Public bug reported:
tried apt-get clean/autoclean/autoremove/update
the system is 18.04.1
Processor: Intel® Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 0 @ 2.50GHz × 24
Graphics adapter: Quadro 600/PCIe/SSE2
Gnome Versin 3.28.2
so far, the system works ok, but start-up / shut down seems to take very long
ProblemType:
Public bug reported:
Running kernel 4.3.3, update of kernel 3.12 failed with non-zero return
status. Driver fglrx is not active, at the moment using "Gallium 0.4 on
llvmpipe (LLVM 3.5, 128 bits)".
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: fglrx-core 2:15.200-0ubuntu0.6
Uname:
We have now LO 5.02, and this ancient bug still makes the focus jumping around
when trying to edit an object bigger than the screen (table, ole, picture,
etc). You really have to be fast when you want to resize such objects,
otherwise your focus is back to the cursor, and you lost the handle.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1012081 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012081
still having the problem with 14.04.2 - and the circumvent of post 22
does not work in 14.04.2 64bit.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1012081 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012081
Mentioned in #1012081, there is a new version for util-linux available via a
ppa.
I installed that new version: The entry in fstab created by gnome-disk-utility
(v 3.10.0) when Show in user interface is
That blueman ppa version works for me, also.
But, I had to reboot to have it working, restarting blueman and pulseaudio did
not do the job.
Strange enough that it now works with blueman. Despite i never use blueman, its
startup seems necessary.
--
You received this bug notification because
#78a hacking fix:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1199059/comments/31
That causes Blueman to crash at startup, but for Pulseaudio, it seems
tyo work.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in
What is disturbing here is the fact that this bug is unassigned or (in case of
pulseaudio) marked invalid.
That means nobody feels responsible and takes care.
We - most probably - will have to wait a long time for this problem to be
solved.
Since the manual loading of
It seems to work if the command
pactl load-module module-bluetooth-discover
is executed directly after startup/login
But, then, don't use Blueman.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
However, the headset seems to work properly if the command
pactl load-module module-bluetooth-discover
is executed directly after startup/login before any paired BT device tries to
connect - from a terminal window, returning 24.
It should be called automatically, but that doesn't seem to
for me bluetooth also does not find my devices.
lsb_release -rd apt-cache policy pulseaudio-module-bluetooth
Description:Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
Release:14.04
pulseaudio-module-bluetooth:
Installed: 1:4.0-0ubuntu11
Candidate: 1:4.0-0ubuntu11
Version table:
*** 1:4.0-0ubuntu11 0
Bluetooth worked well in 13.04 and 13.10, but after upgrade to 14.04 it does
not work anymore.
I am using a generic USB dongle (CSR) on an old 32 bit system.
grep pulseaudio.*bluetooth /var/log/syslog
pulseaudio[3094]: [pulseaudio] module.c: Module module-bluetooth-discover
should be loaded
update:
After power down and restart this morning I tried again:
Bluetooth recognized my paired headset as connected, displayed the lock in the
icon, but in sound settings the headset did not show up, no sound from headset.
After
pactl load-module module-bluetooth-discover
24
After that the
syslog entries:
grep pulseaudio.*bluetooth /var/log/syslog
Jun 4 09:57:52 xxx-Linux pulseaudio[3248]: [pulseaudio]
module-bluetooth-device.c: 12:02:21:B1:40:5E is not known.
Jun 4 09:57:52 xxx-Linux pulseaudio[3248]: [pulseaudio] module.c: Failed to
load module module-bluetooth-device
On 28 June 2013 16:17, Iain Lane i...@orangesquash.org.uk wrote:
I'm guessing you got that from the changes file (or Launchpad's view of
it)? Those aren't quite the same as Debian changelogs, although
obviously they are parsed from them.
Yes, from Launchpad. I see. Ok.
--
You received
Public bug reported:
The changelog entry for 2.37.3-1ubuntu1 is unterminated [1], flowing in
to the next entry for the unreleased debian changes. The following does
not conform to changelog format as defined by debian-policy [2]:
glib2.0 (2.37.3-1ubuntu1) saucy; urgency=low
* Resynchronise
On 15 May 2013 20:02, Daniel 1123...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
wine1.4 : Depends: wine1.4-i386 (= 1.4.1-0ubuntu5) but it is not
installable
So you probably want to enable i386 repositories to use wine:
$ sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
On 15 May 2013 22:22, Daniel 1123...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
Is this the way that each Ubuntu user should go? I never saw this
command before and I think it should not be necessary for
packages from the universe repository.
