to master. I'll try
Il giorno ven, 25/03/2011 alle 09.48 +1100, Robert Ancell ha scritto:
Two questions:
1) Where is it defined what format the path is supposed to be in?
Currently here is not yet a formal page about it, I suppose we should
add the recommendation to use org.$PROJECT or com.$VENDOR in gsettings
Il giorno mar, 08/02/2011 alle 12.30 +0100, Alexander Larsson ha
scritto:
I see a bunch of stuff is now in /org/gnome/appname
and /org/gnome/desktop/*, whereas it used to be in /apps and /desktop.
Have we decided to change this now, and if so, should I change nautilus
to /org/gnome/nautilus
Il giorno mar, 28/12/2010 alle 16.50 +, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto:
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 13:42 +, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
Sergey, who sometimes prefers to look backwards rather than forward
no problem with that. you can maintain the old user experience for
yourself and never
Il giorno gio, 16/12/2010 alle 11.29 +0100, Cosimo Cecchi ha scritto:
AFAICS Epiphany is failing because of this commit, which uses WebKit API
that's not in a tarball yet (or at least, not in the one jhbuild is
using).
Il giorno mer, 08/12/2010 alle 07.23 -0500, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
Other problems:
In my jhbuild sandbox I've issue with gnome-disk-utility too, configure
phase. It mourn for missing avahi-ui.pc file and, in fact, only
avahi-ui-gtk3.pc is installed by jhbuild avahi module.
Il giorno gio, 18/11/2010 alle 02.14 +0100, Vincent Untz ha scritto:
Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010, à 02:02 +0100, Luca Ferretti a écrit :
Pleased to meet you!
snip
We've prepared a long hard training for Luca (you know, the usual
stuff, delegating all the work -- we're lazy people), but you
Il giorno gio, 18/11/2010 alle 08.58 +0100, Fabio Marzocca ha scritto:
My personal welcome to Luca!
Fabio
Hi hi hi... So may I start to poke maintainers? Fabio we want a refresh
of Baobab UI, something beautiful and cool like a Mac application
(daisydiskapp.com for instance) :)
See you and
Pleased to meet you!
The first update to GNOME 2.32 (and my own first release) is now
available. It provides bug fixes, translation updates and the usual care
and kindness that our brave GNOME developers and contributors deserves
to details.
More information about the GNOME schedule is available
Hi,
it seems we have to increase the minimum required xulrunner version from
1.9.1 to 1.9.2. This update is needed in order to build gjs (and so
gnome-shell).
In order to provide a complete information about it, please note:
* we need to tune jhbuild module to 1.9.2, a preliminary patch is
Hi,
it seems we have to increase the minimum required xulrunner version from
1.9.1 to 1.9.2. This update is needed in order to build gjs (and so
gnome-shell).
In order to provide a complete information about it, please note:
* we need to tune jhbuild module to 1.9.2, a preliminary patch
Il giorno gio, 29/07/2010 alle 17.31 +0200, daniel g. siegel ha scritto:
you can find the effect files in the gnome-video-effects git
repository on the usual place [1].
Daniel, do you have the time to provide a page on live.gnome.org showing
each effect applied to same image? It could be
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/XDGConfigFolders [1]
The migration from 2.x to 3.x is a good time to perform this, isn't
it? :)
[1] note: by now it's only a proposal
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Il giorno mer, 02/06/2010 alle 08.50 +0200, Xavier Claessens ha scritto:
The long term plan for the GNOME applications that were removed from the
Desktop, Admin and Dev Tools modulesets is to simply highlight the
high-quality
applications using the GNOME platform through our
Il giorno mer, 02/06/2010 alle 12.08 +0200, Paolo Borelli ha scritto:
- QA effort will be impacted: I used to run a full jhbuild version of
gnome all the time and I don't anymore and I think I am not the only
one... This is a problem on its own (and something the RT should work
on!), but if
Il giorno mer, 02/06/2010 alle 07.52 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
There have been no organized UI reviews of new modules in a long time,
the HIG has not been updated to match the UIs we see in current applications.
