On 26 May 2015 at 22:02, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org wrote:
This is terrible news. I remember fondly working with him on Epiphany many
years ago. His patience and good character were instrumental in getting me
started on
they can access using the the language application developer
docs are showing seems pretty key to me.
Sure, this is one of the main motivations for rebasing the
documentation generator on top of introspection data.
Regards,
Tomeu
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
On 4 March 2014 16:58, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Hey,
It's been proved again in recent hackfests, we have a really great
team writing user documentations, and thanks have to be given to
Shaun, and now Kat, for coordinating the effort.
On the other hand we have absolutely no
On 5 December 2013 18:18, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
If you can try running gnome-shell with valgrind or massif, that will give
you more accurate allocation counts, since it will count all the times that
some code runs malloc(). The profiling results from massif would be
Hello,
have been playing a bit with touch events in Mutter and though it's
pretty easy to get those flowing (see attached proof-of-concept
patch), I'm not so sure about how this feature could be merged without
breaking current users.
AFAICS the biggest issue is to move from core events to
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 20:51, Jason D. Clinton m...@jasonclinton.com wrote:
My question to you would be, why didn't agreement ever get reached? Why,
four years later, are we still arguing about desktop activity? I see a
failure of cooperation; not of the design team's but rather of the whole
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 00:55, Federico Mena Quintero
feder...@gnome.org wrote:
I wonder how people who hack on core Gnome do it on a day to day
basis.
I used jhbuild every day for a few years when I used to hack on Sugar
and at some point I stopped using jhbuild commands other than 'shell',
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:57, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
2012/2/24 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
That sounds great functionality. The webapp will file bugs in BZ and
attach patches to it? Or will maintainers have to go through the
webapp?
We can figure something out, for now
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 21:27, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
Well, this is not quite true Stefan,
Right now if you want to contribute to the docs you have to do quite a bit
of work (git+bugzilla workflow), even if you do this everyday, it can be
quite annoying and distracting to stop
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 16:22, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
2012/2/19 Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 15:00 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I am interested in the dynamic features like doing complicated queries
to show the result and being able to add comments and
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 16:33, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
2012/1/27 Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org
Hello guys,
Just for the record, I've started coding a small django app in github to
see how far can I get with regards a richer API reference web interface.
I'm reusing Mikkael
Hi,
in a bit less than a month from now there will be a hackfest on
documentation in Brno [0]. Has anybody done any further work since
Berlin in generating API documentation in the Mallard format from the
GIR files?
I plan to spend my time there on this, so would be great if I can
avoid stepping
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 08:08, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
[1] http://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps -- just to give an example: I feel
that a backup tool makes more sense than boxes as a core app, imho. And
the wiki says that such a tool is very likely not a core app but would
make a
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 16:19, Ted Gould t...@gould.cx wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 18:22 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 15:01 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
Don't know if you have considered this but in OSX some applications
have a search entry in its Help menu, this
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 19:53, Stormy Peters sto...@gnome.org wrote:
All the questions after this assume a knowledge of GNOME and how our
community works. That's fine if you are polling developers. If you are
polling average users, then I think it's not worth asking.
Another issue that I
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 15:18, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 01 juin 2011, à 13:33 +0100, Richard Hughes a écrit :
On 1 June 2011 12:57, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically, mailing lists don't work for many kinds of productive
discussion.
Agreed.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 14:12, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote:
I think the we define the platform argument is really weak. Our whole
platform is written in C and we definitly don't define that platform.
You can
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 23:59, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
Right now in gjs, you do this:
imports.gi.versions.Gtk = '3.0';
I assume there's nothing stopping Python from using the same technique, and
I know they've talked about it before.
We have basically the same thing:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 00:19, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno mer, 20/04/2011 alle 19.12 -0400, Colin Walters ha scritto:
Hi,
So speaking as someone who was motivated to make writing GNOME apps
easier, I'm not very happy with how things turned out with the mix of
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 01:12, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
== Dynamic Languages in GNOME ==
One thing that's worth addressing though (again) is the question do
we need both Python and JavaScript?. The uptake of both seed and gjs
has been relatively low; lower than Python at
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 15:00, Mathieu Goeminne mgoemi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello there,
First of all, thanks for your work!