Usually it is not required. The
On 14 May 2013 16:12, Daniel 1123...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
** Attachment added: As of 2013-05-14, this is what I still get when trying
to install wine with current package database (apt-get update)
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174509
Title:
Ubuntu 13.04 is saying that gnibbles is not
Is this fixed in 13.04? If so, I'll upgrade (despite other showstoppers like
bug #1075923).
Alternatively, will installing LO 4 solve the issue?
Or, will there be an official update on 12.10 (for LO 3.6)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
** Changed in: gegl (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
** Changed in: gnome-games (Ubuntu)
Scott, any chance of an SRU?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
Title:
gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with
gettext:any,
** Package changed: emacs-defaults (Ubuntu) = emacs24 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077639
Title:
Text repaint problems in Emacs
Status in
** Package changed: emacs-defaults (Ubuntu) = emacs23 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078116
Title:
Traditional emacs color configuration no longer works
Today, gvfs was automatically updated via software update.
Is this problem solved, now?
How to check gvfs version?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075923
Title:
nautilus
** Also affects: wine1.4 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
** Changed in: gettext (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You
This is almost certainly due to multi-arch issues in wine1.4. See bug
954029 and others.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059069
Title:
Installing wine1.4 on amd-64
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1082291 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082291
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1082291
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
--
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1082291 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082291
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1082291
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
--
You received this bug notification
On 19 February 2013 03:54, Scott Ritchie scottritc...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I agree with the sentiment about apt, however I thought it was the
current case that if a recommended (same-arch) package isn't available
in the archive, it does get simply ignored.
Quite right, for ‘install’ and
Output from a failed install with ‘-oDebug::pkgProblemResolver=1’ is
appreciated. The Debian wine packaging is substantially different.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xdg-utils in Ubuntu.
This is in fact a bug in apt as well. A fresh install of 64-bit raring will
try to pull in gnome-exe-thumbnailer:i386, which in turn will ask for
icoutils:i386, which will then conflict:
libunity-webapps0 : Depends: unity-webapps-service but it is not going to be
installed
Rather than
I'm beginning to think I need to make some automated
tests for an elaborate series of multi-arch edge cases.
Hi Scott
Seems that wine is bringing a lot of these m-a issues to your desk :-)
Hopefully this:
winetricks is actually arch: all now
will be sufficient to avoid immediately having
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #700683
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700683
** Also affects: cabextract (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700683
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #700684
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700684
** Also affects: msttcorefonts (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700684
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
update for #37: the version info was not displayed completely.
dpkg-query -l libreoffice-core
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name
This bug is really annoying, I sometimes have to re-start LO after each menu
action, at other times it would run for an hour or more.
I am on i386, with only one monitor, old Radeon 200 graphic.
dpkg-query -l libreoffice-core
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Is there a way how i can run this trigger in some kind of
debug mode for having logging messages?
The trigger executes only one command, you can invoke it manually without
--quiet to see if it behaves similar:
# gtk-update-icon-cache --force --quiet /usr/share/icons/hicolor
(and/or
The delay here might not be due to any bug at all. Reassigned to gtk+
packages for their maintainers to determine.
Florian, which version of libgtk2.0-bin and libgtk-3-bin are you using?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
** Package changed: hicolor-icon-theme (Ubuntu) = sensors-applet
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to hicolor-icon-theme in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743956
Title:
Incorrect icon dimension of
Please demonstrate how this is caused by a bug in aptitude.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pidgin in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271246
On 1 November 2012 10:23, Scott Ritchie scottritc...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Upstream says even libgettext isn't needed at runtime, apparently --
Wine only needs to build the translations into the windows format, and
then just uses those. I'm prepping an SRU.
Makes sense. The Debian packaging does
I am double-checking with
upstream now though.
Appreciated.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
Title:
gettext fails to install; package relationships should be
Recently brought up on debian-devel@ [1].
Wine maintainers, your “Recommends: gettext” is most likely incorrect.
Please attend to this issue.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00410.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1071565 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071565
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1071565
delete button does not delete anything
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
There are conflicts with:
- gettext and gettext:i386
- gettext-base and gettext-base:i386
Please provide the output from apt/dpkg showing the actual error. Is it
the same error as bug #954029?
** Changed in: gettext (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug
** Also affects: wine1.4 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
Title:
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to
Almost all duplicates here have wine1.4 packages involved.