I'm not against evolution of HIG in time, but shouldn't be applications
to
Il giorno mar, 25/05/2010 alle 11.07 +0200, Frederic Peters ha scritto:
New Dependencies
=
empathy depends on:
libfolks
libfolks depends on:
telepathy-glib Vala bindings [3] (should be in telepathy-glib 0.11.6)
for building
telepathy-glib Vala bindings depend
Il giorno gio, 06/05/2010 alle 13.24 -0400, Michael Terry ha scritto:
Hi, it's the maintainer of Deja Dup again. A couple things:
1) I've been talking to the usability guys a bit about the UI in
general and thoughts on a possible Profiles interface. There's an
ongoing discussion on the
Il giorno mar, 20/04/2010 alle 15.45 +0100, Bastien Nocera ha scritto:
- Should the summary and descriptions in the schemas follow the same
rules as GConf wrt periods at the end of sentences?
About this topic,
* while converting from GConf to GSettings, could be good check
labels
Il giorno sab, 17/04/2010 alle 00.17 +0200, Jakub Steiner ha scritto:
Icons follow the naming specification[1], but have a -symbolic suffix,
so only applications specifically looking up these symbolic icons will
render them. If a -symbolic icon is missing, the app will fall back to
the
I've just updated WebKit dep to 1.2.0 stable release in the following
places:
* jhbuild 2.30 moduleset
* jhbuild 3.0 moduleset
* 2.30 external deps page on live.gnome.org
Cheers, Luca
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
Il giorno mer, 07/04/2010 alle 12.11 +0200, Vincent Untz ha scritto:
Le mercredi 07 avril 2010, à 11:57 +0200, Luca Ferretti a écrit :
I've just updated WebKit dep to 1.2.0 stable release in the following
places:
* jhbuild 2.30 moduleset
* jhbuild 3.0 moduleset
* 2.30
Il giorno mar, 30/03/2010 alle 19.16 -0400, Owen Taylor ha scritto:
Dependencies:
Mutter: Will be proposed as a desktop release set module
GJS: Will be proposed as a desktop release set module
gobject-introspection: Will be proposed as a desktop release set module
Maybe I've misses it,
Il giorno mer, 24/03/2010 alle 14.17 +, Sergey Udaltsov ha scritto:
Translated. Typically, 3 letters (well, at least that's my
recommendation as maintainer of xkeyboard-config).
About this, a quick note about xkeyboard-config I always forgot to
report. Why don't use directly ISO 3166-1
Il giorno mer, 17/03/2010 alle 21.12 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
I've just updated JHBuild, adding udisk and UPower modules and update
deps for gnome-powe-manager, gnome-sessione and gnome-disk-utility.
See http
udisks[1] and upower[2] have now a tarball release; what should we do on
2.30 external deps page[3]? Should them replace or put beside
DeviceKit-* ? Here is any official module still using DeviceKit-* ?
Plus, any idea about JHbuild? I remember some issues building
DeviceKit-* maybe related to
Il giorno mer, 10/03/2010 alle 19.05 +0100, Frederic Crozat ha scritto:
Well, I'm currently strugling with smoketesting GNOME 2.29.5 release and
there are some tarballs no longer building because new G_SEAL
deprecation were added in yesterday GTK+ 2.19.3 release and some modules
were not
Il giorno dom, 14/03/2010 alle 14.33 +0100, Andre Klapper ha scritto:
===
GNOME-ICON-THEME
===
gnome-icon-theme.pc removed
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=606245
Missing stock icons in Evolution
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612209
Il giorno mer, 10/03/2010 alle 16.50 -0600, Cody Russell ha scritto:
Just wanted to
post on the lists and see if people have thoughts on this, otherwise I'm
probably going to file a patch to either rip the feature out or at the
very least make it so we can disable it. :)
I'm a big fan of this
It seems the menu entries related to extra pane feature are currently
missing mnemonics and header capitalization here and there.