I send you a mail because I asked a question on the Brasero IRC chat which
said to ask it to you.
I'm Mathieu Goeminne, a phd student (at the UMONS, Belgium) and I'm
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 02:04, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Hey all,
The deadline for 2.32.0 tarballs has passed :-) I've taken a look at
modules that didn't get a tarball, and found that we could do with some
more tarballs. See the list below.
I'll likely go ahead and release
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 23:51, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
[ Resurrecting this thread as I just got back from travelling ]
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:12 PM, John Stowers
john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Something like If you wrote a python plugin for GEdit/Rhythmbox/Totem
then
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:20, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 11:12 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Alternatively, if distros were able to support the combination
Python2+Gtk2+PyGObjectWithIntrospection
Just to be clear, do you mean that distributions
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 13:56, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 13:24 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:20, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 11:12 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Alternatively
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 14:07, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
I'm a bit concerned about the port to python3+gtk3+introspection being
a bit too big of a stretch. Python developers traditionally are a bit
less
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 03:05, John Stowers
john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
A separate but related issue is that unless somebody plans to update
gtk-sharp, Tomboy may not be GTK3 compatible this cycle (I don't know
off-hand what parts of gtk-sharp may be incompatible with GTK3). Do
other
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 21:57, Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr wrote:
Le dimanche 06 juin 2010 à 19:53 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso a écrit :
Moving bindings modules to the Desktop moduleset won't make them less
second-class citizens as long as API that is not bindable without
resorting
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 15:09, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Freitag, den 30.04.2010, 15:06 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper:
If you are a maintainer and plan to propose your module for inclusion in
GNOME 3.0 but have not done yet
Personally I expected but have not yet seen proposals for
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 22:16, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm working on what to include in the Platform Overview.
This affects what gets focused on in the introductions
and howtos in my developer documentation plan:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 20:59, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi Tomeu,
On Thu 14 Jan 2010 16:29, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org writes:
Pygi is still far away from being an usable replacement of static
bindings, at the current development rate.
Why is that? Is the gobject-inspection
2010/1/14 Javier Jardón javierjc1...@gmail.com:
2010/1/11 Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net:
Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 03:01 +0100 schrieb Alberto Ruiz:
2009/7/29 Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net:
=
ZERO modules dependening on
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 19:04, Matthias Clasenmatthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
We have done essentially this (with the extra Preferences menu in
between) for a few releases in Fedora, and we have gone back to using
a single Preferences menu by default now. The two main problems we
faced with
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 22:01, Nirbheek
Chauhannirbheek.chau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 19:04, Matthias Clasenmatthias.cla...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd rather see us focus on moving away from these menus via
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 22:13, Nirbheek
Chauhannirbheek.chau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 22:01, Nirbheek
Chauhannirbheek.chau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Tomeu
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:47, Ulrik Sverdrupulrik.sverd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm developing a gnome application in python, called kupfer[1]. To use global
keybindings, I've taken deskbar-applet's internal wrapped version of
libtomboy (parts of it). I didn't want to put all that build
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 14:22, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
m...@avtechpulse.com wrote:
Gravis wrote:
It works fine with Nautilus when opening files on a local
filesystem. -- http://i44.tinypic.com/t9gzye.jpg
The problem I've run into is that Nautilus will not allow me to open
files on remote
2009/4/6 Adam Schreiber sa...@clemson.edu:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Ted Gould t...@gould.cx wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:17 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
There's one obvious question related to those potential changes: what
will happen to the old way of doing things? For example, will
Hola,
hope this helps: http://live.gnome.org/GnomeLove/SubmittingPatches
Regards,
Tomeu
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 00:38, CaStarCo casta...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I'm new in this list
I patched Alacarte to not to use libglade and instead use gtkbuilder, I have
not done the diffs because I not
Yup, I hope we can reuse lots of that work in Sugar, though we would
need to add AT-SPI support to hippo canvas first (or move to another
canvas).
Cheers,
Tomeu
2009/2/10 Willie Walker william.wal...@sun.com:
+1 -- I'm very excited about this. Many thanks to the people involved who
have the
40 matches
Mail list logo