Binary packages wine1.4-i386 and wine1.4-amd64 both have “Recommends:
gettext”, which is Multi-Arch: allowed. As a result the system attempts
to install both gettext:i386 and gettext:amd64, which is not allowed.
The wine1.4 packages
install both gettext:i386 and gettext:amd64, which is not allowed. The
wine1.4 packages should *consider* whether they actually use the package
gettext …
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu.
At this point the issue is invalid for gettext. This actual cause is
other packages declaring inappropriate relationships with gettext. See
previous comment.
** Changed in: gettext (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
Please provide the output from apt/dpkg showing the actual error. Is it
the same error as bug #954029?
Never mind. That bug (and it's duplicates) all involve wine1.4
packages, so this is definitely a
At least one report here (bug #977078) features playonlinux which
depends on gettext-base. That report also contains the wine1.4 packages
which are problematic, though since playonlinux is arch: all and appears
to be using gettext-base for it's shell script support the dependency in
playonlinux
Structure of gettext packaging in Debian is currently being discussed
http://bugs.debian.org/683751, and it is likely this will no longer be
an issue for playonlinux.
The wine1.4 recommends still needs to be examined.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #683751
** No longer affects: playonlinux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
Title:
gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with
gettext:any,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001
package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified:
usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz
usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001
package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified:
usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz
usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001
package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified:
usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz
usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001
package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified:
usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz
usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 986448
package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified:
usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade:
libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.38.0-1 cannot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 871083
gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different
architectures
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** No longer affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu Precise)
** No longer affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu Oneiric)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cdparanoia in Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 871083
gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different
architectures
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 899316
package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
'./usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file
on
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 899316
package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
'./usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file
on
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 899316
package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
'./usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file
on
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016
package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
** This bug has been marked a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016
package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
** This bug has been marked a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
--
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
--
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
--
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
--
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
--
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016
package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
** This bug has been marked a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016
package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
** This bug has been marked a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
--
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1012345
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
--
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1012345
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug
This is [1] affecting multiple packages and fixed in gettext 0.18.1.1-8.
The fix should be SRU to Precise and all affected packages will need to
be rebuilt.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671257
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #669985
See also bug #924628 which has similar symptoms but is already
addressed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039685
Title:
package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
--
You received this bug notification
** Attachment added: 06-msgfmt-default-little-endian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gettext/+bug/1039685/+attachment/3363497/+files/06-msgfmt-default-little-endian
** Summary changed:
- package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade:
Scratch that. Since the archs involved are i386 and amd64 this is
probably just bug #924628 again.
** No longer affects: gettext (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: gettext
** Summary changed:
- gettext: msgfmt output format prevents multiarch migration [affecting apt in
precise; fixed in sid,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 871083
gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different
architectures
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Also affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cdparanoia in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083
Title:
gzip -9n sometimes generates a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 974934 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974934
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 974934
package libappindicator0.1-cil 0.4.92-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
--
You received
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 899316 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899316
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 899316
package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
'./usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file
On 20 September 2012 18:29, Sworddragon 819...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Are you sure that this is the correct behavior?
Yes.
Some time before I have
opened this ticket it worked like expected: If I have started an
application in the background I could close the terminal without closing
the
On 20 September 2012 19:17, Sworddragon 819...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
I don't know it but with nohup the process will be a direct child of
init after closing the terminal.
If so then do not use nohup for this purpose.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
On 20 September 2012 19:48, Sworddragon 819...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
So there is no difference for me.
My mistake then.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
The same problem appears in LXTerminal too. Maybe a
shared component is affected by this problem.
FYI the shared component in this case is the shell (usually
/usr/bin/bash or similar) which is run by these terminal programs.
Processes started by a shell are (typically) terminated when that
Comment #1 is correct. This is the intended behaviour of the system.
When you start a process it is always as a child of another, usually
some session. Graphically, you log in to a desktop session. When you
start gnome-terminal you are beginning a separate shell session and any
programs
Bug #376147 tracks the issue of gnome-terminal not warning that closing
the terminal will terminate background processes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819842
My problem is now fixed. I will try and explain what happened.
I had a broken soft link that was preventing me from doing
the updates. (as you can see in the term.log)
Changing symlinks in /usr/bin is user error.
The ValueError from the log is a safety check against such
a user error. Not a
95 matches
Mail list logo