Here is a preliminary patch here[1] but of course it will need approval
for string freeze break. Could be good fix this issue ASAP.
PS I'm not sure, but it seems that
Currently we have this status:
Minimum version: 0.37.1
Recommended version: 0.40.6
but gtksourceview master needs 0.41.0.
We have two options:
1) increase the minimum version to 0.41
2) ask gtksourceview maintainers to downgrade
Hoewever I think we should bump miminum version to at
Il giorno mer, 24/02/2010 alle 14.02 +0100, Paolo Borelli ha scritto:
I accepted a patch of gnome goal that updated the build system and
didn't notice that version bump
Paolo, could you please check if the same commit updated required
automake from 1.11 to 1.11.1?
This breaks jhbuild :(
Il giorno mer, 24/02/2010 alle 13.59 -0500, Rodney Dawes ha scritto:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 13:51 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
A final note: Rodney, could you please upload 0.41 to
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/intltool/ ?
The canonical location for intltool tarball downloads
I've just updated WebKitGtk required version here [1] and in jhbuild
moduleset for 2.30.
Version 1.1.21 is required by Epiphany.
Cheers, Luca.
[1] http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentynine/ExternalDependencies
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
Due to Epiphany requirements, I've just updated webkitgtk version to
1.1.19 in both jhbuild and
http://live.gnome.org/action/edit/TwoPointTwentynine/ExternalDependencies
Cheers, Luca.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
I was rebuilding from scratch my jhbuild sandbox, when
gnome-disk-utilities failed due to missing udisks pkg-config file.
I tried to search for a released udisks package, but the only one I
found is a git snapshot here[1].
So, the following unavoidable questions:
* when will be available a
Il giorno mer, 13/01/2010 alle 08.38 -0500, Dan Winship ha scritto:
On 01/13/2010 07:47 AM, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno dom, 22/11/2009 alle 16.32 -0800, Sandy Armstrong ha scritto:
Most users I've spoken to about this prefer ctrl+tab because it is
similar to alt+tab, and can
Hi everyone,
sorry to start a new thread, but I strongly desire this email will not
missed in previous *cough*flame*cough* discussion.
I've recently started helping a man to use and maintain his computer. He
was a professor of engineering at university, but he had an ictus some
years ago and now
Il giorno mer, 11/11/2009 alle 17.02 -0500, William Jon McCann ha
scritto:
Hi Luca,
I'm not sure your evidence supports your conclusion.
Well, to be honest I didn't intent to expose a conclusion like keep the
Interface settings as is. My apologies if it seems so.
It was more: please don't
Il giorno mer, 11/11/2009 alle 22.10 +, Thomas Wood ha scritto:
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 17:05 -0500, William Jon McCann wrote:
So, the
needs-to-be-written Universal Access panel would likely have some
overlap here.
I was under the impression that such an applet was frowned upon by
2009/10/30 David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk:
The point, really, is that Luca was incorrect in stating that we (GNOME)
unconditionally adopts dependencies that are not widely deployed or
fully baked. This was true (and in a sense, still is for some of these
components) for polkit,
Il giorno gio, 29/10/2009 alle 01.23 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ha
scritto:
IMO right now you should push on the distros
to start shipping that (e.g Ubuntu Karmic still seem to have 0.6) and
once distro and existing apps have competely moved to 0.7, all
concerned parties will have a
2009/10/13 Rodrigo Moya rodr...@gnome-db.org:
Ryan is a bit sad to not get feedback on his proposal, so a bit more
seriously: I think what we probably need is a migration plan. Should we
move all the code from gconf to dconf in one cycle (if possible)? Should
apps implement migration for the
2009/9/7 Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net:
Am Montag, den 07.09.2009, 12:25 +0300 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
Who did a decision to remove icons from gnome-panel main menus
(Places, System and Applications) and why there haven't been wilder
scale discussion about it?
Everything has been written
1 - 100 of 272 matches
Mail list logo
